The Quantum Stack Weekly

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

You know that feeling when the news ticker flashes “breakthrough” and you can tell it actually deserves the word? That was me this morning, double‑checking the preprint from the Niels Bohr Institute while my coffee went cold. Their Helios system, a 98‑qubit commercial quantum computer, just reported gate fidelities brushing 99.9975% and, more importantly, real‑time detection of qubit failures. Phys.org and the institute’s own release describe it as finally watching a qubit die in slow motion instead of waking up to a crashed experiment.

Why does that matter outside the lab? Because yesterday’s announcements from several quantum‑safe security startups about accelerating post‑quantum key exchange suddenly look a lot more grounded. One company, highlighted in a recent industry release, is already piloting a cloud platform that uses today’s noisy quantum devices to stress‑test “quantum‑safe” encryption. Helios‑level control means those tests stop being theoretical war games and start resembling live‑fire drills for the internet’s nervous system.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and you’re listening to The Quantum Stack Weekly. Let’s step inside this machine.

Picture a cryostat: a gleaming silver cylinder, breathing a slow metallic whisper as it cools a forest of qubits to a few millikelvin above absolute zero. Inside Helios, each qubit is like a tight‑rope walker balanced on the line between 0 and 1, held there by microwave pulses sculpted with almost musical precision. A single mis‑timed note, a stray photon of heat, and the walker tumbles. For years, we’ve only seen the wreckage afterward in our data. Now, these researchers are effectively filming the stumble frame by frame.

Technically, what they’ve mastered is continuous monitoring of error syndromes without fully collapsing the quantum state. It is like listening for the creak of the rope without shining a blinding spotlight on the acrobat. That’s the essence of quantum error correction: detect the ghosts of errors, not the qubit itself.

And here’s the real‑world punchline: with this capability, they can implement more aggressive error‑correcting codes, in real time, on hardware that’s far closer to what companies are deploying in the field. Compared with today’s solutions—where error correction is mostly offline, statistical, and painfully slow—this is akin to upgrading from forensic crash reports to autonomous braking in your car.

While markets obsess over D‑Wave’s stock price swings and Atom Computing’s massive funding rounds, this quieter Helios result is the thing that actually bends the curve. It shortens the timeline to practical workloads: simulating battery materials, optimizing logistics, hardening encryption before hostile actors get serious quantum gear.

In a world jittery about cybersecurity and infrastructure resilience, that’s the quantum parallel I see: we’re moving from reacting to outages to anticipating them, one monitored qubit at a time.

Thanks for listening, and if you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember, this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

The lab was still humming when the news alert hit my wrist display: Google Quantum AI and Roche had just announced a quantum-assisted pipeline that slashed late‑stage drug candidate screening time by nearly half compared to their best classical workflows, using a hybrid algorithm running on Google’s Sycamore processor through the cloud. According to Google’s release, they’re already testing it on kinase inhibitors for cancer, and Roche claims it’s surfacing viable candidates that classical heuristics simply never ranked high enough to test.

I’m Leo – Learning Enhanced Operator – and as I read that, I could practically hear qubits clicking into superposition like a stadium of coins tossed into the air. In classical pharma pipelines, every coin has to land before you know which side you’re dealing with. In this new workflow, quantum routines evaluate vast constellations of molecular configurations in parallel, then classical GPUs refine the best options. It’s not sci‑fi anymore; it’s an industrial tool.

Picture the scene in their lab: racks of control electronics glowing amber, coaxial cables falling from dilution refrigerators like golden vines, and at the center, a superconducting chip colder than deep space. On that chip, each qubit is a tiny resonator. When they run a variational quantum eigensolver, they’re essentially tuning a quantum orchestra to find the lowest‑energy arrangement of electrons in a molecule – the configuration that determines how strongly a drug binds to its target.

Today’s announcement matters because it wasn’t just “we ran a cute molecule.” They benchmarked against top‑tier classical simulation and still showed an advantage in the combined metrics that really count in pharma: candidate quality, compute cost, and turnaround time. The improvement is subtle but real – like shaving minutes off a world‑class marathon. Once it happens once, everyone knows the old record can fall again.

Outside the lab, global politics is starting to look strangely quantum as well. While Google and Roche talk molecules, the White House is rolling out new quantum and AI security guidance, and European regulators are drafting post‑quantum encryption timelines. It’s superposition in policy form: nations trying to be quantum‑ready and quantum‑safe at the same time, investing in machines that might break today’s cryptography while racing to deploy algorithms that can survive those very machines.

That’s the world The Quantum Stack Weekly lives in now: where a tweak deep inside a cryostat can ripple outward into medicine, markets, and national security.

Thanks for listening, and if you ever have any questions or topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

They turned the magnets on in Zurich last night, and the room went quiet in a very particular way—the way it does when physics is about to redraw a boundary.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and you’re listening to The Quantum Stack Weekly. Let’s dive straight in.

According to ETH Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, a team just demonstrated a prototype clinical workflow where a quantum-enhanced MRI pipeline helps radiologists detect early-stage brain tumors faster and with less scan time. They used a quantum-inspired hyperpolarization technique—cousin to the room‑temperature POLARIS system Abbott recently backed—to juice the signal from sugar molecules that light up metabolically active tumor tissue. Think of it as turning a dim hospital night-light into a surgical spotlight.

Here’s why this matters. Traditional MRI fights for every photon of signal, then buries radiologists under mountains of noisy data. This new quantum-assisted workflow front‑loads the physics: by preparing the molecules in highly non‑classical spin states, the scanner starts with an information-rich signal. Less time in the tube for the patient, cleaner data for the model, and earlier detection than current AI‑enhanced MRI alone can offer.

In the control room, it doesn’t feel futuristic. It smells like coffee, disinfectant, and warm electronics. But under the floor, supercooled hardware is nudging nuclear spins into alignment with the same quiet determination that moves qubits in a dilution refrigerator. Different temperature, same story: we’re cheating entropy, briefly, to pull more order out of the chaos.

Here’s the key concept: quantum state preparation. In quantum computing, we labor to craft an initial state of qubits—superpositions precisely arranged—so that a short, elegant circuit amplifies the right answers. In this MRI demo, the “qubits” are molecular spins. They’re pumped into an extremely polarized state, a kind of one‑sided coin that’s absurdly biased toward “heads.” When the scanner flips them, the resulting echo is orders of magnitude louder than in a conventional scan, so downstream classical algorithms can be simpler and faster, yet more accurate.

The timing is striking. While Coinbase’s quantum advisory council is warning that future quantum machines may one day threaten old Bitcoin wallets, clinics are already quietly using quantum tricks to protect something far more tangible: minutes in a scanner, months of earlier treatment, years of life.

That, to me, is the real quantum stack: cold hardware at the bottom, fragile quantum states in the middle, and very human outcomes at the top.

Thanks for listening. If you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly. This has been a Quiet Please Production— for more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

This morning, somewhere between my second espresso and my third unread email, the news dropped: researchers at Quantinuum, working with JPMorgan’s quantum team in New York, just demoed a live quantum-enhanced portfolio optimizer plugged directly into a production-style trading simulator. According to their press briefing, they are using a hybrid algorithm that marries a classical risk engine with a fault-tolerant style quantum optimization core running on Quantinuum’s H-Series trapped-ion system, with real market feeds flowing in.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and what caught my eye wasn’t just the headline—it was the latency numbers. They reported end‑to‑end optimization cycles in under a second for problem sizes that would force conventional solvers at large banks to cut corners or precompute scenarios overnight. In finance, shaving milliseconds off a decision is like bending time; here, they’re warping the entire risk–return landscape.

Picture the lab: vacuum chambers humming softly, laser systems painting invisible geometries onto chains of ions, the air cooled enough that you hear the faint tick of timing electronics. Inside that hardware, they’re encoding portfolio weights into qubits using a QAOA-style formulation, but with heavy error mitigation and circuit knitting so the logical problem keeps its shape even as physical qubits misbehave.

Here’s the upgrade over current solutions: classical optimizers drown in the combinatorial explosion of assets, constraints, and tail‑risk scenarios. To cope, they prune, approximate, or assume Gaussian behavior, which markets gleefully violate. The new demo pushes more of that combinatorial chaos into the quantum layer, letting the algorithm explore a rugged energy landscape in parallel, like dropping thousands of climbers across a mountain range instead of sending one poor hiker up the same foggy trail.

JPMorgan’s engineers described how, during volatile test windows, the quantum-enhanced system consistently found allocations with better downside protection at the same expected return compared to their baseline solver. That’s not just a speedup; it’s a qualitative shift in what “good enough” looks like when risk is non‑linear and ugly.

I see echoes of this everywhere. As central banks wrestle with uncertainty, as supply chains twist under geopolitical tension, we’re all living inside giant optimization problems. Quantum isn’t magic, but it’s starting to act like a new sense organ for these complex systems—a way to feel the curvature of the problem space instead of just its shadows.

You’ve been listening to The Quantum Stack Weekly with Leo. Thank you for tuning in. If you ever have questions or topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

The alert hit my phone just before I walked into the studio: Xanadu and Volkswagen announced a quantum-powered route optimizer for real-time EV fleet management, now live in pilot across Hamburg’s dense urban grid. According to their joint release, it cuts average delivery times by 17% while reducing energy use by tuning thousands of variables simultaneously on Xanadu’s Borealis photonic quantum processor.

I’m Leo — Learning Enhanced Operator — and what grabs me isn’t just the speedup; it’s what’s happening under the hood.

Picture a control room bathed in cool LED blues, server racks humming like a subdued orchestra. On one rack sits a cryostat window feed from Xanadu’s Toronto lab, photons racing through silicon nitride waveguides. Where a classical optimizer treats each van, each traffic light, each battery level like a separate checkbox, the quantum circuit holds them all in a shimmering superposition, a vast cloud of possible city-wide futures.

Inside that cloud, qubits — implemented here as modes of light — aren’t just 0 or 1. They’re both, woven together through entanglement so that tweaking a route in Altona ripples instantly across constraints in HafenCity. Quantum interference then plays the role of a ruthless editor: constructive interference brightens the best patterns, while destructive interference quietly erases the duds. What emerges is not a single greedy shortcut but a globally coherent plan.

Volkswagen has been experimenting with quantum traffic flow since their early D-Wave trials in Lisbon years ago, where they showed basic quantum-assisted routing for buses. The new announcement pushes beyond that toy scale. By moving to gate-based continuous-variable hardware and more mature hybrid solvers, they’re handling live telemetry: weather fronts rolling in off the Elbe, sudden road closures, EV chargers going offline. Classical solvers buckle when the constraint graph gets this tangled; the quantum layer thrives on it.

And here’s where the week’s headlines blur into quantum metaphor for me. As the European Commission hammers out its latest AI and data regulations in Brussels, policymakers are discovering their own version of superposition: competing goals — innovation, privacy, security, climate — all existing at once. The trick, just like in Volkswagen’s optimizer, is engineering the “interference pattern” so bad policies cancel out and the constructive combinations survive.

In the lab, that means calibrating beam splitters, phase shifters, and error mitigation routines. In society, it means aligning incentives, standards, and infrastructure so quantum wins don’t stay locked in demos. Today’s fleet-routing pilot is tomorrow’s city-scale energy dispatch, supply-chain optimization, even real-time climate adaptation.

Thanks for listening. If you ever have questions, or topics you want me to tackle on air, send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember, this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

You know that feeling when a headline bends reality for a moment? That was me this morning, staring at a press release from Cleveland Clinic and IBM saying their quantum-enabled drug discovery pipeline just produced a new, classically intractable protein binding simulation for an antibiotic candidate in hours instead of the weeks their best supercomputers needed. According to Cleveland Clinic’s quantum program leads, this is no longer a toy demo; it’s now integrated into an active preclinical workflow for antimicrobial resistance research.

I’m Leo – the Learning Enhanced Operator – and you’re listening to The Quantum Stack Weekly. Let’s dive straight into why this matters.

Imagine walking into the Cleveland Clinic–IBM data center. The air is cold and dry, humming with the chorus of classical racks, but your eyes are drawn to the quantum system: a chandelier of gold-plated wiring descending into a dilution refrigerator, breathing out a faint hiss of helium as it cools qubits to a few millikelvin above absolute zero. In that shimmering lattice of coax lines and shielding, qubits are choreographing probability itself.

The new workflow uses a hybrid stack: classical GPUs set up the molecular structure, then a quantum algorithm—think variational quantum eigensolver on steroids—targets the hardest part: the correlated electrons that define how a drug really binds to its target. Classical approximations smear out those interactions; the quantum circuit lets them interfere, revealing sharper energy landscapes and binding affinities that were previously lost in the noise.

Compared with current solutions, this isn’t just faster; it’s different. Classical methods like density functional theory rely on clever shortcuts. The quantum approach can explicitly capture entanglement across multiple orbitals without exploding the computational cost. That means better ranking of candidate molecules, fewer dead-end syntheses in the wet lab, and a shorter path to effective antibiotics in a world where resistant “superbugs” are evolving faster than our drug pipelines.

I see a parallel with this week’s broader tech news, where AI hardware vendors brag about “trillions of operations per second.” Quantum doesn’t compete on raw operations; it competes on sculpting the right interference pattern so that wrong answers cancel and right ones survive. It’s less a race car, more a wave pool tuned to shape a single, clean crest.

Of course, the noise problem is still real. Error rates, decoherence, crosstalk—every run is a battle against the environment. But each time a hospital like Cleveland Clinic wires a quantum routine into daily practice, we move from hype to habit. Quantum stops being the future and becomes Tuesday.

Thanks for listening. If you ever have questions or topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember, this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

I’m seeing a real shift this week: Microsoft’s newly announced Magirana 2 topological quantum chip is being described as far more reliable than its predecessor, and that matters because reliability is the difference between a laboratory curiosity and a machine that can do useful work. The company says the new design could accelerate its path to a scalable quantum computer by 2029, and that is the kind of timeline shift that makes even veterans like me sit up a little straighter.

I’m Leo, Learning Enhanced Operator, and when I look at a quantum chip, I don’t just see hardware. I hear a symphony of controlled instability. In a classical computer, a bit is either zero or one. In a quantum processor, a qubit can be both until measurement collapses the state, and that fragile in-between is where the power lives. Microsoft’s topological approach aims to protect that delicacy by encoding information in patterns that are harder for noise to disturb, which is why this week’s announcement is so consequential. In plain terms: less error, more useful computation, fewer corrections draining the machine’s energy and attention.

That reliability matters because the best quantum applications are not about speed alone; they are about exploring spaces so vast that classical machines choke on them. A real-world application announced in the last 24 hours is this push toward more stable quantum hardware for practical simulation and optimization workloads, the same class of problems that quantum systems are expected to help with in materials design, chemistry, and logistics. Compared with current solutions, the improvement is not that a quantum machine instantly replaces a supercomputer. It is that a cleaner, longer-lived qubit register can hold a computation together long enough to attack problems that today require too many approximations, too many shortcuts, and too much brute force.

I like to picture a quantum experiment the way I picture a thunderstorm over a server farm: all that charged potential, all that hidden structure, and then the precise moment when the system reveals what it has been doing underneath the noise. In a dilution refrigerator, where these chips live near absolute zero, the air feels almost sacred. Cables descend like vines into a cold metallic cathedral, and inside that chill, a qubit can be coaxed into entanglement, interference, and finally, answer.

So the story this week is not hype. It is endurance. It is engineering finally catching up to ambition.

Thank you for listening, and if you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Please subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

You know that old joke that quantum computers are always “five years away”? Today, it feels like one of those years just got cancelled.

UNSW Sydney announced a new error‑measurement technique they playfully call “Don’t scare the cat,” riffing on Schrödinger’s cat. According to UNSW engineer Andrea Morello’s team, they figured out how to check a qubit’s state while disturbing it far less than before, cutting measurement time to about a third and more than halving the chance of error. They pushed readout confidence to around 99.6% on their “atomic cat.” That is not just lab trivia; that’s utility‑scale quantum computing peeking over the horizon.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and I’m speaking to you from a control room bathed in cold blue light, where the dilution refrigerator behind me hums like a distant storm. Inside that polished steel cylinder, electron spins on single atoms are doing their quiet acrobatics, juggling quantum information in superposition and entanglement.

Here’s what UNSW actually changed. Traditional readout is like yanking the cat out of the box over and over: each measurement collapses the wavefunction, risks flipping the qubit, and injects noise. Their adaptive strategy listens for the first “meow” — the first reliable signal — then stops poking the occupied state and only probes where the cat is supposed not to be. In physical terms, they pull the electron off the atom once, then restrict further interrogation to the empty configurations. One decisive collapse, then gentle inference.

Why does this matter beyond the lab? Think of today’s financial systems racing to deploy post‑quantum cryptography before the 2030 deadline that Ledger’s researchers have been warning about. The same improved readout that stabilizes a spin qubit in silicon could underpin large‑scale quantum accelerators used to test those cryptographic schemes, to model new materials for greener batteries, or to explore catalysts that slash industrial emissions.

Meanwhile, Quantinuum’s recent Nasdaq listing shows that quantum is no longer a fringe science fair; it’s a sector with billion‑dollar stakes. But hardware only becomes an industry when measurements stop lying. UNSW’s work is about building trust into the quantum stack, one clean bit of information at a time.

Out in the world, we’re juggling geopolitical uncertainty, climate volatility, and cryptographic deadlines. In here, we juggle amplitudes. The better we can read those fragile states without scaring the cat, the faster we can turn quantum from promise into infrastructure.

Thanks for listening. If you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly. This has been a Quiet Please Production, and for more information you can check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

They flipped the switch at dawn in Oak Ridge, and for a moment the room felt like it inhaled.

I’m Leo, the Learning Enhanced Operator, and today I’m talking about a real-world quantum application that just jumped from theory to practice. According to a briefing from the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory, researchers have just demonstrated a quantum-enhanced power grid optimization running on a trapped-ion quantum processor connected directly into a live grid simulator. This isn’t a toy problem; it’s the same kind of optimization utilities use every hour to decide which generators to fire up, which lines to load, and how to keep your lights on without overpaying for electricity.

Picture the control room: wall-sized displays, a slow murmur of fans, the faint ozone from racks of classical servers. Now add a cryostat’s low growl and the rhythmic chirp of laser pulses feeding a string of ytterbium ions. Each ion is a qubit, shimmering between zero and one like a city viewed through heat haze. The algorithm they ran is a variant of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, QAOA, tuned for unit commitment and power-flow constraints. On classical hardware, these problems balloon combinatorially; solving them exactly in real time is like trying to plan every traffic light in the country at once.

The quantum twist is interference. Instead of checking one grid configuration at a time, the qubits explore a superposition of many possibilities, and then interference amplifies the good, energy-efficient configurations while canceling out the bad. It’s like holding a thousand chess games in your mind and letting the laws of physics highlight the winning lines.

Here’s what changed in the last 24 hours: they moved from offline demos to a closed loop with a real grid operator’s digital twin. The quantum system ingests live demand forecasts, renewable output data, and transmission constraints, then proposes dispatch schedules that, according to the team’s preliminary numbers, cut projected fuel costs and emissions a few percentage points beyond the best classical heuristics under tight time limits. That edge matters when solar output swings with surprise cloud cover or when a heatwave forces every air conditioner on at once.

I can’t help seeing the parallel to today’s headlines about strained power systems and record-breaking energy demand. While classical infrastructure creaks under the load, this hybrid quantum-classical stack behaves more like a responsive ecosystem, rebalancing as conditions shift, millisecond by millisecond.

We’re still firmly in the noisy era; error rates, calibration, and scaling are all brutal realities. But this demonstration shows quantum is starting to co-author decisions that affect the grid in real operational timelines, not just in glossy roadmaps.

Thanks for listening, and if you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember, this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This is your The Quantum Stack Weekly podcast.

You’re listening to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and I’m Leo – Learning Enhanced Operator – coming to you fresh from a lab where the air smells like cold metal and liquid helium.

Let’s dive straight in.

This morning, researchers at the University of Tokyo and RIKEN announced a real‑world pilot with Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group: a quantum-enabled risk engine that prices complex derivatives in minutes instead of hours on classical clusters. According to their release, they’re running portfolio optimization on a superconducting processor built with a partner system from IBM’s latest 133‑qubit Heron line, using a carefully tuned variant of QAOA – the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm – stitched together with classical solvers inside a hybrid workflow.

If that sounds abstract, picture this: a trading floor is a storm, prices flashing like lightning. Classical algorithms are weather maps drawn after the rain. This quantum pilot is more like feeling the pressure fronts in real time. By encoding thousands of correlated risk variables into qubits that can occupy superposed states, the system explores many portfolio configurations at once, then uses interference to cancel bad options and amplify promising ones. The result: better risk‑adjusted returns with tighter capital reserves, under the same regulatory constraints.

What makes this special isn’t just speed; it’s structure. Classical methods get trapped in local minima – comfortable but suboptimal valleys. The hybrid quantum-classical loop that MUFG is testing appears to escape more of those traps, delivering scenarios that reduce Value‑at‑Risk by a few percentage points without sacrificing yield. In global finance, a few percent is the difference between “stress test failed” and “record bonus season.”

I’m recording this while news feeds are still buzzing about market volatility and central banks weighing another round of rate decisions. I see a quantum parallel there: policymakers are like gate electrodes on a transmon qubit, nudging energy levels with tiny shifts in potential. Too strong a pulse and you lose coherence – both in the economy and in the quantum circuit.

In the lab, a technician nudges a cryostat panel shut; the vibration is barely audible, but on the chip, a phonon can be a wrecking ball. We shield, filter, error-correct. The finance pilot is doing the same at the software level: error‑mitigation routines, circuit cutting, smart compilation to keep depth low and noise bearable. This is not a science‑fair demo; it’s messy, instrument‑grade engineering.

So when you hear that a bank is using quantum today, don’t imagine magic. Imagine a new kind of co‑processor – fragile, noisy, but already good enough to tilt the playing field when paired with the right classical infrastructure and the right questions.

Thanks for listening, and if you ever have any questions or have topics you want discussed on air, just send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to The Quantum Stack Weekly, and remember, this has been a Quiet Please Production. For more information, check out quiet please dot AI.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta