Today’s show opens with a major update on Adam Krupp and the

From there, the conversation expands into the broader implications of

The show then shifts to Indiana’s state Senate primaries, focusing on

That leads into a deeper look at why many of these races are failing

Finally, the show examines Greg Ballard’s recent comments on

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s show opens with a detailed look at gas taxes in Indiana, breaking down how drivers are paying multiple layers of taxation, including both an excise tax and a sales tax that rises along with fuel prices. The discussion centers on recent comments from the governor about whether to suspend parts of those taxes, how previous temporary relief impacted prices, and what may happen next. It also explores how different proposals—from both Republicans and Democrats—approach the idea of tax relief and what that means for everyday costs.

The conversation then moves into how those tax decisions are framed, particularly the idea that any reduction in taxes could impact infrastructure like roads and bridges. That leads into a broader look at state spending priorities, including recent examples involving large amounts of public money, and how those decisions compare to the relatively small savings taxpayers might see at the pump. The segment ties these ideas together by questioning how funding tradeoffs are presented to the public.

In the second major segment, the focus shifts to Indiana Republican politics, using a recent Indy Star column about Diego Morales as a starting point. The discussion looks at how party support works, why certain candidates continue to receive backing from top officials, and what that says about leadership and accountability within the party. It also examines the role of party loyalty versus performance and how that affects decision-making at higher levels.

That conversation expands into a broader reflection on political culture, including how both major parties elevate certain voices over others and how that impacts voters’ perception of candidates. There’s also a focus on how expectations of elected officials—particularly around competence, transparency, and behavior—play into how they are evaluated by both party insiders and the public.

The final segment moves to the national stage, analyzing a New York Times focus group of Trump voters and what it reveals about current political sentiment. The discussion highlights how voters view issues like cost of living, immigration, and foreign policy, and how those views connect to approval ratings. It also emphasizes how expectations set during campaigns—especially around affordability—can shape how voters respond once those expectations aren’t fully met.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s show covers three major stories that all tie back to accountability and transparency in government. It starts with a serious issue involving swatting incidents that targeted Indiana lawmakers during the redistricting fight. Despite multiple cases and the potential for real harm, there have been no arrests, no updates, and no clear answers from state officials, raising questions about how something this significant could seemingly disappear without resolution.

The conversation then shifts to the Fourth Congressional District race, where Jim Baird, Craig Haggard, and John Piper are competing in the primary. The focus centers on Haggard’s past controversies and a new dispute involving a data center–connected super PAC. Allegations include undisclosed campaign expenditures, ties between the PAC and a data center company, and questions about legislation and business dealings that could benefit those same interests.

From there, the discussion zooms out to a broader look at elections in Indiana, with early voting trends and turnout issues across the state. While Marion County is seeing increased participation, much of the state continues to struggle with low engagement, prompting a deeper look at why voters are tuning out.

A key theme is the lack of distinction between candidates, especially in primary races. Many challengers are criticized for running on limited issues without clearly defining how they differ from incumbents, leaving voters with little reason to feel invested or motivated. Examples from state Senate races highlight how candidates often take similar positions, even while attacking each other in campaign materials.

The show ultimately raises a consistent question across all these topics: whether it’s unanswered investigations, campaign controversies, or uninspiring candidates, how much accountability are voters actually getting from the people seeking to represent them.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s show digs into how Indiana handles your money, starting with the reality that drivers are hit with two separate taxes on gasoline—an excise tax and a sales tax that rises with prices. The governor’s temporary suspension of the sales tax is under scrutiny, especially with uncertainty around whether it can legally continue without legislative approval and whether relief for taxpayers will actually last.

From there, the conversation shifts to property taxes and the broader role of local government. Using real examples from a Brownsburg meeting, the discussion highlights how decisions are delayed, avoided, or buried in process when officials are asked to think outside the usual framework. It paints a picture of systems driven more by playbooks and bureaucracy than by problem-solving or accountability to taxpayers.

A major focus is the frustration over how governments talk about “lost revenue,” especially after years of rising property tax collections. The show examines how taxpayers are seeing only modest relief while local entities react as if funds they never owned were taken from them, raising questions about where previous increases actually went and why budgets still fall short.

The episode also revisits the state’s property tax reform efforts, including claims about how many people actually saw decreases versus increases. It breaks down concerns that any short-term relief may disappear due to unchanged assessments, combined with the likelihood of future referendums and other tax pressures returning.

Finally, there’s an update on the Adam Krupp situation, focusing on his disappearance from DCS, his return in a newly created role with no defined responsibilities, and the lack of transparency from state leadership. The segment raises broader questions about accountability, hiring practices, and how high-level positions are handled when issues arise behind the scenes.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of The Rob Kendall Show, we break down how ambition,

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On today’s episode of The Rob Kendall Show, we start with the fallout

We then dig into why redistricting failed to gain traction in Indiana

From there, we move into a major example of that frustration: state

Next, we take a closer look at Todd Rokita and how political

Finally, we break down a growing scandal out of Clinton County

All of this ties back to a central theme: the issue isn’t whether

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Internet Influencer Scott Presler came to Indiana with much fanfare, as

But crowds across the state for the conservative activist were small. As

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s episode of The Rob Kendall Show dives deep into one of the most controversial and unresolved political stories in Indiana right now — the case surrounding Dubois County Sheriff Tom Kleinhelter. What began as an 80-page probable cause affidavit detailing alleged misuse of jail commissary funds has somehow led to… nothing. No charges from the original prosecutor, no clear explanation, and a timeline that raises serious questions about what changed once Mike Braun became governor.

Rob walks through the full background, from the State Board of Accounts investigation to the involvement of state police and veteran investigator Jeff Herrin. The case appeared to be heading toward serious consequences, only to abruptly stall. Now, with Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears stepping in and filing limited charges, the story has resurfaced — and the pressure is building. The key question remains: why did such a detailed case seemingly disappear, and who made that decision?

The show also breaks down the explosive developments from the Law Enforcement Training Board, which rejected a proposed agreement that would have allowed Kleinhelter to quietly retain his credentials. That decision forced Governor Braun to act, but his response — a brief, vague statement removing Kleinhelter from the board — has only raised more eyebrows. Rob analyzes Braun’s comments from Hammer and Nigel, where the focus shifted away from the allegations and toward criticism of former superintendent Doug Carter, prompting even more scrutiny.

Beyond the politics, Rob reflects on the role of media and accountability, explaining why stories like this matter and why persistence is necessary. He shares his perspective on using his platform to push for transparency, challenge power, and keep stories alive that might otherwise fade. It’s a candid look at what drives the show and why certain issues continue to get attention long after others move on.

The episode then shifts to your wallet, breaking down Indiana’s confusing gas tax situation. Braun’s temporary suspension of the gas sales tax saved drivers about 17 cents per gallon — but that relief may be short-lived. If the suspension isn’t extended, prices could jump by over 23 cents per gallon due to how the tax is calculated. Meanwhile, calls are growing to suspend both the sales tax and the excise tax, which could significantly increase savings for Hoosiers at the pump.

Rob puts those numbers into context, comparing short-term tax relief to broader spending decisions and questioning whether the priorities match what taxpayers actually need. As always, the show blends detailed breakdowns with sharp commentary, tying together politics, policy, and everyday impact in a way that keeps the focus on accountability and transparency.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s show starts with a powerful and emotional look back at the life and legacy of Bob Kevoian, one half of the legendary Bob and Tom Show. The reaction to his passing goes far beyond media circles, highlighting just how deeply he connected with everyday people across generations. From stories of his kindness to the lasting impact he had on listeners, it’s clear Bob wasn’t just a radio personality, he was part of people’s lives, routines, and memories.

The conversation then shifts into the broader influence of Bob and Tom, and how their dominance in radio shaped not just Indianapolis, but the entire state. There’s a deeper reflection on how media has changed, why that kind of connection is harder to replicate today, and what it means when figures who defined entire eras begin to pass on. It’s not just nostalgia, it’s a reminder of how powerful a voice can be when it truly resonates with people.

From there, the focus turns to Indiana politics and the looming local elections. The argument is straightforward: local races should be about local issues, but many candidates are missing the mark. Instead of focusing on things like property taxes, utility costs, and everyday affordability, campaigns have been built around national narratives that don’t resonate with voters on the ground. The result is a disconnect that could cost challengers any real shot at winning.

There’s also a sharp critique of outside political influence, particularly the role of national figures and organizations shaping local campaigns. The idea that big-name endorsements or appearances can carry a race is put to the test, with real-world examples showing low turnout and limited impact. The takeaway is clear: voters care about what affects their daily lives, not political theater driven from outside the state.

Finally, the show zooms out to the national level, taking aim at Republicans in Washington for failing to deliver on core promises around inflation and cost of living. The frustration centers on what’s described as a simple economic reality: spending drives inflation, and inflation is crushing everyday Americans. Instead of addressing that, the focus appears to be shifting toward political strategy, including the possibility of leveraging Supreme Court vacancies to energize voters ahead of midterms.

It’s a mix of reflection, frustration, and blunt analysis, from honoring a broadcasting icon to breaking down why voters are increasingly fed up at every level of government. If there’s a through line, it’s this: people want results, not excuses, and they’re starting to respond accordingly.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today’s episode of The Rob Kendall Show dives into two very different stories that ultimately point to the same underlying problem: a system that isn’t working the way it should. We start with the controversy surrounding David Shelton, where political opponents are attempting to turn his wife’s completely legal business into a scandal. The question becomes simple—if something is lawful, transparent, and widely accepted in society, why is it being weaponized politically?

That leads into a broader discussion about accountability. Should candidates be judged based on what their spouse does, especially when there’s no illegal behavior involved? And if a legal business suddenly becomes disqualifying, what does that say about the state that allows it in the first place? The contrast becomes even sharper when you compare this line of attack to the very real concerns surrounding those currently holding office.

From there, the show shifts into a firsthand look at how local government actually operates—and where it breaks down. A redevelopment commission meeting in Brownsburg becomes a case study in confusion, lack of preparation, and a complete absence of leadership. What should have been a straightforward decision about using excess funds to help schools avoid raising taxes turned into an hour-and-a-half display of uncertainty.

Listeners get a clear breakdown of how tax increment financing (TIF) is supposed to work, why it was created, and how it can be used effectively to reduce taxpayer burden. But what happens when the people in charge don’t fully understand the system they oversee? The result is paralysis, missed opportunities, and decisions getting kicked down the road instead of resolved.

At its core, this episode highlights a larger issue that goes far beyond one town or one race. There’s a growing pattern of well-meaning people in positions of authority who lack the knowledge, direction, or willingness to make decisive choices. Add in leadership that won’t lead and staff with their own agendas, and you end up with a system that stalls out—leaving taxpayers to deal with the consequences.

If you’ve ever wondered why property taxes don’t seem to go down, or why government feels stuck in place, this episode connects the dots. What’s happening in one Indiana community is likely happening in many others—and understanding it is the first step to holding it accountable.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices