We first discuss the practicalities and potential impact of implementing Director Chopra’s call in a recent blog post for simplification of consumer finance regulations and simple bright-line rules. We then examine the role and objectives of regulation such as predictability and responsiveness to stakeholder input and consider whether the CFPB’s current approach to regulation, including its abandonment of official staff commentary updates, furthers those objectives. We also discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in EPA v. West Virginia and consider its implications for future challenges to CFPB actions.
Alan Kaplinsky, Ballard Spahr Senior Counsel, hosts the conversation.
View all episodes
By Ballard Spahr LLP
4.9
4545 ratings
We first discuss the practicalities and potential impact of implementing Director Chopra’s call in a recent blog post for simplification of consumer finance regulations and simple bright-line rules. We then examine the role and objectives of regulation such as predictability and responsiveness to stakeholder input and consider whether the CFPB’s current approach to regulation, including its abandonment of official staff commentary updates, furthers those objectives. We also discuss the recent SCOTUS decision in EPA v. West Virginia and consider its implications for future challenges to CFPB actions.
Alan Kaplinsky, Ballard Spahr Senior Counsel, hosts the conversation.
32,147 Listeners
30,649 Listeners
25,875 Listeners
8,752 Listeners
9,179 Listeners
8,476 Listeners
372 Listeners
6,296 Listeners
112,617 Listeners
1,451 Listeners
10,240 Listeners
16,246 Listeners
16,081 Listeners
10 Listeners
13 Listeners