Who knew "onions are evil"?! 

This one is. Or at least the leadership. 

The ridiculous idea that someone's copyrighted ownership of a world-wide brand (infowars) should or could be taken away, and what it reveals about a person who would want to use it, and to do the exact opposite of the original idea.

Never ever trust someone whose root is "comedy" but who also wants to delve in spiteful vengeance just because someone is fully exercising their rights and trying to inform people. It is the former person, not the latter, who should be sued for $1.5 Billion. 

Remember, take Alex Jones for what you want, but always know that as much as any news outlet he brings receipts. 

And now "infowars" will be someone purposely creating fictional content. Because he didn't like Alex Jones actual reporting.  

Irony much?

Kimmel is pretty much a dick, but can be entertaining to some. 

But what he did NOT do is ANY call to violence the week of April 19. The facts, with even a scintilla of research, prove it was just an age joke.

For the President to conclude in a hard way that it was about violence is literally the same kind of unnecessary disingenuous rhetoric that inflames unstable sycophants.

We, and by we I mean also Kimmel, have a greater right to the plain meaning and actual intent of the words we utter than other people have the right to misunderstand or to be "offended" by their interpretation. 

If either side could consistently act like adults... That'd be great. 

A sports analogy of the point first, then a dive into "The Trouble at Dill Creek Farm" as the perfect example about how a fact, there and known early on but kept ignored and therefore undeveloped, meant a team of investigators kept themselves in "the matrix" instead of seeing things for what they were.

Eventually, but years later, they pulled themselves out, but had they noticed "the black cat on the stairs" at the time, it would have saved much time and effort and brought justice quicker. 

(CORRECTION: A mis-utterance when mentioning a quick aside on 9-11. I mentioned a lack of debris but stopped there. i meant plane debris at the non-WTC sites. Sometimes with this large of a library you can make too quick of a nod towards what you've said in previous episodes}

More of a "quick rant" in spirit, since the length is a bit much vs typical QROTs. 

Early thoughts and impressions and best guess on the authenticity of the event at the White House Correspondents Dinner. 

And related ponderings. 

Pff. Funny if not tragic.

In the analogy, if you keep lending tools and money to the neighbor who never returns anything and always breaks his promise... Shame on you.

Let alone when they repeatedly break their promises within a day. 

Or in this case, minutes, with the promise being to the world. 

Not that it is news. Those who have analyzed it know the definition of their process IS this.
But still, for some it is somehow better to hear it from the horse's mouth.
1. The admission.
2. Even more interesting, that section of the 60 minutes interview is missing from most of the transcripts. But your dude Tyson found it.

CBS News transcript where you CAN find the verbiage

[POWELL:] We're not trying to move markets to a particular level. We just want them to work. We want, you know, people to be buying and selling. And so, you know, it felt like we really needed to act. And we did.

PELLEY: Fair to say you simply flooded the system with money?

POWELL: Yes. We did. That's another way to think about it. We did.

PELLEY: Where does it come from? Do you just print it?

POWELL: We print it digitally. So as a central bank, we have the ability to create money digitally. And we do that by buying Treasury Bills or bonds for other government guaranteed securities. And that actually increases the money supply. We also print actual currency and we distribute that through the Federal Reserve banks. 

PELLEY: In terms of size, Mr. Chairman, how does what the Fed is doing right now compare to the unprecedented action it took in 2008?

Also reported in Forbes: Fed Chairman Powell 60 Minutes Interview Highlights Bitcoin’s Value Proposition