When a country gives its soldiers uniform patches that signify their country being FIFTY TIMES its current size by including all or parts of eight neighboring countries including taking in many strategic positions in those countries, you might be being lied to when they chalk a bunch of military aggression to just "self defense." 

This is a lens that you should not be able to unsee each and every time you hear some disingenuous excuse of like "we had to level the whole building to teach the family of the terrorist, who is not even in the building, a lesson." And "the last 'stronghold' that we MUST defeat via direct invasion" just HAPPENS to be the largest city (so they can demolish that too)

Use your eyes and minds to judge actions that result in massive death and destruction. Don't just pick a side based on an idea you think you heard and ignore the specific case. To do so, when lives are lost and residences are destroyed, is to lose your empathy and humanity. 

This is easy. A nation (ANY nation) should have an educational system that overwhelmingly supports its own citizens, over citizens of another country (and all other countries combined).

Let alone 600 THOUSAND. LITERALLY MORE THAN THE POPULATION OF THE STATE OF WYOMING.  

You do not support the welfare of your own CITIZENS by allowing large numbers of foreign students to attain education at your schools. You do not cultivate your nation's collective intellect growth. 

What you DO cultivate, is access to high rollers and sensitive facilities. Literal intellectual transfer to those loyal to other countries. And in the case of the 600,000, to the literal power that is at philosophical odds with you on the planet.

This doesn't make sense. And has never made sense. 

Just as with immigration, we should absolutely allow some foreign students. But it HAS to be under common sense limits. 

American citizens, of all backgrounds, deserve the opportunities that our educational institutions provide. 

We deserve better than to be educating the world, when our citizens need to be, can be, and should be better educated. 

But for damned sure we deserve better than to be giving people who did not grow up to learn and appreciate the philosophy and founding of our country to have a leg up on those that do. 

C'mon, K-State and Iowa State. Not every "baby" has to be thrown out with the bathwater. What works for the SEC powers and the Big 10 powers are very bad ideas for your programs. 

Think of the most suspenseful "someone is in a server room or private office doing something they're NOT supposed to do" scene you've ever seen in a political intrigue genre movie. 

Not multiply it by a million, as to affect on humans and the planet. Specifically innocent infants and children. And you have what seems to be going on now. 

No study ever that was a true double-blind for safety or effectiveness on a childhood ob'ccine. Let alone one that compares the full 70- to 90-shot regimen to those who took none. 

1. Background and analysis on EASY solution on how Trump can still appease his base, and the truth, even if he is "in the files," and RELEASE THE EPSTEIN INFORMATION. ALL OF IT!

2. "Becoming Brigitte" - Macron's attempt at intimidation lawfare. That just won't work. Why? It's not even close to legitimate / can possibly win. 

Miscellaneous Points of Truth.

Starting with an "I Told You So" about the motivations of the EU and the new sacred cow, Ukraine.

To generally related topics. 

And initial thoughts on the minute, and now 2:45, of vid missing from the "raw footage" the FBI released. 

Robert Tanenbaum, a very accomplished NYC prosecutor, becomes the Deputy Chief Counsel for the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assassinations). In his first week in D. C. he is called on by a U.S. Senator.

The Senator, Richard Schweiker, is a member of the "Church Committee", which investigated intelligence activities. More specifically Schweiker was a co-chair on a sub-committee investigating "performance or non-performance" of intelligence agencies during the initial investigation of the assassination."

During their meeting, Schweiker tells Tanenbaum two things about the CIA and the Kennedy assassination. 

Mainly discussing topics introduced in The Lever's article "

FDA Approved — And Ineffective"

From 2013 through 2022, 73% of drugs approved by the FDA didn’t meet the agency’s four foundational standards required to show the drugs work as expected. 

Fifty-five of the approved drugs met only ONE of those four standards.

39 met NONE of them.

The pillars: 

Control group: Patients taking the drug were compared to a control group that was given a placebo or a comparator drug.

Replication: At least two “well-controlled” trials showed the drug was effective.

Blinding: Subjects in the studies and the doctors who cared for them don’t know which patients are on the drug and which are in the control group.

Clinical endpoint: The studies measured the drug’s effect on patients’ survival or function rather than a surrogate measure.

They're only the basis of good science from what we all learned in about tenth grade. But to the FDA and those that create drugs.. unimportant. 

The cancer "treatment" sub-segment was even worse.

This isn't taking into account the likely much worse situation for the legally-protected-from-lawsuits vaccine corner of the market.

Drug companies committed to doing "confirmatory" studies AFTER market release just have not done them. 

"Accelerated Pathway" as the foot in the door towards the FDA becoming a "passive observer" instead of a gatekeeper / true regulator / true guardian for consumer safety

"Surrogate outcomes" as a basis for how nearly every drug commercial proves that they in no way take the full calculus into account ("Yeah, but is it good overall?)

Placebos against another drug as something that reduces statistical significance

For those in the know, Demon Fearci at the ground floor of the root of the problem. 

- Rexulti

- aducanumab

- Elmiron

- ticagrelor 

- AZT

- Avastin

- Lidocaine

-Gardisil

- others

=============================================

Integrity Concerns in Ticagrelor Trials Challenge Clinical Confidence

 US HSS Office of Inspector General "Delays in Confirmatory Trials for Drug Applications Granted FDA’s Accelerated Approval Raise Concerns"

"Should regulatory authorities approve drugs based on surrogate endpoints?"

The Deadly Secrets Behind “Breakthrough” Alzheimer’s Drugs

A follow up to TSOT120. Further evidence of the toxicity of GLP-1s.

 

- 4.22 times higher risk of intestinal obstruction than when using another big pharma non-obesity "drug" (Contrave). 

- NINE times higher risk of Pancreatitis than when using Contrave. 

- 3.67 time higher risk of stomach PARALYSIS (gastroparesis) than when using Contrave. 

I find other articles discussing these also affecting your KIDNEYS. "Kidney problems can occur without symptoms until the condition is at an advanced stage with limited treatment options."

Ho. Lyshit. 

AND higher risk of thyroid cancer.