How often does the art of critical thinking in education get scrutinized by educators?
Teachers, administrators, students, and parents expect critical thinking to be embedded in their school curricula. Yet, defining and determining if students use and demonstrate critical thinking poses challenges. For many years the term, “critical thinking” was used loosely and didn’t really have a definition. That changed in the early 1990’s when a research team worked together to make sense of the concept. According to The Delphi Project:
The ideal critical thinker is habitually inquisitive, well-informed, trustful of reason, open-minded, flexible, fair- minded in evaluation, honest in facing personal biases, prudent in making judgments, willing to reconsider, clear about issues, orderly in complex matters, diligent in seeking relevant information, reasonable in the selection of criteria, focused in inquiry, and persistent in seeking results which are as precise as the subject and the circumstances of inquiry permit.
Teaching in the Information Age.
Now, more than ever, we can access information. However, we face a watershed moment in history where critical thinking seems to be crumbling. Currently, it seems like language fails to meet the complex and rapidly changing phenomena in the world as we know it. So, what exactly does this mean? I am speaking from the perspective as an artist teacher.
Recently, I challenged my students to create a work of art that embodied two opposing, but related concepts. The general idea being that by being more empathetic, they could reduce bullying. Markedly, I required that they address both ideas in the artwork. Despite spending a great deal of time teaching what empathy means, my students truly struggled with this project.
It quickly became apparent that students hadn’t considered the possibility that bullying wasn’t an inevitability. Moreover, they didn’t understand what empathy meant. Because they didn’t hold both of these ideas in their minds as prior knowledge, the project confronted their world view. In fact, for some students, the notion of empathy made them uncomfortable because they failed to fully understand what it meant.
The internet isn’t critical thinking.
Upon facing an academic challenge, the students rallied valiantly! They immediately turned to the internet as a surrogate critical thinker. In the hope that the internet would quickly solve their problem and they could get “done” with the project, they suddenly discovered a problem. Apparently, the internet hasn’t figured out how to end bullying either. Ironically, the one place they turned to to solve the bullying problem is an enclave of bullying. In reality, it’s difficult to imagine the internet taking an interest in working against itself by solving such a profitable problem. (But I digress).
Ultimately, many of the students began to ask questions. After all, if the internet couldn’t think critically for them, they would have to do it for themselves. Of course, the internet still served a purpose in this project. The difference manifested itself in the way the students started approaching their use of the internet. Whereas initially they saw the internet as a surrogate critical thinker, they came to see the internet as a research tool for their own thinking. Fundamentally, this shift mattered because it showed that they were starting to think for themselves.
How can artist teachers enhance critical thinking in the classroom?
In the first place, we can emphasize and encourage students to be “habitually inquisitive.” While this might sound obvious, purposefully teaching students this way isn’t easy. Nevertheless we should ask students to develop their own questions that guide their artistic process. However, for students, this opens an array of possibilities that can be intimidating and overwhelming. Despite this normal reaction, teachers can guide students through this process by modeling our own sense of curios...