Why do politicians rarely talk about class anymore? Social class remains one of the strongest influences on people's life chances, shaping everything from income and education to health and housing. Yet despite its continuing importance, class has become far less visible in political language and public debate.

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the changing role of class in political communication and asks why discussions of inequality are often framed in terms of aspiration, opportunity or identity rather than social class itself. What has happened to the language of class? Why has it become less prominent in mainstream politics? And what might be lost when politicians stop talking about class and economic inequality?

Joining Stephen is Professor Andrew Sayer, one of Britain's leading social theorists and an influential scholar of class, inequality and social justice. Together, they examine how political language shapes public understanding of inequality and consider what the disappearance of class from political discourse reveals about contemporary politics.

This episode explores social class, political communication, inequality, political language, public opinion, social mobility and the role of language in shaping political debate.

Guest: Professor Andrew Sayer

Presenter: ⁠⁠Professor Stephen Coleman⁠⁠

Producer: ⁠⁠Carl Hartley⁠⁠

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released. 

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it. 

What happens to democracy when local journalists disappear? Across the UK and beyond, newsrooms have shrunk, local newspapers have closed, and fewer reporters are attending council meetings, court hearings and community events. But what does this mean for accountability, transparency and public trust?

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the growing crisis in local journalism and asks what happens when there is nobody left to scrutinise those in power. Why does local news matter for democracy? What role do journalists play in holding councils, public bodies and local institutions to account? And what are the consequences when important decisions are made without public scrutiny?

Joining Stephen is Dr Tor Clark, journalism scholar at the University of Leicester, who worked as a political journalist from 1988-2014, and whose research examines local news, democratic participation and the changing media landscape. Together, they explore how the decline of local reporting is creating an accountability gap and consider what can be done to strengthen local journalism in the future.

This episode explores local journalism, democracy, public accountability, media trust, community reporting, local government and the crucial role of journalism in democratic life.

Guest: ⁠Tor Clark

Presenter: ⁠Professor Stephen Coleman⁠

Producer: ⁠Carl Hartley⁠

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released. 

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it. 

Are universities becoming less open to controversial ideas, or has concern about free speech on campus been exaggerated? Debates about academic freedom, student protest and so-called "cancel culture" have become increasingly prominent in public life, raising important questions about what universities are for and how disagreement should be managed. In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the politics of free speech on campus and asks whether universities can remain places where difficult, unpopular and challenging ideas are openly discussed. Why have disputes about free expression become such a powerful political issue? How should universities balance freedom of speech with concerns about harm, inclusion and student wellbeing? And what happens when competing rights and values come into conflict?

Joining Stephen is the documentary maker Ric Bienstock, whose acclaimed BBC documentary Speechless examined free speech, academic freedom and cancel culture in higher education. Drawing on her research and reporting, Ric reflects on how these debates play out in practice and why they continue to generate such strong reactions. Together, they explore free speech, academic freedom, political communication, public debate, universities and the challenges of maintaining open discussion in a democratic society.

Guest: Ric Bienstock
Presenter: Professor Stephen Coleman
Producer: Carl Hartley

To find out more about Ric's documentary, Speechless, then click on it's website: https://www.speechlessfilm.com/.

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released. 

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it. 

How do we talk about antisemitism in political and public life? Discussions about antisemitism often involve questions of language, history, identity and political responsibility. Yet disagreements frequently arise over how antisemitism is defined, recognised and communicated.

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the language of antisemitism and asks how politicians, journalists and citizens discuss one of society's oldest and most enduring forms of prejudice. Why do debates about antisemitism become so politically charged? How does language affect public understanding of discrimination? And what happens when difficult conversations about prejudice become entangled with wider political arguments?

Joining Stephen is Dr Ben Gidley, Reader in Sociology and Psychosocial Studies at Birkbeck, University of London, whose research focuses on racism, migration, identity, belonging and contemporary forms of antisemitism.

Together, they examine how language can clarify, complicate and sometimes polarise discussions about antisemitism in contemporary society, while exploring the responsibilities of politicians, media organisations and citizens in fostering meaningful democratic debate.

This episode explores political communication, antisemitism, public opinion, media framing, political language, democracy and the ways language shapes public understanding of prejudice and discrimination.

Guest: Dr Ben Gidley
Presenter: Professor Stephen Coleman
Producer: Carl Hartley

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released. 

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it. 

How does language shape the way we understand Islamophobia? Political debates are influenced not only by the issues being discussed, but also by the words used to describe them. Terms such as prejudice, discrimination, extremism and Islamophobia carry powerful meanings that shape public understanding and political responses.

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the language of Islamophobia and asks how politicians, journalists and citizens discuss anti-Muslim prejudice in public life. Why do disagreements emerge over the use of the term Islamophobia? How does language influence perceptions of discrimination? And what role does communication play in shaping public debate about identity, belonging and social cohesion?

Joining Stephen is Dr Salman Al-Azami, Senior Lecturer in Language, Media and Communication at Liverpool Hope University, whose research examines media representation, Islamophobia and the ways Muslim communities are portrayed and discussed in public discourse.

Together, they explore how language can illuminate difficult issues, but also become a source of misunderstanding, disagreement and political controversy.

This episode explores political communication, media framing, Islamophobia, public opinion, political language, democracy and the relationship between language and social attitudes.

Guest: Dr Salman Al-Azami
Presenter: Professor Stephen Coleman
Producer: Carl Hartley

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released. 

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it. 

Is free speech under threat, or are we witnessing a moral panic about free expression? Debates about censorship, cancel culture and academic freedom have become increasingly prominent in public life, but how much of the conversation is driven by evidence and how much by perception?

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman explores the growing debate around free speech and asks why concerns about freedom of expression have become such a powerful political issue. What do we mean when we talk about free speech? Are universities becoming less open to controversial ideas? And how should democratic societies balance freedom of expression with the need to protect people from harm?

Joining Stephen is Arif Ahmed, philosopher at the University of Cambridge and Director for Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom at the Office for Students.

Together, they examine the politics of free speech, the role of universities in fostering open debate, and why arguments about free expression continue to provoke such strong reactions.

Guest: Arif Ahmed
Presenter: Professor Stephen Coleman
Producer: Carl Hartley

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released.

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it.

Why is it often easier to talk about football than politics? Supporters of rival clubs can argue passionately about tactics, managers and performances while sharing a common understanding of the game. Political debate, by contrast, can often feel inaccessible, overly technical or disconnected from everyday experience.

In this episode, Professor Stephen Coleman asks what politicians might learn from the way football is discussed. Why do football pundits, commentators and supporters find ways to analyse complex events without talking down to their audiences? What makes football conversations feel more open, engaging and accessible than many political discussions?

Joining Stephen is academic, broadcaster and football finance expert Kieran Maguire, who reflects on the language of football, the culture of sporting debate and the lessons politics might take from the way it's debated.

The conversation also explores the relationship between sport and political power. Why are politicians so keen to attach themselves to major sporting events? When does political interest in sport become political intervention? And what can we learnt from Donald Trump's reported involvement with a player suspension during the FIFA Club World Cup?

From football fandom and sports punditry to political communication and public engagement, this episode explores how politics might become easier to understand - and easier to talk about.

Guest: Professor Kieran Maguire
Presenter: Professor Stephen Coleman
Producer: Carl Hartley

You can hear Kieran Maguire on The Price of Football Podcast.

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released.

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it.

What do people mean when they talk about a political mood or political vibe? Political decisions are often influenced by feelings, atmospheres and collective perceptions that can be difficult to define.

Professor Stephen Coleman explores the role of mood in politics and asks how political emotions influence campaigns, leadership and public opinion.

Joining Stephen is Dr Robert Topinka from Birkbeck, University of London, who helps unpack how cultural moods emerge and why they matter politically.

This episode explores political culture, public opinion, emotions, communication and democratic engagement.

Guest: Robert Topinka

Presenter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Stephen Coleman⁠⁠⁠⁠

Producer: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Carl Hartley⁠⁠

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released.

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it.

Does Prime Minister's Questions help voters understand politics—or is it simply a weekly political performance? PMQs is one of the most recognisable events in British politics, attracting both praise and criticism.

Professor Stephen Coleman examines the role of Prime Minister's Questions and asks what purpose it serves in a modern democracy. Does it improve accountability? Does it inform the public? Or is it primarily political theatre?

Joining Stephen is Labour MP Alex Sobel, who offers an insider's view of parliamentary scrutiny.

This episode explores parliamentary politics, accountability, rhetoric and democratic engagement.

Guest: Alex Sobel

Presenter: ⁠⁠⁠Stephen Coleman⁠⁠⁠

Producer: ⁠⁠⁠Carl Hartley⁠

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released.

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it.

Do politicians and public servants understand politics in the same way? Elected politicians often focus on vision and public promises, while administrators must concentrate on delivering services and solving practical problems.

Professor Stephen Coleman explores how political leaders and public officials communicate with one another and asks whether misunderstandings between the two can affect government performance.

Joining Stephen is Ed Whiting, Chief Executive of Leeds City Council.

This episode explores public administration, political leadership, local government, communication and democratic governance.

WARNING: One use of bad language.

Guest: Ed Whiting

Presenter: ⁠⁠Stephen Coleman⁠⁠

Producer: ⁠⁠Carl Hartley

We'd love to hear from you. Share your thoughts, suggest topics to cover, or ask questions. Leave a comment below or visit ⁠⁠www.thesoundofpolitics.com⁠⁠. And if you like this podcast then please follow to be the first to hear when a new episode is released.

The Sound of Politics is a podcast about political communication, political rhetoric, political leadership, democracy, public opinion and the language of politics. Hosted by Professor Stephen Coleman, each episode explores how politics is communicated and how citizens can better understand it.