The St.Emlyn’s Podcast

Simon and Iain belatedly reflect on a tough winter and the posts in January.

Check out stemlynsconference.com if you want to know more about #StEmlynsLIVE

S

The Importance and Practice of Debriefing in Emergency and Critical Care

Debriefing is a crucial process in healthcare settings, particularly in emergency and critical care units. It involves structured discussions following critical events to help teams learn from their experiences and support each other's psychological well-being. This process is not just about operational reflection but also about addressing the emotional impact of challenging situations on healthcare professionals.

Debriefing can take two primary forms: hot debriefs and formal debriefs. Hot debriefs occur immediately after an event and focus on operational aspects, such as what happened, what went well, and what could be improved. They are concise and do not delve into the psychological aspects of the incident. These debriefs are valuable for capturing immediate lessons and determining if further, more comprehensive discussions are necessary.

Formal debriefs, on the other hand, are conducted five to seven days post-event. This delay allows participants to process initial emotions, making it a more suitable time for in-depth discussions. Formal debriefs cover both operational details and psychological reactions, providing a safe space for staff to express their feelings and thoughts. They are essential for long-term learning and emotional healing, ensuring that the team can move forward positively.

The timing of debriefing is critical. While hot debriefs capture immediate reflections, formal debriefs should not be rushed. Conducting them too soon can be ineffective, as participants might still be too emotionally charged to engage constructively. In our hospital, formal debriefs are usually organized when an event causes significant distress among the staff, whether due to a clinical situation, a tragic incident involving a colleague, or a complex ethical dilemma.

The setting for a debrief should be carefully chosen to ensure a conducive environment for open communication. We often use teaching rooms, which are formal enough to maintain the seriousness of the discussion but comfortable and private enough to encourage honesty and confidentiality.

Selecting the right facilitators is crucial for a successful debrief. Typically, a social worker, like Liz, and a senior medical consultant co-facilitate. The consultant provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical aspects, while the social worker manages the psychological and emotional discussions. This balance ensures that all relevant facets of the event are covered.

A formal debrief generally follows a structured format:

Introduction and Ground Rules: The facilitator sets the stage by explaining the purpose of the debrief and establishing ground rules, such as maintaining confidentiality and focusing on constructive feedback.

Narrative of the Event: A detailed recount of the incident is provided, clarifying what happened and why certain decisions were made. This helps participants understand the context and avoid misunderstandings.

Operational Discussion: The team discusses the operational aspects, identifying what was done well and what could be improved. This is critical for learning and improving future responses.

Emotional and Psychological Impact: Participants share their emotional reactions, providing a space for acknowledging the psychological effects of the event. This aspect of debriefing is vital for team support and individual well-being.

Closing and Follow-Up: The debrief concludes with a summary and any agreed-upon actions. Facilitators also provide information on additional support resources, if necessary.

Debriefing can be challenging, especially in navigating sensitive topics or when there are conflicting opinions. It's essential to create a safe space where all participants feel comfortable sharing. Facilitators must manage the discussion to ensure that dominant personalities do not overshadow quieter voices, encouraging everyone to contribute.

In some cases, separate debriefs for different groups involved in the event—such as pre-hospital staff, nurses, and doctors—may be necessary. This approach ensures that discussions are relevant to each group's experiences and prevents unnecessary exposure to distressing details that may not be directly applicable.

Debriefing should not be limited to negative or critical incidents. Regularly debriefing both positive and challenging events fosters a culture of continuous improvement and support. It helps normalize the practice, making it an integral part of the workplace rather than an extraordinary event.

It's important to recognize that not all staff may want to participate in debriefings, and that’s acceptable. Debriefing should always be voluntary, with alternative support mechanisms available for those who need them.

The long-term benefits of debriefing are substantial. It helps prevent burnout by providing a space for staff to process their experiences, supports continuous learning, and improves patient care outcomes. A well-implemented debriefing process can enhance team cohesion, reduce staff turnover, and foster a positive workplace culture.

Debriefing is a vital component of healthcare practice in emergency and critical care settings. It provides a structured approach to reflect on critical events, offering both operational and psychological support to healthcare teams. While it requires time and effort, the benefits for staff well-being and patient care are invaluable.

We encourage healthcare professionals to integrate regular debriefing into their practices, not just for critical incidents but as a routine part of their work. This approach helps build a resilient and supportive workplace culture, where staff feel valued and heard. Sharing experiences and learning from each other strengthens the team and ultimately leads to better care for patients.

We invite you to share your experiences with debriefing in your hospital. What strategies have worked well? What challenges have you encountered? Connect with us through the St. Emlyn's blog or Twitter, and let's continue the conversation about improving our practices and supporting each other in this challenging yet rewarding field of healthcare. Stay tuned for more insights from St. Emlyn's as we explore the complexities of working in emergency and critical care. Until next time, take care and keep supporting each other.

In the St Emlyn's podcast, hosts Simon Carley and Rick Bodey explore the crucial aspects of diagnostic test accuracy studies, particularly relevant for emergency medicine. This discussion revolves around the PICTR framework, a tool for structuring research questions and critical appraisals in diagnostic studies. PICTR stands for Patient group, Index test, Comparator, Target condition, and Reference standard.

The patient group is the specific population in which the diagnostic test is evaluated. It's essential to select a relevant group to ensure the study's findings are applicable to real-world settings. For example, a cardiac marker tested in a specialized cardiology clinic may not perform identically in the diverse environment of an emergency department. In practice, the patient group should include all individuals who present with symptoms indicative of the condition the test aims to diagnose, providing a broad and pragmatic study population.

The index test is the new diagnostic tool being evaluated. Key factors include how and when the test is applied, the conditions under which it is used, and the training of the clinicians administering it. For example, if evaluating a new troponin test, the timing of sample collection and the level of operator training are crucial, as these can significantly influence the test's accuracy and reliability. Understanding these details ensures that the study results can be replicated in different clinical settings and with various levels of clinician expertise.

The comparator is an existing diagnostic test or standard used to measure the new test's effectiveness. This comparison helps determine whether the new test offers improvements over current practices. For instance, when comparing a new scoring system for assessing chest pain against the TIMI risk score, researchers can evaluate which method more accurately identifies patients at risk for acute coronary syndromes. However, not all studies include a comparator, especially if the new test is intended to replace an existing standard entirely.

The target condition refers to the specific illness or condition that the test aims to diagnose. Defining this condition involves setting clinical criteria or thresholds. For example, the criteria for diagnosing myocardial infarction have evolved with advancements in biomarker sensitivity, such as the use of high-sensitivity troponins. A meaningful target condition is one that impacts clinical decision-making and patient management, ensuring that the diagnosis leads to actionable insights that improve patient outcomes.

The reference standard, often called the "gold standard," is the most accurate method available for confirming whether a patient has the target condition. It serves as the benchmark against which the new diagnostic test is measured. However, reference standards can have limitations, such as false negatives or positives. For example, while a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is a common reference standard for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, it is not perfect. In some cases, a new test may outperform the reference standard, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of study results.

Applying the reference standard uniformly across all patients can be challenging, especially when the standard is invasive or carries risks. For example, diagnosing subarachnoid hemorrhage typically involves a CT scan followed by a lumbar puncture. However, not all patients may undergo these procedures due to their invasive nature. In such cases, researchers may use follow-up data as a proxy, assuming that if no adverse outcomes occur during the follow-up period, the patient likely did not have the target condition.

This approach helps mitigate the ethical concerns and practical challenges associated with applying invasive reference standards to all study participants. It also highlights the importance of being pragmatic when appraising diagnostic studies, focusing on the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings rather than striving for methodological perfection.

Critical appraisal of diagnostic studies involves evaluating the study's design, including the selection of the patient group, the application of the index test, and the choice of the reference standard. Researchers and clinicians must also consider the study's limitations, such as potential biases or the imperfect nature of the reference standard. These factors can affect the study's conclusions and their relevance to clinical practice.

Understanding and applying the PICTR framework helps ensure that diagnostic studies are comprehensive and provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making. It allows for better evaluation of new diagnostic tools, ensuring they are safe, effective, and applicable in real-world clinical settings.

The PICTR framework provides a structured approach to designing and evaluating diagnostic test accuracy studies. By focusing on patient groups, index tests, comparators, target conditions, and reference standards, researchers can produce more accurate and clinically useful results. This approach is crucial in emergency medicine, where timely and accurate diagnoses can significantly impact patient outcomes.

For clinicians, mastering the principles of PICTR enhances the ability to critically appraise research and make informed decisions about the implementation of new diagnostic tests. As diagnostic technologies continue to evolve, the importance of robust, evidence-based assessments will only grow, ensuring high-quality patient care and optimal use of healthcare resources.

Understanding Devastating Brain Injury: Key Insights and Guidelines

In a recent episode of the St Emlyn's podcast, Simon Carley hosted experts Dan Harvey and Mark Wilson to discuss the intricacies of managing devastating brain injury (DBI). The conversation covered new guidelines, the challenges in prognostication, ethical considerations, and practical approaches in clinical settings. This blog post provides a comprehensive summary of their insights, focusing on the importance of standardized care, ethical decision-making, and the role of family involvement.

Devastating brain injury encompasses severe brain damage that often leads to significant long-term impairment or death. These injuries can result from various causes, including trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypoxic brain injury, and intracerebral hematomas. The term "devastating" highlights the severity of these injuries, but as discussed, the perception of devastation can vary, complicating management and prognostication.

One of the core issues in managing DBI is the variability in clinical practice across different healthcare settings. This inconsistency can lead to different outcomes depending on where the patient is treated. Dan Harvey emphasized that the new guidelines aim to standardize care, providing a consistent approach regardless of location. The guidelines recommend an observation period of up to 72 hours to gather comprehensive clinical data, crucial for making informed decisions.

Mark Wilson highlighted the difficulty in early prognostication, noting that initial presentations can be misleading. Factors such as intoxication, medication effects, or pre-existing conditions can obscure the true extent of brain injury. The term "perceived devastating brain injury" underscores the subjective nature of these assessments, stressing that what appears catastrophic on imaging may not always align with clinical outcomes.

Radiological findings, while essential, must be interpreted alongside clinical assessments. A severe CT scan may not always correlate with poor clinical outcomes, and vice versa. The discussion stressed the importance of not rushing to judgment based solely on initial imaging or clinical presentation. Recent studies, including those by Hanni Marcus and Mark Wilson, have shown that some patients with poor prognostic indicators can recover better than expected, particularly those with extra-axial hematomas.

Ethical considerations are paramount in managing DBI. The definition of a "good recovery" can vary widely among patients and families. For example, elderly patients with significant impairments may still value life, even with extensive care needs. The guidelines emphasize the importance of involving families in discussions about prognosis and treatment, ensuring decisions align with the patient's values and preferences.

Understanding the patient's and family's perspectives is crucial in determining the appropriate course of action. This holistic approach ensures that care decisions are not only medically sound but also ethically and personally appropriate. The discussion also highlighted the need for clear communication, helping families navigate complex and emotionally charged situations.

The guidelines advocate for a period of observation to avoid hasty decisions based on incomplete information. This period, typically up to 72 hours, allows for the identification and management of reversible factors, collection of comprehensive medical history, and better communication with the family. The aim is to reduce the risk of prematurely withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.

Determining the level of care for DBI patients involves deciding whether to transfer them to neurocritical care units or manage them in general ICUs. While specialized care offers advanced interventions like intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, evidence does not conclusively show that these measures always improve outcomes. The discussion acknowledged the limitations of resources and the importance of considering logistical factors, such as proximity to the patient's family.

The guidelines encourage clinicians to make informed decisions based on available evidence and specific case circumstances. They stress that not all DBI patients require transfer to specialized centers, especially when prognosis remains uncertain. The focus should be on providing essential life-saving therapies and monitoring the patient's condition.

When recovery is deemed unlikely, transitioning to palliative care becomes a compassionate and appropriate choice. The guidelines stress the importance of clear communication with the family, ensuring they understand the prognosis and rationale behind limiting or withdrawing aggressive treatment. Palliative care focuses on symptom management, comfort, and supporting the patient and family, addressing not only physical but also emotional and psychological needs.

Organ donation is an important consideration for DBI patients when the prognosis is poor. The guidelines recommend discussing this option with the family as part of end-of-life care planning. These discussions should be handled sensitively, providing clear information and respecting the family's wishes. Organ donation can provide hope and purpose in the face of tragedy, potentially saving other lives.

The St Emlyn's podcast episode on devastating brain injury provides crucial insights into the complexities of managing this challenging condition. The newly published guidelines offer a structured approach, emphasizing comprehensive assessment, ethical considerations, and family involvement.

Key Takeaways:

Standardize Practice: Reduce variability in DBI management by adhering to standardized guidelines, ensuring consistent and high-quality care.

Comprehensive Assessment: Utilize both clinical and radiological assessments to inform prognosis. Avoid premature conclusions based on incomplete data.

Ethical and Family Considerations: Engage with families to align treatment decisions with the patient's values and wishes. Provide clear, compassionate communication throughout the process.

Observation Period: Allow an appropriate observation period to clarify the patient's condition and potential for recovery.

Palliative Care: Transition to palliative care when necessary, prioritizing patient comfort and dignity.

Organ Donation: Discuss organ donation as part of end-of-life planning, handling these conversations with care and respect.

By following these guidelines, healthcare professionals can navigate the complexities of managing DBI with greater confidence and compassion, ultimately improving patient outcomes and supporting families through challenging times. For more detailed information and resources, visit the St Emlyn's blog and stay updated with the latest in emergency and critical care.

Understanding Devastating Brain Injury: Key Insights and Guidelines

In a recent episode of the St Emlyn's podcast, Simon Carley hosted experts Dan Harvey and Mark Wilson to discuss the intricacies of managing devastating brain injury (DBI). The conversation covered new guidelines, the challenges in prognostication, ethical considerations, and practical approaches in clinical settings. This blog post provides a comprehensive summary of their insights, focusing on the importance of standardized care, ethical decision-making, and the role of family involvement.

Devastating brain injury encompasses severe brain damage that often leads to significant long-term impairment or death. These injuries can result from various causes, including trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypoxic brain injury, and intracerebral hematomas. The term "devastating" highlights the severity of these injuries, but as discussed, the perception of devastation can vary, complicating management and prognostication.

One of the core issues in managing DBI is the variability in clinical practice across different healthcare settings. This inconsistency can lead to different outcomes depending on where the patient is treated. Dan Harvey emphasized that the new guidelines aim to standardize care, providing a consistent approach regardless of location. The guidelines recommend an observation period of up to 72 hours to gather comprehensive clinical data, crucial for making informed decisions.

Mark Wilson highlighted the difficulty in early prognostication, noting that initial presentations can be misleading. Factors such as intoxication, medication effects, or pre-existing conditions can obscure the true extent of brain injury. The term "perceived devastating brain injury" underscores the subjective nature of these assessments, stressing that what appears catastrophic on imaging may not always align with clinical outcomes.

Radiological findings, while essential, must be interpreted alongside clinical assessments. A severe CT scan may not always correlate with poor clinical outcomes, and vice versa. The discussion stressed the importance of not rushing to judgment based solely on initial imaging or clinical presentation. Recent studies, including those by Hanni Marcus and Mark Wilson, have shown that some patients with poor prognostic indicators can recover better than expected, particularly those with extra-axial hematomas.

Ethical considerations are paramount in managing DBI. The definition of a "good recovery" can vary widely among patients and families. For example, elderly patients with significant impairments may still value life, even with extensive care needs. The guidelines emphasize the importance of involving families in discussions about prognosis and treatment, ensuring decisions align with the patient's values and preferences.

Understanding the patient's and family's perspectives is crucial in determining the appropriate course of action. This holistic approach ensures that care decisions are not only medically sound but also ethically and personally appropriate. The discussion also highlighted the need for clear communication, helping families navigate complex and emotionally charged situations.

The guidelines advocate for a period of observation to avoid hasty decisions based on incomplete information. This period, typically up to 72 hours, allows for the identification and management of reversible factors, collection of comprehensive medical history, and better communication with the family. The aim is to reduce the risk of prematurely withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.

Determining the level of care for DBI patients involves deciding whether to transfer them to neurocritical care units or manage them in general ICUs. While specialized care offers advanced interventions like intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, evidence does not conclusively show that these measures always improve outcomes. The discussion acknowledged the limitations of resources and the importance of considering logistical factors, such as proximity to the patient's family.

The guidelines encourage clinicians to make informed decisions based on available evidence and specific case circumstances. They stress that not all DBI patients require transfer to specialized centers, especially when prognosis remains uncertain. The focus should be on providing essential life-saving therapies and monitoring the patient's condition.

When recovery is deemed unlikely, transitioning to palliative care becomes a compassionate and appropriate choice. The guidelines stress the importance of clear communication with the family, ensuring they understand the prognosis and rationale behind limiting or withdrawing aggressive treatment. Palliative care focuses on symptom management, comfort, and supporting the patient and family, addressing not only physical but also emotional and psychological needs.

Organ donation is an important consideration for DBI patients when the prognosis is poor. The guidelines recommend discussing this option with the family as part of end-of-life care planning. These discussions should be handled sensitively, providing clear information and respecting the family's wishes. Organ donation can provide hope and purpose in the face of tragedy, potentially saving other lives.

The St Emlyn's podcast episode on devastating brain injury provides crucial insights into the complexities of managing this challenging condition. The newly published guidelines offer a structured approach, emphasizing comprehensive assessment, ethical considerations, and family involvement.

Key Takeaways:

Standardize Practice: Reduce variability in DBI management by adhering to standardized guidelines, ensuring consistent and high-quality care.

Comprehensive Assessment: Utilize both clinical and radiological assessments to inform prognosis. Avoid premature conclusions based on incomplete data.

Ethical and Family Considerations: Engage with families to align treatment decisions with the patient's values and wishes. Provide clear, compassionate communication throughout the process.

Observation Period: Allow an appropriate observation period to clarify the patient's condition and potential for recovery.

Palliative Care: Transition to palliative care when necessary, prioritizing patient comfort and dignity.

Organ Donation: Discuss organ donation as part of end-of-life planning, handling these conversations with care and respect.

By following these guidelines, healthcare professionals can navigate the complexities of managing DBI with greater confidence and compassion, ultimately improving patient outcomes and supporting families through challenging times. For more detailed information and resources, visit the St Emlyn's blog and stay updated with the latest in emergency and critical care.

Introduction

In the latest Sentiment podcast, Simon Carly and Natalie May review the December highlights from St Emlyn's and provide a preview of exciting upcoming events in 2018. The month featured a range of content, including clinical insights, wellbeing initiatives, and journal club discussions, while the upcoming year promises numerous educational opportunities.

1. Insights from the Intensive Care Society Meeting

Dan Horner attended the Intensive Care Society meeting in Liverpool, where Paul Young from New Zealand emphasized the scarcity of high-quality evidence for many intensive care interventions. He urged practitioners to critically evaluate the evidence behind their practices. Another notable topic was contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), with debates on its clinical significance. This post is essential for those in intensive care, providing a thorough overview of the current challenges and evolving practices in the field.

2. Updated Guidelines for Managing Paracetamol Overdose

A significant update discussed new guidelines for handling accidental therapeutic excess of paracetamol. The new approach moves away from automatic hospitalization, advocating for a more measured response based on clinical assessments and specific blood test results, such as INR and liver function tests. This shift is crucial for emergency medicine practitioners, helping to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and focus resources on patients who need them most.

3. The ED Wellness Spa Initiative

Laura highlighted the innovative ED Wellness Spa initiative in Manchester, designed to support clinician wellness. The spa provides a dedicated space in the ED for staff to relax and rejuvenate, featuring elements like a gratitude tree and wall, wellness literature, and mindfulness tools. It also includes team-building activities, such as raft building, aimed at fostering a supportive and cohesive team environment. This initiative is a pioneering effort to address healthcare provider burnout, promoting a holistic approach to staff well-being.

4. Pain Management in Minor Trauma

Gareth reviewed a study from the Annals of Emergency Medicine comparing the effectiveness of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and their combination in treating minor musculoskeletal trauma. The study found no significant difference in pain relief among the groups, suggesting paracetamol alone is sufficient. This challenges the routine use of combination therapies and supports a simpler, safer approach to pain management in emergency settings.

5. The Marcy Pan Guidelines on Anorexia Management

Vicki Vella discussed the Marcy Pan guidelines for managing severe anorexia, emphasizing the condition's high mortality rate and the need for careful clinical management. The guidelines include the use of the SUSS (Sit-Up Squat Stand) test to assess physical health and identify critical cases. Vicki also highlighted the issue of diabulimia, where individuals with type 1 diabetes manipulate insulin to lose weight, underscoring the importance of screening for eating disorders in these patients.

1. Teaching Cooperative Course in Cape Town

The year kicks off with the Teaching Cooperative Course in Cape Town from March 20-21. This course aims to transform medical education by moving away from traditional lectures to interactive, hands-on learning experiences. It is an excellent opportunity for educators to refine their teaching methods and engage more effectively with students.

2. BAD-EM Fest and St. Emlyn's Live

Following the Cape Town course, the BAD-EM Fest will be held from March 22-25, offering a unique blend of academic and creative sessions. Later in the year, St. Emlyn's Live will return to Manchester on October 9, providing another chance for professionals to delve into critical topics in emergency medicine.

3. FIX Courses in New York

The FIX (FemInEM Ideas eXchange) conference, set for October 17-18 in New York, focuses on gender equity in emergency medicine. The event features diverse speakers and workshops aimed at promoting inclusivity and equity in the medical profession. It's a must-attend for those committed to fostering a more equitable work environment.

4. RISUS Litology Course in New South Wales

In New South Wales, the RISUS Litology course will offer advanced training in resuscitation. The course, featuring experts like Cliff Reed and Karl Harbig, will focus on high-quality, evidence-based techniques through case-based discussions. This event is ideal for advanced practitioners seeking to deepen their knowledge and skills in resuscitation.

The St. Emlyn's team expresses gratitude to its community for their continued engagement and support. While not everyone can attend these conferences, the team remains committed to sharing key learnings through their blog and podcast, ensuring that valuable knowledge is accessible to all. The upcoming year promises further opportunities for learning and professional growth, fostering a global community of compassionate and informed emergency medicine professionals.

As the St. Emlyn's community looks forward to 2018, the team is excited to continue offering high-quality content and engaging with healthcare professionals worldwide. Here's to another year of growth, learning, and sharing in the vibrant field of emergency medicine.

Introduction

In the latest Sentiment podcast, Simon Carly and Natalie May review the December highlights from St Emlyn's and provide a preview of exciting upcoming events in 2018. The month featured a range of content, including clinical insights, wellbeing initiatives, and journal club discussions, while the upcoming year promises numerous educational opportunities.

1. Insights from the Intensive Care Society Meeting

Dan Horner attended the Intensive Care Society meeting in Liverpool, where Paul Young from New Zealand emphasized the scarcity of high-quality evidence for many intensive care interventions. He urged practitioners to critically evaluate the evidence behind their practices. Another notable topic was contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), with debates on its clinical significance. This post is essential for those in intensive care, providing a thorough overview of the current challenges and evolving practices in the field.

2. Updated Guidelines for Managing Paracetamol Overdose

A significant update discussed new guidelines for handling accidental therapeutic excess of paracetamol. The new approach moves away from automatic hospitalization, advocating for a more measured response based on clinical assessments and specific blood test results, such as INR and liver function tests. This shift is crucial for emergency medicine practitioners, helping to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and focus resources on patients who need them most.

3. The ED Wellness Spa Initiative

Laura highlighted the innovative ED Wellness Spa initiative in Manchester, designed to support clinician wellness. The spa provides a dedicated space in the ED for staff to relax and rejuvenate, featuring elements like a gratitude tree and wall, wellness literature, and mindfulness tools. It also includes team-building activities, such as raft building, aimed at fostering a supportive and cohesive team environment. This initiative is a pioneering effort to address healthcare provider burnout, promoting a holistic approach to staff well-being.

4. Pain Management in Minor Trauma

Gareth reviewed a study from the Annals of Emergency Medicine comparing the effectiveness of paracetamol, NSAIDs, and their combination in treating minor musculoskeletal trauma. The study found no significant difference in pain relief among the groups, suggesting paracetamol alone is sufficient. This challenges the routine use of combination therapies and supports a simpler, safer approach to pain management in emergency settings.

5. The Marcy Pan Guidelines on Anorexia Management

Vicki Vella discussed the Marcy Pan guidelines for managing severe anorexia, emphasizing the condition's high mortality rate and the need for careful clinical management. The guidelines include the use of the SUSS (Sit-Up Squat Stand) test to assess physical health and identify critical cases. Vicki also highlighted the issue of diabulimia, where individuals with type 1 diabetes manipulate insulin to lose weight, underscoring the importance of screening for eating disorders in these patients.

1. Teaching Cooperative Course in Cape Town

The year kicks off with the Teaching Cooperative Course in Cape Town from March 20-21. This course aims to transform medical education by moving away from traditional lectures to interactive, hands-on learning experiences. It is an excellent opportunity for educators to refine their teaching methods and engage more effectively with students.

2. BAD-EM Fest and St. Emlyn's Live

Following the Cape Town course, the BAD-EM Fest will be held from March 22-25, offering a unique blend of academic and creative sessions. Later in the year, St. Emlyn's Live will return to Manchester on October 9, providing another chance for professionals to delve into critical topics in emergency medicine.

3. FIX Courses in New York

The FIX (FemInEM Ideas eXchange) conference, set for October 17-18 in New York, focuses on gender equity in emergency medicine. The event features diverse speakers and workshops aimed at promoting inclusivity and equity in the medical profession. It's a must-attend for those committed to fostering a more equitable work environment.

4. RISUS Litology Course in New South Wales

In New South Wales, the RISUS Litology course will offer advanced training in resuscitation. The course, featuring experts like Cliff Reed and Karl Harbig, will focus on high-quality, evidence-based techniques through case-based discussions. This event is ideal for advanced practitioners seeking to deepen their knowledge and skills in resuscitation.

The St. Emlyn's team expresses gratitude to its community for their continued engagement and support. While not everyone can attend these conferences, the team remains committed to sharing key learnings through their blog and podcast, ensuring that valuable knowledge is accessible to all. The upcoming year promises further opportunities for learning and professional growth, fostering a global community of compassionate and informed emergency medicine professionals.

As the St. Emlyn's community looks forward to 2018, the team is excited to continue offering high-quality content and engaging with healthcare professionals worldwide. Here's to another year of growth, learning, and sharing in the vibrant field of emergency medicine.

December round up of St.Emlyn's

Dates for your diary.

1. Cape Town Teaching Course

2. Manchester Teaching Course

3. BadEMFest18

Blog posts.

1.Dan does part of State of the Art #ICSSOA2017. St.Emlyn’s

2.Management of paracetamol therapeutic excess in the ED. St.Emlyn’s.

3.The ED Spa. Wellness and Support in #Virchester. St.Emlyn’s. (NOTE - We forgot to mention the incredible contribution of Kirsten Ballantyne on this project - it's more than just Laura)

4.JC : Paracetamol, NSAID’s or both in MSK trauma. St.Emlyn’s

5. 104 Reflections from Sydney HEMS – the eBook. St.Emlyn’s

6.MARSIPAN – Not just for (Christmas) Cakes. St.Emlyn’s

7.How to ask a question at a conference. The origin of ‘that’ algorithm. St.Emlyn’s

8.Review of 2017. St.Emlyn’s

If anyone wants to know more about any of the conferences we talk about please get in touch with the team [email protected]

S

Natalie and Simon discuss reflections, e-books and life at Sydney HEMS. This week we have added Lorikeets in the background (Nat recorded at Coogee Bay in NSW). We think they sound cute so we've kept them in (or rather we could not edit them out).

S