cOn August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.

In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:


Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf

cOn August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.

In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:


Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf

On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.

In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:


Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf

A recent federal indictment unsealed in June 2024 details a sophisticated scheme involving the Sinaloa Cartel and Chinese money launderers in Los Angeles. The indictment charges 24 individuals, including key figures such as Edgar Joel Martinez-Reyes, with conspiracy to distribute drugs, launder money, and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

This investigation, dubbed "Operation Fortune Runner," revealed that over $50 million in drug proceeds were laundered through an underground banking system linked to Chinese nationals. The money laundering network, based in the San Gabriel Valley of California, processed and concealed large amounts of drug trafficking proceeds, making them accessible to cartel members in Mexico and elsewhere. Methods used included trade-based money laundering, asset structuring, and the purchase of cryptocurrency.

The collaboration between U.S., Chinese, and Mexican law enforcement led to the arrest of several fugitives involved in this scheme. This case underscores the growing partnership between Mexican drug cartels and Chinese organized crime groups to launder drug money, which funds the production and distribution of dangerous drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine in the United States​.

In this episode we take a look at that indictment.  


(commercial at 10:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci

A recent federal indictment unsealed in June 2024 details a sophisticated scheme involving the Sinaloa Cartel and Chinese money launderers in Los Angeles. The indictment charges 24 individuals, including key figures such as Edgar Joel Martinez-Reyes, with conspiracy to distribute drugs, launder money, and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

This investigation, dubbed "Operation Fortune Runner," revealed that over $50 million in drug proceeds were laundered through an underground banking system linked to Chinese nationals. The money laundering network, based in the San Gabriel Valley of California, processed and concealed large amounts of drug trafficking proceeds, making them accessible to cartel members in Mexico and elsewhere. Methods used included trade-based money laundering, asset structuring, and the purchase of cryptocurrency.

The collaboration between U.S., Chinese, and Mexican law enforcement led to the arrest of several fugitives involved in this scheme. This case underscores the growing partnership between Mexican drug cartels and Chinese organized crime groups to launder drug money, which funds the production and distribution of dangerous drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine in the United States​.

In this episode we take a look at that indictment.  


(commercial at 10:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci

A recent federal indictment unsealed in June 2024 details a sophisticated scheme involving the Sinaloa Cartel and Chinese money launderers in Los Angeles. The indictment charges 24 individuals, including key figures such as Edgar Joel Martinez-Reyes, with conspiracy to distribute drugs, launder money, and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

This investigation, dubbed "Operation Fortune Runner," revealed that over $50 million in drug proceeds were laundered through an underground banking system linked to Chinese nationals. The money laundering network, based in the San Gabriel Valley of California, processed and concealed large amounts of drug trafficking proceeds, making them accessible to cartel members in Mexico and elsewhere. Methods used included trade-based money laundering, asset structuring, and the purchase of cryptocurrency.

The collaboration between U.S., Chinese, and Mexican law enforcement led to the arrest of several fugitives involved in this scheme. This case underscores the growing partnership between Mexican drug cartels and Chinese organized crime groups to launder drug money, which funds the production and distribution of dangerous drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine in the United States​.

In this episode we take a look at that indictment.  


(commercial at 10:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci

A recent federal indictment unsealed in June 2024 details a sophisticated scheme involving the Sinaloa Cartel and Chinese money launderers in Los Angeles. The indictment charges 24 individuals, including key figures such as Edgar Joel Martinez-Reyes, with conspiracy to distribute drugs, launder money, and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

This investigation, dubbed "Operation Fortune Runner," revealed that over $50 million in drug proceeds were laundered through an underground banking system linked to Chinese nationals. The money laundering network, based in the San Gabriel Valley of California, processed and concealed large amounts of drug trafficking proceeds, making them accessible to cartel members in Mexico and elsewhere. Methods used included trade-based money laundering, asset structuring, and the purchase of cryptocurrency.

The collaboration between U.S., Chinese, and Mexican law enforcement led to the arrest of several fugitives involved in this scheme. This case underscores the growing partnership between Mexican drug cartels and Chinese organized crime groups to launder drug money, which funds the production and distribution of dangerous drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine in the United States​.

In this episode we take a look at that indictment.  


(commercial at 10:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci

The Sinaloa Cartel is one of the largest and most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. It is based in the Mexican state of Sinaloa and has a global reach, with operations in several countries, including the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. The cartel is known for its ruthless tactics, including violence, bribery, and corruption.The Sinaloa Cartel was founded in the late 1980s by a group of drug traffickers, led by Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, who is now serving a life sentence in the United States. Since then, the cartel has grown into a powerful criminal organization with a complex hierarchy and sophisticated operations.The cartel's primary source of income is the trafficking of illegal drugs, primarily cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine. The Sinaloa Cartel is responsible for a significant portion of the drugs that enter the United States from Mexico, and it has been estimated that the cartel's annual revenues exceed $3 billion.

The cartel operates through a network of cells and affiliates, each with its own area of operations and responsibilities. The top leadership of the cartel is believed to be composed of a small group of individuals, including Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, who is considered the current leader of the cartel.The Sinaloa Cartel is known for its brutal violence, and it has been responsible for numerous assassinations, bombings, and other violent acts.

The cartel has also been accused of using bribery and corruption to maintain its power and influence, and it has been reported that the cartel has bribed law enforcement officials and politicians in Mexico and other countries.Despite efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel, it remains a significant force in the global drug trade. The Sinaloa Cartel continues to adapt and evolve, using new technology and tactics to evade law enforcement and expand its operations.

In this episode we pull back the curtain a little further and explore how the Sinaloa cartel has evolved since El Chapo's arrest and how his sons, the Los Chapitos have ushered in new future that is built upon the synthetic narcotics game


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Case details Sinaloa cartel's fentanyl-fueled evolution (msn.com)

A superseding indictment is a formal legal document issued by a grand jury that replaces a previous indictment in a criminal case. It updates or adds charges, changes the factual basis, or modifies the defendants listed. Here are the key points:Key Features:

1. Replacement: It replaces an earlier indictment with new or revised charges.
2. Additional Charges: It can include additional charges not present in the original indictment.
3. New Defendants: It can add new defendants or modify the charges against existing ones.
4. Updated Information: It reflects new evidence or information obtained during the ongoing investigation.

Purpose:

1. Flexibility: Allows prosecutors to adapt to new developments in the case.
2. Comprehensive Prosecution: Ensures that all relevant charges and defendants are included based on the latest available evidence.
3. Clarity: Provides a clear and updated statement of the charges against the defendants, which is important for legal proceedings and the defense's preparation.

Process:

1. Grand Jury Review: Like the original indictment, a superseding indictment must be reviewed and approved by a grand jury.
2. Filing and Notification: Once approved, it is filed with the court, and the defendants are notified of the changes.

Impact:

1. Defendant's Rights: Defendants have the right to be informed of any new charges and to respond accordingly.
2. Legal Proceedings: The case proceeds based on the superseding indictment, which may alter the strategy of both the prosecution and the defense.

Summary of Superseding Indictment No. 09 CR 383:Case Information:

• Case Number: No. 09 CR 383
• Judge: Ruben Castillo
• Type: Superseding Indictment

Violations Cited:

• Title 21, United States Code:
  • Section 841: Relates to the manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing of controlled substances, or possession with intent to do so.
  • Section 846: Concerns attempts or conspiracies to commit any offense defined in this subchapter, including drug trafficking offenses.
  • Section 952(a): Prohibits the importation of controlled substances into the United States.
  • Section 960: Specifies penalties for the importation and exportation of controlled substances.
  • Section 963: Addresses conspiracies to violate any provision of this subchapter, including import and export violations.
• Title 18, United States Code:
  • Section 2: Covers the principle of aiding and abetting, meaning anyone who aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures the commission of an offense against the United States is punishable as a principal.

Key Points:

• Superseding Indictment: This document replaces a previous indictment with updated charges and information.
• Drug-Related Charges: The cited violations primarily relate to drug trafficking, manufacturing, distribution, and importation, as well as conspiracy to commit these offenses.
• Aiding and Abetting: The inclusion of Title 18, Section 2, indicates that individuals involved may have also been charged with assisting or facilitating these crimes.

The defendants:

JOAQUIN GUZMAN-LOERA, 
 a/k/a “El Chapo,” 
 a/k/a “Chapo Guzman,” 
ISMAEL ZAMBADA-GARCIA, 
 a/k/a “El Mayo,”
 a/k/a “Mayo Zambada,”
JESUS VICENTE ZAMBADA-NIEBLA,
 a/k/a “Vicente Zambada-Niebla,”
 a/k/a “Vicente Zambada,”
 a/k/a “Mayito,”
 a/k/a “30 ”
ALFREDO GUZMAN-SALAZAR, 
 a/k/a “Alfredillo,”
ALFREDO VASQUEZ-HERNANDEZ,
 a/k/a “Alfredo Compadre,”
FIRST NAME UNKNOWN, LAST NAME 
UNKNOWN, 
 a/k/a “Juancho,”
GERMAN OLIVARES,
FELIPE LAST NAME UNKNOWN,
TOMAS AREVALO-RENTERIA,
PEDRO FLORES, and 
MARGARITO FLORES

(commercial at 8:05)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

C:\Documents and Settings\rsamborn\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\4MRWRZ20\Chapo-Mayo Indictment DG ed (go.com)

A superseding indictment is a formal legal document issued by a grand jury that replaces a previous indictment in a criminal case. It updates or adds charges, changes the factual basis, or modifies the defendants listed. Here are the key points:Key Features:

1. Replacement: It replaces an earlier indictment with new or revised charges.
2. Additional Charges: It can include additional charges not present in the original indictment.
3. New Defendants: It can add new defendants or modify the charges against existing ones.
4. Updated Information: It reflects new evidence or information obtained during the ongoing investigation.

Purpose:

1. Flexibility: Allows prosecutors to adapt to new developments in the case.
2. Comprehensive Prosecution: Ensures that all relevant charges and defendants are included based on the latest available evidence.
3. Clarity: Provides a clear and updated statement of the charges against the defendants, which is important for legal proceedings and the defense's preparation.

Process:

1. Grand Jury Review: Like the original indictment, a superseding indictment must be reviewed and approved by a grand jury.
2. Filing and Notification: Once approved, it is filed with the court, and the defendants are notified of the changes.

Impact:

1. Defendant's Rights: Defendants have the right to be informed of any new charges and to respond accordingly.
2. Legal Proceedings: The case proceeds based on the superseding indictment, which may alter the strategy of both the prosecution and the defense.

Summary of Superseding Indictment No. 09 CR 383:Case Information:

• Case Number: No. 09 CR 383
• Judge: Ruben Castillo
• Type: Superseding Indictment

Violations Cited:

• Title 21, United States Code:
  • Section 841: Relates to the manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing of controlled substances, or possession with intent to do so.
  • Section 846: Concerns attempts or conspiracies to commit any offense defined in this subchapter, including drug trafficking offenses.
  • Section 952(a): Prohibits the importation of controlled substances into the United States.
  • Section 960: Specifies penalties for the importation and exportation of controlled substances.
  • Section 963: Addresses conspiracies to violate any provision of this subchapter, including import and export violations.
• Title 18, United States Code:
  • Section 2: Covers the principle of aiding and abetting, meaning anyone who aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures the commission of an offense against the United States is punishable as a principal.

Key Points:

• Superseding Indictment: This document replaces a previous indictment with updated charges and information.
• Drug-Related Charges: The cited violations primarily relate to drug trafficking, manufacturing, distribution, and importation, as well as conspiracy to commit these offenses.
• Aiding and Abetting: The inclusion of Title 18, Section 2, indicates that individuals involved may have also been charged with assisting or facilitating these crimes.

The defendants:

JOAQUIN GUZMAN-LOERA, 
 a/k/a “El Chapo,” 
 a/k/a “Chapo Guzman,” 
ISMAEL ZAMBADA-GARCIA, 
 a/k/a “El Mayo,”
 a/k/a “Mayo Zambada,”
JESUS VICENTE ZAMBADA-NIEBLA,
 a/k/a “Vicente Zambada-Niebla,”
 a/k/a “Vicente Zambada,”
 a/k/a “Mayito,”
 a/k/a “30 ”
ALFREDO GUZMAN-SALAZAR, 
 a/k/a “Alfredillo,”
ALFREDO VASQUEZ-HERNANDEZ,
 a/k/a “Alfredo Compadre,”
FIRST NAME UNKNOWN, LAST NAME 
UNKNOWN, 
 a/k/a “Juancho,”
GERMAN OLIVARES,
FELIPE LAST NAME UNKNOWN,
TOMAS AREVALO-RENTERIA,
PEDRO FLORES, and 
MARGARITO FLORES

(commercial at 8:05)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

C:\Documents and Settings\rsamborn\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\4MRWRZ20\Chapo-Mayo Indictment DG ed (go.com)