Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Two Cases in Which the Plaintiffs Seek to Overturn the Chevron Judicial Deference Framework: Who Will Win and What Does It Mean? Part II
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Two Cases in Which the Plaintiffs Seek to Overturn the Chevron Judicial Deference Framework: Who Will Win and What Does It Mean? Part II
On January 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases in which the question presented is whether the Court should overrule its 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. That decision produced what became known as the "Chevron judicial deference framework" - the two-step analysis that courts typically invoke when reviewing a federal agency's interpretation of a statute. This two-part episode repurposes our webinar held in February 2024 and brings together as our guests three renowned administrative law professors, Kent Barnett, Jack Beermann, and Craig Green, and a leading Supreme Court practitioner, Carter Phillips, all of whom are experts on Chevron. In Part II, our guests share their reactions to the oral arguments, including their views on what the Justices' questions and comments reveal about the Justices' thinking, their predictions for how the Court will rule, and potential implications of the Court's ruling on existing and future regulations.
Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel in Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group, leads the discussion.
View all episodes
By Ballard Spahr LLP
4.9
4545 ratings
On January 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases in which the question presented is whether the Court should overrule its 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. That decision produced what became known as the "Chevron judicial deference framework" - the two-step analysis that courts typically invoke when reviewing a federal agency's interpretation of a statute. This two-part episode repurposes our webinar held in February 2024 and brings together as our guests three renowned administrative law professors, Kent Barnett, Jack Beermann, and Craig Green, and a leading Supreme Court practitioner, Carter Phillips, all of whom are experts on Chevron. In Part II, our guests share their reactions to the oral arguments, including their views on what the Justices' questions and comments reveal about the Justices' thinking, their predictions for how the Court will rule, and potential implications of the Court's ruling on existing and future regulations.
Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel in Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group, leads the discussion.
More shows like Consumer Finance Monitor
View all
Freakonomics Radio
32,106 Listeners
Planet Money
30,635 Listeners
The NPR Politics Podcast
25,880 Listeners
Marketplace
8,712 Listeners
On the Media
9,188 Listeners
Political Gabfest
8,460 Listeners
Bloomberg Law
375 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,285 Listeners
The Daily
112,499 Listeners
Bold Names
1,448 Listeners
Today, Explained
10,226 Listeners
Throughline
16,240 Listeners
The Ezra Klein Show
15,991 Listeners
The Consumer Finance Podcast
10 Listeners
RegFi Podcast
13 Listeners