
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yes, we came up with a pithy name we are sure will catch on for the new and VERY consequential US sentencing guideline amendment which allows a 2-level reduction for those with zero criminal history points and who aren't excluded based on several listed criterion.
This amendment is a BIG DEAL, and will be retroactive, potentially impacting thousands of inmates in the BOP, and countless clients currently facting sentencing in federal court.
But, some of the language is ambiguious and you must arm yourself with the right legal ammunition and also remember to preserve the issue for appeal. To that end, bear with as, as we go waaay into the legal weeds by engaging in a mind-numbing conversation about whether "and" really means "and" as it appears in criterion 10 (leader/organizer exclusion) of the new "ZIPPO" guideline exclusion provisions.
Necessary as this is, it's exactly the kind of mental masturbation that gives me flashbacks to LSATs and law school final exams and makes me wanna throw up in my mouth.
So, to compensate, I barfed up a dumb song about the whole thing. If you make it past the end credits, you'll hear my debut musical performance on this podcast. As Maximus Decimus Meridius famously says, "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED???!!!".
Yes, this might be the moment where you say Set For Sentencing officially jumped the shark. I can live with that.
IN THIS EPISODE:
OTHER LINKS:
We did a general podcast on all of the major new guideline amendments. We zeroed in on the ZIPPO here b/c it's so important, but if you want a broader view, check out this ep:
https://dougpassonlaw.com/podcast/big-guideline-changes-on-the-horizon-with-mark-allenbaugh/
By Doug Passon5
3030 ratings
Yes, we came up with a pithy name we are sure will catch on for the new and VERY consequential US sentencing guideline amendment which allows a 2-level reduction for those with zero criminal history points and who aren't excluded based on several listed criterion.
This amendment is a BIG DEAL, and will be retroactive, potentially impacting thousands of inmates in the BOP, and countless clients currently facting sentencing in federal court.
But, some of the language is ambiguious and you must arm yourself with the right legal ammunition and also remember to preserve the issue for appeal. To that end, bear with as, as we go waaay into the legal weeds by engaging in a mind-numbing conversation about whether "and" really means "and" as it appears in criterion 10 (leader/organizer exclusion) of the new "ZIPPO" guideline exclusion provisions.
Necessary as this is, it's exactly the kind of mental masturbation that gives me flashbacks to LSATs and law school final exams and makes me wanna throw up in my mouth.
So, to compensate, I barfed up a dumb song about the whole thing. If you make it past the end credits, you'll hear my debut musical performance on this podcast. As Maximus Decimus Meridius famously says, "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED???!!!".
Yes, this might be the moment where you say Set For Sentencing officially jumped the shark. I can live with that.
IN THIS EPISODE:
OTHER LINKS:
We did a general podcast on all of the major new guideline amendments. We zeroed in on the ZIPPO here b/c it's so important, but if you want a broader view, check out this ep:
https://dougpassonlaw.com/podcast/big-guideline-changes-on-the-horizon-with-mark-allenbaugh/

8,485 Listeners

3,566 Listeners

87,500 Listeners

112,882 Listeners

2,350 Listeners

32,358 Listeners

7,216 Listeners

12,558 Listeners

8,113 Listeners

5,823 Listeners

16,223 Listeners

10,522 Listeners

434 Listeners

7,097 Listeners

996 Listeners