Send us a text
From the atonement understanding of recapitulation propounded by Irenaeus the second century Bishop of Smyrna, to the theory of satisfaction expounded in the eleventh century by Anselm of Canterbury, the biblical understanding of atonement has not been without its fair share of exponents. In the ensuring years from Irenaeus, there has been theories of ransom, moral influence, governmental, healing and kaleidoscope; including major debates centred around christus victor and penal substitution. Where does the common ground lay if any, and does it really matter?
This week Pete and the Curious Team will be diving into the various views of the atonement, seeking to draw the essential truths to the surface. Despite the many opinions and emphasis, the atonement remains a rich and wonderfully powerful truth of scripture. In this weeks episode the team seeks to cut through the multiple ideas to land on some central elements key to every atonement theory
Recommended Reading:
The Curious team have sifted through a heap of reading on the atonement. Not all the following titles express the individual views of the team, but provide a cross section of opinion. Here are a few of their recommendations;
The Cross of Christ - John Stott
The Mediator - Emil Brunner
The Crucifixion - Fleming Rutledge
Pierced For Our Transgressions - Steve Jeffery, Mike Ovey and Andrew Sach
Atonement - Eleonore Stump
In My Place Condemned He Stood - J I Packer and Mark Dever
The Death of Christ - James Denny
The Work of Christ - P T Forsyth
Where Wrath and Mercy Meet - David Peterson
Send your questions or thoughts to: [email protected]
Support us on Instagram @theologyforthecurious
Find us on TikTok: @theologyforthecurious