Think About It with Michael Leppert

A friend sent me a link to an episode of "Pod Save America" on Sunday with the short message, "This is worth your time." The podcast is a favorite among the left, hosted by a small group of former Obama advisers who describe the show as being for people "who are not ready to give up or go insane." I have occasionally listened to it, but frankly, I didn't want to give it an entire, torturous hour of my precious weekend.

A few hours later, I find myself in the middle of a project: learning about the "abundance agenda." Jon Favreau hosted the episode featuring authors Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson and a discussion of their new book, "Abundance." The blurb describes it as "a once-in-a-generation, paradigm-shifting call to renew a politics of plenty, face up to the failures of liberal governance, and abandon the chosen scarcities that have deformed American life."

The challenge in that description is obvious. Liberals have to face up to their failures? Oh no, anything but that!

Commentary and polling data of late is showing a frustration toward what appears to be a void of leadership on the left. It's a predictable cycle following an election like the one that happened five months ago. The other side won. Electoral minorities don't get inaugurated. They don't have black-tie galas to celebrate their defeat and anoint the poohbah of the resistance either. In the spring following an election like 2024, it is customary for the losing team to still be searching for its recovery plan.

However, this moment is clearly different than that typical spring-after. American institutions are being decimated by a Trump administration not because of some ideology or consensus-based ambition of the GOP, but simply for the joy of the decimation itself. Resisting, effective resisting is what the Democrat faithful seem to be demanding more than anything.

Democrats, and mathematically, the majority of Americans, can vividly see what it doesn't like happening in Washington. What is less clear to both leaders and followers of progressive politics is what the proactive alternative should be. Abundance, as an agenda, could become that alternative.

Basically, the agenda is that blue cites and blue states need to govern better, but not just for the sake of governing. Klein explains on the podcast that abundance, as an agenda, attempts to answer this simple but important question: "what don't we have enough of and how do we get it?"

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

Henry Reider is a young man from Sierra Leone who recently and miraculously survived tuberculosis. Using the words "recently" and "miraculously" to describe his recovery from a disease that has had a preventive vaccine since 1921 and a cure since 1943 is reason enough to become obsessed with the question: why?

"Everything is Tuberculosis: The History and Persistence of Our Deadliest Infection" is not a book I would choose to read under normal circumstances. Outside of the medical community or those afflicted with it, who would? I am hopeful that, for starters, it will be read by the same people who put other John Green books on the bestseller lists. And then growing from that unusual initial gathering of readers, it reaches the souls of every individual who needs to read it.

Green met Reider and his mother several years ago on a trip to the west African nation, and the families have become friends. Green's son, not to mention his famous brother, is also named Henry, which has led Reider to refer to both as the "namesakes," in their regular calls since his recovery. All of the components of that recovery serve as the primary human story and the vehicle for the latest great book in Green's library of greats.

Reider's story is fascinating, especially when told by one of the great storytellers of our time. But the history and the evolution of responses to the infection is the real star here. From the now ridiculous sounding strategies and treatments of it, to the way cities and even states, like New Mexico, were developed in large part to combat the infection, are all expertly detailed. Even fashion trends would evolve and modify based on what can only today be seen as irrational theories on how infections function.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

Sun Tzu, the former Chinese general, military strategist and philosopher, is known for his treatise, "The Art of War." It's remarkable how valuable the writings, believed to have been written in the 5th century BC, continue to be today. Forget the arguments about whether he is the one who wrote it and when. It doesn't matter. The lessons are simple, and they still work.

I cannot recall a legislative decision as ridiculous as the one made Friday by New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and the Senate Democratic Caucus he leads. After weeks of articulating the awful things contained in the Republican version of the budget continuing resolution, or CR, he abandoned his position at crunch time and chose to give it enough votes to pass. Democrats gained, let me count, zero things in exchange for their acquiescence.

Two days earlier, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, told NBC News, "Democrats had nothing to do with this bill. And we want an opportunity to get an amendment vote or two. And so that's what we are insisting on." Apparently not for long.

One of Sun Tzu's principles of war is to seize opportunity. Democrats failed that one.

They seized nothing by conceding to the Republicans here. Absolutely nothing. Schumer's stated reasoning for caving was that a shutdown would create opportunity for the White House to do even more unconstitutional and damaging things. Donald Trump and Elon Musk weren't asking congress for permission before Friday's vote. Now that the shutdown has been averted, they still aren't.

I think the mere existence of the filibuster is dumb, and I always have. The 60-vote necessity to proceed, particularly on CRs, served Republicans well throughout Joe Biden's presidency. Likewise, it should have been used last week by the Democrats to either block the CR or to gain concessions by using it as leverage. It's the reason it exists. Neither happened.

Worse yet, Schumer and the Democrats gave the Republican budget package ten votes, when all the concession required was seven. By giving the GOP three more votes than they needed, it gave Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, the freedom to vote no on the package for his personal, political reason that the package doesn't reduce debt. That's simply malpractice.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

I teach storytelling, though the official titles of the classes are things like presentations, writing or speech for business. But on the first day of school in all of my classes, I put a slide on the screen with this quote from the late Steve Jobs: "The most powerful person in the world is the storyteller." Then I ask my new students if they believe that or not

Jason Isbell is one of America's greatest storytellers, and yes, he's on one of my first day of school slides too. His latest album, "Foxes in the Snow," was released Friday morning, and in my opinion, it's his best album yet. I was predisposed to loving this one because the production is stripped down to nothing but Isbell, his guitar and a microphone. I first became a fan because of the words he writes. Then I noticed he is an incredible guitarist. I love this album most because that's all we get. The best songs are always at their best in their simplest of forms.

On "Foxes," Isbell tells the Wall Street Journal: "There's a lot of heavy stuff on the record, and it felt private…I didn't really want anybody else in the room for that." Listeners get to join him there.

I'm not sure this stuff is any heavier than usual, but I get why it's heavier for him. His recent divorce, his new love interest and his new part time residency in New York City are detailed throughout the song list. What seems to make it heavy is that this is a new world for Isbell, filled with disappointment and excitement, but most of all, newness.

That's what I hear in all of these songs, particularly in "Open and Close," in which he sums up the description of his new life with the declaration, "it's time to be brave."

What I am trying to get my students to achieve with their audiences is connection. That sounds like a vague, generic term when they hear me use it the first time. But as should be expected, there is a scientific term for it, known as "neural coupling." This is "the literal synchrony in brain states between speaker and listener. When you're the speaker, your goal is to replicate the same pattern of brain activity that you have in your head inside the head of your conversational partner," as described by Dr. Matt Johnson in Psychology Today.

I don't feel the specific pain of Isbell's divorce or the specific excitement of his new love, but I mirror many of the components of his emotional state that come from facing a new world. Specifically, the pressure that is felt from the need to be brave.

This is why storytelling is so powerful.

Amanda Zurawski never had plans to describe a profoundly personal slice of her life on a big stage. Yet she was at the Buskirk-Chumley Theater in Bloomington on Friday for a screening of "Zurawski v Texas," the 2024 documentary about her battle for women's reproductive rights.

The film's synopsis captures what has become a familiar modern story: "Women denied abortions under Texas' ambiguous and unforgiving abortion bans band together with a fearless attorney to sue Texas." The fearlessness is the thing that connected with me.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

I left public service in 2002. The experiences of the thirteen years I spent as an employee of the State of Indiana help define me. On paper, my career path wouldn't make immediate sense to most people today. But it makes perfect sense to me. Why? Primarily because I enjoyed serving the public, and importantly, I was good at it. People thanked me for my service when I left.

In less than two months since the inauguration of President Donald Trump, approximately 75,000 federal employees accepted a buyout package offered by the new administration and voluntarily left public service. Another 30,000 have been fired. For context, Delta Airlines employs 100,000 people, and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. employs 107,500.

This will cause significant and widespread suffering in predictable and unpredictable ways. Americans will feel this, one way or another. Even in the post-trust era, this is one thing we can all count on. And Trump and Elon Musk are just getting started.

Included in those breathtaking numbers are individual people who were doing important things, vital things, even life-saving things that are no longer being done. An excellent example is "Emily," a recently terminated lab technician who worked at the National Institutes of Health. She worked in a cancer research lab, and she worries what these cuts will mean to people who need the treatments NIH is, or was, developing. "People will lose their lives," she said in an interview with the NBC local affiliate in Washington.

Also commenting was White House spokesperson Kush Desai. He said, "The Trump administration is committed to slashing waste, fraud, and abuse while increasing transparency of where limited taxpayer dollars from NIH are going and how exactly they're advancing scientific research and development." The "waste, fraud, and abuse" bit is the go-to storyline for the entire enterprise of this profoundly troubling cleansing of public servants. And while that spin is becoming the new Big Lie, adding the phrase "increasing transparency" makes it even more absurd.

In Indiana, Luke Britt, the state's longest serving public access counselor, stepped down last week after 12 years in the role following changes to his office by state lawmakers this time last year, as reported by WFYI. Prior to last year's legislation, Britt's office was designed to construe disputes about public access to government records in favor of government transparency. His office was created in 1999 in response to public outcry for exactly that, transparency.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

There are so many stars and influencers surrounding us these days, it's difficult for the uncool to keep up. I don't know exactly when I crossed over into that territory, but I'm guessing it was shortly after my first son was born. He celebrated his 30th birthday this month.

Back when I was cool, reading was not among the reasons. Now, it might be the coolest thing I do.

In my youth, Dolly Parton wasn't cool. She was originally a country and bluegrass musician, which in the world of my youth, was cool's opposite. But after her singing voice slowly became embedded in the fabric of America, her cultural voice followed. That voice is cool as it gets.

Parton started the Imagination Library in 1995 for the children within her home county in East Tennessee, not far from my childhood home. The program delivers one age-appropriate book per month to children five-years old and younger. To recipients, the books arrive via U.S. Mail, free of charge. Do the math. That's as many as 60 books in a personal library of each participating child. There is no catch, no burden, no problem.

But as the uncool know so well, nothing is truly free. Books cost money, and thirty years since the program started in one county, it is now available in five countries and gives millions of free books each month to children around the world. It's an intricate operation, involving a long list of operational and funding partners to make it all happen.

Indiana is one of 21 statewide partners in the U.S., though the partnership is now threatened by the Indiana House's recently passed budget. In 2023, the legislature approved a $6 million expenditure in its budget for the program. That's a budget item big enough to notice, and small enough that cutting it can't possibly be celebrated. I am unaware of any public discussion about discontinuing the appropriation during the first half of this year's legislative session.

So, when the House passed its budget last week and the funding was surprisingly gone, the silence about it ended. I learned about it first from the national media. "We are hopeful that Gov. (Mike) Braun and the Indiana legislature will continue this vital investment by restoring the state's funding match for local Imagination Library programs," Jeff Conyers, president of the Dollywood foundation, said in a statement to the Daily Beast.

Conyers was not hysterical about it. He was cool. And while Braun responded quickly to the call out coming from an organization with a big name on it, I found the response to be less than cool, even cold.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

An abundance of adjectives can be used to describe the first 30 days of the second Trump administration. "Chaotic" would be my first choice. But Thesaurus.com provides a list of synonyms to consider in my search for the perfect word. The six strongest matches to my top choice also work. "Tumultuous" or "turbulent?" Yes. "Disorganized" or "helter-skelter?" Ditto. "Lawless" and "anarchic" are the others on that short list, and yes, they both sadly apply as well.

This first month has not been about egg prices or healthcare. Nor has it been about education or justice. And though headlines are big about Ukraine and Gaza, those too are merely components of what today's true battle is really all about: turf.

America is in the midst of a turf war. It's so old-school, most don't even recognize it for what it is. But when Trump's new leadership at the Department of Justice eviscerated the Republican team in its Southern District of New York to force the dismissal of the corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams, the White House was seizing the local government of the city.

The case against Adams is, or was, about as open and shut as possible. Turkish nationals were pumping campaign funds and luxury travel to the mayor and were receiving favors in return in several easily traceable instances. The corrupt relationship began when Adams was the president of the New York borough of Brooklyn. It intensified during his mayoral campaign, and it continued after he took office. The SDNY has or had the goods on him.

So, what is the motivation for Team Trump to dismiss a corruption case against a prominent Democrat? Again, with the word calisthenics, an oft used political descriptor would be "leverage." But I think that word is a soft, understatement.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

February 12, 2025

I have been thinking about Winston Churchill since Donald Trump announced his planned seizure of the board of trustees of the Kennedy Center last Friday.

In 1938, Churchill said, "The Prime Minister (Neville Chamberlain) …has reminded us of the old saying that it is by art man gets nearest to the angels and farthest from the animals."

On the floor of the Indiana Senate last Thursday, Minority Leader Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, made a point of order just before the vote on Senate Bill 289. The bill would create a series of prohibitions and requirements regarding diversity, equity and inclusion programs in Indiana. It's a conglomeration of poorly developed ideas that chaotically attempt to send a message to Hoosiers that the undefined "woke" ideology is being put down in the state for good. It's a bad-idea bill that is written poorly enough that even four Republicans voted against it.

I am certain I will write about the awfulness of this bill in future columns. Today, I will just label it as a collection of pretzel-like twists of racist gestures designed to comfort a constituency who has demonized DEI programs before bothering to learn what they are. Stay tuned for more on the substance of it.

In the midst of the three-hour Senate debate on SB 289, Lt. Governor Micah Beckwith posted this to his campaign Facebook page: "Indiana just TORPEDOED Woke Indoctrination!" The post goes on about how the rebellion of equal rights has been put down, and how "the left is LOSING IT." It's the kind of post to more likely come from a MAGA-cult member standing in line to get into a Lee Greenwood concert. Except it wasn't. It came from the President of the Indiana Senate, in reference to legislation that was being debated on the Senate floor at that very moment.

And it was written in past tense, as if the vote and the outcome had already occurred. It was at least two hours early.

In Indiana, the lieutenant governor is the nonvoting, presiding officer of the Senate. He or she manages the process and is assisted by a parliamentarian to assure the process is followed in accordance with the state's constitution and the rules of the Senate. From 1989 through 2004, a Democrat presided over the Republican controlled body. Awkward, right?

Nope. Not at all. Both of those former governors, Frank O'Bannon and Joe Kernan, in their roles as lieutenant governor, did their jobs with a commitment to statesmanship and respect for the body. It is not what either man will be remembered for, primarily because it didn't take great restraint or character to simply do the damn job as our citizenry has come to expect. And by the way, every Republican LG, dating back to at least 1980, has done the same.

Today, that is apparently too much to ask of Micah Beckwith. He would rather use the position to garner attention for himself, even if it means prejudging outcomes while he presides.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

February 5, 2024 It's an old joke, and though I made a reasonable effort to track down the original source, I failed. However, I did find that early versions of it, dating back to at least 1930, centered on indecent proposals for sex. Not surprisingly, and nearly a century later, the anecdote often is aptly applied to policy dealmaking negotiations in legislative bodies across America. Skipping the indecency of the set-up, this is a family friendly column after all, a version of the punchline goes like this: "We've already established what we are. Now, we're just haggling over the price." Healthcare debates in the Indiana Statehouse are primarily an exercise in "haggling over the price." But like the original version of the joke, the more important part of the debate really is the "establishing what we are" part. Whitney Downard, reporter for the Indiana Capital Chronicle, succinctly reported last week on a hearing of the Indiana Senate Committee on Health and Provider Services that featured five legislative proposals moving forward that were almost entirely about the price. The bills dealt with financial incentives for patient referrals, tracking the average negotiated charge between healthcare providers and insurers, non-compete agreements for physicians, prior authorization of care by insurers, and finally, two bills regarding pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs. Whew. I read the story several times and still don't see the part about Hoosiers getting healthier. The most important part of the healthcare debate often doesn't even come up in the rooms where decisions are being made: What can we do to live healthier lives? Anyone who believes that either Indiana or America will magically become healthier by resolving all the debates about price first, should also be shopping for Jack's beanstalk beans. Establishing "the price" isn't the mission. Improving the public's overall health is.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert

Michael Leppert is an author, educator and a communication consultant in Indianapolis. He writes about government, politics and culture at MichaelLeppert.com.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Indiana Citizen or any other affiliated organization.

January 29, 2025

The word Indiana is literally defined as "the land of the Indians." When Congress divided the Northwest Territory in 1800, it named the western section the Indiana Territory, and when it became a state in 1816, Indiana became its name.

In 2025, new Governor Mike Braun, in his first budget proposal in office, proposes to end funding for the Native American Indian Affairs Commission. The cut comes as part of his 15% cut to the Indiana Civil Rights Commission. That may sound like a lot of money, but it isn't. The state is spending less than $3 million a year on the ICRC in the current budget.

A new governor's first budget proposal is uniquely important. Voters' eyes often glaze over when this part of governing comes up, and I get that. But budgets are where we as a people proclaim what matters to us. Though the legislature must enact the two-year spending plan, governors generally propose them at the beginning of the law-writing session. The first budget proposal from a newly elected governor is a marker. It defines his priorities to us, and in this case, aptly defines his character as well.

On January 6, 2025, outgoing Governor Eric Holcomb signed a government-to-government agreement with the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians. Holcomb said in a news release, "I've sincerely enjoyed learning about Pokagon history and culture as well as getting to know and work with Chairman (Matthew) Wesaw." The state has a relationship with the federally recognized tribe, and our now former governor treated it with respect.

Times have apparently changed.

Connect with Michael Leppert

Visit michaelleppert.com to read the full post and links to any resources or articles mentioned.

Twitter @michaelleppert

Facebook at Michael Leppert