thinkfuture: technology, philosophy and the future

thinkfuture: technology, philosophy and the future

By chris kalaboukisBusinessManagement
Download on the App Store

thinkfuture: technology, philosophy and the future episodes

  • 299 Innovation in Health Care with Aidan Petrie New England Medical Innovation Center

    I interview Aidan Petrie (112 patents), who runs the New England Medical Innovation Center. We discuss where the health care industry is going in the United States and globally, how we are seeing more systems as opposed to single-purpose devices, how the lines are blurred between devices that need to go through the standard FDA process and which don't. It's a surprise to me that even with all of the strides we've made to speed things up - there is still a lot of time and money involved in bringing a new product to market. NEMIC addresses the need for companies in the space with great clinical value to navigate the path to product. Plus, he invented the EASY button. ;) Final Message: Go Big or Go Home.

    LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aidan-petrie-4311b86

    NEMIC: https://www.nemicenter.com/who-we-are

    54 min
  • 298 Success Vs. Solutions with Luther Brewster from Roseman University of Health Sciences

    Dr. Luther Brewster has spent the past 15 years launching health professional schools, developing community-based medicine curriculums and healthcare delivery models that would facilitate evolution in healthcare. Currently, he is a member of an executive leadership team recruited to Roseman University of Health Sciences to create a new medical school for the Southern Nevada region. 


    linkedin: linkedin.com/in/lubrewster

    twitter: supaluo


    Academic Ventures: 

    GENESIS: GENESIS.Roseman.edu

    The Academy: www.valuehealth.fiu.edu


    Private ventures: 

    hmbl hmblhealth.com

    Synnova Health: Synnovahealth.com

    55 min
  • 297 Thinktank Your Startup Economist Badri Gopalakrishnan From Infinite Sum Modeling

    An interesting wide-ranging interview with Economist Badri Gopalakrishnan from Infinite Sum Modeling

    • Technological progress tends to be retarded by policy 
    • Does technology or policy drive innovation?
    • How policy can negatively affect innovation
    • Technology is powerful but is only part of the picture
    • Policy always lags technological progress - but it doesn't need to be so
    • Startups don't have to fight policy
    • They should work with policymakers and competitors
    • Would Uber's path have been smoother if they worked with the taxi unions?
    • Economic models drive most pricing everywhere
    • Blockchain and Farming  - gap on how to apply technologies
    • Emotions typically overtake reality when it comes to technological progress
    • Permissionless innovation is still valid, but it can be done better
    • Disruptive technologies never come from policy, but it can drive policy if it grabs share fast enough
    •  Constant battles between disruptive innovation and policy - can these work together?
    • Startups should also be a thinktank - to deeply understand the implications of a startups business prior to creating an adversarial relationship with existing players in the space
    • AI startups could provide mitigation plans for possible future job loss
    • How to move to a collaborative environment from an adversarial environment
    • Global trade and China - differentiate the people from the state - the regime is challenging and authoritarian
    • China: IP issues and supply chain issues - startups without resources should probably stay away
    • Free trade may drop into blocks - 3D printers will likely eliminate the requirement to manufacture in other countries
    • 3D printing and robotics manufacturing will change the shape of trade worldwide
    • If there is no skill upgrading, then we may need to implement UBI
    • What do you do with the "unemployables" - outside of the high tech folks, we still need personal service folks
    • UBI is definitely coming - its happening in many places already - India has already experimented with UBI
    • Countries will likely become more protectionist - more free trade BUT more reciprocity
    • 1 hr
    • 296 the future of crm and cx with martin schneider of sugarcrm

      http://hellofuture.co 

       i interview martin schneider, the head of corporate strategy at sugarcrm. we cover the future of crm and customer experience. we talk working from anywhere, how ai can help people sell and get what they want, how big data can change things, talent acquisition, how ai can pre-emptively get us jobs, mates, and stuff, intentional communications, and much more.  

      https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinaschneider/

      54 min
    • 294 EXTRA less competition = less capitialism = less innovation

      Good morning everyone, and welcome to the thinkfuture podcast. I'm your host, Crystal Palace, and once again, we're coming in July from deep in the heart of Silicon Valley, California. Now I ask you. Do you find that innovation has stalled lately? The innovation has run up against a brick wall and doesn't seem to be getting anywhere. And I wonder if that has something to do with us stepping away from the concept of competition. Now in a capitalistic system in a capitalist system, competition is what drives everything. Competition drive sales drive profitability drives adoption of new products; it drives everything, but for some reason, over the last little while, we've all stepped back and decided that you know, maybe competition isn't a fat good thing anymore.

      Perhaps we shouldn't focus on doing better or getting better or advancing ourselves are grabbing market share. Whatever I mean, some companies are doing that look at something like Amazon Amazon's pretty cutthroat about it. But there's plenty of other companies who are stepping back and looking at other things in looking at it in a more holistic way they're looking at their employees well being they're looking at employee they're looking at there. Customers they're looking at social justice. They're looking at all these different factors that have nothing to do with being competitive. They'd instead take. Political positions then focus on competition focused on execution, focus on their products, and services focus on being the best possible product at the best possible price in the best possible space to capture that customer. In short, they're stepping away. From capitalism, they're stepping away from capitalism and not making profits the business's driving motives there. I mean, it's still there, but I find it's getting less and less critical. Those companies who don't have this as the business driver that they're not competing effectively and efficiently against their customers are going to die, I'm sorry. I'm sorry, but you know all of the social justice stuff is excellent. All of this thinking about things outside of profitability is great. However, it's dangerous. It's dangerous ground, especially considering the current economic situation that we're in.

      We need to re-up our focus on innovation; we need to re-up our emphasis on profitability. We need to re-up our emphasis on competition on driving our competitors into the ground. I mean, it sounds cruel. It sounds horrible. But the reality is that that's what capitalism is. That's what business is. Capitalism business is based on the meter; it's survival of the fittest, and the company that does the best will win. I mean, look at what's happening right now with the coronavirus. A company like Amazon and E. commerce online companies like Amazon is taking it to the bank. They're doing amazingly great because they are focusing on taking advantage of the crisis and driving more profitability driving more services using that ability that they have to ship things to the customer to capture that market share away from other companies now, some of you may be going all my god that's horrible, but if you're an Amazon shareholder, you're probably going yes yes yes as a thing shoots up over above 3000 percent $3000 a share

      6 min
    • 293 EXTRA innovation is meaningless
      • Do you feel that innovation is meaningless?
      • An actual quote from the leader of an innovation group "At this point, thinking about the future is meaningless"
      • Falling back on short-term thinking is a mistake
      • They don't see the ramifications of this
      • Look beyond the crisis - surf on it or hide under it
      • Take the crisis and use it as an opportunity for your company to grow
      • Example: we learn to eliminate commuting due to COVID: which leads to healthier employees, an improved environment, and lower facility costs.
      • 7 min
      • 292 EXTRA the jobs to be done theory of innovation
        • Why do disruptive innovation efforts fail so often?
        • Is innovation all about meeting customer desires?
        • JTBD Theory creates a "job description" of the customer's desires
        • There is the "job" and "how is the job done" 
        • Similar to things I've been talking about
        • There is always a mismatch between demand and supply
        • We can use technology to capture the customer's desire and write a job description for the customer.
        • Once we know the job to be done, we can go on and use technology to fulfill the job to be done
        • 9 min
        • 291 EXTRA are you denying human nature?
          • Are you denying human nature when you design your products?
          • When you try to make humans better, most of the times your efforts fall flat
          • Do you expect too much of your customers? Like rational behavior?
          • It's near impossible to change human nature, so you need to work with it not against it
          • Communism and socialism fail because they expect people to change their essential human natures
          • Acceptance of Reality is sometimes tough for humans to understand
          • We can't stray too far from the norms of human nature
          • 10 min
          • 290 EXTRA Time Is On Your Side
            • 3 Tips on Dealing with Time
            • Firstly, people don't start working on stuff until halfway until it's due
            • For example, if your team has a 4-week deadline, then they won't start working on it in earnest in 2 weeks. So always cut your deadlines in half.
            • Work both expands and contracts to fit the time allotted
            • Secondly, imagine in your mind that the work involved to complete a task is much more than it is.
            • For example, if you imagine a task is going to take 2 weeks, even though it's probably a 1-week task, then you will not feel as stressed when it takes less than 2 weeks
            • Thirdly, always go first. 
            • For example, if you have to present during a conference, take the first slot (or the earliest slot you can), then once you are done, you can relax
            • 8 min

            About thinkfuture: technology, philosophy and the future

            From the publisher's feed

            Welcome to thinkfuture, where host Chris Kalaboukis explores the bold ideas shaping tomorrow. From AI-driven creativity and personal growth to leadership in remote work, this podcast delves into the…