Today, we spotlight a remarkable Scottish-born inventor whose creation revolutionized the way we clean our homes and workplaces. On August 30, 1901, Hubert Cecil Booth, a brilliant engineer, patented his design for the first powered vacuum cleaner that sucked in dust and dirt, retaining it with a filter. This breakthrough would forever change the face of cleaning technology.

Hubert Cecil Booth was born on July 4, 1871, in Gloucester, England, to Scottish parents. After his early education in Gloucester, he went on to study at the City and Guilds Institute in London, where he specialized in civil and mechanical engineering. Booth's career was diverse; he designed everything from Ferris wheels for amusement parks to suspension bridges and even engines for Royal Navy battleships. However, it was his work on the vacuum cleaner that would cement his legacy.

Before Booth's invention, cleaning machines primarily used air to blow dirt away, rather than sucking it in. This method was inefficient and often created more mess than it removed. Booth's eureka moment came in 1901 during a demonstration of an American cleaning machine at the Empire Music Hall in London. The machine blew dust off the chairs, prompting Booth to wonder if reversing the process—sucking in air and filtering out the dust—could be a better solution.

In a rather unconventional test of his theory, Booth placed a handkerchief over a chair cushion in a restaurant, pressed his mouth to it, and tried to suck up the dust. To his amazement, the handkerchief trapped the dirt, proving that suction was the key to effective cleaning. This experiment laid the foundation for his groundbreaking invention.

Booth's first vacuum cleaner, nicknamed the "Puffing Billy," was a large, petrol-powered machine that relied on a piston pump to draw air through a cloth filter. The machine was so bulky that it had to be transported by horse and carriage, with long hoses snaking through windows to reach the rooms inside. Despite its size, the principles behind the "Puffing Billy" remain largely unchanged in today's vacuum cleaners.

The early versions of Booth's vacuum cleaner were not sold directly to consumers. Instead, Booth founded the British Vacuum Cleaner Company (BVCC) and offered cleaning services. His red vans, manned by uniformed operators, became a familiar sight as they roamed the streets of London, offering their services to homes, businesses, and even the Royal Family. Booth's vacuum cleaner gained royal approval when it was used to clean Westminster Abbey before the coronation of King Edward VII in 1902.

While Booth's vacuum cleaner was a marvel of engineering, it was not without its challenges. The noise of the machines drew complaints, and Booth was even fined for frightening horses. Nevertheless, his invention was widely adopted in various industries, from theaters to naval barracks, where it greatly improved hygiene and cleanliness.

On August 30, 1901, Booth received his patent for the vacuum cleaner, solidifying his place in history as the inventor of one of the most important household appliances of the 20th century. Over the following decades, Booth continued to refine his invention, eventually founding the Goblin company, which focused on industrial vacuum cleaners. While his company later lost out to competitors like Hoover in the household market, Booth's impact on the world of cleaning technology remains undeniable.

Booth's legacy extends beyond the vacuum cleaner. His innovative spirit and engineering prowess were recognized throughout his life, though he humbly turned down a knighthood. He passed away in 1955 at the age of 83, leaving behind a legacy of ingenuity and perseverance.

As we remember the events of August 30, 1901, we celebrate Hubert Cecil Booth's contribution to modern life. His invention has not only made our homes and workplaces cleaner but has also inspired countless innovations in technology and engineering.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we delve into a tragic and pivotal event that unfolded on August 29, 1797: the Massacre of Tranent. This somber day in Scottish history saw the brutal suppression of a peaceful protest against conscription, leading to the deaths of several men, women, and even children. The massacre stands as a stark reminder of the lengths to which authorities were willing to go to enforce unpopular laws, and the heavy price that communities paid in their fight for justice and autonomy.

To understand the context of the Massacre of Tranent, we must first look at the broader political climate of the time. In 1797, Britain was deeply embroiled in the French Revolutionary Wars, and the threat of invasion loomed large. To bolster its military forces, the British government introduced the Scottish Militia Act of 1797, which mandated the conscription of 6,000 men from Scotland to serve in the militia. Unlike in England, where militia service was often voluntary, the Scottish Act imposed compulsory service, a deeply unpopular move that sparked widespread resentment and anger among the Scottish population.

The town of Tranent, located in East Lothian, became a focal point for opposition to the Militia Act. The local population, primarily made up of colliers and laborers, vehemently opposed the conscription law, viewing it as an unjust imposition by the government. On August 28, 1797, a group of Tranent residents drew up a proclamation expressing their collective disapproval of the Militia Act. The document was a powerful statement of resistance, asserting their peaceful intentions while also warning that any coercive measures taken by the authorities would make the government responsible for the consequences.

The following day, on August 29, a group of protesters gathered in Tranent to present their proclamation to Major Wight, the commanding officer of the recruitment squad stationed in the town. Among the protesters was Jackie Crookston, a local woman who would become a symbol of the tragic events that were about to unfold. The protesters hoped that their peaceful demonstration would persuade the authorities to reconsider the implementation of the Militia Act in their community.

However, the response from the authorities was anything but peaceful. The proclamation was ignored, and tensions quickly escalated. As the situation grew more heated, the Cinque Ports Light Dragoons, a cavalry regiment stationed in the area, were called in to disperse the crowd. The Dragoons, along with members of the East Lothian Yeomanry, unleashed a brutal attack on the unarmed protesters. The soldiers fired into the crowd, killing several people, including Jackie Crookston. The violence did not end there; as the protesters fled into the surrounding countryside, they were pursued by the Dragoons, who continued to cut down anyone in their path, regardless of their involvement in the protest.

The exact number of casualties remains uncertain, with estimates ranging from a dozen to over twenty people killed, and many more injured. The massacre left the small town of Tranent in shock and mourning. In the aftermath of the violence, reports emerged of further atrocities committed by the soldiers, including acts of rape and looting, which only deepened the sense of outrage and grief among the survivors.

The Massacre of Tranent was not just a local tragedy; it resonated across Scotland and beyond. The event highlighted the deep divisions between the ruling authorities and the working-class communities, and it underscored the extent to which the government was willing to go to enforce its will. The massacre also served as a grim reminder of the dangers of militarization and the potential for violence when the state turns its power against its own people.

In the years that followed, the Massacre of Tranent was remembered as a symbol of resistance against oppression. The town of Tranent continues to honor the memory of those who lost their lives on that fateful day. In 1995, a statue by sculptor David Annand was unveiled in the town center, depicting Jackie Crookston and a child, serving as a poignant reminder of the human cost of the struggle for justice and the right to dissent.

As we reflect on the events of August 29, 1797, let us remember the bravery of those who stood up against an unjust law, and the tragic consequences that followed. The Massacre of Tranent is a chapter in Scottish history that reminds us of the importance of defending our rights and standing up against injustice, no matter the cost.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through history. Tune in tomorrow for another enlightening episode of "This Day in Scottish History." I'm Colin MacDonald, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we turn back the clock to August 28, 1296, a day that marked a significant and somber moment in Scotland's long and tumultuous history. On this day, King Edward I of England, known as "Edward Longshanks" and the "Hammer of the Scots," held a parliament at Berwick-upon-Tweed, where he summoned the Scottish nobility to sign what would become known as the Ragman Rolls.

To understand the gravity of this event, we must first set the stage. In the late 13th century, Scotland was embroiled in a succession crisis following the death of King Alexander III in 1286 and the subsequent death of his heir, Margaret, Maid of Norway, in 1290. With no clear successor, the Scottish crown was left vulnerable. Several claimants, including John Balliol and Robert Bruce, vied for the throne, leading to a period of uncertainty and tension.

In 1291, King Edward I of England was invited to arbitrate the succession dispute, a decision that would have far-reaching consequences. Edward seized this opportunity to assert his authority over Scotland, demanding that the Scottish nobles recognize him as their overlord before he would make his decision. This initial submission was the precursor to what would later unfold at Berwick.

By August 1296, Scotland had suffered significant defeats at the hands of Edward I. Earlier in the year, Edward had captured Berwick, a key strategic stronghold, and forced John Balliol, who had been crowned King of Scots in 1292, to abdicate. Scotland was effectively under English occupation, and Edward was determined to cement his control over the Scottish nobility and gentry.

The parliament held at Berwick on August 28, 1296, was a grim spectacle of submission. Edward I summoned all Scottish landholders to appear before him and sign the Ragman Rolls, a series of documents that recorded their acts of fealty and homage to the English king. This was not a voluntary act of allegiance but one compelled by the overwhelming force of Edward’s military might. The rolls were so named because of the numerous pendent seals attached to them, each representing the coerced loyalty of a Scottish noble or landholder.

The Ragman Rolls are among the most significant documents in Scottish history, not only because of what they represent—the subjugation of the Scottish nobility under English rule—but also because of their lasting legacy. The term "Ragman Roll" itself has become synonymous with a long and rambling list, and it even gave rise to the modern word "rigmarole," which refers to a lengthy and complicated procedure or statement.

The rolls consist of multiple parchments, sewn together and filled with the names of over 1,500 Scottish nobles and landowners, each of whom had been forced to pledge allegiance to Edward I. Among those who signed were some of the most powerful men in Scotland, including Robert the Bruce, the future King of Scots. Despite signing the rolls, many of these men would later rise in defiance against English rule, most notably Bruce himself, who would lead Scotland to victory at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314.

The significance of the Ragman Rolls cannot be overstated. They symbolize a moment of profound humiliation for Scotland, yet they also set the stage for the nation's resurgence. The forced submission of 1296 would eventually give rise to a fierce resistance, as Scots from all walks of life rallied against English domination. The memory of the Ragman Rolls would linger, fueling the desire for independence that would culminate in the Wars of Scottish Independence.

As we reflect on the events of August 28, 1296, we are reminded of the resilience and determination of the Scottish people. The signing of the Ragman Rolls was a dark chapter in Scotland's history, but it was also a prelude to a period of resistance and eventual triumph. The spirit of defiance that emerged in the wake of this submission would shape the course of Scottish history for generations to come.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we dive into the fascinating tale of Deacon William Brodie, whose trial began on this day, the 27th of August, in 1788. Brodie was a man who led a double life that was as intriguing as it was perilous. On the surface, he was a respected cabinetmaker and city councillor in Edinburgh. But beneath that veneer of respectability, he was a cunning and audacious criminal.

Born in Edinburgh on the 28th of September, 1741, Brodie was the son of a prosperous businessman who held the esteemed title of Convenor of Trades in Edinburgh. William inherited his father's trade and quickly made a name for himself as a master craftsman. By 1781, he had risen to the prestigious position of Deacon of the Incorporation of Wrights, a role that not only affirmed his expertise but also placed him on the city’s town council. He was well-liked and moved in the highest circles of Edinburgh society, even rubbing shoulders with the likes of poet Robert Burns and painter Henry Raeburn.

However, this reputable public persona was a mere façade. Brodie's position as a cabinetmaker provided him with unfettered access to the homes of Edinburgh’s elite. He used this access to make wax impressions of the keys to the very locks he was hired to install or repair. By night, he would return to these homes, using the copied keys to gain entry and steal valuables. His criminal endeavors began as early as 1768, when he successfully burgled a bank, making off with £800—a fortune at the time. His illicit gains supported his lavish lifestyle, which included a voracious gambling habit and the maintenance of two mistresses, who were unaware of each other's existence.

Brodie’s downfall began on the night of March 5th, 1788, during a botched robbery at the excise office in Chessels Court, on the Canongate. Along with his accomplices—John Brown, George Smith, and Andrew Ainslie—Brodie had planned to make off with a significant haul. However, the plan was foiled when an excise officer unexpectedly returned to the office. The gang managed to escape, but with only £16—far less than they had hoped for. Realizing the net was closing in on him, Brown, one of Brodie’s accomplices, sought to save his own skin by turning King's Evidence, naming his fellow gang members in exchange for a pardon.

With Brown’s testimony and a cache of duplicate keys found hidden beneath a stone near Salisbury Crags, the authorities quickly rounded up Smith and Ainslie. Brodie, realizing the gravity of his situation, fled Edinburgh. He first made his way to Dover and then to London, where he boarded a ship bound for the Netherlands. However, his attempts to evade capture were in vain. A King’s Messenger, George Williamson, tracked him to Amsterdam, where he was apprehended and brought back to Edinburgh to stand trial.

On the 27th of August, 1788, the trial of Deacon Brodie and George Smith commenced. Despite Brodie’s attempts to maintain his innocence, the evidence against him was overwhelming. Not only had tools of his trade—including copied keys and disguises—been found, but letters he had written while on the run incriminated him further. The jury found both Brodie and Smith guilty, and on the 1st of October, 1788, they were hanged at the Old Tolbooth in Edinburgh before a crowd of 40,000 spectators, including Brodie’s ten-year-old daughter.

The tale of Deacon Brodie did not end with his death. Rumors circulated that he had worn a steel collar and bribed the hangman, hoping to survive the hanging and escape to Paris. Whether these stories were mere legend or had some basis in truth remains a mystery, but they certainly added to the mythos surrounding the man who inspired Robert Louis Stevenson’s famous novella, "Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." Brodie’s life, with its stark contrasts between the respectable and the nefarious, served as the perfect template for Stevenson’s exploration of the duality of human nature.

Today, Deacon Brodie is remembered in Edinburgh not just for his crimes, but also for his complex character. His legacy lives on in the city, with pubs, streets, and even a close named after him, a constant reminder of the man who embodied both the light and dark sides of Edinburgh’s 18th-century society.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we turn our attention to a tragic event in Scotland's industrial past that took place on August 26, 1901. On this day, the Donibristle mining disaster claimed the lives of eight coal miners and rescuers in Fife, Scotland. This disaster is a somber reminder of the dangers that coal miners faced daily during a time when safety measures were far less advanced than they are today.

The Donibristle Colliery, located near Cowdenbeath in Fife, was part of a coalfield that stretched beneath the vast Moss Morran moorland. This mine had been in operation for years, extracting coal from the Mynheer Seam, which lay deep beneath the surface. The coalfield was known for its treacherous conditions, especially given that much of the workings lay beneath a thick layer of peat, known as the Moss, which covered the moorland above.

On that fateful day, two men, David Campbell and Alexander Smith, were working at a heading—essentially an excavation site within the mine—where they were probing upwards with a rod to prepare for the formation of an air shaft. At 1:40 PM, disaster struck. Without warning, the Moss above them suddenly burst into the mine, overwhelming the men with an unstoppable flow of soft peat. The initial inflow of the Moss claimed the lives of Campbell, Smith, and two other miners working in the lower levels of the mine.

The news of the disaster spread quickly, and the first rescue efforts began almost immediately. Two rescue parties were formed, and these brave men descended into the mine, knowing the dangers they faced. The first rescue team, led by Thomas Rattray, the oversman—a position equivalent to a foreman—ventured deep into the mine, hoping to reach the trapped miners. Tragically, Rattray's team was never seen again, their lives claimed by the relentless flow of Moss.

The following day, rescuers succeeded in freeing five miners who had been trapped in the mine for over 24 hours. However, the situation took a turn for the worse when the Moss surged again, trapping two more rescuers, John Jones and John Sheddon, as they attempted to locate the last trapped miner, Alexander Bauld. It wasn't until the early hours of August 29th, three days after the disaster began, that Robert Law, a miner from Cowdenbeath, managed to rescue Jones, Sheddon, and Bauld.

The aftermath of the disaster was grim. A total of eight men lost their lives, including both the miners caught in the initial inflow and the rescuers who perished in their valiant attempts to save their comrades. The bodies of some of the victims were not recovered until months later, as the Moss continued to flow into the mine, making recovery efforts dangerous and difficult.

The official inquiry into the disaster revealed a series of tragic errors and misjudgments. Despite warnings and prior knowledge of the dangerous conditions beneath the Moss, the decision was made to continue mining operations. The probe conducted by the manager and oversman in the preceding year had shown the Moss to be of considerable thickness, and yet, operations were resumed without adequate precautions. The inquiry ultimately concluded that while the owners of the mine bore no direct blame, the management's failure to enforce stricter safety protocols and the oversman's apparent decision to proceed without proper authorization contributed to the tragedy.

The Donibristle disaster stands as a poignant reminder of the perils faced by miners in the early 20th century. The bravery of the rescuers, who risked and ultimately sacrificed their lives in the hope of saving others, is a testament to the human spirit in the face of overwhelming adversity.

As we reflect on the events of August 26, 1901, we honor the memory of the men who lost their lives in the Donibristle disaster. Their sacrifice is a powerful reminder of the need for vigilance and safety in all workplaces, especially in industries as hazardous as coal mining.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we remember a tragic event that took place on August 25, 1972. On this day, the Kilbirnie Street fire in Glasgow claimed the lives of seven brave firefighters. This devastating incident remains one of the most significant losses of life for the UK Fire Service in peacetime.

The Kilbirnie Street fire began in a warehouse used by the Sher Brothers company, located at 70–72 Kilbirnie Street in the Port Eglinton area on the south side of Glasgow. The building, originally constructed as stables in 1899, had been repurposed multiple times over the years. By 1972, it was a cash and carry warehouse for textiles, clothing, and household goods. The building's structure included a ground floor, first floor, and an attic, all connected by internal stairs and a goods lift. The first floor was made of concrete, while the attic floor was a composite of steel and timber, supported by cast iron columns. The layout and stock of the warehouse created a high fire load, which had been noted during fire prevention visits in the months leading up to the disaster.

The fire was discovered around 11:21 am by an employee who saw it starting in the attic. The Glasgow Fire Service received three emergency calls, and within minutes, two water tenders and a turntable ladder were dispatched from South station under the command of Station Officer Carroll. Upon arrival, they found a serious fire in progress with smoke billowing from the building. All staff had evacuated safely, and initial firefighting efforts began under difficult conditions due to thick smoke and the cluttered layout of the premises.

Divisional Officer Quinn soon arrived on the scene and, after assessing the situation, called for additional reinforcements. Despite the efforts to ventilate the building and tackle the blaze, the complexity of the stock and internal partitions made it difficult to locate and combat the fire effectively. By around noon, as the initial crews grew exhausted, more resources, including an emergency tender with additional breathing apparatus and fresh personnel, were brought in.

Around 11:55 am, as conditions inside the building worsened, Divisional Officer Quinn ordered all personnel to evacuate. However, Fireman James Rook, unaware of the order, remained inside to assist with flare-ups in the attic. While trying to extinguish the fire, Rook and an officer were trapped by collapsing stock. The officer managed to escape and raised the alarm, prompting a rescue operation.

Despite the dire situation, Divisional Officer Quinn and a team of firefighters re-entered the building to save Rook. Between 12:05 and 12:20 pm, Quinn, Leading Fireman Alistair Crofts, and Firemen Iain Bermingham, Allan Finlay, William Hooper, and Duncan McMillan attempted the rescue. They found Rook and began to drag him out, but a sudden flashover—a rapid and intense fire spread—engulfed the first floor, causing a structural collapse. This tragic turn of events trapped and ultimately killed the rescuers and Rook.

The aftermath of the fire saw a roll call revealing the missing men, and further rescue attempts were made, but it was clear that the conditions inside the building were too hazardous. The fire was eventually controlled by external firefighting efforts, and the bodies of the fallen firefighters were recovered. The loss of Divisional Officer Quinn, Leading Fireman Crofts, and Firemen Bermingham, Finlay, Hooper, McMillan, and Rook marked one of the darkest days in the history of the Glasgow Fire Service.

In the days that followed, Glasgow mourned the loss of these heroes. Public funerals were held, and the men were laid to rest in the Glasgow Necropolis, with their names added to the memorial for firefighters lost in the Cheapside Street whisky bond fire of 1960. A fatal accident inquiry conducted later concluded that the fire spread rapidly across the hardboard-clad first floor ceiling, leading to the deadly flashover. The bravery and dedication of the men involved were commended, highlighting their selflessness and courage.

As we remember the events of August 25, 1972, we honor the memory of the seven firefighters who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty. Their legacy continues to inspire those who serve in the fire service today.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we turn our attention to a landmark event in the cultural landscape of Scotland and the world—the opening of the first Edinburgh International Festival of Music and Drama, which took place on August 24, 1947. This festival, now known simply as the Edinburgh International Festival, has grown to become one of the most prestigious and influential arts festivals in the world, showcasing the very best in music, theatre, opera, and dance.

The roots of the Edinburgh International Festival are deeply entwined with the aftermath of World War II. The idea for the festival was conceived by a group of visionary individuals who sought to use the arts as a means of healing the wounds of war and promoting international cooperation. Among these visionaries was Rudolf Bing, an Austrian-born opera impresario who had fled the Nazi regime and had served as the general manager of the Glyndebourne Opera Festival. Alongside Bing were arts patron Lady Rosebery, theatre director Sir Tyrone Guthrie, and Audrey Mildmay, wife of Glyndebourne founder John Christie.

Their goal was ambitious: to create a festival that would "provide a platform for the flowering of the human spirit" and enrich the cultural life of Scotland, Britain, and Europe. The city of Edinburgh was chosen as the festival’s home for its rich history, stunning architecture, and its ability to accommodate and welcome large numbers of visitors. The city’s iconic landmarks, such as Edinburgh Castle, provided a dramatic and picturesque backdrop that could rival any other cultural hub in Europe.

Financing the festival was no small feat. It was initially supported by Lord Rosebery, who generously contributed £10,000—winnings from his horse Ocean Swell’s wartime victories in the racing world. This sum was matched by Edinburgh Town Council and further supported by the Arts Council of Great Britain under the chairmanship of the renowned economist John Maynard Keynes. With funding secured, preparations for the inaugural festival began in earnest.

When the first Edinburgh International Festival opened on August 24, 1947, it offered a rich and varied program that set the tone for future festivals. Under Bing's direction, the festival featured performances by leading international artists and companies, including the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, reunited with their conductor Bruno Walter. This was a poignant reunion, as Walter had left Europe following the Nazi annexation of Austria in 1938.

The festival also embraced the diversity of the arts, presenting not only classical music but also opera, ballet, theatre, and even Scottish piping and dancing on the Esplanade of Edinburgh Castle. This broad approach was designed to appeal to a wide audience and establish the festival as a major cultural event that celebrated both international and Scottish traditions.

One of the early triumphs of the festival was its staging of Sir David Lyndsay's "The Thrie Estaites," a seminal work of Scottish drama that had not been performed since the 16th century. The production was met with critical acclaim and marked a revival of interest in Scotland’s own cultural heritage.

The success of the inaugural festival exceeded all expectations. It not only drew audiences from across Britain and Europe but also set the stage for Edinburgh to become a global cultural capital. The festival's influence was immediate and far-reaching, inspiring the creation of several other festivals in the city, including the now-world-famous Edinburgh Festival Fringe, which began as an alternative to the official program.

Over the years, the Edinburgh International Festival has continued to evolve, attracting the world’s greatest artists and performers to its stages. From classical music legends like Yehudi Menuhin and Leonard Bernstein to groundbreaking theatre productions and innovative dance performances, the festival has remained at the forefront of the global arts scene. It has also played a vital role in fostering international cultural exchange, offering audiences a window into the artistic traditions of countries from every continent.

The festival's ability to adapt and innovate has ensured its continued relevance. Whether through the introduction of new art forms, such as contemporary visual arts exhibitions, or the inclusion of cutting-edge digital technology, the Edinburgh International Festival has consistently pushed the boundaries of what an arts festival can be.

As we reflect on the events of August 24, 1947, we celebrate the vision and determination of those who founded the Edinburgh International Festival. Their commitment to the arts and to the idea of cultural unity in the aftermath of war has left a lasting legacy, one that continues to inspire and enrich lives around the world.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we commemorate a somber yet monumental day in Scottish history—August 23, 1305. On this day, Sir William Wallace, one of Scotland's most revered national heroes, was executed by the English, marking the end of his fight in the First War of Scottish Independence. Wallace’s life and legacy, however, have endured far beyond his death, making him a symbol of resistance and the relentless pursuit of freedom.

Born around 1270, Sir William Wallace was a Scottish knight who emerged as one of the principal leaders in the struggle against English rule during the turbulent times of the late 13th century. His early life remains somewhat shrouded in mystery, with conflicting accounts of his upbringing and family background. What is known is that Wallace was a member of the lesser nobility and was drawn into the conflict with England as the political situation in Scotland deteriorated.

The political crisis in Scotland began with the death of King Alexander III in 1286, leaving a power vacuum and a contested succession. The resulting instability and the intervention of King Edward I of England, who sought to assert his authority over Scotland, led to widespread resentment and resistance among the Scots. Wallace, like many of his compatriots, was unwilling to accept English domination and took up arms in defense of his homeland.

Wallace first gained prominence in 1297 with a daring act of defiance—the killing of the English High Sheriff of Lanark, William de Heselrig. This bold move sparked a wider rebellion against the English occupation, and Wallace soon joined forces with Andrew Moray, another leader of the resistance. Together, they achieved a remarkable victory at the Battle of Stirling Bridge on September 11, 1297. Despite being vastly outnumbered, the Scottish forces routed the English army, inflicting a heavy defeat that reverberated throughout the kingdom.

Following the victory at Stirling Bridge, Wallace was appointed Guardian of Scotland, effectively becoming the leader of the Scottish resistance. However, his tenure as Guardian was short-lived. In 1298, the Scots suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Falkirk, where English longbowmen decimated Wallace's forces. Though he survived the battle, Wallace resigned as Guardian, and his influence began to wane as other leaders, including Robert the Bruce, emerged in the fight for Scotland's independence.

Despite the setback at Falkirk, Wallace continued to resist English rule, engaging in guerrilla warfare and seeking support from foreign powers, including the French court. However, his efforts to rally support for the Scottish cause were ultimately unsuccessful. In August 1305, Wallace was betrayed by a fellow Scot, John de Menteith, who handed him over to the English near Glasgow. Wallace was taken to London, where he was put on trial for treason and other charges.

The trial was a farce. Wallace's defense was that he could not be a traitor, as he had never sworn allegiance to King Edward I of England. Nonetheless, the verdict was a foregone conclusion. On August 23, 1305, Wallace was subjected to the brutal execution reserved for traitors—he was hanged, drawn, and quartered. His head was displayed on a pike atop London Bridge, while his limbs were sent to different parts of England and Scotland as a grim warning to others who might defy English rule.

Despite his death, Wallace's legacy endured. He became a symbol of Scottish resistance, immortalized in literature, poetry, and later in film. Blind Harry’s epic poem "The Wallace," written in the 15th century, romanticized his life and deeds, though it took considerable liberties with historical facts. In modern times, Wallace's story was brought to a global audience by the film "Braveheart," although it, too, was more legend than history.

William Wallace's fight for Scotland’s independence laid the groundwork for future struggles, and his name became synonymous with the fight for freedom. The monument at Stirling Bridge, erected in the 19th century, stands as a testament to his enduring legacy, reminding Scots and visitors alike of the price paid for liberty.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we're delving into a dramatic and pivotal event that took place on August 22, 1582, known as the Raid of Ruthven. This event was not just a mere power struggle but a significant chapter in the turbulent history of Scotland's monarchy and its relationship with the country's nobility.

The Raid of Ruthven was a political conspiracy orchestrated by a group of powerful Scottish nobles who sought to control the young King James VI. The key figures behind this bold move were the Earls of Gowrie and Mar, along with several other Presbyterian lords who were alarmed by the growing influence of Catholicism and the French, represented primarily by James’s favorite, Esmé Stewart, Duke of Lennox, and James Stewart, Earl of Arran. The conspirators, driven by a mixture of religious zeal, political ambition, and concern over the future of Scotland, decided to act.

The stage was set on August 22, 1582, while King James VI was hunting near the Castle of Ruthven in Perthshire. The Ruthven Lords, as they became known, saw this as their opportunity. Seizing the moment, they abducted the king and took him to Ruthven Castle. The next day, on August 23, they presented James with a lengthy "supplication" that detailed their reasons for this audacious act. The document argued that their actions were necessary to protect Scotland from foreign influence and to ensure the king's proper governance.

James VI, only 16 years old at the time, was understandably shocked and terrified by this sudden turn of events. According to historical accounts, he even broke down in tears, prompting one of the raiders, the Master of Glamis, to reportedly remark, "Better bairns greet than bearded men," using the Scots word "greet," meaning "weep" or "mourn."

The raid was a calculated move to curtail the influence of the pro-Catholic advisors surrounding James VI, particularly Lennox, who was seen as a major threat to the Protestant cause in Scotland. To prevent any rescue attempts by Lennox’s forces, the Earl of Mar stationed an armed force at Kinross, effectively cutting off any approach to Ruthven. During a skirmish, the Earl of Arran's brother, William Stewart, who had tried to reach the king, was captured and injured, losing two fingers in the process. Arran himself also fell into the hands of the raiders.

For the next ten months, King James VI was effectively held captive by the Ruthven Lords, who controlled his movements and, by extension, the governance of Scotland. They moved him between several locations, including Perth and Stirling, where they gathered additional support from other nobles such as Francis Stewart, Earl of Bothwell, and the Earl of Glencairn. During this period, the regime implemented reforms that aligned with their ultra-Protestant agenda, which was even endorsed by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.

However, this situation could not last. By June 1583, James managed to escape from his captors while at St. Andrews, effectively ending the Ruthven Regime. The young king, who had grown increasingly resentful of his enforced captivity, quickly reasserted his authority, dismissing the Ruthven Lords from court and pardoning those who had opposed them.

The aftermath of the Raid of Ruthven was tumultuous. While the Earl of Gowrie initially avoided severe punishment, he continued to plot against the king and was eventually executed for high treason in 1584. This marked the end of his influence and the collapse of the faction that had sought to control the Scottish crown through manipulation and force.

The Raid of Ruthven stands as a stark reminder of the fragile nature of power during this period in Scottish history. It highlights the intense rivalries and the precarious position of the young James VI, who would later become James I of England. The event also underscores the deep religious and political divides that characterized Scotland in the late 16th century.

As we reflect on the events of August 22, 1582, we see a young king caught in the crossfire of his nobles' ambitions, a nation grappling with religious and political turmoil, and the enduring struggle for control over the future of Scotland.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Today, we journey back to August 21, 1689, a day that saw the streets of Dunkeld, Scotland, transformed into a brutal battlefield during the Jacobite rising of 1689. This was a crucial moment in the struggle between those loyal to the deposed King James VII and the forces supporting William of Orange. It was a day marked by intense conflict, bravery, and a significant turning point in Scotland's history—the Battle of Dunkeld.

The Battle of Dunkeld was part of what is often called Dundee's Rising, named after the prominent Jacobite leader, John Graham of Claverhouse, Viscount Dundee. This rising was a response to the so-called "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, where James VII of Scotland (and II of England) was overthrown in favor of his Protestant daughter Mary and her husband, William of Orange. The Jacobites, largely composed of Highland clans and loyal supporters of James, sought to restore the deposed king to the throne.

Just a few weeks before the Battle of Dunkeld, the Jacobites had won a significant victory at the Battle of Killiecrankie, but their triumph was short-lived. The death of Viscount Dundee during that battle left the Jacobite forces without their most charismatic leader. Command fell to Colonel Alexander Cannon, a less experienced leader, whose appointment caused dissension among the Highland chiefs, notably leading to the departure of the formidable Sir Ewen Cameron of Lochiel and some of his men.

Amid this tumult, the newly formed Cameronian Regiment, a staunchly Covenanter force, was ordered to hold the town of Dunkeld against the advancing Jacobite forces. The Cameronians, named after the martyred Covenanter leader Richard Cameron, were a regiment raised largely from the tenantry of the Marquess of Douglas and were known for their fierce religious and political convictions. Their commander, Lieutenant Colonel William Cleland, a veteran of the Covenanter cause, was tasked with defending Dunkeld at all costs.

Dunkeld, however, was not an easily defensible town. Lacking any protective walls, Cleland's troops were forced to improvise. They took up defensive positions in Dunkeld Cathedral, a building surrounded by an enclosing wall, and in the nearby mansion of the Marquess of Atholl. The Jacobites, numbering around 3,000 to 5,000, vastly outnumbered the Cameronians, who had only about 1,200 men. The stage was set for a brutal and desperate fight.

The battle commenced early on the morning of August 21, as the Jacobites stormed the town from all sides. Despite their initial success in pushing back the Cameronians from their outlying positions, the narrow, winding streets of Dunkeld hindered the Highlanders' ability to execute their feared Highland charge effectively. The Cameronians, meanwhile, fought with the ferocity of men defending their very way of life. Tragically, Lieutenant Colonel Cleland was killed in the first hour of the battle, struck by two musket balls. Despite his mortal wounds, he dragged himself out of sight to prevent his men from losing heart at the sight of their fallen leader.

With Cleland dead, command passed to Captain George Munro of Auchinbowie. Under Munro's leadership, the Cameronians continued their stubborn defense. For sixteen grueling hours, the battle raged on. The streets of Dunkeld were filled with the sound of musket fire, the clash of steel, and the cries of the wounded. In some cases, Highlanders who had taken refuge in houses were trapped and burned alive as the Cameronians fought back with relentless determination.

As the day wore on, both sides began to run low on ammunition. In a resourceful move, the Cameronians stripped lead from the roof of Atholl House to make bullets, allowing them to continue the fight. By 11 PM, the Jacobites, exhausted and depleted of both energy and ammunition, decided to withdraw, leaving behind around 300 of their dead and wounded. The Cameronians, though battered and bloodied, had successfully defended Dunkeld and claimed a vital victory for the Williamite cause.

The Battle of Dunkeld was more than just a clash of arms; it was a symbolic victory for the Williamites. The Jacobites' defeat here, coupled with their loss of leadership and morale, marked a significant turning point in the rising of 1689. The Cameronians, who had stood firm in the face of overwhelming odds, would go on to become the 26th (The Cameronian) Regiment of Foot and later the Cameronians (Scottish Rifles), a regiment with a proud history in the British Army.

Today, if you visit Dunkeld Cathedral, you can still see the scars of that battle—musket ball holes in the east gable serve as a reminder of the fierce fight that took place there over three centuries ago. The battlefield itself was recognized as a site of historical importance and was added to the Inventory of Historic Battlefields in Scotland in 2012.

As we reflect on the events of August 21, 1689, we remember the bravery and sacrifice of those who fought and died at Dunkeld. It was a day that helped shape the future of Scotland and left a lasting legacy in the annals of Scottish history.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com