Three InSight, Episode 6. Google's URL Shortener. Do we really have to talk about Google? Yes. URL shorteners have good/bad side. Curious about monetization. Bit.ly Pro now exists because of Google's service. Bit.ly offers the best tracking. Google wants to be able to index shortened URLs, and this is a great way to enable it. Shorteners are becoming a risky proposition, don't click stuff if you don't know the source. Hackers are preying on our trust with shorteners. Will goo.gl links show up in Google Analytics? Analytics and Adsense are paired nicely. Metzger Associates is using Bit.ly in press releases - intentionally. These days the URL/domain isn't so important because everything is being shortened. Big scary URLs are now simple. Dave uses the public library to reserve books and uses Google search to get there so he doesn't have to remember the actual URL. No singing for the holidays in the podcast, that's a promise.
Google's Nexus One - which came first, Nexus One or Nexus Six? Duh :) Palm is coming back with Pre and Pixi - is the dawn of renewed competition on the horizon? Apple started the app abstraction process with the mobile providers - and now Google is taking it one step further with an unlocked phone that works on either GSM network. The price may be reduced if you allow ads on the service. There's plenty of competition in the industry. Hardware should be carrier agnostic. We all want the carrier to simply provide pipes. Oh, MobileMe rocks. Doyle's ISP argument - what if you had to turn in your PC, or get a new one every time you switched ISPs at home? That's the way the mobile world works right now. Comcast buys BNC Universal, is that another step down the path of paid content? If you're a Comcast subscriber, will NBC content get higher priority? Java promised write once run anywhere. People are working on the same for iPhone/Windows Mobile/Android. Once that becomes easy the apps will proliferate. Tablets are on the way - just a matter of time. Amazon has Kindle, Barnes and Noble has the Nook. It's just a matter of time before the Crunchpad (joojoo) and the Apple tablet appear. Netbooks are hot right now but will ultimately vanish. Tablets may just cause their demise. Apple's purchase of Lala could mean that we get to take our iTunes libraries to any device, not just Apple endorsed devices. Stream Lala on the iPhone if you can't fit the whole library on your phone. Devices will become just receivers for content. Dave has a G4 media server... G4? Really? :) The next generation of content will be serverless. Dave suggests that ten of thousands of copies of The Dark Knight might be easily replaced with single digital streams. But what if the server crashes? More data is lost because of user error, that is the case with professionals (Danger! excluded).
Facebook privacy settings. New privacy changes are a nightmare. Yes! Michael got a prompt in Facebook, set some things, and clicked OK. Doyle thinks it's silly… much ado about nothing. Dave's view is that Facebook promised privacy. This dialog and these changes violate that trust. (note: "Everyone" was default only if you hadn't changed the settings previously. If you had, they did their best to match what your modified settings were). Managing these settings isn't for the novice - which arguably is the Facebook population, and weren't well described. Confusion is the cause and result of all of this. They're trying to make it a better place with more control, but may have botched this one in their communication. Google doesn't care about your stuff. Big Brother is watching! (LOL, that's a joke). There are 100 million users and Facebook might be their first experience with social media. Doyle thinks they're over-reacting. Michael thinks the problem is that Facebook assumed a higher level of intelligence in the average American than they should have. But at least they're trying. Doyle suggests that Facebook, when they make a substantive change, should provide videos for each level of user. That way everyone understands. One popup for 350 million people isn't an effective means of communications. Dave suggests that his daughter's content is, and should remain, private. His daughter would have just clicked OK. Everything would then have been public instead of friends only which was the agreement he and his daughter made. Kids in 1840 weren't taught to look both ways before crossing the street. If you're parenting the same way now, you're in for a load of trouble. Dave is sophisticated enough to know how to make that change. We've got to evolve our parenting style to match the technology our kids play with.
Facebook ties to Twitter. Dave wants content filters. Wants to be able filter Facebook by removing the #fb tag. Dave's insistent that people separate their feeds and not cross post. Let's hope this doesn't cause a DOS with Twitter (bi-directional syncing!). Doyle could podcast with himself. We all have friends on both networks that aren't on the other. Social media is facing an oligopoly. Michael only follows people he's met IRL on Twitter but has 780 followers. Facebook is IRL only. Tweetdeck is kind of solving this problem with checkboxes (so is Seesmic). Different networks have different expectations. Twitter can support dozens of updates per hour from someone, where that's not OK on Facebook. LinkedIn now supports Twitter sync…but why? That's just not OK. It's business focused and people's private tweets don't belong there. They way a guy talks in a locker room is different from the way a guy talks at Thanksgiving dinner. Doyle is proof (based on the studio audience). Do men and women talk differently in a locker room? Yes! Doyle is censoring himself because we asked him to? Props to B-Side, they're done at the end of the year. We're looking for a new home for the podcast. We're open to wealthy potential sponsors too. Happy Holidays!
Reach the hosts: Doyle Albee: http://doylealbee.com, Michael Sitarzewski: http://friendmichael.com and Dave Taylor: http://davetayloronline.com
Thanks for listening!