Discussing the incredible triumph which is the very existence of this sequel film. A film, Daniel argues, which works arguably poorly as a standalone film, and even worse as a sequel, but excellently as the middle part of what promises to be a breathtaking trilogy.

Bo and Daniel share whether or not they cried (guess who did and who didn't), and Bo waxes meta about the Miles Morales story as a whole.

Daniel suggests that not all the animation in the film is connected to the overall story, and Bo rebuts..

We define a villain as "the one who believes they are right no matter what", and we predict where "Beyond the Spider-Verse" is going to take Miguel.

We explore how Peter B. Parker's role changed from the previous film to this one..

And we finish with some thoughts about other Spider-man properties.

Welcome aboard! Dive right in.

Goodness? Evil? Do they exist in a vacuum? Does James Gunn think so?

We discuss how we almost didn't even see the movie in the first place, and whether or not we enjoyed it.

Bo expressed a strange feeling he had, that he had "seen this movie before".

Daniel explains the importance of Superman, and ultimately, the role of a hero.

We ultimately agree that Guardians is an excellent set of James Gunn movies,

but that it's starting to feel like James Gunn only knows how to effectively tell one story.

Today we're talking Tears of the Kingdom, and all the Zelda that came before it.

Learn about our expectations going in, and laugh with us about Nintendo's unpredictable marketing strategies.

In an attempt to identify the magic of Zelda, we compare and contrast our childhood Zelda experiences.

At one point, Bo asks Daniel if he thinks he would have loved Tears of the Kingdom at age 7, wherein we admit perhaps we're becoming crotchety old men.

UItimately we arrive at the conclusion that this Breath of the Wild sequel feels more like GTA V than it does Ocarina of Time.