Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Since I began doing weekly news roundups in 2008 I’ve been striving to bring order, meaning, and raw, brutal honesty to the chaos of ongoing events. Every Sunday morning, while some go to church and others sleep off hangovers, I lounge around my Moroccan villa sipping green tea and writing up Saturday evening’s False Flag Weekly News. This week it wasn’t hard to find a theme.

Mainstream media has finally started covering two monumentally gargantuan, insane stories: Trump’s unprecedented mega-corruption, and Israel’s deliberate mass-murder of tens of thousands of children in a certified genocide. Granted, these aren’t exactly breaking news. Sam Kaplan began tracking Trump’s gazillions of dollars worth of scams and crimes in January 2025, while people like Owen Jones have been covering the Gaza genocide since October 2023.

If dog-bites-man is no news, while man-bite-dog is news, we can extrapolate that when the news actually covers the news that it normally is being paid not to cover…now THAT is news! As of this week, the genocide of Gazan children is officially a mainstream story, thanks to a UN report, while Trump’s scams are making headlines since he self-reported two billion dollars worth of them. Now even MSM consumers are starting to get a closeup view of the sickest, vilest, most decadent, corrupt, murderous, genocidal, evil regime in the history of the world. And presiding over it all, or at least fronting for it, is Donald J. “drain the swamp, no wars” Trump, the self-proclaimed “best president in the history of Israel,” a senile narcissist pervert and con artist. And now even Fox is reporting on “Trump family: biggest grift of all time.” (But why are they finally reporting this now? Are they pummeling Trump into following Bibi’s orders to re-ignite the war on Iran?)

The treasonous billionaires who made Trump “red Caesar” (or was that “red Caligula”) should have invested their money in an AI remake of a vintage John Waters comedy starring Donatella Trumpella alongside Divine and Edith Massey. Here’s a preview: (video link)

When Waters made his classic films Pink Flamingos (1972) and Female Trouble (1974) I was a naive high school kid who found them, like Philip Roth’s even more perverted Portnoy’s Complaint, transgressively hilarious. In those days, Jewish perverts and obese transsexual clowns were working the sideshow where they belonged. Today, they’ve taken over the whole circus.

Autobiographical aside

At my high school graduation in 1976 I wore a red-white-and-blue “F* THE BICENTENNIAL” T-shirt under my graduation garb, which I removed at a semi-inappropriate moment to display the offensive message. I had a bad case of JFK assassination coup blues and identified with the “angry hippies,” as Waters called them, who were disgusted with both mainstream culture/politics and drug-fueled left-leaning idealism but couldn’t imagine a viable alternative. Still, we tried anyway, and launched punk rock. I spent August 1976 hitchhiking around Cornwall and Wales with side-trips to London, mooching off employed people and reading about the next big countercultural thing, the Sex Pistols, in the underground music press.

Post-bicentennial, my alienation just got worse. From the seventies on, until reformed by Islam and marriage in 1993, I inhabited the overlapping fringes of the punk demimonde, second-tier academia, and literary-journalistic bohemia.

Had I become a normal upstanding American, maybe I could have helped stop the USA’s decline from its horrible bicentennial of 1976 to its current semiquincentennial nadir. But that’s probably a grandiose, unrealistic fantasy. Decades of “trying to change the system from within” instead of yapping about JFK and 9/11 from the fringes might have led to a life sentence—not just 20 years—of boredom…culminating in acquiescence to the self-serving mediocrity that’s de rigueur in mainstream circles.

F* the Bicentennial! Back to This Week’s Semiquincentennial News

Trump’s 250 year birthday party for the USA didn’t exactly go off without a hitch. Where to begin? Well, there was the iconic American flag paraglider crash. There was Trump’s Great American State Flop on the Capitol Mall, which answered the question: What if Trump gave a Great American State Fair and nobody came?

But those calamities were as nothing compared to Congress moving to officially put the US military under Israeli command. Admittedly there are some strong arguments in favor:

*If Israel commanded the US military directly, it wouldn’t have to kill US presidents, as it did in 1963.

*If Israel commanded the US military directly, it wouldn’t have to suborn US presidents in order to mass murder American servicemen in false flag naval attacks, as it did in 1967.

*If Israel commanded the US military directly, it wouldn’t have to blow up skyscrapers in New York killing 3000 people in order to hijack the US military to wage war on Israel’s enemies, as it did in 2001.

So we could avoid the tragedies of presidential assassinations, ship sinkings, and skyscraper demolitions simply by turning our military over to Israel lock, stock and barrel. What could go wrong?

Maybe a disastrous ground invasion of Iran?

And that leads us back to the question “How Much Money Can Trump Scam Before the Oil Runs Out?” The US is caught between the humiliating but least-worst alternative of surrendering to Iran by actually implementing the 14-point Memorandum of Understanding, and the most-worst alternative of sacrificing American lives in a pointless and doomed ground invasion. Everyone except Israel prefers the least-worst.

Heretofore, the Trump regime has been wavering between “peace is at hand” announcements, 39 of them at last count, interspersed with roughly the same number of bloodcurdling threats. Every time Trump yells “peace” oil prices dive and markets stabilize. Every time he yells “war” the opposite occurs. This situation has created a gold mine for insider traders, including Trump’s own family (by Trump’s own admission!) So as long as Trump can keep the Iran situation wavering back and forth between not-quite-war but also not-quite-peace, his crime family can rake in billions.

But all good things come to an end. Once oil hits tank bottom, and the global economy seizes up and melts down, the quintessentially Trumpian brand of market-manipulation consisting of screaming “peace” on Monday mornings and “war” on Friday evenings will be no longer viable.

So the trillion dollar question is: When does the oil run out? Best available estimates suggest that crunch time will arrive during the next three to eight weeks. Based on those estimates, if I were licensed to give investment advice, which I am not, I would say: “Buy oil!” Futures, I mean. Oil prices are currently in the neighborhood of prewar levels, and it seems unlikely that they will not be significantly higher, possibly a lot higher, maybe even catastrophically higher, by this fall or, at the latest, early winter.

But how will it play out politically? Fully surrendering to Iran and fully restoring Homuz traffic may be the least-worst option, but it still might be too-little-too-late to save the economy from shocks that will crater the Republicans in November. That could put Trump and his crime family on the fast track to prison.

Not surrendering—i.e. not muzzling the Israeli mad dog—will just make the economic crunch, and Trump Inc.’s political crunch, that much worse.

So the Administration can choose: It can surrender, take a hopefully modest economic and political hit, and possibly survive. Or it can embrace a full-scale catastrophe that will impact US allies in Europe and Asia the worst, while obeying Israel’s orders to plunge into a catastrophic ground war.

A massive, losing war with plenty of American casualties, coupled with a global economic meltdown, sounds like a recipe for political disaster. The Trump regime is presumably trying to postpone any such disaster until after the November elections. That sounds like what JD Vance recently implied by saying the US wasn’t really surrendering to Iran but was instead “just buying time” (until the war starts again). Martin Jay, fellow Morocco-based journalist, recently expressed his suspicions that the Trump regime’s apparent break with Bibi is just for show, and that the war will resume when winter weather enables a ground invasion.

The Iranian leadership isn’t falling for it. They are tightening the screws to ensure that Trump will face economic disaster in advance of the November elections…unless he actually muzzles Israel and releases a substantial chunk of Iran’s stolen money.

So on the occasion of America’s ill-starred Semiquincentennial, the grotesquely corrupt, increasingly authoritarian Trump Clown Regime is impaled on a Morton’s fork. The only options—surrender to Iran (bye-bye Hormuz, petrodollar, and Israel) or surrender to Israel (disastrous mega-war and New Great Depression)—are both, from the US imperial perspective, almost unimaginably terrible…though some might argue that the loss of the Israeli albatross around America’s neck would be not just a silver lining, but, for those with eyes to see, the all-time greatest American victory, the salvific triumph we have all been waiting for.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Is material progress an illusion? Is the modern world a sham? And is AI exponentially intensifying the ersatz nature of modernity? Paul Cudenec, a notable voice of the freedom movement during the COVID lockdowns, discusses these and other questions, including “illegal” ones involving the Rothschild banking dynasty and Zionism.

Excerpts:

Modernity, AI

Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. Kevin Barrett here, doing podcasts of one sort or another since 2006, when I got expelled from the academy for wrongthink, I guess it was. So I’ve been doing wrongthink ever since.

And here to do some wrong thinking with me is Paul Cudenec. He’s a notable dissident from the UK, and he’s got a Substack which is highly recommended. He contributes to publications like Winter Oak and Organic Radicals, which I just discovered. It’s all very cool stuff and harks back to my deep history as a kind of left-leaning, anarchist-leaning troglodyte Luddite, thinking that the modern world and progress and all of that stuff is not so great. So I think we’re pretty much on the same page on a lot of things. Welcome, Paul Cudenec. How are you?

Paul Cudenec: Thanks, Kevin. Nice to be able to speak to you.

Kevin Barrett: Where should we start?…These days there are a lot of backwards-looking folks who, like us, are not enamored with the modern world…there is a right wing who want to expel all the immigrants from Europe and the West and go back to Conan the Barbarian land and be heroically militaristic and that sort of thing. And likewise there are others who are not enamored of progress and pseudo-equality and fake liberation movements who are skeptical of the right-wing approach. How do you situate yourself among those of us who are skeptical of material progress as the be-all end-all?

Paul Cudenec: I come to this through anarchism. I was active in the anarchist movement in the UK for years. I live in France now, actually…I’ve never liked the modern world: consumerism, supermarkets, factories…the idea that it is a life-stifling force, that we are forced to live inside this great machine…I’ve got over that now. Actually, I think I’ve got a very particular role in the current time in pointing out what’s wrong with the system we live in, informed by what I know of how we used to live, but with the purpose of forging a future that is better than the present we live in now. It’s inspired in some ways by elements of the past, but only the elements that we like. It’s not possible to recreate the Middle Ages or the Bronze Age. It will be a different society…

Kevin Barrett: So today people are telling us that AI will make us all elite. AI, these robots, will do all the work, and theoretically they could create great beauty, just like great civilizations created great beauty in the past. But you and I, I think, are a bit skeptical of turning the world over to AI and its overlords. Why are those people wrong who say that AI is going to save us?

Paul Cudenec: Well, there are so many reasons, aren’t there? Even the idea that AI can create beautiful things is disproven just by looking at a piece of AI art. I recognize it now. It took a while to realize that particular style was actually AI creating things. I mean, it’s hideous because it’s false. To me, anything that is beautiful—I associate beauty, in the classical tradition, with truth and nature. Those things belong together.

Some creative professionals may be able to use AI to do away with boring, mundane work—filling in forms or whatever—but they will still have their creativity in their job. For most people, AI is placing them in little boxes and telling them what to do. AI is becoming their slave master, basically, their boss.

It’s also the prison guard to their cell, deciding things without any communication, without any causation, without the slightest hint of humanity—which you would expect from a human boss. There would at least be some understanding there.

This is going to be a rigid system, far worse than any of us have experienced before.

And, of course, it’s going to continue to destroy nature, the living world, with these data centers they’re building everywhere, sucking up all the water. How selfish of us to think we should be prioritized for drinking water over the demands of the AI industry. They’re cutting down trees and building power infrastructure to provide the electricity these systems require.

Kevin Barrett: Do you think there’s a built-in reason why AI is not going to make things better? It’s basically an imitation machine. The chatbots imitate human speech, human conversation, human discourse.

Paul Cudenec: Deliberate falsity—not just accidentally. It’s been set up that way.

The good thing, though, is that this imitation may prove to be its downfall. I’ve read that AI goes around the internet finding things to adopt as its opinions and source of knowledge. Increasingly, it’s finding mistaken material generated by AI itself and feeding that back into the system.

So yes, I think you’re right, and I hope they can’t get past that. Maybe they think if they build enough data centers they can…

—-

Zionist Censorship

Kevin Barrett: The basic logic they’re using is pretty incredible. Supporting Palestine is supposedly a call for genocide against the Jewish state. Wait a minute—I thought it was kind of the other way around, wasn’t it? Who went there and tried to get rid of the people who were already living there? I don’t think it was the Palestinians.

Paul Cudenec: No, exactly.

The last time I was in the UK, I spoke at an event staged by an organization called The Real Left. It used to be called Left Lockdown Skeptics during Covid.

I wasn’t the only speaker making the point that it’s the same networks and the same entity behind both agendas. I ended up talking about Judeo-supremacism and the power of the Rothschilds.

A Jewish anti-Zionist speaker who had spoken earlier that day and whose speech I had enjoyed—because she explained how, despite being Jewish, she’d been accused of anti-Semitism for opposing Israeli actions—actually became offended by what I was saying. She accused me of anti-Semitism and walked out.

That was the last time I was in the UK. I think the temperature has been notched up a bit since then on those issues.

It’s not that different in France, really. I think they’ve gone a little further in Britain, but there is a lot of pushback. That’s encouraging. There are many people speaking out on this issue on social media and elsewhere.

Kevin Barrett: So now in the United States, it’s actually a certain branch of the Republican Party that’s pushing these restrictions. They’re banning what is really a pretty mainstream style of thought and analysis.

Back when I was in the academy, being radically pro–Third World liberation and supporting Palestinian liberation groups was considered perfectly normal in many circles.

It was the same thing with South Africa. Everybody saw it as the same thing. Mandela freeing South Africa—everybody agreed on that, except for a small minority.

Supporting armed resistance against occupation was not considered an extreme position. Everybody supported that. Now it’s treated as illegal. It’s strange. The views that were acceptable if not almost mandatory in the academy where I used to work are now effectively prohibited. I’m still having a hard time adjusting to that.

(For the full conversation, watch the video or listen to the audio above.)

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

The US-Israeli war on Iran is already pretty weird, even before we start factoring in Chinese-alien intel technologies, mind-waves controlling Trump, psychedelic “jellyfish” drone formations terrifying pilots and taking down F-15s, EMF weapons that cause droughts (and yield downpours when you blow them up), Uri Geller issuing red-alert Mullah-telepathy warnings as he attempts to eat kosher hummus with a flaccidly drooping spoon…do we even need such stuff to see this as the oddest war ever?

It is deeply strange that a mid-level regional power like Iran can utterly defeat the world’s most powerful military. It’s bizarre that the supposed religious fanatics who rule Iran speak and act with tact, reason, consistency, and restraint, while the president of the United States blathers incoherently, alternating drooling obscenity-laced threats with equally incoherent outbursts radiating peace, love, and call-option-friendly investment optimism. And perhaps the most bizarre sight of all is the global economy drifting slowly and inexorably towards a cliff, like an unconscious canoeist drifting towards Niagra Falls, while gathered onlookers (the markets) seem oblivious to the catastrophe that is about to unfold.

Already cursed to live in interesting times, we don’t need the curse to get worse (and presumably even more interesting). But Iran war fringe stuff is definitely a thing, and as far as I can tell nobody has tried to bring it all together.

I asked Gemini:

Has anyone written a comprehensive article about “fringe” phenomena from the Iran war?  I’m talking about reports like:

*Uri Geller says Iran is using mind waves to control Trump.

*F-15 pilots are terrified of Iranian drones flying in “alien jellyfish” formations.

*Iran accuses the US of weather warfare and claims it ended its drought by blowing up US radars in the Gulf States.

Gemini answered:

“There is no single, all-encompassing article that covers all of these ‘fringe’ and unusual stories.”

Until now.

And I’m the man for the job. Before I learned Arabic and became an Iranian-TV Middle East expert, I moonlighted as Dr. Weirde, author of Dr. Weirde’s Weirde Tours: A Guide to Mysterious San Francisco. What’s more, my academic training included studying reports of fringe phenomena as background for a Ph.D. dissertation comparing miraculous and supernatural claims in medieval Moroccan saints’ legends to contemporary personal experience narratives. So the precise spot where Islamic-world-geopolitics meets high weirdness is my bailiwick.

Where to begin? We might as well start with the jellyfish. Last Wednesday, Press TV’s headline announced: “Downed F-15 pilot’s account of ‘alien’ Iranian jellyfish formation shocks US intel.” According to the report:

The US military and intelligence community were thrown into a state of profound shock and disbelief when an American F-15 pilot, shot down over Iran in April, reported witnessing a sight that defied conventional understanding of Iranian military capabilities.

According to a report by CNN on Tuesday, which cited four sources familiar with the incident, the pilot described seeing multiple Iranian drones hovering in the air, moving in perfect unison, in a formation that eerily resembled a jellyfish.

CNN quoted one of the pilots:

“Multiple drones interconnected and moving as one with smaller drones below the bigger drones like legs,” one of the sources familiar with the pilot’s witness account told CNN. “Real alien sh*t.”

But is it “alien sh*t” or Chinese sh*t? China is famous for its amazing sky displays featuring drones flying in incredibly dense and complex formations.

While Iranian drone engineers may be cooperating with their Chinese counterparts, we shouldn’t imagine that Iran isn’t capable of breakthrough drone innovations without outside help. Iran is an engineering powerhouse, as the US military is learning the hard way. Google tells us:

Iran produces roughly 230000 to 250000 engineering graduates annually. It routinely ranks in the top 3 to 5 countries globally for total engineering graduates outperforming major economies like Germany and Japan. A standout characteristic of Iran’s engineering landscape is that women comprise up to 70% of its STEM and engineering graduates one of the highest ratios in the world.

Wait a minute…Isn’t Iran a medieval theocracy that keeps women barefoot and pregnant? That’s what Fox News and the Iranian royalists in Beverly Hills keep telling us. I guess those barefoot and pregnant Iranian housewives must be finding the spare time to sit around in their chadors earning online engineering degrees and building extraterrestrial-looking drone swarms that can take down F15s. Radical Islam at its absolute scariest!

So there’s probably nothing extraterrestrial or supernatural about Iran’s “alien jellyfish drones.” As the Ukrainians found out the hard way, Iran has good drone engineers.

And while we’re debunking dubious legends, let’s quickly disabuse ourselves of:

*The Khordad “UFO” Sightings & Metallic Spheres: An AI hallucination…ask your favorite AI about this and it will spin a completely fictitious yarn, inventing a tale that will make the accounts of the craziest human UFO abductee seem relatively plausible.

*The Persian Gulf “Cthulhu” / Caspian Sea Monster Reports: Another AI hallucination, in which Gemini takes a deep whiff of DMT and tells us:

* The Claim: A fringe maritime rumor alleged that sonar technicians aboard coalition warships detected massive, unidentified biological anomalies in the Strait of Hormuz. The more extreme versions of the rumor claimed Iran had “weaponized deep-sea creatures” or unearthed an ancient anomaly to attack naval vessels blocking the strait.

* The Reality: This rumor was a highly distorted game of telephone regarding Iran’s asymmetric naval tactics. To counter American naval primacy, Iran deployed hundreds of semi-submersible, low-profile speedboats and remote-controlled explosive aquatic drones to bottleneck the Strait of Hormuz. To sonar operators and radar systems, these small, erratic, wave-skimming signatures looked highly unusual, which internet forums quickly spun into “sea monster.”

But there is no such rumor. Gemini hallucinated it by taking the insane American psy-op about Iran supposedly weaponizing kamikaze dolphins, adding a pinch of HP Lovecraft and a very real fleet of Iranian speedboats, and turning the mixture into a bad acid trip.

*The ‘New Nostradamus” predicted the Iran war. It seems that on or around February 22, some British guy who calls himself “the new Nostradamus” predicted the US would go to war with Iran in March. But you didn’t have to be Nostradamus to notice the US had sent nearly all its available military assets to the region and would likely attack. What’s more, the self-styled soothsayer Craig Hamilton-Parker expected the war to end almost instantly, saying it would be: “a swift and limited operation: It will escalate quickly, then stop.” The tabloid Times of India tells us: “He also references symbolic imagery from earlier readings, ‘yellow and red flags’ and ‘a lion soaring above Iran.’” In other words, Hamilton-Parker expected the Iranian royalists, who are despised by nearly all of the Iranian people, to take over Iran in the wake of a swift US victory! Wow. Talk about a Nostra-dumb-ass!

Real Paranormal Rumors

Setting aside the ridiculous claims of hallucinating AIs and ill-informed fortunetellers, there actually are some interesting paranormal rumors about the US-Israeli war on Iran. Some can be sourced to the Iranian side. According to some Iranian sources, Iran has not only been waging war on the Epstein class, but also against the child-sacrificing worshippers of Baal. Iranian demonstrators, and pro-Iran demonstrators around the world, have repeatedly burned statues of Baal in “a symbolic protest linked to renewed online conspiracy theories surrounding the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and alleged child abuse by Western elites.”

The Jerusalem Post tell us that these are just “antisemitic conspiracy theories.”

The Post article begins:

Iranian state-aligned media and senior regime figures have again invoked supernatural and conspiratorial language in describing the conflict with Israel, with recent and past material referring to a “war of occult sciences”, “Zionist sorcery,” jinn, and Jewish talismans. The theme has also surfaced in Iranian claims that Israel used “occult and supernatural spirits” during the 12-day war.

So claims that beneath the surface of the Zionism-vs.-Iran war is “a war of occult sciences” are just antisemitic conspiracy theories…except that Israel is also offering its own version of the claim. Israeli media reported this week that “Uri Geller Claims Iran Used Mind Waves on Trump Over Iran Deal.” According to Grok, which does not appear to be hallucinating:

In a Channel 14 interview on June 22, Geller said Iran deployed low-frequency waves—like telepathy but tech-based—to sway Trump into signing the June 17 Islamabad Memorandum, a 14-point pact extending a 60-day ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz toll-free, and offering Iran $300 billion in reconstruction aid tied to nuclear talks. The deal, inked at France's Palace of Versailles and in Tehran, drew fire from Israel's right-wing circles as too soft, with no new nuclear concessions from Iran. No evidence backs Geller's claims, which experts dismiss, while online mockery highlighted his past CIA psychic ties amid Israel's frustration over the U.S.-Iran thaw.

Geller claims that he has done psychic work for intelligence agencies, beginning with the Mossad, for decades, and that this kind of activity is carried out by all governments. I emailed him, asking:

Is this accurate? “Uri Geller Claims Iran Used Mind Waves on Trump Over Iran Deal” https://x.com/i/trending/2069127215397396752

I mentioned that my go-to psi science source Dean Radin has spoken highly of his spoon-bending abilities, and invited the Israeli psychic and friend of Netanyahu on my podcast. Geller replied:

Yes I believe they did and I have inside intel info. However I do not do podcasts.

But watch these:

https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/l2dc2u/the_secret_life_of_uri_geller_psychic_spy_bbc/

Call me crazy, but I believe Geller and the Iranian anti-Baal people. I think Geller is right that governments have weaponized psi. Jon Ronson’s The Men Who State at Goats was designed to obfuscate that reality by skunk-spraying it with humorous ridicule. The reason I have Geller’s email is that I hang around private online groups with people—many retired intel folks—who understand these things. So count “governments use psi” as one of those conspiracy theories that are very likely true. But the evidence isn’t very respectable, and much of it is circumstantial, so don’t hold your breath waiting for Ron Unz to write an American Pravda piece.

Weather Warfare

Here’s another weird conspiracy theory about the Iran war that is likely true: Iran’s reservoirs are suddenly brimming with water in the wake of rains that “coincidentally” started falling as soon as Iran blew up most of the US’s radar stations in the region. According to left-leaning Global Research, respectable voices in the region have long been accusing the US and Israel of stealing rainfall from targeted countries:

Iraqi MP Al-Kaikhani in turn has claimed that Washington and Tel Aviv had been “stealing clouds”, causing droughts regionally.

The right-wing French RIVAROL published a similar article, translated by the Occidental Observer. Excerpt:

AN ABNORMAL DROUGHT THAT DRAGGED ON

About fifteen years ago, the then-President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, repeatedly claimed that Western powers (under American influence) were “stealing” rain from Persia and much of the Middle East (including Iraq). Naturally, at that time, almost everyone in the West considered the strongman of Tehran a crackpot, a conspiracy theorist who, moreover, had the misfortune, it was assumed, of being a notorious historical revisionist.

Westerners continue to silence or deny what Mahmoud had calmly stated. In 2018, Iran officially accused the United Arab Emirates and Israel of stealing its rains, when the senior official of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Brigadier General Gholam Reza Jalali, declared: “Israel and another country are working together to prevent Iranian clouds from raining.”

The New York Times reported that the country Jalali did not name was the United Arab Emirates, which has launched a cloud seeding program by injecting chemicals into clouds in an attempt to induce rain in its favor, but also to prevent rainfall in Iran.

Today, however, many Middle Eastern elites are talking about the extreme drought and equally abnormal heat that have plagued the region for ages. We also recall that before the war against Iran, the country had suffered for years from a dramatic water shortage that directly endangered the people, especially the nation’s capital, whose inhabitants (and first and foremost the government) were ready to flee rather than become parched or dry out like old stones.

THE RETURN OF THE RAIN

And then, suddenly, a miracle amidst the misfortunes! In Iran, the clouds finally wept, abundantly and regularly, and temperatures returned to normal (dropping by an average of five degrees Celsius). A few days after the first Iranian strikes against American bases located in the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere on the Arabian Peninsula, the regional climate changed completely.

I don’t dismiss these claims. Around 2015, at the VIP building of Imam Khomeini International Airport, I met a man who said he was an engineer working on an Iranian program aimed at countering the US weather warfare program. He said the Americans were responsible for the draught in Iran, as well as the related one that had opened the door to regime change in Syria, and that the programs involved electromagnetic energy. He added that Iran was making great progress countering them, and expected to have the problem solved in the fairly near future. (Apparently he didn’t realize back then that the only solution was to blow up US radar stations!)

Hyper-Precise Targeting Intel

And finally, one more “true conspiracy theory”: Iran has hit US targets with shocking accuracy, sparking rumors about advanced or esoteric technologies. The Wall Street Journal just published another article featuring satellite photos showing just how accurate those Iranian missiles really are. But Iran is using engineers, not psychics. Gemini, its DMT apparently worn off, tells us:

“Esoteric” Chinese Tech and Satellite Targeting

The Claim: Reports allege that Iranian missiles are striking Western and regional targets with a hyper-advanced, pinpoint precision that did not exist months ago, driven by clandestine or “esoteric” Chinese intelligence and technology transfers.

The Reality: The tech isn’t magical or spiritual; it is a highly sophisticated digital architecture. Intelligence experts point to Iran utilizing China’s BeiDou satellite navigation network, alongside algorithmic AI targeting data, to bypass U.S. electronic jamming. Furthermore, leaks have exposed intricate corporate supply chains funneling massive amounts of Chinese sodium perchlorate (a critical solid ballistic missile fuel component) directly to the IRGC. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

So the bottom line is: It’s a weird war. Nobody in the chattering classes of the West expected Iran to be able to pull off a coup of this magnitude. And among those who didn’t realize who they were dealing with, and didn’t understand until too late that they were picking on the wrong country, were such self-styled Nostradamuses as Craig Hamilton-Parker, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Bibi’s credulous sycophant, Donald J. Trump.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Dissociated Press

In a characteristically brilliant diplomatic coup, US president Donald “3D Chess” Trump has convinced the Iranian government to sweeten the Memorandum of Understanding so Trump can claim it includes something—anything—other than abject and unconditional surrender.

Below are the additional 10 amendments to the MOU leaked to Dissociated Press by an unidentifiable White Horse souse.

Amendments to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the US and Iran

1) Iran insists: We don’t just promise never to build nuclear weapons, we CROSS OUR HEARTS AND HOPE TO DIE!

2) Iran will build a stunning monument to Donald Trump: a 1:100 scale LEGO replica of Mar-a-Lago, called Mar-a-LEGO, to be placed on a traffic island in central Tehran. Iran promises never to blow it up, cinematically or otherwise, as long as Trump doesn’t violate the deal.

3) Jared Kushner can have a very small island in the Persian Gulf if he promises not to build a bunker or rape any children there.

4) Iran promises that it will not gloat, chortle, or smirk as it takes possession of the $300 billion tribute payment from the defeated United States.

5) Iran pledges to redouble its efforts against ISIS and al-Qaeda, starting with the US-supported government in Damascus.

6) Iran agrees not to sue the Trump Organization for using the trademarked currency name “rial” for a forthcoming cryptocurrency roll-out of “The Trump Rial,” as long as Trump makes it clear that Iran neither endorses nor has any role in this or any other Trump Organization scam.

7) Iran agrees not to release any Trump-Epstein files, and to fire at least 100 missiles at Tel Aviv if Israel releases them, and maybe even if it doesn’t.

8) Iran agrees to help Trump throw Netanyahu under the bus: Ayatollah Khamenei Jr. will take his arms, Trump will take his legs, and they will swing Bibi back and forth a few times and then throw him beneath an AEC Routemaster double-decker London transport vehicle traveling at 40 miles per hour through central Tehran packed with tourists paying exorbitant prices to observe the proceedings from close range. Proceeds will be split evenly between the Trump Organization and the Revolutionary Guards.

9) Iran promises never to say anything positive about former President Obama and his very-bad-not-good JCPOA, nor anything negative about Trump’s very fine extremely wonderful Iran deal, a deal like nobody has ever seen before.

10) Iran sweetens the deal with a promise to supply the White House chef with a full year’s supply of top-grade Iranian pistachios, accompanied by ten cases of pistachio-flavored Diet Coke.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Rasheed Muhammad of the Red Pill Diaries interviews Kevin Barrett.

Excerpts:

Kevin Barrett: “The Iranian psychiatrists have been advising the Iranian negotiators on how to deal with a megalomaniacal psychopathic narcissist. And the Iranian negotiating team says they’ve been doing much, much, much better ever since they got that advice from Iran’s top psychiatrists.”

“Trump curses out Netanyahu and says, everybody hates Israel. Trump has said maybe a dozen or a couple of dozen blurt-outs that were more truthful than anything any president has said about these topics for a long time. So I did my satire saying, yeah, the Iranian psychiatrists are taking credit for curing him from psychosis, and now he’s back in the reality-based community.”

“And then Vance is backing him up saying that the Israelis should be very, very careful because Trump is the only head of state in the world that can stand them anymore. ‘We’ve got one guy, one head of state in the world who runs the world’s most powerful country, who still doesn’t hate their guts, who still is sort of on their side. Maybe, if you behave yourselves.’ So yeah, it seems like if it’s all an act, I don’t see why. It has no point, because they’re not going to fool the Iranians into letting their guard down. So no, I think it’s actually just reality setting in.”

Rasheed Muhammad: “So that’s what happens with empire at the end. It seeks to regain a lost hegemony, a lost global dominance through military adventurism, but that only accelerates the decline. That’s true at the end of every empire: the Austro-Hungarian Empire which stumbled like the Germans into World War I, the Athenian Empire that attacked Sicily and all its fleet were sunk…that’s what empires do.”

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link (show features tribute to Cat McGuire)

There are lots of great female activists and commentators out there. One of them was Cat McGuire, the False Flag Weekly News co-host who passed away on Friday. Watch Helen Buyniski and I remember Cat at the beginning of this week’s FFWN.

But why in the world would anyone ever pay any attention to…Laura Loomer? When I asked Google “who the h* is this person” the answer came up: “Laura Elizabeth Loomer (born May 21, 1993) is an American far-right political activist, conspiracy theorist, and internet personality.” Right…but since she’s unpleasant and unintelligent, why does anyone care about her?

Well, it turns out (surpise surprise) that she has friends in high places. Google says she enjoys “direct, high-level access to President Trump.” Like Monica Lewinsky, Loomer appears to have been “sent” to the President of the United States by rich Zionist Jews. But don’t joke about Loomer “Lewinskying” Trump, or she might sue you, like she sued Bill Maher when he said something about Trump making her put a bag over her head before she’s allowed to crawl under his desk.

As an apparent junior member among Trump’s circle of Jewish handlers, which is headed by only slightly more intelligent and experienced individuals like Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, Laura Loomer may have access to inside information. So when she tells us that a false flag “ten times worse than 9/11” is on the way, we can’t entirely write it off as the feebleminded ravings of a drooling Islamophobic idiot.

Link to tweet

Glenn Greenwald has a point: Israel has a record of orchestrating terrorist outrages, assassinations, and false flags when it feels its back is up against the wall. They killed JFK to get nukes. They did 9/11 to hijack the US military and send it against the seven countries Israel viewed as threats. What wouldn’t they do to prevent the US from implementing a peace deal with Iran that throws Israel under the bus?

A huge false flag blamed on “Muslims with financial ties to (anti-Israel) podcasters” might not pass the verisimilitude sniff test. But neither did the JFK magic bullet, nor the 9/11 demolitions, nor the Charlie Kirk magic bullet for that matter. So if midtown Manhattan gets vaporized by an Iranian nuke financed by Tucker Carlson’s Qatari bank account, and Israel breaks out in celebratory dancing while [[[the media]]] plays endless loops of Palestinian kids bribed with candy pretending to celebrate, don’t say Laura Loomer didn’t warn you.

Israel might stand to benefit from a purported “Muslim terror attack” that was only nine times bigger than 9/11…or possibly even smaller than that. The political climate in the USA is unfavorable to Trump’s handling of Iran, but even less enthusiastic about blowing up the global and domestic economies by shredding the deal. But things could change overnight in the aftermath of a big “Muslim terror attack.” If the event were blamed on Iran, Trump’s deal, and the economy, would both go up in smoke. And if the attack were catastrophic enough, it might generate the political will to put the half-million or more “boots on the ground” that would be required for a real attempt to impose a regime change on Iran. And that, of course, is what Israel wants. That is why Netanyahu and Mossad chief David Barnea lied to Trump to trick him into attacking Iran in the first place. As with the CIA lying to JFK to con him into approving the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, the president was told: “We can easily pull off this regime change without sending in the Marines,” when in fact the whole purpose was to grease the skids for a full-scale invasion.

They could also assassinate Trump and blame it on Iran. Using a Hezbollah-style fiber-optic FPV drones to take out the President presumably wouldn’t be that hard. Those drones have a range of up to 30 miles! Why bother climbing onto rooftops or trying to catch Trump at his Mar-a-Lago golf course, as the various fake wannabe Trump assassins have, when you can hit him from miles away? Blaming a patsy would presumably be much easier when the actual drone operator is far from the kill zone.

But the Mossad probably won’t kill Trump, because JD Vance has been all but telling them not to. Vance’s recent anti-Israel blurt out translates to a simple three word message: “Don’t kill Trump.”

"Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time. And he happens to be the head of state of the world's superpower. If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally I have left.”

Translation: “If I were Israel, I wouldn’t be killing the only powerful ally I have left…because the next president would turn Tel Aviv into a parking lot.”

Bibi, of course, might make sure that there are two “Iran-sponsored Hezbollah FPV drones” so that Vance is taken out along with Trump. That would leave Mike Johnson, Chuck Grassley, and Marco Rubio manning the line of succession. Interestingly, all three publicly support Trump’s Iran deal, while the rest of the Republic Party howls in outrage in hopes of attracting lavish infusions of kosher cash. (Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Bill Cassidy, Mike Pence, and Nikki Haley, among others, have openly revolted against the deal, blasting Trump's MoU as a “fiasco" and "the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”)

Has someone from the US side of the Deep State whispered in the ears of Johnson, Grassley, and Rubio about how unseemly it would look, and how dangerous it might prove to be, were anyone in the line of presidential succession to give Israel the impression that killing the people ahead of them might serve Zionist interests? Inquiring minds would love to know.

Given the unpropitious line of succession, the Israelis might prefer false flag terrorism over assassination, as Laura Loomer’s unsubtle tweet seems to suggest. But what kind of terror attack? Targeting “the tallest building” is a long-time Zionist obsession, according to Christopher Bollyn, who reveals that Mossad founder Isser Harel stated in 1979 that “Islamic terrorists” would destroy New York’s tallest building because it was a phallic symbol. It so happens that the tallest building in America is One World Trade Center in New York City at exactly 1,776 feet. What’s more, One World Trade Center is owned by the notorious Jewish terrorist and insurance fraudster Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Netanyahu, who confessed on television to being party to the demolition of WTC-7 on 9/11. Silverstein also owns the 73-story US Bank Tower, conveniently located only six miles from the heart of Hollywood and its thousands of Jewish cinematic magicians and storytellers who could help “sell” the Iranian terror attack plotline.

But maybe blowing up tall buildings and blaming it on Muslims is too “been there done that” i.e. “worked once, won’t work again.” So let’s help our Mossad friends brainstorm about how to carry through on Loomer’s threat. Here are a few ideas:

*White House Reflecting Pool Algae an Iranian Bioweapon—Devours Washington DC!

*Trump Vaporized by Exploding Golf Ball that Turns Out to Have Been an Iranian Mini-Nuke!

*Iranian Sleeper Cell Hidden in National Weather Service—Controls Rain to Ruin July 4th Barbecues! (They Made It Rain in Iran By Blowing Up US Radars, So What If They Make It Rain HERE?!)

*CIA Warns: Every Third Pothole in America May Be a Secret Iranian Missile Silo!

*Entire East Coast Blackout Caused by Single Iranian Operative Unplugging Very Large Extension Cord!

*Nuclear Alert Issued After Suspicious Persian Cat Seen Near Strategic Air Command Headquarters!

*Iranian Cyberhackers Blamed for Mind-Eating Social Media Virus Named Laura Loomer!

And if those aren’t stupid enough, feel free to drop some even stupider ones in the comments, in hopes of making the Mossadniks who are reading this laugh so hard that they forget to launch a false flag ten times worse than 9/11.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Excerpts:

Richie Allen:

..Iran says an end to Israel’s hostilities in Lebanon is inseparable from the deal. But the Israelis are saying “our forces will remain in the country indefinitely.” Where is all this going to lead? Let’s welcome back to the program a friend of ours, the academic author and broadcaster, and long-time contributor to Iran’s Press TV, and he has traveled extensively in Iran, it’s always a pleasure to welcome back to the show our old pal Kevin Barrett. Kevin, how are you?

Kevin Barrett:

Hey, I’m well Ritchie. Great to be back with you.

Richie Allen:

Thank you very much, my friend. And you said to me this morning that it’s nice to be reporting good news for a change. So as far as you’re concerned, this is good news. This is reason to be optimistic.

Kevin Barrett:

Well, it’s better than most of the news.

Richie Allen:

Yeah, I’ll give you that.

Kevin Barrett:

Yeah, I think peace is better than war. And Iran basically winning is better than any alternative. So yeah, this agreement clearly favors Iran. Whether it’s going to last without blowing up again is an open question. But in the meantime, I think it’s basically a good thing that it’s opening up the possibility that the US is going to have to break from its total subjugation to Zionism and to Netanyahu. And we’ll see whether that actually plays out. But if the US is going to adhere to the terms of this agreement, it’s going to have to order the Israelis to pull out of Lebanon, pull out of Gaza, and this is going to be unprecedented. So it has potential to be something very good for the region and the world, but I don’t know if the odds are favouring that outcome. ..

…that opens up a couple of different possible futures, right? And whether the American Platonic Guardians or Deep State are up to taking on the Israelis, again, is an open question.

Richie Allen:

I don’t personally believe that any president is really running things, but let’s just imagine I’m wrong because I’m often wrong. Let’s imagine Trump really is running the government, the administration. If he is, this is abject humiliation.

Kevin Barrett:

Well, it should be and it would be if Trump were rational. But Trump is quite capable of spinning delusions to support his narcissism. So I’m sure there will be handles he can grab onto to claim that he’s getting something better than Obama did. (And Trump can try to blame Netanyahu and say that when Netanyahu promised him the war would be a success) he was lying. Either that or he was totally incompetent and screwed up. So it’s Netanyahu’s fault, Trump! It’s not your fault. Blame it on Netanyahu. Blame it on the Israelis and go after them with all guns blazing. And that’s exactly what you need to do.

Richie Allen:

How many resolutions Kevin? How many resolutions at this point in history, how many resolutions were passed in the United Nations condemning and ordering the Israelis to stop the settlements and to stop the interning of Palestinian children? It’s got to be in the hundreds, right? Must be.

Kevin Barrett:

Yeah, I think there are hundreds of these UN resolutions telling Israel to do things that it’s never done. And the two most important ones are, was it 192, there’s 240 something, I’m forgetting the numbers right now, but the two keys resolutions. The first requires Israel to allow Palestinian refugees who were driven out of Israel by terrorism to return to their homes and be compensated for their suffering. And then the other one is post-1967, demanding that Israel return to its pre-1967 borders. Because the principle that you can steal territory by launching a war has been officially contrary to international law since World War II.

So those are the two key resolutions. Israel has to allow all Palestinian refugees to return, and to return to its pre-1967 borders—or better yet its UN borders…though the international consensus is for the 1967 ones.

Richie Allen:

Tell me this, has Gaza and the horrendous problems facing the Palestinian people been forgotten in the wake of the attacks on Iran and Lebanon?

Kevin Barrett:

Well, I don’t think it’s been forgotten. Actually, the people of Gaza have been saved, in a way, by Iran. Though Iran is being more forthright about stopping Israel’s war in Lebanon. But likewise, Iran is going to demand the end of this war on Gaza as well…

Richie Allen:

Norman Finkelstein has been a very prominent pro-Palestinian voice for many many years. And his aunt I think or his mother was in Auschwitz. So he’s an interesting character He came out and said something which I’m sure you’re aware of, which I found interesting. He said that he’s not at all comfortable with the US alternative right or the right wing alternative media, namely Tucker Carson, Candace Owens and others, supporting Palestine.

Kevin Barrett:

Well, I admire the work of Norman Finkelstein. I think he’s basically a good guy. But if you try to figure out where he’s coming from…he is one of these people who’ve grown up in the Jewish community, surrounded by the myths of the Jewish community about Jewish suffering, the persecution of the Jews. Everywhere the Jews have ever gone, they’ve been persecuted by their neighbors, for no reason. And so, you know, whereas some people from the Jewish community react to that narrative and that culture by becoming insufferably narcissistic, and often even psychopathic, like probably the majority of Jewish Israelis, others like Norman Finkelstein react to this narrative by accepting this victim role, this belief that the Jewish people have been victimized, but then universalizing it and identifying with victims everywhere. This puts Finkelstein not to far from the Iranian Shia ideology, which identifies with victims and demands that we stand up for victims. And that’s good. But I think this conditioning, which created the Norman Finkelstein that we know, who is standing up for the Palestinian victims, and even telling a certain amount of truth about the Holocaust industry…I think his ideology and worldview are conditioned by this sacred narrative of victimization that begins, in his culture, with the alleged victimization of the Jews throughout history. And that narrative and that culture make him suspicious of, let’s say, a right-wing American ideology, which is not founded on this defense of victims, which, on the contrary, is actually, to some extent, reacting against the victimization narrative, whether it’s anti-LBGTQ (because the left has made them out as victims) or whether it’s any of the other areas where the left has been identifying with victims. So I think Finkelstein is wary of the American right wing because of that. And I think he probably has some of that atavistic Jewish fear of the goyim getting out of control. And the goyim that Jews are taught they have to watch out for are the nationalistic ones, the right wing ones, the patriotic American or German ones who represent their mainstream majority culture and then are going to be coming after the Jews. Now the right-wingers would argue that’s what’s really going on here is that the Jews always come into these cultures and seize the best niches in the economy and basically become parasites off these cultures and take over the commanding heights of these cultures, especially in finance and media, and when the dominant culture—let’s say white Americans—doesn’t like it, they get into a clash with the Jews. And this leads to the Jews getting expelled or persecuted.

If we think about both of these cultures with their narratives—the Jewish left wing one of Norman Finkelstein, and the right wing one represented (in watered down form) by people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens—we can see why there would be a clash between them.

Richie Allen:

Yeah, for me it’s just wretched identity politics. I do want to say, and we won’t get into it because Kevin and I have gotten into it before, I don’t agree with Kevin that Jews have not been othered and ostracised and blamed throughout history.

Kevin Barrett:

I didn’t say that!

Richie Allen:

No no no, but you did say it’s effectively a myth that the Jews were victims and that they were run out of countries around the world. You don’t agree with that. I think it’s more complicated. I think Jews have been othered and scapegoated and blamed throughout history.

Kevin Barrett:

Of course they have. But often for good reason.

Richie Allen:

No, not for good reason. We’re not going there. But yeah, for me, it comes back to identity politics, really. And it’s the bane of my life, Kevin. And we’ve had this before you and I. Ultimately, salvation, I think, lies in realising that whatever our beliefs are, whichever God we pray to, we’re all the same mate. And there is an unfolding tyranny that has gripped the world. It’s a technocratic tyranny that’s building up and it doesn’t spare anybody. I mean, it’s funny isn’t we talk about these things. The most austere, the most heavy handed of the restrictions during the COVID times were undoubtedly in Tel Aviv and in Jerusalem and in the towns of Israel. The Israelis were absolute b******s to their own people during that particular time which I think is worth mentioning now.

It’s fascinating Kevin the Finkelstein thing it really is because he suffered greatly because of I believe because of his activities you know he lost tenure, didn’t he, at Paul University, if I’m not mistaken. And he went after Alan Dershowitz, didn’t he? And they came down pretty heavy on Finkelstein, the lobby, the Israeli lobby. So I’m fascinated by it. I think if you leave aside... it was a brilliant answer you gave by the way I think you’re probably on the money there but for me I look at Carlson and Owens and I see grifting Kevin. I see it being about engagement farming and brand building, follower building and ultimately money building. But I say that probably far too often for my listeners’ liking. But that’s where I see it. I don’t see any sincerity in it. Am I wrong?

Kevin Barrett:

Yeah, I think you’re wrong if you think that there’s no sincerity at all in people like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. I think they’re both probably pretty sincere overall, more so than when they worked for Fox News, and more so than the people who stayed at Fox News. So, yeah, I wouldn’t go quite that far. Was it Mark Twain who said that “it’s hard to get a man to see something if his income depends on not seeing it.” And so people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, when they were working for Fox, there were a lot of things that they didn’t see. And then they started to see some of them. And I think they were sincere enough to be willing to step outside of Fox and speak more honestly about a lot of these issues. But even today, even in the positions that they are in today, there may be places that they just sort of unconsciously don’t want to go.

Richie Allen:

Fair enough. I’m not going to come back on that. I’ll give you the final word on that. Listen, the High Court in this country ruled earlier this year that the UK government’s proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful. That was right. It was a good decision. It shouldn’t be a terrorist offense to support an organization that ultimately wants to bring an end to the tyranny of the Israeli state against the Palestinians. But the government appealed it, and the court has ruled that the banning of Palestine Action was indeed lawful.

Kevin Barrett:

Yeah, it’s pretty outrageous that opposing genocide is illegal and can get you imprisoned in the UK. And supporting genocide, which one would think would be practically a capital crime, is actually pretty much mandatory. So we’re living in a topsy-turvy, upside-down world, to say the least.

I actually kind of like the American tradition of First Amendment jurisprudence, which says that the only way your speech can be restricted is if there is a really direct connection between your speech and something seriously unlawful. In other words, if I want to say “Here’s why I support Palestine Action, or Hamas, or whatever”—and I have, I wrote a long essay about why I support Hamas, giving all sorts of good reasons, I think. Anybody’s welcome to argue with me and tell me why they think I’m wrong. Obviously that shouldn’t be illegal. What should be illegal is if I am giving some kind of a speech in a situation where my impassioned words are going to directly lead to somebody committing a crime. That obviously is what “crying fire in a crowded theater” would refer to. So these 80-year-olds in London who hold a little cardboard placard saying “I support Palestine Action”—can anybody really argue that people who see that placard are immediately going to run out and commit some crime? It’s ridiculous. So Great Britain really should be ashamed of itself, that this is going on in the country that gave us free speech in Hyde Park, and the Magna Carta, and all these things. It’s outrageous.

Richie Allen:

It’s outrageous. You’ve got the lobby here telling the British government that when people use slogans like “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” that what it really means is it’s okay to kill Jews...

It’s interesting that you’re speaking to me from Morocco, where you did write that very lengthy, well-written article about why you support Hamas. You know, the way it is here (in the UK), if you were working here, you would be in jail now. That’s how crazy it is. I mean, I’ve always said, I don’t fence straddle. I never have done. I always give the opinion that I really believe, the one I really believe. I don’t support any group or I don’t support anybody. I never supported the IRA. And I’m a die-hard Irish republican. I don’t support any group at all. But the Palestinians have every right to resist their occupation. In fact, it’s enshrined in the law that they have the right to resist. But it has become so utterly despotic now, that if you were living and working here, you’d be in jail for saying you support Hamas. That’s a fact.

Kevin Barrett:

Well, if I run out of money, and I can’t pay for my rent and food any more, which could happen since they’ve deplatformed me from Patreon and Youtube and Stripe and all of these places, I guess I could scrape together my last twenty dollars and buy a Ryan Air ticket from Morocco to London and get off the plane in London and tell everybody about my article and I could have my food and housing covered for the rest of my life by the British taxpayer…

(For the full unexpurgated interview, check out the audio or video track above.)

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link TruthJihad link

Live Press TV interview broadcast 6/11/26 @13:15 pm Quds Time

KEVIN BARRETT:Well, once again, we’ve seen that Trump and the Americans are lashing out in frustration because they’ve lost the war. They lost within the first 24 to 48 hours, and they have no more realistic options. They’ve bombed all the military targets they can bomb with massively diminishing returns, and so now they’re going after civilian targets. The New York Times just reported on its front page this morning that the destruction of two reservoirs in Bamani, in southern Iran, appears to be a war crime. If the New York Times is telling us that the American government is committing an obvious war crime by targeting civilian drinking water, and they’re putting that on their front page, you know there is some dissension going on, and some strategic problems, afflicting the command and control of the American empire.

So basically Trump is lashing out, vacillating between ridiculous exaggerated threats and equally ridiculous exaggerated claims that peace is at hand so the markets should be happy in order to help Trump’s and the Republicans’ prospects in the upcoming elections. He also probably would like to calm things down in time for the World Cup because the Americans are already getting all kinds of terrible publicity around the ways that they’re treating people. They’re not even allowing the Iranian team to sleep in the United States. They have to take a three hour flight into the United States, and then fly out that same day. It’s ridiculous. And they’re treating fans in similar ways, turning people back who have perfectly good visas and so on, and subjecting people to torture as they try to get through American immigration.

So the Americans are looking terrible in front of the world right now, and Trump doesn’t want them to look even worse, as it’s obvious that he’s lost this war. But what can he do? Bomb civilian facilities? Meanwhile, Iran is hitting military targets. Iran hit, I believe, 21 different US bases across the region, and apparently hit a hangar in Jordan containing advanced U.S. aircraft, F-35s.

So, once again, the same pattern keeps emerging, where Iran remains disciplined, goes after military targets, and goes after strategic assets like control over the Strait of Hormuz. The United States, with nothing military or strategic that it’s capable of doing, just lashes out and then Trump’s mouth lashes out as well.

PRESS TV:Kevin Barrett, why isn’t Donald Trump trying to cut his losses? Domestically, his approval ratings are awful. The economy is being affected with this unwarranted war. Regionally, I think, the U.S.’s reputation has taken a massive hit. One would think that instead of convoluting the situation even more, adding more knots to what already is, that the Trump administration, Donald Trump itself would be trying to cut his losses, but that’s not happening.

KEVIN BARRETT:Well, Trump has personality issues. As Bandy Lee wrote back maybe 10 years ago, Trump is clearly a pathological, narcissistic sociopath. And he has delusions of grandeur, as we see in all of these tweets where he tweets himself as Dr. Jesus and all these things. He’s the last person on earth that could ever admit they made a mistake.

So had he been a rational human being, and then had Trump even been minimally rational, as soon as it became clear within the next 24 to 48 hours after that attack on February 28th that it wasn’t going to work, that’s when Trump should have laid the blame on Netanyahu and gotten the hell out. That’s when he could have cut his losses to an absolute minimum. And he still would have had to deal with Iran running the Strait of Hormuz, but he wouldn’t have been in this position where the Americans just keep digging this hole and they’re going deeper and deeper and deeper. You’re supposed to stop digging when you’re in that situation, but apparently Trump and his advisors don’t know that.

And part of the reason (for US inability to cut its losses) along with this unfortunate personality of Trump’s, is the fact that not just Trump but the American government in general is largely influenced if not controlled out of Tel Aviv. And the Israelis are in a terrible strategic situation. They are seeing that their dreams of regional hegemony evaporate as Iran and its allies assert themselves in the region, gain control over the Strait of Hormuz, potential control over the Red Sea, and escalation dominance with their missile force that can’t be touched since it’s in underground storage. And suddenly Israel sees its dreams going up in smoke, and all they can imagine doing is continuing to force their American vassal, from whom they collect trillions of dollars of tribute, to bleed itself digging this hole deeper and deeper.

So how does this all end? I think ultimately they are going to somehow have to cut their losses. And maybe Netanyahu going down will be the way it all pans out, and the Zionist entity will then appoint new leadership, try to blame Netanyahu for their excesses and failures. And then maybe Trump will again try to shift that blame to Netanyahu and try to find a way to wriggle out. But Iran’s going to be on top when that happens.

PRESS TV:Kevin Barrett, let’s also talk about the Iranian response to the Israeli attacks that took place in the south of the Lebanese capital, Beirut, in the Dahia district. So Iran, it held its word. It kept up its word. It said if an attack. He also said that the ceasefire must encompass the entire resistance front. How significant was that, seeing the retaliation being carried out against the Israelis by these.

KEVIN BARRETT:Well, this case of Iran drawing a red line and then acting when it was crossed actually changes the whole regional equation, as all the observers, including Western observers, are admitting. Prior to this, Iran was so restrained that it really never, ever hit anybody unless it was hit itself. And now Iran drew that red line around Beirut and said if Israel goes ahead and bombs Beirut, then Iran will retaliate.

This raises the possibility that Iran can now dissuade and deter the Zionist entity from its most egregious excesses, potentially not only from bombing Beirut, but perhaps even ultimately forcing the Zionist entity to withdraw from places like the parts of Gaza that it occupies, as well as southern Lebanon. And if to the extent that this happens, we will have to see some major radical change in leadership in Tel Aviv. They’re going to have to admit failure. And that’s probably going to require scapegoating Netanyahu and coming up with new leadership. And it won’t be that much better. It’ll be devoted to genocide and expansion. But they’re going to have to admit that they lost this round. So Iran’s drawing this red line around Beirut and then standing by it and punishing the Zionists for crossing that red line completely changes the regional equation.

PRESS TV:Kevin Barrett, you mentioned the IAEA resolution the anti-Iran resolution where the Board of Governors they adopted this anti-Iranian resolution that happened on Wednesday. The resolution has been called everything from being flawed to being illegal as well. Is there a big question mark right now over the legitimacy and with it the independence and reputation of the IAEA?

KEVIN BARRETT:Well, the IAEA has shown that it’s a corrupt cat’s paw for this evil empire that’s ruling the world through nuclear threats. The Zionist entity is the world’s worst case of nuclear proliferation. They are not signed on to the NPT in any way shape or form. They’re blatant serial violators. They stole the nuclear material to build hundreds of nuclear weapons from the United States, with the help of the Kosher Nostra organized crime ring that dominates the United States. And so the IAEA was actually complicit in the war on Iran by putting out their resolution essentially seeming to give some kind of justification for the attack on Iran. And so they have a terrible record and this is not going to help. Ultimately they’ve been proven irrelevant and the world is going to have to come up with some new institutions to deal with the problem of proliferation.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link (recorded Sunday, minutes after news broke of Israel crossing Iran’s red line by bombing Beirut)

“Crazy Bibi” could have made good money selling furniture in Philadelphia: “Hurry, hurry, hurry, these prices are f*ing crazy!” Instead, he’s running Israel’s going-out-of-business sale, peddling tens of thousands of corpses of Palestinian and Lebanese women and children, while the world is no longer buying his excuses.

Bibi could have made even more money in commodities speculation: “Come on down, hurry, get your August oil futures—these prices are REALLY f*ing crazy!”

But Bibi has one Trump card and he’s playing it for all it’s worth. Though we can’t be sure what’s on the card—is it Trump performing a sex act on Bill “Bubba” Clinton as stated by Jeffrey Epstein in an email to his brother, or something even worse?—it’s obvious that Bibi is the butch and Trump is the femme, mirroring the Roy Cohn-Trump “mentorship,” meaning that Netanyahu just keeps leading Trump around on a leash, ignoring the Orange Poodle’s pathetic little yelps.

That’s why when Trump tells Netanyahu not to strike Iran, Netanyahu gives Trump the proverbial finger and bombs Tehran anyway.

But you know what’s really f*ing crazy? I’ll tell what’s f*ing crazy: Israel is conducting a hostile takeover of the US military. If there is a reason that every politician who supports this shouldn’t be summarily executed for treason, please let me know in the comments, because I can’t think of one.

As I write this Monday at 1 pm Quds Time, corresponding to 6 a.m. US Eastern, it isn’t yet clear whether the US will be fully dragged into the revved-up Iranian-Israeli hostilities. But I wouldn’t bet against it. Even pre-hostile-takeover, the Israeli-US war on Iran is a joint effort, and the US is obviously the junior partner. Essentially Israel’s entire military is being provided free of charge by the US taxpayer. It’s the US, not Israel, that used up half of its entire arsenal of THAAD interceptors protecting the genocidal Zionist entity occupying Palestine. There is no reason to think Trump will actually use all of that theoretical leverage provided by the fact that the US taxpayer completely pays for the fake state of “Israel” in order to gain any meaningful degree of separation from the “f*ing crazy” mad dog terrorizing West Asia.

If “Israel” succeeds in embroiling the US and its Gulf vassals in major escalation, not only will what’s left of US bases in the region be pummeled, and US ships damaged and perhaps sunk, but the Red Sea will likely be closed by Iran’s Yemeni allies, driving global oil prices towards the Götterdämmerung that everybody except the futures markets has been predicting. What’s more, I wouldn’t bet on the life support systems in Zionist-occupied places like Kuwait and especially the UAE continuing to support life. Without electricity for air conditioning and desalinization for potable water, those so-called countries will barely be fit for snakes and lizards. Message to Linh Dinh, who rashly flew to Dubai a few days ago: Please remove yourself from the “plastic a*****e of the universe” (Faulkner thought it was LA but he hadn’t seen Dubai) before the lights go out and the taps run dry!

Are there any American national security insiders getting tired of “Israel” dragging the US, West Asia, and the world into complete ruin? Possibly. A few days ago someone leaked a story to The New York Times about the Pentagon facing a “growing espionage threat from Israel.” (How much greater the Mossad threat could possibly get after they’ve already killed a president and his about-to-become-president brother, slaughtered US sailors on an unarmed spy ship 59 years ago today, and blown up the Twin Towers in the mother of all false flags, remains to be seen…)

Max Blumenthal reported an interesting detail about the “growing Israeli espionage threat”: The Mossad got caught planting bugs in the Secret Service vehicle that would lead the response to any emergency involving the president. If you had contingency plans for another assassination of a sitting president you might want to do something like that.

But there’s no obvious reason why Israel would want to assassinate Trump, who services Bibi with barely a peep of protest. So maybe they’re bugging the Secret Service emergency vehicle just to send a message: “Because we can!”

Ever since Trump let Netanyahu drag him into the idiotic and criminal February 28 attack on Iran, and the Iranians responded by seizing permanent control over the Strait of Hormuz, Trump has been flailing around desperately trying to minimize the public perception of the size and scope of the disaster, while reassuring markets that everything will be soon returning to normal. Daily distractions, alongside occasional obfuscations, have sufficed to keep markets from fully facing the terrible truth.

Now that the war is exploding again, what new distractions await us? Humorists note that if war on Iran was a distraction from Epstein, now Trump needs more Epstein revelations as a distraction from his ever-more-disastrous war on Iran. But from Trump’s perspective, an even better distraction would be aliens abducting Steven Spielberg and landing on the White House lawn as a PR stunt for Spielberg’s new film Disclosure Day. (Spielberg denies conspiracy theories that his film will be grooming the public to believe in aliens, but then, he also denied that Schindler’s List was grooming the public to believe in the Holocaust, so it’s best to take anything he says with a proverbial grain of salt.)

Will the aliens arrive just in time to watch Trump serve as ring girl when Bibi MCs the first big UFC fight at the White House?

And would “aliens land to watch UFC fight at White House” succeed in distracting the public, and the markets, from the Zionist-incited total implosion of Earth’s economy?

Or maybe they’ve got an even bigger distraction up their sleeves. If and when they whip it out on us, you can bet that False Flag Weekly News will be there to expose the sordid, shocking truth.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate. Alternately you can Paypal or Zelle to truthjihad[at]gmail(dot)com. Note that Zelle, unlike other methods, doesn’t charge any fees.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Israel just prevailed in its scorched earth campaign against the USA in general, and the state of Kentucky in particular, by “primarying” Rep. Thomas Massie. Since they couldn’t Epstein him, the Kosher Nostra used AI to generate a suggestive clip of Massie having a “threesome” affair with Democrats Ilhan Omar and AOC. Welcome to the AI era! Who needs Epstein and his gaggle of teenage sex slave shiksas when you’ve got AI? From now on, Israel will just create fake videos of imaginary misbehavior on the part of anyone who doesn’t follow their orders.

But how long will that strategy work? Fox News addicted boomers who can’t tell AI from reality, and who love the “Israel” they learned about from Leon Uris, are dying off. Younger Americans are increasingly disgusted by Zionist Jew lies, Zionist Jew depravity, and Zionist Jew genocide. Massie won more than 80% of the Gen Z (under 30) vote. He won the 26 to 35s 72%-16%. He won Gen X (ages 36-64) by a greater than 6% margin. Unfortunately for Massie and America, the MOFs (moronic old farts) turned out in great numbers, and two-thirds of their votes went to Massie’s Israel-owned opponent, Ed Gallrein.

Or did they? The senior (Israeli) citizen voters were responsible for practically all of the mail-in ballots, and the vast majority went to Gallrein. In an interesting coincidence, Gallrein’s total mail-in haul of 10,854 votes perfectly covered his margin of victory of 10,283 votes. Were all ten thousand plus of those Zio-ballots actually filled out and mailed by old fogies who were compos mentis? The 2020 election, Trump’s supporters never tired of telling us, was stolen by Democrats who made sure that entire senior centers full of zombies voted unanimously for Biden. Trump himself calls mail-in ballots “election fraud” and “cheating” and has been trying to ban mail-in voting, but hasn’t succeeded so far since the Constitution deems that states run elections and the details are handled by local administration.

But for some reason Trump hasn’t been protesting Gallrein’s victory and demanding a thorough inspection of all those mail-in ballots to see whether they were postmarked in Tel Aviv. That’s probably because Trump has never had a job in his life except money launderer and front man for the Kosher Nostra.

Though Israel got away with primarying Massie, like it primaried Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman and a long list of people before that, it likely won a pyrrhic victory. By exposing Israel’s control of the US Congress in an unprecedented way, and outraging the majority of non-retirement-age people nationwide, the Zionists are wasting what’s left of their soft power—their appeal to hearts and minds.

AIPAC’s Massie takedown happened in the wake of two of Israel’s worst-ever PR disasters: The New York Times’ exposure of Israel’s unbelievably disgusting torture of Palestinian prisoners, including training dogs to commit rape, was quickly followed by Ben Gvir sharing a video of himself joining Israeli guards in abusing the humanitarian activists who were attacked and kidnapped a thousand kilometers from Israeli shores and taken to Israel for brutalization.

With all of this self-inflicted PR damage, Israel is sacrificing any potential it may have had for a long-term future in favor of minor, short-term gains. As it wins at the tactical level, by successfully kidnapping and abusing activists, kidnapping and dog-raping Palestinians, or getting honest politicians thrown out of the US Congress, it loses bigly strategically.

That’s also true of the Israel-driven war on Iran. As neocon superstar Robert Kagan has been grumpily observing, the vicious attack on Iran February 28th basically forced the Iranians to permanently seize the Strait of Hormuz, thereby raising Iran’s status as a regional power by several notches. While the sneak attack succeeded tactically by mass-murdering Iranian leaders and schoolgirls alike, it will go down in history as one of the most colossal strategic failures ever recorded. (If Israel thought Iran pre-Hormuz was an existential threat, just wait till you see what’s coming.)

Tactical success creating strategic failure seems an Israeli speciality. That’s basically the thesis of Ronan Bergman’s Rise and Kill First, which chronicles Israel’s grotesque history of political assassinations (while leaving out the biggest ones, including the Kennedys). Bergman notes that Israel has grown increasingly proficient at murdering its leading opponents, but that every time it murders a Resistance leader, new Resistance leaders arise in his place to present even greater threats. That is certainly what happened when the Zionists wiped out a major segment of Iran’s leadership February 28, uniting the country behind equally-capable leaders who are even more hardline than the martyred ones.

Why do the Zionists keep shooting themselves in the foot by shooting people they would be well advised not to shoot? Why do they brag about dog rape and abuse of humanitarian activists, when strategically it would make more sense to respect basic decency and international law? Why do they make a pushy, obnoxious spectacle of themselves sacrificing Thomas Massie, whose influence could have been dealt with more subtly and effectively through low-key, rational politicking? And above all, why do they keep behaving in ways that increase the determination of their Middle Eastern neighbors, and an ever-greater segment of the world’s population, to be done with them, when they could easily accept the international consensus of Oslo, Camp David, and so on, and assure themselves of a decent future?

E. Michael Jones, who is leading a conference I’m attending here in Croatia, says “the Jews are the enemies of Logos.” By Logos he means something like “the God-given rationality, order, and beauty infusing creation.” Dr. Jones argues that the Jews, in rejecting Jesus Christ, rejected Logos, and have been at war with it ever since. That is why they are infused with a spirit of hatred and ugliness and grotesquely aggressive behavior that turns out to be self-destructive.

Dr. Jones makes a pretty good argument for that thesis. But Zionist Jews themselves, with their outrages against decency and morality and reason, are making an even better one.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com