Truth Jihad Radio

International business consultant and wildlife foundation manager Sami Jamil Jadallah discusses his article “Qatar World Cup Getting Smeared by a Well-Organized, Well-Funded Racist Attack Machine.” He writes: “My message to these pundits (criticizing Qatar) is to shut the F-CK up and look at your history of hate, racism, and colonial wars. If one does not enjoy a good game without being drunk, that person has a problem. As for LBGT issues, let us keep in mind till recently, sodomy was a criminal felony, and Black and White marriage was illegal and punishable by jail. So please don’t teach us your mentally and ethically corrupt morality. As an Arab and a Muslim, ‘We Are All Qatar.’”

For more Qatar-bashing-bashing, check out my satire “Qatar Doesn't Have Enough Genders to Host a World Cup.”

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Ken Meyercord writes:

“I had a revelation last night as I lay tossing and turning, and I thought I’d run it by you to see how you think it ranks with St. Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus. There’s a website out there called ‘Jew or Not Jew‘, on which individuals are scored (between zero and 15) as to whether they are Jewish or not. As explained on the website, ‘We evaluate how Jewish a person is based on three factors. How Jewish they are internally, how Jewish they are externally and how much we want that person to be a Jew in the first place.’ I had always thought the site the work of some Jew-hater wanting to keep track of Jewish cliquishness in order to expose their disproportionate role in important segments of our society. Now I think differently. I think it is meant as a tool by which to identify Jews for those Jews wanting to engage in what has been called ‘ethnic nepotism.’ (Circumstantial evidence: The descriptions of the evaluation process by which an individual’s score is arrived at are so clever and witty they must have been written by a Jew.)

“I had occasion to visit the site recently as I wanted to determine if it is still the case that the president of every Ivy League school but one is either a Jew or married to a Jew (It is the case). I found that none of the presidents were included amongst the thousands of individuals ranked by the site. That surprised me as many lesser lights are, e.g., Zack de la Rocha, Victoria Coren Mitchell, Ray Comfort. Even Sam Bankman-Fried, the ex-billionaire founder of the now bankrupt bitcoin exchange FTX, was not listed until two days ago—after he had made the headlines (Score: 13). (Bankman-Fried’s case reminds me of the comment by the ‘self-hating’ Jew, Gilad Atzmon, that ‘If you hear of a financial scandal involving millions of dollars, anyone could be behind it; if you hear of one involving billions of dollars, you can bet a Jew is behind it.’)

“One thing I learned from my investigation into the Ivy League presidencies is that even Jews have trouble identifying who is a Jew and who is not. The Jewish Telegraph Agency, which bills itself as ‘the definitive, trusted global source of news and analysis on issues of Jewish interest and concern,’ thought the one Gentile amongst Ivy League Prez, Lee Bollinger of Columbia (Of all places!), was Jewish (see Correction at end of article). So maybe the Jew or Not Jew site is of great value to Jewish elders—in fact, founded by them—to assist them in recruiting their fellow tribesmen in fulfilling their destiny to be a ‘light unto the nations.’ In a supreme irony, if the site proves not enlightening enough, might it be the Jews themselves who mandate that their fellow tribesmen identify themselves publicly, say, by displaying a yellow Star of David on their clothing!”

I responded by sending Ken a link to Ron Unz’s article exposing the shocking overrepresentation (in relation to their grades and test scores) of Jews in elite US universities.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Ken Meyercord writes:

“I had a revelation last night as I lay tossing and turning, and I thought I’d run it by you to see how you think it ranks with St. Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus. There’s a website out there called ‘Jew or Not Jew‘, on which individuals are scored (between zero and 15) as to whether they are Jewish or not. As explained on the website, ‘We evaluate how Jewish a person is based on three factors. How Jewish they are internally, how Jewish they are externally and how much we want that person to be a Jew in the first place.’ I had always thought the site the work of some Jew-hater wanting to keep track of Jewish cliquishness in order to expose their disproportionate role in important segments of our society. Now I think differently. I think it is meant as a tool by which to identify Jews for those Jews wanting to engage in what has been called ‘ethnic nepotism.’ (Circumstantial evidence: The descriptions of the evaluation process by which an individual’s score is arrived at are so clever and witty they must have been written by a Jew.)

“I had occasion to visit the site recently as I wanted to determine if it is still the case that the president of every Ivy League school but one is either a Jew or married to a Jew (It is the case). I found that none of the presidents were included amongst the thousands of individuals ranked by the site. That surprised me as many lesser lights are, e.g., Zack de la Rocha, Victoria Coren Mitchell, Ray Comfort. Even Sam Bankman-Fried, the ex-billionaire founder of the now bankrupt bitcoin exchange FTX, was not listed until two days ago—after he had made the headlines (Score: 13). (Bankman-Fried’s case reminds me of the comment by the ‘self-hating’ Jew, Gilad Atzmon, that ‘If you hear of a financial scandal involving millions of dollars, anyone could be behind it; if you hear of one involving billions of dollars, you can bet a Jew is behind it.’)

“One thing I learned from my investigation into the Ivy League presidencies is that even Jews have trouble identifying who is a Jew and who is not. The Jewish Telegraph Agency, which bills itself as ‘the definitive, trusted global source of news and analysis on issues of Jewish interest and concern,’ thought the one Gentile amongst Ivy League Prez, Lee Bollinger of Columbia (Of all places!), was Jewish (see Correction at end of article). So maybe the Jew or Not Jew site is of great value to Jewish elders—in fact, founded by them—to assist them in recruiting their fellow tribesmen in fulfilling their destiny to be a ‘light unto the nations.’ In a supreme irony, if the site proves not enlightening enough, might it be the Jews themselves who mandate that their fellow tribesmen identify themselves publicly, say, by displaying a yellow Star of David on their clothing!”

I responded by sending Ken a link to Ron Unz’s article exposing the shocking overrepresentation (in relation to their grades and test scores) of Jews in elite US universities.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

In his new article Energy from the Vacuum scientist Josh Mitteldorf observes: “There are persistent stories of people who invent perpetual motion machines only to disappear or to die mysteriously or become insane.” After looking at the physics of various proposed free energy technologies, he notes: “Many people have speculated that such technologies are not only possible, but that they have been developed and deployed by an elite group of powerful individuals or for advanced military applications, but kept secret from the public…Free energy could threaten the world’s reserve currency. In addition, the same ZPE technologies that could run our cars and heat our houses without pollution might also be converted too easily to make mega-bombs that no one wants to think about. The fact that these technologies are bubbling up in the mainstream scientific literature suggests that something is afoot.”

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

In his new article Energy from the Vacuum scientist Josh Mitteldorf observes: “There are persistent stories of people who invent perpetual motion machines only to disappear or to die mysteriously or become insane.” After looking at the physics of various proposed free energy technologies, he notes: “Many people have speculated that such technologies are not only possible, but that they have been developed and deployed by an elite group of powerful individuals or for advanced military applications, but kept secret from the public…Free energy could threaten the world’s reserve currency. In addition, the same ZPE technologies that could run our cars and heat our houses without pollution might also be converted too easily to make mega-bombs that no one wants to think about. The fact that these technologies are bubbling up in the mainstream scientific literature suggests that something is afoot.”

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Scott Bennett, author of The Shell Game (a copy of which he bestowed on Tucker Carlson) discusses the midterm elections, our participation in the Towards Tomorrow Seminar with former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and much more. Below is an excerpt from the interview.

Kevin Barrett: Your take on the EU then is quite different from that of the EU's top foreign policy chief Josep Borrell, who raised some eyebrows a few weeks ago when he said "Europe is a garden and most of the rest of the world is a jungle and the jungle could invade the garden." But there might be a little bit of truth to that (especially) if we imagine (as you've said) that these mRNA vaccines are indeed going to depopulate us to a certain extent, slowing our fertility. Fertility is already so low in the European world, and it's down to just about replacement in North America. So with or without the effect of COVID, there is a differential between, say, African fertility, which is still quite high, and fertility in the U.S. and North America and Europe, which is much, much lower. And then if you factor in the mRNA vaccines and COVID, neither COVID nor the vaccines hit Africa very much. And then there are other countries in Asia as well with with somewhat higher birth rates than the West. So this garden versus jungle metaphor, of course, was very politically incorrect and and very arrogant. And of course his championing the EU is quite ridiculous, as you suggested. However, there is that demographic angle that maybe needs to be addressed.

Scott Bennett: Yeah, well, we studied this when I was back at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC, way back in 2003 to 2008: the population winter coming and the demographic failure in Europe and America. And it's only gotten worse. And there's the other thing I've studied that's doomed the West, Kevin (as opposed to) what I saw when I was in the Middle East: There's such a preservation of feminine, delightful women, and they're rejoicing in their feminine gifts and being women and being wives and mothers and being real girls in the most classical feminine sense. And there's no oppression of women, there's no brutality, there's...there's harmony.

Kevin Barrett: You're saying there are still two different separate genders. Is that legal?!

Scott Bennett: Yes. There's a complementariness that I was so refreshed to see. I loved talking with the young Muslim women that were at the conference. They're very, very genteel and polite and everything beautiful that women are that has been preserved in their culture. In America, we have a complete abomination. The Feminine Mystique (by Betty Friedan). Karl Stern wrote about it in The Flight from Woman. George Gilder wrote about it in Men and Marriage and Sexual Suicide in the West. Since 1960, there has been a slow degeneration, decay and destruction of the feminine ideal of women as mothers and wives and their gentleness and serenity. Women exist in an emotional state for a reason, because God made them this way for the harmony of humanity. And we in the West have polluted and corrupted and deformed and and tried to rip women out of their natural state. It's like taking a fish out of the ocean and putting, you know, paper wings on it and saying, Now you're a bird. Well, it ain't going to work. And we've seen that it doesn't work, with the ferocity and anger and feminism and hatred of men and divorce that have grown in the last 30 years in America and its culture and pop culture.

And we have an amazingly toxic environment in this country that makes the natural love and attraction between men and the women, and the natural inclination to marriage, so embittered and cold and twisted. That's the other the main pathology that afflicts us. And I didn't see that over there. It doesn't exist over there. So I look at these things from an emotional-psychological social science point of view. And I think, I keep saying, sadly, we are so full of toxicity. You were talking (earlier in the interview) about German self-loathing. This causes a mental breakdown on the individual and societal level, in emotional breakdowns and nervous breakdowns. You have an explosion of pent-up energy. So there's enormous pent-up energy in Germany. There's enormous pent-up energy in America. You see that in certain phenomena, such as Men Going Their Own Way, right? There's a whole Internet subculture of men who are giving up marriage, giving up women, living their own lives.

Kevin Barrett: And they're almost as mad at women as the feminists are at men.

Scott Bennett: Yes. So there's an amazing animosity and toxicity that is brewing in this country. It's an amazing thing to behold. But I didn't see it anywhere in the Middle East. Not anywhere! It's not there.

Kevin Barrett: So why do right-wing conservative people who share your values and mine—why do they, so many of them, hate Muslims and Islam?

Scott Bennett: That's the sad thing. I can only say it's the Jewish-Israeli-Zionist brainwashing and bags of money that they've been giving them, and the AIPAC brainwashing curriculums, and the Heritage Foundation briefing books that they give to these politicians. I've seen the briefing books.

Kevin Barrett: But it's not just politicians. It's also the ordinary people. People who comment on some of my articles and stuff — I see these these conservative people with values and critiques of a lot of things I can relate to. But lot of them have these bizarre hallucinations about Islam (and) hate Islam. What you're saying wouldn't fit at all with with their world-view.

Scott Bennett: They're ignorant, Kevin. They've never been over there. They've never met these people. They've never shared time and meals with them and spoken intimately. And that's the sad thing. But there's no animosity between the Muslims and Christian people. I was amazed at the the lack of animosity, because I was looking at it from an American point of view. I was looking at it like, well, I'd be pissed off, I'd be this, I'd be that, I'd want vengeance. I want to kick the s**t out of people if they came into my country and broke things and killed my relatives. But I'm looking at it from an American Western point of view. Their point of view was different. Their point of view is, God's in charge. God will do everything. Our job is to walk in love. And I kept coming back to God. That's what the Bible says. Walk in love. Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars discusses his new article “Requiem for a Figurehead” as well as the midterms, abortion and “sexual liberation,” our “Towards Tomorrow” seminar with Dr. Ahmadinejad, and the Kanye and Kyrie controversy. Below is the transcript of the show’s final minutes.

Kevin Barrett: I wanted to ask you about the Kanye and Kyrie controversy. They apparently spoke that J word that you are notoriously associated with also speaking, and they lost billions of dollars. I bet you never lost billions of dollars.

E. Michael Jones: No, I didn't. And I've said it a lot more times than Kanye has, actually. (laughter) I do have a theory about what happened here. Now, if you focus on Kyrie — we pronounce it Keerie-ay. We don't say "Kyrie" eleison in mass. But anyway, if you focus on Kyrie, what he did seems completely insignificant. I mean, he tweeted a recommendation for a movie, okay?

Kevin Barrett: He didn't even recommend it. He just had a link in the tweet that just basically means, hey, this is interesting. It doesn't even say whether he likes it or dislikes it.

E. Michael Jones: Right. So why is it suddenly World War Three at the ADL? What's going on here? First of all: Jonathan (Greenblatt), hold on. Take a deep breath. Take a step back. Count to ten. You just wrecked the best revolutionary operation in America. It was called the black-Jewish Alliance. It's been in existence for 100 years. The NAACP was created by Jews to keep blacks on the plantation. And you were successful. The most successful resurrection of the black-Jewish alliance was Black Lives Matter. Everybody thought it had died in 1967. Now it's back with a vengeance. And Jonathan, you just wrecked it! Why did you do that? Why did the ADL shoot itself in the foot? This guy named Liel Liebovitz just wrote an article saying the ADL has to go. It's a Jew saying this. So (Jonathan Greenblatt) why did you do this? I think the answer is: because they needed something immediately to cover up the really damaging revelations that came out in the Kanye West scandal.

Kevin Barrett: And what were those?

E. Michael Jones: The fact that he had a personal trainer by the name of Harley Pasternak... Okay, so wait a minute. He's your “personal trainer” and then he tweets — Kanye published the tweet — if you don't do what I say, I'm going to have you institutionalized. You will you be shot up with drugs and you will never see your children again, or something like that.

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, that was a pretty nasty threat. I mean, I've heard of "you'll never work in this town again." I'll bet Mel Gibson heard that a few times. But "we're going to take your kids away and institutionalize you..."

E. Michael Jones: Whoa, whoa. This is really serious. And it's not the first time this has happened. Google Marilyn Monroe's Jewish psychiatrist back in the fifties. Back then you weren't called a personal trainer. You were called a psychiatrist when you had to take control of people's lives. But the situation was similar because that guy Greenson shot Marilyn Monroe full of drugs and probably killed her. And now here's this guy, Pasternak, who's got connections with Canadian psychological warfare operations. And he tells this guy on camera that, "yeah, I have access to really powerful drugs." Well, wait a minute. This is getting really serious. And all these A-listers there are basically under the control of this Jewish personal trainer who will threaten that if you get out of line, he'll shoot you up with drugs, have you institutionalized, and take away your children!

Kevin Barrett: I understand that Sirhan Sirhan's Jewish personal trainer said "if you keep going to these pro-Palestinian demonstrations, I'm going to make sure you're locked up for the rest of your life." I'm just joking, semi-joking, here. But I do think Sirhan Sirhan probably did actually have a Jewish personal trainer who was skilled in hypnotherapy. But that's another topic for a different radio show. Yeah, I think you're right, Mike. By putting that out there, you would think that the whole world would take Kanye's side. And I think a lot of the world has.

E. Michael Jones: But the blacks have these token guys like Shaquille O'Neal, Charles Barkley, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, all of these guys on the plantation, who attack Kanye as if to say, "no, there's no such thing as Jewish control."

Kevin Barrett: What's wrong with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar? I used to really like him when I was a kid and he was winning championships for the Milwaukee Bucks. He was a feisty Muslim troublemaker back then. What happened to that guy? Did they lobotomize him?

E. Michael Jones: He called Kanye an anti-Semite. No, Kyrie, Kyrie. He called Kyrie an anti-Semite.

Kevin Barrett: Kareem is still probably close to seven feet tall, but he's lost a lot of intellectual and moral stature. He's becoming an embarrassment to the American Muslim community.

E. Michael Jones: So they basically divided the the black community. And the point of Lial Leibovitz's article is that the people who are going to pay the price here are the little Jews. And it's going to be places like Brooklyn where you have this intense confrontation between blacks and Jews on the street level. And they're going to be attacked thanks to Mr. Greenblatt and his organization. Leibovitz is saying that Greenblatt came from the Democratic Party and basically made the ADL a Democratic organization. And it doesn't care for ordinary Jews. Okay. I agree with that. But the other side of the coin is that basically the Jews took over the Democratic Party. So now you have Merrick Garland: Does anyone seriously think he applies the laws in some type of equal fashion? He's like the Cheka. This is lawfare. You've got this weaponization of the law by all of these Jewish prosecutors who are taking Soros money.

Kevin Barrett: Isn't it like every member of Biden's cabinet is either Jewish or married to a Jew?

E. Michael Jones: Yeah. They say they have so many Jews they could have a minyan if it were a synagogue. Obviously the ADL now represents the Democratic Party. I'm sure Norman Podhoretz and the Commentary crowd, the neoconservatives, are upset about this. But ... They blew up the whole black-Jewish alliance, which is one of the crucial features of the Democratic Party. Complete recklessness. I mean, did they panic? It's more plausible that they panicked because people were talking about Kanye too much and they needed to distract from it by talking about this black Hebrew Israelite stuff, which is apparently what Kyrie believes.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars discusses his new article “Requiem for a Figurehead” as well as the midterms, abortion and “sexual liberation,” our “Towards Tomorrow” seminar with Dr. Ahmadinejad, and the Kanye and Kyrie controversy. Below is the transcript of the show’s final minutes.

Kevin Barrett: I wanted to ask you about the Kanye and Kyrie controversy. They apparently spoke that J word that you are notoriously associated with also speaking, and they lost billions of dollars. I bet you never lost billions of dollars.

E. Michael Jones: No, I didn't. And I've said it a lot more times than Kanye has, actually. (laughter) I do have a theory about what happened here. Now, if you focus on Kyrie — we pronounce it Keerie-ay. We don't say "Kyrie" eleison in mass. But anyway, if you focus on Kyrie, what he did seems completely insignificant. I mean, he tweeted a recommendation for a movie, okay?

Kevin Barrett: He didn't even recommend it. He just had a link in the tweet that just basically means, hey, this is interesting. It doesn't even say whether he likes it or dislikes it.

E. Michael Jones: Right. So why is it suddenly World War Three at the ADL? What's going on here? First of all: Jonathan (Greenblatt), hold on. Take a deep breath. Take a step back. Count to ten. You just wrecked the best revolutionary operation in America. It was called the black-Jewish Alliance. It's been in existence for 100 years. The NAACP was created by Jews to keep blacks on the plantation. And you were successful. The most successful resurrection of the black-Jewish alliance was Black Lives Matter. Everybody thought it had died in 1967. Now it's back with a vengeance. And Jonathan, you just wrecked it! Why did you do that? Why did the ADL shoot itself in the foot? This guy named Liel Liebovitz just wrote an article saying the ADL has to go. It's a Jew saying this. So (Jonathan Greenblatt) why did you do this? I think the answer is: because they needed something immediately to cover up the really damaging revelations that came out in the Kanye West scandal.

Kevin Barrett: And what were those?

E. Michael Jones: The fact that he had a personal trainer by the name of Harley Pasternak... Okay, so wait a minute. He's your “personal trainer” and then he tweets — Kanye published the tweet — if you don't do what I say, I'm going to have you institutionalized. You will you be shot up with drugs and you will never see your children again, or something like that.

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, that was a pretty nasty threat. I mean, I've heard of "you'll never work in this town again." I'll bet Mel Gibson heard that a few times. But "we're going to take your kids away and institutionalize you..."

E. Michael Jones: Whoa, whoa. This is really serious. And it's not the first time this has happened. Google Marilyn Monroe's Jewish psychiatrist back in the fifties. Back then you weren't called a personal trainer. You were called a psychiatrist when you had to take control of people's lives. But the situation was similar because that guy Greenson shot Marilyn Monroe full of drugs and probably killed her. And now here's this guy, Pasternak, who's got connections with Canadian psychological warfare operations. And he tells this guy on camera that, "yeah, I have access to really powerful drugs." Well, wait a minute. This is getting really serious. And all these A-listers there are basically under the control of this Jewish personal trainer who will threaten that if you get out of line, he'll shoot you up with drugs, have you institutionalized, and take away your children!

Kevin Barrett: I understand that Sirhan Sirhan's Jewish personal trainer said "if you keep going to these pro-Palestinian demonstrations, I'm going to make sure you're locked up for the rest of your life." I'm just joking, semi-joking, here. But I do think Sirhan Sirhan probably did actually have a Jewish personal trainer who was skilled in hypnotherapy. But that's another topic for a different radio show. Yeah, I think you're right, Mike. By putting that out there, you would think that the whole world would take Kanye's side. And I think a lot of the world has.

E. Michael Jones: But the blacks have these token guys like Shaquille O'Neal, Charles Barkley, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, all of these guys on the plantation, who attack Kanye as if to say, "no, there's no such thing as Jewish control."

Kevin Barrett: What's wrong with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar? I used to really like him when I was a kid and he was winning championships for the Milwaukee Bucks. He was a feisty Muslim troublemaker back then. What happened to that guy? Did they lobotomize him?

E. Michael Jones: He called Kanye an anti-Semite. No, Kyrie, Kyrie. He called Kyrie an anti-Semite.

Kevin Barrett: Kareem is still probably close to seven feet tall, but he's lost a lot of intellectual and moral stature. He's becoming an embarrassment to the American Muslim community.

E. Michael Jones: So they basically divided the the black community. And the point of Lial Leibovitz's article is that the people who are going to pay the price here are the little Jews. And it's going to be places like Brooklyn where you have this intense confrontation between blacks and Jews on the street level. And they're going to be attacked thanks to Mr. Greenblatt and his organization. Leibovitz is saying that Greenblatt came from the Democratic Party and basically made the ADL a Democratic organization. And it doesn't care for ordinary Jews. Okay. I agree with that. But the other side of the coin is that basically the Jews took over the Democratic Party. So now you have Merrick Garland: Does anyone seriously think he applies the laws in some type of equal fashion? He's like the Cheka. This is lawfare. You've got this weaponization of the law by all of these Jewish prosecutors who are taking Soros money.

Kevin Barrett: Isn't it like every member of Biden's cabinet is either Jewish or married to a Jew?

E. Michael Jones: Yeah. They say they have so many Jews they could have a minyan if it were a synagogue. Obviously the ADL now represents the Democratic Party. I'm sure Norman Podhoretz and the Commentary crowd, the neoconservatives, are upset about this. But ... They blew up the whole black-Jewish alliance, which is one of the crucial features of the Democratic Party. Complete recklessness. I mean, did they panic? It's more plausible that they panicked because people were talking about Kanye too much and they needed to distract from it by talking about this black Hebrew Israelite stuff, which is apparently what Kyrie believes.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Two very strange stories—the hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, and Homer Van Meter’s account of his Sonoma County shootout with satanic cult members in 2004—just got even stranger. Homer Van Meter says that one of the cult members bore an uncanny resemblance to a younger version of David DePape, the man who was arrested for assaulting Paul Pelosi on October 28. Van Meter says a second witness, the woman he rescued from the cultists, has positively identified DePape as one of her kidnappers.

All of this may seem completely unbelievable to anyone unfamiliar with the evidence that criminal rings specializing in sexual blackmail, some of them in the guise of satanic cults, largely “own” the highest level of our national security state. A leading expert in the topic, the late FBI official and private investigator Ted Gunderson, worked with Homer Van Meter on the 2004 kidnapping case and endorsed Van Meter’s account. Gunderson and Van Meter uncovered evidence pointing to Lt. Col. Michael Aquino as the alleged godfather behind the satanic murder/prostitution syndicate.

Could David DePape have been “sent” to the Pelosi mansion? Was the incident scripted as an October Surprise? Listen to Homer Van Meter, read his book The Dreaming Time, and consider the possibilities.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Two very strange stories—the hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, and Homer Van Meter’s account of his Sonoma County shootout with satanic cult members in 2004—just got even stranger. Homer Van Meter says that one of the cult members bore an uncanny resemblance to a younger version of David DePape, the man who was arrested for assaulting Paul Pelosi on October 28. Van Meter says a second witness, the woman he rescued from the cultists, has positively identified DePape as one of her kidnappers.

All of this may seem completely unbelievable to anyone unfamiliar with the evidence that criminal rings specializing in sexual blackmail, some of them in the guise of satanic cults, largely “own” the highest level of our national security state. A leading expert in the topic, the late FBI official and private investigator Ted Gunderson, worked with Homer Van Meter on the 2004 kidnapping case and endorsed Van Meter’s account. Gunderson and Van Meter uncovered evidence pointing to Lt. Col. Michael Aquino as the alleged godfather behind the satanic murder/prostitution syndicate.

Could David DePape have been “sent” to the Pelosi mansion? Was the incident scripted as an October Surprise? Listen to Homer Van Meter, read his book The Dreaming Time, and consider the possibilities.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com