The Harris Poll recently found that 70% of people say the traditional leadership style has contributed to the societal problems we're currently facing. Unbehaved* host Meghan French Dunbar unpacks why — and what actually works instead.
She opens with the story of a boss she once worked for who was such a Tyrannosaurus Rex that her survival strategy became "do not make sudden movements, do not make eye contact, maybe he won't notice I'm here." Five months in, she gave notice. His response: "Your last day is today. Hand in your computer."
That story is the whole diagnosis in one scene.
Meghan walks through three failures of the traditional leadership model — and the new playbook that's replacing it, backed by data from MIT, Google's Project Aristotle, LinkedIn, and the 100+ leaders interviewed for her book This Isn't Working:
It confuses toxic masculine traits with real leadership. Abusive, controlling, hyper-competitive, dominant — these degrade leadership and drive the Great Resignation. But leaders who never learned the difference between healthy and toxic masculine just keep bringing the toxic version to work.It dismisses healthy feminine traits as "soft skills." Communication, vulnerability, collaboration, care, intuition — these aren't secondary. LinkedIn's research shows care and compassion are the #1 driver of employee engagement right now.It's too narrow. The best leaders don't rely on 2-3 traits — they carry a wide toolbelt and know which to use when.Meghan tells two stories that illustrate the alternative. The first: how she chose to tell her team about her pregnancy loss on the flight home from Amsterdam — instead of the boilerplate "family emergency" email — and how that turning point transformed a high-performing team into an extraordinary one. The second: how a workshop with women leaders at a $5B Midwest manufacturing company ended with them commissioning matching jackets after two days of sticky-note vulnerability.
Plus one provocative side note that will piss some people off: women aren't better leaders than men. Women are just more fluent at expressing both healthy masculine AND healthy feminine traits — because they were socialized to do both. Men were only taught to do one.
** [Editor's note: This episode originally aired under the show's former name, "Better Than This." The show is now "Unbehaved."]
WHAT WE COVER
The T-Rex boss story — the leader Meghan feared so much her survival strategy was borrowed from Jurassic ParkThe Harris Poll stat: 70% of people say traditional leadership has contributed to today's societal problemsDr. Virginia Shine's 1973 research — when asked to picture a leader, most people picture a man. Replicated globally in 1996 and every decade since.How patriarchy shaped what "leadership" means — masculine traits coded as leadership, feminine coded as domesticFailure #1: Confusing toxic masculine traits with real leadership. The full list — abusive, aggressive, controlling, cutthroat, dominant, exploitative, harsh, hyper-competitive, rigid, vindictive, and moreMIT's Great Resignation research — it's not entitled Gen Z. It's toxic, abusive workplacesGoogle's Project Aristotle — psychological safety was the #1 predictor of top-performing teamsThe 70% stat: your manager has as much or more impact on your mental well-being as your spouseFailure #2: Dismissing healthy feminine traits as "soft skills." Why the label itself is the problemThe pregnancy loss story — the flight home from Amsterdam, the boilerplate email Meghan almost sent, and the different email she wrote insteadThe baby elephant moment — how her team stepped up around her after she chose vulnerabilityThe 5.3x trust stat — employees who witness their leader being vulnerable are 5.3x more likely to trust themThe 24% stat — only 24% of leaders say they feel comfortable being vulnerable at workThe sticky note exercise — how a women's leadership workshop at a $5B Midwest manufacturing company ended in matching jacketsLinkedIn's research — care and compassion is the #1 driver of employee engagementFailure #3: Too narrow a definition of leadership skills. The best leaders don't rely on 2-3 skills — they carry a wide toolbelt and know when to reach for whichThe Whitney story — Meghan's first big-kid manager who could show up in a room with the confidence of a lioness AND be one of the most caring people she's ever metThe full research-backed list of healthy leadership traits — accountable, adaptable, ambitious, appreciative, attentive, authentic, caring/compassionate, collaborative, communicative, competent, decisive, emotionally intelligent, empowering, generous, grounded, honest, humble, innovative, inspiring, intentional, intuitive, relational, resilient, strategic, supportive, transparent, and vulnerableThe provocative side note: why "women make better leaders" isn't quite right — and what's actually going onThe 3 takeaways — stop feeling like you can only express masculine traits, retire the "soft skills" label, and widen the range of skills you developPULL QUOTES
"70% of people say that the traditional leadership style has contributed to the societal problems we're currently facing." — Harris Poll
"I took a bit of the Jurassic Park approach. He was the Tyrannosaurus Rex, and I was like — do not make a sudden movement, do not make eye contact. Maybe he won't notice I'm here."
"70% of people say that their manager has as much or more of an impact on their mental well-being as their spouse does."
"Employees who regularly witness their leader being vulnerable are 5.3 times more likely to trust their leader. And yet only 24% of leaders say they feel comfortable being vulnerable at work."
"Please, let's just retire the name 'soft skills.' These are incredible leadership skills to have."
"I don't think women actually make better leaders than men. What I think has happened is that women have been conditioned to express both — the healthy feminine AND, in order to succeed, the healthy masculine. Men have only been taught one."
"The more traits you have, the more tools you have in your toolbelt."
"Care and compassion in the workplace is the number one driver of employee engagement right now." — LinkedIn research
"My whole team just stood around me like a baby elephant in the middle of one of those elephant rings. They protected my time. They managed my inbox. They protected my privacy. I felt so supported by my team — and I didn't even realize how much I needed that."
CHAPTERS
00:00 — Cold open: the Harris Poll and today's topic01:00 — The T-Rex boss story begins02:30 — "Your last day is today" — how it ended04:00 — Dr. Virginia Shine's 1973 research + the picture-a-leader exercise05:00 — Quick recap: patriarchy + business + why leadership got coded masculine08:00 — Failure #1: Confusing toxic masculine with real leadership09:00 — The full list of toxic masculine traits10:30 — MIT's Great Resignation research + Google's Project Aristotle12:00 — The 70% mental-well-being stat13:30 — Failure #2: Dismissing "soft skills" — and why the label itself is the problem14:30 — The pregnancy loss story + the flight home from Amsterdam (trigger warning noted on-mic)18:00 — The baby elephant moment + how the team stepped up20:00 — The 5.3x trust stat + only 24% of leaders feel comfortable being vulnerable21:00 — The Midwest manufacturing sticky note exercise + the matching jackets25:00 — Stats on care, compassion, teamwork, collaboration27:00 — Failure #3: Too narrow a definition of leadership28:00 — The Whitney story — the manager who could hold both30:00 — The full list of healthy leadership traits (from This Isn't Working research)33:00 — Provocative side note: why "women are better leaders" isn't quite right35:00 — 3 takeaways + sign-offRESOURCES MENTIONED
The Harris Poll — 70% of people say traditional leadership has contributed to today's societal problemsDr. Virginia Shine (1973, replicated 1996) — the "think of a leader" study proving global bias toward masculine leadership imageryMIT research on the Great Resignation — toxic, biased, cutthroat, dishonest, disrespectful, and abusive workplaces are the driver (not "entitled Gen Z")Google's Project Aristotle — psychological safety as the #1 predictor of top-performing teamsLinkedIn research — care and compassion is the #1 driver of employee engagementThe 70% stat — your manager has as much or more impact on your mental well-being as your spouseThe 5.3x stat — employees who witness vulnerable leaders are 5.3x more likely to trust themThe 24% stat — only 24% of leaders say they feel comfortable being vulnerable at workThe 75% stat — of employees rate teamwork and collaboration as very importantThe 50% stat — companies that promote collaboration and better communication reduce turnover rates by 50%Full lists (worth bookmarking):
Toxic masculine traits — abusive, aggressive, angry, arrogant, authoritative, cutthroat, controlling, exploitative, harsh, hyper-competitive, hyper-independent, prideful, rigid, risky, unemotional, vindictive, violentHealthy leadership traits (from Meghan's book research) — accountable, adaptable, ambitious, appreciative, attentive, authentic, caring/compassionate, collaborative, communicative, competent, decisive, emotionally intelligent, empowering, generous, grounded, honest, humble, innovative, inspiring, intentional, intuitive, relational, resilient, strategic, supportive, transparent, vulnerableThis Isn't Working by Meghan French Dunbar (Hachette, 2025)CONNECT WITH MEGHAN
Book: This Isn't Working — available wherever you buy booksWebsite: meghanfrenchdunbar.comSubstack: meghanfrenchdunbar.substack.comFULL TRANSCRIPT
[Editor's note: Lightly cleaned for readability. Preserves original voice + delivery.]
Meghan French Dunbar (00:00): I don't know about you, but the societal stress we're all living in right now — it's a little dumpster-fire-ish. There was a recent statistic that came out from the Harris Poll that found that 70% of people say the traditional leadership style has contributed to the societal problems we're currently facing. And I was like — yes, it does. Sure does.
That's what we're going to talk about today. Traditional leadership. What is it? Why is it failing us? And what can we do about it? What's the alternative? I promise we're going to get there. We're going to go into an entire new approach of what we can do in place of the traditional leadership model.
So to illustrate the traditional leadership model, I'm going to take us way back — more than a decade back. I've just started a new job and it's one I'm very excited about. I'm working with a founder who I've idolized. He's a thought leader. He's someone I've always wanted to know and now I get to work for. So I'm coming onto his leadership team and I'm very damn excited about this new job. And I show up on day one, I go in to meet him, and he's on his phone. I hear him: "Just get it done. I don't know what could be taking you so long." And then he hangs up.
And I'm like — woo. This guy is firecracker. I don't want to be on the receiving end of this guy. He is a dominant dude.
I come to find out later that day that he was in fact talking to one of my colleagues. That was how he spoke to his employees. And this wasn't a one-time thing and it wasn't just a one-person target. It was in fact everyone. This was how he communicated. Very harsh. Very abrasive. A very dominant, aggressive, competitive person.
Within the first few weeks, I was terrified. Just absolutely scared of the man. I took a bit of the Jurassic Park approach. He was the Tyrannosaurus Rex, and I was like — do not make a sudden movement, do not make eye contact. Maybe he won't notice I'm here.
Others took a different approach. Some of my colleagues took more of a peacock approach where they really wanted to impress him. He was like one of those fathers who never loves their child, and the child is just constantly looking for their approval. There were a lot of people in there who were just like, just say something nice to me. Look at all the good work I did. And he would still just be gruff. There was always something wrong. He was always nitpicking. He had exceedingly high expectations that he, of course, came up with in his brain, didn't really communicate to anyone, and then would yell at us if we didn't hit them. He'd interrupt people mid-sentence. Shut people down. Super defensive. Highly critical of everyone around him.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. He was kind of old-school. Worked for a long time in Manhattan. I truly believe he thought this was the best way to lead — that you use fear and aggression and intimidation, it's my way or the highway, he's the thought leader here and we just need to execute his vision. I'm sure someone led him like this at one point.
I lasted five months. Something happened, I won't get into it. I was just like — F this, I'm out. I walked out the door and it turns out this was pretty much what every single employee did there. Most people didn't last more than a year.
When I called to tell him that I was leaving, I said, "I can give you four to six weeks. I know I'm in a leadership role, I have a lot of things to do, I don't want to leave you guys in a bind, but I'm going to be heading out for greener pastures shortly."
And he said: "Your last day is today. Hand in your computer. You're done."
He hung up on me. Cut off access to my email. Had a colleague drive to my house and pick up my computer within 90 minutes of my resigning. That's traditional leadership style.
Meghan French Dunbar (~04:00): When I say "traditional leadership style," it might not be this person — but as a thought exercise, if I ask you: think of a leader or a manager. What's the first thing that comes to mind?
When I first did this exercise, it was a 40-year-old white man sitting on a desk in a corner office in Manhattan. He had this — I don't even know why it's a pinstripe suit, but this chintzy pinstripe suit and a cheesy grin. That was my first mental image of a leader. And I was like — my god.
Did any of you think of a woman? If you did, you're in the significant minority of the global population.
This traditional leadership approach was first established by Dr. Virginia Shine in 1973. She asked managers in the United States to think of a manager or a leader and describe what came up. The vast majority thought of a man, or someone expressing masculine traits. This was replicated in 1996 and has been replicated in numerous contemporary studies which continue to show, to this day, that leadership has become synonymous with men and masculinity — or what are considered "masculine" traits.
If you listened to the episode where we talked about all the barriers women contend with in the workplace and just casually the history of business and patriarchy and toxic masculinity and all my favorite subjects combined, this will come as no surprise. If you didn't, here's the super-duper quick recap:
Business has been around for about 3,000-5,000 years, depending on what you count. Currency came around 5,000 years ago. The first organizations that could enter into contracts are about 3,000 years old. But let's just say — for thousands of years, business has been a thing. And as it became a globalized thing that impacts nearly every living species on planet Earth, the entire time it has evolved, it has done so in patriarchal societies. Patriarchy being the common belief that men are superior to women, that women's roles are relegated to domestic work, childrearing, homemaking.
As part of these patriarchal beliefs, we took our human traits — which everyone has access to — and decided these are the traits that will make women good caretakers and homemakers, and these are the traits that are powerful and dominant and what leaders need. Those are the "masculine" traits. We condition young boys to embody masculine — strong, competitive, ambitious, confident, courageous, bold. And young girls: docile, meek, quiet, subservient, agreeable, gentle, kind. All the things that will make you a fantastic, delightful wife and mother someday. If you somehow escaped your childhood without these being forced on you based on your gender identity, congratulations. Most of us didn't.
Since patriarchy became a thing about 10,000 years ago, many of the men were not just conditioned to embody masculine traits — they were belittled or made fun of if they expressed anything feminine. This is what toxic masculine beliefs are: a lot of anti-femininity. Anything that's an expression of "feminine" traits is a weakness. So men are not encouraged to be kind or compassionate or thoughtful or collaborative or any of the things. And these are the same men who, because of patriarchy, have been in the driver's seat of business since its inception. Unsurprisingly, we now equate effective leadership with purely masculine traits and with men.
Bink bink bomp. There it is in two minutes.
Meghan French Dunbar (~08:00): But the issue is — that is not the most effective way to lead.
It's just the leadership style that's been available to most leaders because they've never learned to express anything else. Then, because it's just what we see in leader after leader after leader, leadership becomes synonymous with masculinity without anyone taking the time to ask — wait a second, is that right?
Because it's not. Contemporary research continues to show that the very best leaders have a healthy blend of masculine AND feminine. We're going to get into that.
This is also why the traditional leadership model has been failing us. Three particular reasons.
Failure #1: Not all "masculine" traits are created equal.
When I say the traditional leadership model is failing us, I am not saying that masculine traits don't belong in leadership. There's a distinction between healthy masculine traits that improve your leadership, and toxic masculine traits that degrade it.
The issue is that many leaders don't make the distinction. They think leadership IS any masculine trait. So they bring a ton of toxic masculine traits to the table and it degrades their leadership.
Some of the most common toxic masculine traits: abusive, aggressive, angry, arrogant, authoritative, cutthroat, controlling, exploitative, harsh, hyper-competitive, hyper-independent, prideful, rigid, risky, unemotional, vindictive, and violent. (Full list in the show notes.)
When you look at what these toxic traits do in the workplace, they degrade leadership and destroy culture. This is what I experienced with the T-Rex leader I worked with. None of us wanted to collaborate. I was sitting in the corner trying not to make eye contact, 100% terrified. I was definitely not offering any of my opinions or suggestions because I was literally scared of being yelled at. People were fighting all the time. People were crying in the office. It was an abusive, toxic place to work.
MIT's most recent research around the Great Resignation — which everyone continues to blame on the "entitled millennial and Gen Z workers who are asking for too much" — in fact identified that the Great Resignation has been driven by toxic, abusive workplaces. The key elements they identified: workplaces that are biased, cutthroat, dishonest, disrespectful, and abusive. Cue: toxic masculine traits create these workplaces.
Hyper-individualist or dominant leaders decrease collaboration and employees' desire to be helpful.Hyper-controlling and micromanaging leaders decrease morale, reduce productivity, and are cited as one of the top three reasons employees resign.Leaders using fear, intimidation, and aggression to "drive results" decrease psychological safety — the key element that Google's Project Aristotle identified as the #1 predictor of top-performing teams.When leaders are aggressive, dominant, cutthroat, and fear-based, they decrease psychological safety — which decreases collaboration, innovation, and creativity. All of it.
And when employees aren't leaving, they're feeling disengaged, disrespected. They bring it home. There's a statistic that 70% of people say their manager has as much or more of an impact on their mental well-being as their spouse. That blows my mind. That is the responsibility managers and leaders have — and that so many are abusing because they don't understand the difference between toxic traits and healthy ones.
End scene. Off the soapbox.
Failure #2: The traditional model overlooks healthy feminine traits — our leadership superpowers.
What they're most often referred to now is "soft skills," right? They're given some attention. There's some soft skills training for collaboration and communication. But of course, they're soft skills. Inferior to the hard skills, the real leadership skills. They have to be downgraded because they have something to do with the feminine. And of course, the feminine — well, we'll kind of accept it in the workplace, but we don't really want to. So we'll give it this degrading name and maybe do some training around it and pat ourselves on the back and feel good.
Please. Let's just retire the name "soft skills." These are incredible leadership skills. Communication, relationship-building, collaboration, vulnerability, adaptability, the ability to listen. All of these make leaders extraordinary and create unbelievable workplace cultures.
To illustrate — I'm going to tell a personal story from when I was CEO. This is one of the times I'm going to talk about something I did right, instead of using all the ways I've messed up. Trigger warning: pregnancy loss. Skip ahead if that's not something you feel like having in your brain today.
Backstory: I started a magazine in 2014 with a co-founder. Our first issue got picked up by every Whole Foods in the world. Then Target, Barnes & Noble, Books-a-Million. All of a sudden at 30 years old I was at the helm of a nationally distributed print magazine called Conscious Company Magazine. It turned into a media company — investment round, building the team, live events, podcasts, membership community, the whole thing. We got acquired in late 2017. I stayed on as CEO of a wholly-owned subsidiary under our new parent company.
Throughout this whole time — about four years — I don't think I took a vacation. Working nights and weekends. I had this entire story that the success of the company was resting on my shoulders and I couldn't take one single effing break.
2019 comes around and I'm like — I've been at this for five years. Maybe I should take a few days off. My husband and I decide to go to Europe. Amsterdam and Belgium. I've been looking at the canals in Bruges and imagining this gorgeous vacation.
Multiple weeks before this trip, I find out I'm pregnant. We had been trying. I was excited. Big deal. As soon as I found out, I was daydreaming about walking around the canals with my beautiful husband, talking about baby names, all the romantic ideas.
We fly to Amsterdam. Having a great vacation. Feeling good. We get to Bruges on day three — canals, cute romantic vision. We check into our bed and breakfast. And it turns out that I realize I'm losing the pregnancy.
There's so many emotions. This is the first time I've been on vacation. I've needed this time. And suddenly I'm dealing with an extraordinarily traumatic, stressful situation. I'm feeling guilty like — oh my god, I don't want to ruin the rest of our trip. We spend the next day in the hospital. Instead of the romantic vacation with my husband, the next week we're just trying to keep myself together. I'm just destroyed. I'm so sad. I'm grieving.
We get on the airplane home. Flying out of Brussels. The very first thing I do is pull out my computer and start drafting an email to my team to tell them I've had a family emergency. Right — a family emergency. I'm not going to tell them what's going on because leaders definitely aren't vulnerable in front of their team. We keep our personal and professional lives separate. I need to be stoic. Unemotional. This pillar of strength. All these ideas around leadership that are rooted in masculinity, in embodying masculine traits as a leader. A big part of that is: you do not show weakness, and you definitely don't show people when you're struggling.
So I'm writing this email. Boilerplate. I've had a family emergency, I am a robot, there is no emotion, I'm not going to tell anyone what's going on, but I'm going to be gone for a few days after I get home. This is an eight-hour flight.
And I'm looking at it and I start thinking — I spend the majority of my waking hours with these people. These are people I trust. My team, they work every day under my leadership and my guidance to bring all sorts of bonkers visions of mine to life. I would be so sad if one of them felt like they couldn't talk to me. If someone on my team was going through something as awful as I'm going through right now and I had no idea, I would be so sad that they didn't feel like they could talk to me about it.
I don't know what came over me, but I just was like — no. I'm not doing it the old way. I'm throwing the traditional playbook out the window.
So I write a different email. I say — everyone, I would love to have an all-hands meeting on Monday.
We had a co-working space. I got us a conference room. My whole team showed up on Monday. I came in and I told them what happened, and I cried openly in front of them. I told them how much grief I was feeling and I let them know I needed to take the week off to be with my family and heal. Some of them cried with me. It wasn't like any professional meeting I've ever seen.
I would say it was a turning point for my organization.
I was vulnerable with everyone, showed them how much of a human I am. And not only did I watch my entire team step up — holy moly, they went into full lock-up. I felt like a baby elephant in the middle of one of those elephant rings. My whole team just stood around me. They protected my time. They managed my inbox. They protected my privacy. They were extraordinary. I felt so supported by my team, and I didn't even realize how much I needed that.
But then — my team started to talk to me about things happening in their lives. Things I was very glad that I knew about as their leader. And the way we started to gel and trust each other as a team — it took us from what I would say was a high-performing team before, to an extraordinary team after.
I experienced firsthand the power of vulnerability at work. Research shows employees who regularly witness their leader being vulnerable are 5.3 times more likely to trust their leader — which leads to increased innovation, creativity, and the growth of team members themselves. And yet only 24% of leaders say they feel comfortable being vulnerable at work.
We kind of know the impact — but because traditional leadership tells us we're not really supposed to use these feminine traits at work, we don't really know how to step into them. But they are absolutely mission-critical for effective leadership.
Another vulnerability story. My friend Jocelyn and I were leading a women's leadership workshop at a large manufacturing company in the Midwest — a $5 billion company. Because they're in manufacturing, they were having a hard time getting women into leadership roles, and when they did have women in leadership, they were often at different plants and didn't know each other. The CEO brought us in to help the women who were in leadership build connections.
We're going in feeling a little nervous, honestly — like, these are Midwest manufacturing leaders, our work is really rooted in helping people connect through vulnerability. Are they going to be into it?
One of the very first exercises: we put up a big piece of butcher paper marked 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023. We asked them to anonymously write on sticky notes the major things that had happened in their personal or professional lives over the last three years. (This was 2023 — so there was COVID, so much.) They wrote and posted all their sticky notes based on the timeline.
Then we asked everyone to go up and look at everything their colleagues had gone through.
You see up there everything that everyone is going through at work that nobody is talking about. People's parents had passed away. Their children were contending with major mental health issues. They had financial issues. There was so much up on that board that immediately the very first thing you feel is a profound sense of compassion.
Then I said — who of you had something happen that was hard enough that you didn't even put it up on a sticky note? Many of the women raised their hand. And I said — this is the thing. Not only do the people you work with have things going on you don't know about, but there's an iceberg effect. Even the things they might show you, there's a ton of other things under the water.
Over two days, these women started opening up to each other. They started talking about common issues. And by the end — I kid you not — they left the workshop and had matching jackets made with nicknames on the back for all of them, because they felt such a profound sense of teamwork, collaboration, and camaraderie.
That is how vulnerability brings people together. It is a superpower in the workplace that we often overlook and disregard as a "soft skill."
There are numerous healthy feminine characteristics that improve leadership and are critical to building thriving cultures: care and compassion, listening, adaptability, communication, intuition, collaboration and teamwork. So many of these. Just a few statistics:
LinkedIn's research found that people who demonstrate care and compassion in the workplace are the #1 driver of employee engagement right now.Leading with compassion lowers employee absenteeism and exhaustion.Intuition strengthens complex decision-making.75% of employees rate teamwork and collaboration as very important to their job.Companies that promote collaboration and better communication reduce employee turnover by 50%.That's Failure #2 — overlooking the healthy feminine traits that make or break leadership.
Failure #3: Too narrow a definition of leadership — relying on only 2-3 skills.
Contemporary research continues to show the best leaders have a healthy blend of feminine AND masculine, plus a wide range of skills. They don't rely on 2-3 skills to get them through. Their ability to discern which skill or trait to rely on based on the situation is what makes them extraordinary.
I experienced this with my very first big-kid-job manager at the Environmental Defense Fund. My manager Whitney — hot damn, this woman. She could show up in a room with the confidence of a lioness AND was one of the most caring and thoughtful people I've ever met. She was bold, strategic, ambitious, confident, adaptable. She listened to my concerns, collaborated with me, acknowledged me.
All of the traits she held — the more traits you have, the more tools you have in your toolbelt. Traditional leadership relies on a few go-to things and that's all it does. The new playbook — healthy, holistic leaders bring feminine AND masculine AND have a wide range of skills.
Some of the research I reviewed while writing This Isn't Working:
One study of more than 300,000 leaders identified the top 10 leadership traits: inspiring and motivating others, high integrity and honesty, solving problems and analyzing results, driving for results, communicating powerfully, building relationships, technical/professional expertise, strategic perspective, developing others, and the ability to innovate.Another study found the five most effective leader traits: mindset based on emotional regulation, emotional intelligence, being able to acknowledge and be grateful for employees, customizing employees' experience, and creating a culture of transparency and trust.And as I interviewed leader after leader for the book, I asked all of them: what are the key characteristics you find to be the most effective leadership traits? Here's the list I aggregated:
Accountable, adaptable, ambitious, appreciative, attentive, authentic, caring/compassionate, collaborative, communicative, competent, decisive, emotionally intelligent, empowering, generous, grounded, honest, humble, innovative, inspiring, intentional, intuitive, relational, resilient, strategic, supportive, transparent, and vulnerable.
As you can see — it is not a handful of leadership traits that builds extraordinary leadership. It's a wide range. A vast spectrum. Healthy feminine PLUS healthy masculine, brought together, with leaders who can discern which trait to rely on when.
Meghan French Dunbar (~33:00): Side story. This is one of those where I'm like — this is going to get taken out of context, but who cares, I just have to say the thing.
We were hosting a CEO workshop a year and a half ago. Someone brought up conventional research showing that women make better leaders than men. And I was like — I'm gonna have to say it, aren't I?
I'm going to push back. I don't think women actually make better leaders than men.
I think what has happened is that the women who are in leadership roles have, since they were young, been conditioned to express all of the feminine traits — the healthy ones. (And yes, there are toxic feminine traits — we'll talk about that later.) So they know how to be kind and caring and nurturing and compassionate.
And in order to succeed in the business world — and probably before that in academia and other patriarchal spaces where masculine traits are seen as what you have to be to be an effective leader — they've also learned how to healthily express masculine traits.
So many women, especially in the business world, can express both healthy masculine and healthy feminine — making them extraordinary leaders. Whereas men have been conditioned since they were young to only express masculine, belittled if they express anything feminine, and they've gotten into the business world where they're still told to do the masculine thing. Maybe they've done some soft skills training, but they're very rarely encouraged to learn how to express these feminine traits — even though they're totally available to them.
There are many men who have figured out how to effectively express care, compassion, empathy, emotional intelligence, and vulnerability. Some of the best leaders I've ever met. So when people say women are better leaders than men, what I actually see is that women are more fluent at expressing both — and men aren't encouraged to, so they're not as effective because they can't do the feminine thing.
Sorry, not sorry. Hope I don't get too much shit for that one.
Meghan French Dunbar (~35:00): Alright, three key takeaways from today.
One: Stop feeling like you can only express masculine traits in the workplace. If many people only feel comfortable expressing masculine, then it's the only thing that will be accepted. Just stop right there. Understand the difference between healthy and toxic masculine. And expand.
Two: Let go of the myth of soft skills. There are healthy feminine traits that are just as valuable — if not more valuable — than many of the masculine traits. Lean into them, value them equally, and work on expressing them.
Three: The more the merrier. The wider the range of healthy skills you can develop, express, and know when to reach for based on the situation — the more dynamic, the more multifaceted your leadership will be.
That's it for today. It was a lot. But thanks for hanging in with me.
Hopefully I'll see you next time.