Unchained

Unchained

Download on the App Store

Unchained episodes

  • The Chopping Block: Why Vivek Ramaswamy Wants Less Crypto Regulation - Ep. 569

    Welcome to The Chopping Block – where crypto insiders Haseeb Qureshi, Tom Schmidt, Tarun Chitra, and Robert Leshner chop it up about the latest news. This week, the gang welcomes Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, who discusses his mission to end the U.S. government’s regulatory overreach of the crypto industry, the parallels between crypto and the biotech industry where he came from, whether “code is law” is an appropriate framework for crypto regulation, how Bitcoin could be a check on the Fed, and how less regulation would actually lead to fewer, not more, instances of fraud like FTX.  

    Ramaswamy is promising to release a comprehensive crypto policy plan this week. 

    Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform.


    Show highlights: 
    • what Vivek thinks about crypto and why he is interested in this topic as a presidential candidate
    • why he believes the SEC is engaging in “unconstitutional overreach” when it comes to crypto
    • what the similarities are between early-stage biotech and early-stage crypto investing
    • whether current regulatory requirements create a "false blanket of security"
    • how Vivek would act to make sure the SEC doesn't overreach
    • how the system should respond to less regulation in terms of fraud and innovation
    • how stablecoins can reinforce the value of the dollar and Bitcoin can help discipline the Fed, according to Vivek
    • whether Bitcoin is an asset that the Fed should buy for its balance sheet
    • why Vivek believes it was a mistake to abandon the gold standard in the 1970s
    • the gang's debrief of the conversation: what stood out, where they agree or disagree with Vivek
    • their reaction to the conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried

    • Hosts
      • Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly 
      • Robert Leshner, founder of Compound
      • Tom Schmidt, general partner at Dragonfly 
      • Tarun Chitra, managing partner at Robot Ventures


        DisclosuresGuest
        Vivek Ramaswamy, American entrepreneur and U.S. presidential candidateLinks
        • Fox Business: Ramaswamy woos pro-crypto voters, says he’ll build new policy framework for digital assets
        • Axios: Ramaswamy goes after regulators at crypto event
        • CoinDesk: Vivek Ramaswamy Is Drafting a 'Crypto Policy Framework'
        • WSJ: Stablecoins Can Keep the Dollar the World’s Reserve Currency
        • Decrypt: What Stops the Fed From Buying Up Bitcoin?
        • Forbes: What Happened In 1971?
        • Unchained: SBF Trial, Day 18: Sam Bankman-Fried Found Guilty on All 7 Counts in Swift Verdict

        • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

          49 min
        • How Can OpenSea Regain Dominance After Layoffs and the NFT Market Decline? - Ep. 568

          Last week, OpenSea, the former frontrunner in the NFT marketplace, confirmed the layoff of half its workforce as the NFT markets seemed to bottom out. 


          gmoney, NFT collector and founder of 9dcc, joins Unchained to provide insight into the once-dominant NFT marketplace’s fall from grace. He talks about the competitive dynamics that challenge the platform's market share and whether a token launch could help. In addition, gmoney delves into why the NFT market has been “abysmal,” what could potentially catalyze its revival, and how he thinks creator royalties will evolve. 


          Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform.

          Show highlights:

          • whether OpenSea 'rested on their laurels' after becoming the market leader
          • whether the fact that its competitor Blur launched a token was a reason for OpenSea's fall
          • whether OpenSea not immediately following other platforms such as Blur in making creator royalties optional led to some of its decline
          • how gmoney wants to incentivize people to pay creator royalties 
          • why the NFT market has gone down and what gmoney's thesis for NFTs is
          • what catalysts could cause the next NFT bull run, according to gmoney
          • how NFTs make it possible for certain groups to access new forms of credit 
          • whether Ethereum can be displaced from its leadership position in the NFT market
          • what gmoney thinks could revive OpenSea’s prospects
          • Whether Blur's model is to blame for the decline in the NFT market
          • how gmoney thinks Blur should act to retain its market dominance
          • Thank you to our sponsors!
            • Crypto.com
            • Arbitrum Foundation
            • Phemex
            • Popcorn Network
            • Guest
              gmoney, NFT collector and founder of 9dccLinks
              • Previous episodes of Unchained and The Chopping Block debating NFT Royalties:
              • The Chopping Block: Did Blur Cause a Decline in the NFT Market?
              • The Chopping Block: Two on Two Debate: NFT Royalty Throwdown!
              • Are NFT Royalties the Way? How to Build a Sustainable Creator Economy
              • Decrypt: 
              • Did Blur Really Crash the NFT Market?
              • OpenSea’s move to make creator royalties optional for NFT trades
              • Blur Overtakes OpenSea as Ethereum NFT Trading Skyrockets
              • The Crypto Times: Blur Jumps Nearly 30% Within Days While OpenSea Layoffs
              • Cointelegraph: OpenSea lays off 50% of staff with severance in preparation for version 2.0 launch
              • CoinDesk: NFT Lending Platform Blend Sparks Concerns Over Ecosystem Liquidity
              • The Information: Coatue Cuts Value of OpenSea Stake by 90% as Fund’s Returns Sag
              • Axios: The fight over a shrinking NFT market as marketplaces foresee next big boom 
              • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                44 min
              • The Chopping Block: Did Blur Cause a Decline in the NFT Market? - Ep. 567

                Welcome to The Chopping Block – where crypto insiders Haseeb Qureshi, Tom Schmidt, Tarun Chitra, and Robert Leshner chop it up about the latest news. This week, they explore the enigmatic 'unhinged scale' metric, consider whether recent layoffs could have been anticipated, and examine the challenges facing the NFT market. They also provide a somewhat critical look at the events of the recent BAYC Apefest and share their takeaways on how Solana survived the Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX fiasco. 


                Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, TuneIn, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform.


                Show highlights: 

                • What the unhinged scale metric is and why SBF ranks the highest in that metric
                • Whether the companies doing layoffs could have predicted the market moves in a better way
                • Whether people and the press are being too harsh on the companies reducing their workforce
                • How the NFT market is a much harder environment than everything else, given the extreme volatility
                • Whether the model used by Blur caused the value of NFTs to go down
                • What’s more important in the NFT market: the supply or the demand
                • The BAYC ‘Apefest’ that caused eye damage to some participants and whether someone sabotaged the meetup
                • Tarun’s takeaways from the recent Solana conference in Amsterdam
                • Whether the people who survived the Solana market crash are like ‘cockroaches after a explosion’
                • Why Haseeb believes that Solana represents the most incredible story in the history of Layer 1s
                • Whether crypto gaming studios should focus on building ‘dumber’ games rather than AAA ones
                • Why “nature is a Ponzi scheme,” according to Tarun
                • Hosts
                  • Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly 
                  • Robert Leshner, founder of Compound
                  • Tom Schmidt, general partner at Dragonfly 
                  • Tarun Chitra, managing partner at Robot Ventures


                    DisclosuresLinks
                    • Previous episodes of Unchained and The Chopping Block debating NFT Royalties:
                    • The Chopping Block: Two on Two Debate: NFT Royalty Throwdown!
                    • Are NFT Royalties the Way? How to Build a Sustainable Creator Economy
                    • Decrypt: 
                    • Ava Labs Confirms Layoffs, Affecting 12% of Avalanche Studio's Employees
                    • Did Blur Really Crash the NFT Market?
                    • Cryptotimes.io: Blur Jumps Nearly 30% Within Days While OpenSea Layoffs
                    • Cointelegraph: OpenSea lays off 50% of staff with severance in preparation for version 2.0 launch
                    • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                      1 hr 7 min
                    • A 20+ Year Sentence? Why the Evidence Against SBF Was Too Hard to Overcome - Ep. 566

                      In this episode of Unchained, Laura does a detailed unpacking of the historic Sam Bankman-Fried trial and verdict with defense lawyer Sam Enzer and former Southern District of New York prosecutor Rich Cooper. They discuss what a thorough job the government did in presenting its case, whether the government will pursue a second trial on campaign finance charges, why it takes so long for sentencing to occur, what the differences between this case and the Bernie Madoff case are, and what Bankman-Fried’s likely sentence will be. 

                      Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform.

                      Show highlights:
                      • how the cross-examination of SBF showed to the jury that he was unreliable, according to Rich
                      • why the charge conference with the jury is important to the prosecution for “protecting the record”
                      • why the closing argument of the prosecutors was so effective 
                      • what “conscious avoidance” is and how the prosecutors tried to prove that SBF was guilty of that
                      • why SBF’s tweet last November that "FTX is fine" was the hardest part of the trial for the defense, according to Enzer
                      • why Enzer wasn’t surprised by how quickly the jury made its decision 
                      • what SBF’s strongest argument is for an appeal
                      • why Enzer "hopes" that there won't be a second trial against SBF and whether he will plead guilty to the additional charges
                      • why the sentencing occurs so many months after the verdict
                      • how this case is similar, but also different, from the Bernie Madoff case
                      • how many years SBF could spend in prison, according to Enzer and Cooper
                      • when cooperating witnesses such as Caroline Ellison, Nishad Singh, and Gary Wang are likely to get sentenced

                      • Thank you to our sponsors!
                        • Crypto.com
                        • LayerZero
                        • Popcorn Network

                        • Guest:
                          • Sam Enzer, partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel.
                          • Previous appearances on Unchained: 
                          • Why SBF's Testimony So Far Has Likely Already Doomed Him
                          • Another Bad Week for Sam Bankman-Fried in His Criminal Trial
                          • Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify
                          • SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case
                          • SBF’s Lawyers Could Be Annoying the Judge. How Might That Impact the Trial?
                          • Rich Cooper, Former SDNY prosecutor
                            Links
                            • Previous coverage by Unchained on the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried:
                            • How Heated Sidebars During the SBF Trial Could Impact the Jury’s Decision
                            • SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF’s Family
                            • SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied’ While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable’
                            • SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact
                            • SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF’s Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda’s Special Privileges
                            • Sam Bankman-Fried Trial: Here's Everything That Happened So Far
                            • SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison?
                            • Visit www.unchainedcrypto.com for more!

                              Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                              1 hr 24 min
                            • Two Genesis Creditors Describe Their Frustrations With the Bankrupt Crypto Lender - Ep. 565

                              Two Genesis creditors, BJ and Branden, who prefer to use pseudonyms for security reasons, spoke with Unchained about the alleged fraud by the crypto lender and its parent company, Digital Currency Group (DCG). The discussion is one of the first times Genesis creditors have spoken with a media organization about the situation.

                               

                              BJ and Branden explain how they gave more loans to Genesis after it took a $1.1 billion hit from the liquidation of Three Arrows Capital and how they then came to be members of the ad hoc group, a collective of Genesis customers who came together to try and save the company from bankruptcy.

                               

                              They talk about how they now want DCG to pay back the $1.1 billion it owes over a shorter timeframe and to pay back any Bitcoin in actual Bitcoin. The discussion with Unchained followed shortly after New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Genesis, along with its parent company Digital Currency Group, and Gemini Trust.

                              Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, or on your favorite podcast platform.

                              Show highlights:
                              • what NYAG Letitia James alleged in the lawsuit against Gemini, DCG, and Genesis
                              • how BJ and Branden became creditors of Genesis, including the role of the influence of MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor
                              • how Genesis claimed it got into what it called a “liquidity mismatch”
                              • how, after the Three Arrows Capital collapse, BJ and Branden were reassured that Genesis had "no issues" and "was back to business"
                              • whether the trading and lending units of Genesis were all part of the same company and why that distinction is important
                              • what the difference is between the ad hoc group and an unsecured creditors committee
                              • what the creditors are proposing in order to get their assets back
                              • why the creditors want to be paid in crypto, not in USD
                              • whether the case will go to litigation and what Silbert can do to avoid it
                              •  

                                Thank you to our sponsors!
                                • Crypto.com
                                • Arbitrum Foundation
                                • Phemex
                                • Popcorn Network
                                • Guests:
                                  • Branden, Creditor of Genesis
                                  • BJ, Creditor of Genesis
                                  • Links

                                    Previous coverage of Unchained on Genesis and DCG:

                                    • ​​Genesis May Be Facing Bankruptcy. Could It Take DCG Down With It?
                                    • Gemini vs. DCG Is Heating Up. Could Gemini Force Genesis Into Bankruptcy?
                                    • $630M Due Next Week: Is DCG at Default Risk?
                                    • NYAG Lawsuit

                                      • Unchained: NY Attorney General Sues Crypto Firms Gemini, Genesis, and DCG for Over $1 Billion Fraud
                                      • The Block: DCG says it was 'blind sided' by NYAG suit in third quarter shareholder letter
                                      • Genesis, Gemini, DCG disputes

                                        • Unchained:
                                        • Gemini Says DCG Missed $630 Million Payment Last Week
                                        • Cameron Winklevoss Threatens to Sue DCG and Barry Silbert Over Delays in Genesis Resolution
                                        • DCG Calls Gemini Lawsuit a ‘Publicity Stunt’ From Cameron Winklevoss
                                        • DCG Calls Gemini’s Complaint a PR Campaign in Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit
                                        • FTX and Genesis Reach $175 Million Settlement, Resolving Complex Dispute
                                        • DCG and Genesis Reach In-Principle Deal With Creditors
                                        • Gemini and Genesis Creditor Groups Object to In-Principle Deal to Resolve Bankruptcy
                                        • Genesis Winds Down its US Spot Crypto Trading Operation
                                        • Genesis Sues Parent Company DCG, Seeks Repayment of $600 Million
                                        • DCG Proposes Remuneration Plan That Could Enable Gemini Earn Users to Be Made Whole
                                        • Genesis Winds Down All Crypto Trading Services: Report
                                        • Gemini Pushes Back on DCG’s Remuneration Proposal, Calling it an ‘Attempt to Bait’ Earn Users
                                        •  

                                          Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                          1 hr 29 min
                                        • SBF Trial, Day 18: Sam Bankman-Fried Found Guilty on All 7 Counts in Swift Verdict

                                          The downfall of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried from king of the crypto world to crypto scammer is complete.


                                          A Manhattan jury of nine women and three men took less than five hours Thursday afternoon, day 18 of the high-profile trial, to convict Bankman-Fried on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy for stealing billions of dollars of his customers’ assets. 


                                          “Sam Bankman-Fried perpetrated one of the biggest financial frauds in American history, a multi-million scheme designed to make him the king of crypto,” said Damian Williams, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in remarks following the verdict.


                                          The guilty verdict came a year to the day after crypto publication CoinDesk published a story showing balance sheet irregularities at Bankman-Fried’s investment company, Alameda Research, that suggested the ties between Alameda and FTX were unusually close. Bankman-Fried now faces potentially decades in prison. Sentencing is scheduled for March 28.


                                          After listening to Judge Lewis Kaplan read through 60 pages of instructions, jurors quickly concluded that Bankman-Fried was responsible for decisions that led to an $8 billion hole in its balance sheet, including the use of customer assets for political donations, investments and his own personal use. Prosecutors had reiterated this theme in a stinging, Thursday morning rebuttal. 


                                          And jurors rejected whole-hog Bankman-Fried’s defense team’s narrative that Bankman-Fried was being villainized for being a poor manager who didn’t create sufficient risk management systems. They also did not buy into Bankman-Fried’s claim that he was unaware of the severity of his company’s financial problems and that his inner circle, three of whom testified earlier in the trial as part of plea agreements, were to blame. 


                                          “We respect the jury’s decision,” said Bankman-Fried’s lead attorney, Mark Cohen. But we are very disappointed with the result. Mr. Bankman-Fried maintains his innocence and will continue to fight the charges against him.”


                                          U.S. attorney Wiliams called Bankman-Fried’s crimes “ fraud” as “old as time,” and said his office had “no patience for it.” 


                                          He added: “This case moved at lightning speed, that was a choice, not a coincidence.”



                                          Catch up on Unchained’s previous coverage: 
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF’s Family
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied’ While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable’
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF’s Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda’s Special Privileges
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison?
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life'
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness?
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 12: Former FTX General Counsel Speaks Out Against SBF
                                          • Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors?
                                          • Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify
                                          • Here’s How Sam Bankman-Fried’s High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out
                                          • SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case
                                          • The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect
                                          • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                            6 min
                                          • SBF Trial, Day 17: Closing Arguments Ask: ‘Villain or Good-Faith Actor?’

                                            Prosecutors and defense attorneys in the trial of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried closed their arguments with similar stories to their opening statements more than three weeks ago: a tale of two Sams.


                                            On Wednesday morning, day 17 of the trial, the government took jurors on a final grand tour of Bankman-Fried’s alleged lies, evasions and misdirections that they said aimed to hide the ugly truth of a gaping $8 billion hole in the crypto exchange’s balance sheet from investors and regulators, and that reflected his indifference to spending customer assets. 


                                            Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas Roos said that as the person overseeing FTX and the separate trading entity, Alameda Research, to which FTX funneled customer deposits, Bankman-Fried was the only person who could have been responsible for decisions that led to the deficit – criminally so.


                                            “He told a story and he lied to you,” said Roos, who punctuated his more than two-hour presentation with metadata readings and time tables that seemed to devastatingly illustrate SBF’s ongoing awareness of his company’s financial debacle.


                                            But in the afternoon, Bankman-Fried’s defense team portrayed him in softer tones, as a math nerd with no ill-intent and guilty only of bad management, particularly his failure to install adequate risk management protections. Attorney Mark Cohen said that the government had failed to prove its case as it sought to create a Hollywood villain responsible for the disappearance of the funds, cartooning his dress and personal habits to make their case. At one point, he seemed to appeal to jurors’ emotions, reminding them that Bankman-Fried had lived a big life and now faces prison.


                                            Bankman-Fried faces potentially decades in prison on a total of seven counts of wire fraud and conspiracy. The prosecution will have an opportunity for rebuttal on Thursday, and jurors could begin deliberating his fate before the end of the day.. 

                                            Often raising his voice for dramatic effect, Roos highlighted earlier testimony from Bankman-Fried’s inner circle and Google metadata indicating his awareness of the balance sheet woes to show his involvement in the company’s oversight. Bankman-Fried testified on Monday that he was unaware of the problems, suggesting others were to blame. 

                                            And Roos used the time tables to demonstrate separately that Bankman-Fried had lied to Congress about protecting customer assets even as he paid off loans using them, and that he had spent heavily on investments, political contributions and personal items, even after he knew of the massive balance sheet hole. 


                                            “This was a pyramid of deceit built by the defendant on a foundation of lies and false promises, all to get money, and eventually it collapsed, leaving countless victims in its wake,” Roos thundered.

                                            Visit UnchainedCrypto.com for prior episodes

                                            Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                            18 min
                                          • The Chopping Block: Nic Carter on Hamas’ Crypto Funding, SBF’s Courtroom Collapse, and Dramas Involving Lido and dYdX - Ep. 564

                                            Welcome to The Chopping Block – where crypto insiders Haseeb Qureshi, Tom Schmidt, Robert Leshner chop it up about the latest news. This week, the gang sits down with guest Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures, whose tweet thread pushed the Wall Street Journal to correct its story that Hamas had raised tens of millions in crypto. Carter discusses the challenges in tracking how much crypto Hamas has actually received, the declining prospects for Sam Bankman-Fried’s acquittal, and ongoing dramas surrounding staking protocol Lido and decentralized exchange dYdX.  


                                            Show highlights: 

                                            • Why the cross-examination has not gone well for Sam Bankman-Fried
                                            • how the Wall Street Journal misinterpreted data and may have overstated the amount of crypto donations flowing to Hamas for terrorist activities 
                                            • why it’s difficult to pinpoint how much funding Hamas has raised in crypto donations
                                            • how extensive crypto funding for terrorists is believable to many outside observers of the industry, even recently some of its supporters in Congress, but does not reflect reality
                                            • Why Hamas has decided on its own to stop trying to raise funds in crypto
                                            • how Lido is upset at the way Layer Zero has pre-marketed its bridge
                                            • why dYdX’s pivot to decentralization with fees going into its token is a positive development but does not give the protocol the moral high ground to attack erstwhile competitors such as UniSwap.

                                            • Hosts
                                              • Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly 
                                              • Robert Leshner, founder of Compound
                                              • Tom Schmidt, general partner at Dragonfly


                                                Guest
                                                Nic Carter, general partner at Castle Island VenturesDisclosuresLinks

                                                Previous coverage by Unchained on the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried:

                                                • How Heated Sidebars During the SBF Trial Could Impact the Jury’s Decision
                                                • Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF’s Family
                                                • Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied’ While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable’
                                                • Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact
                                                • Day 4: SBF’s Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda’s Special Privileges
                                                • Sam Bankman-Fried Trial: Here's Everything That Happened So Far
                                                • Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison?
                                                • Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life'
                                                • Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness?
                                                • Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges 
                                                • Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender
                                                • Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony
                                                • Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole
                                                • Day 12: Former FTX General Counsel Speaks Out Against SBF
                                                • Day 13: Before Judge, Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Gives Few Straight Answers
                                                • Day 14: Sam Bankman-Fried Casts Blame on Others for Key Decisions at FTX
                                                • Day 15: Prosecutors Hammer Bankman-Fried’s Contradictions With Reams of Evidence
                                                • Day 16: In Final Cross Examination, SBF Gets Caught Again by His Own Words

                                                • Hamas

                                                  • Unchained: Binance Helps Israel Police Freeze Hamas Crypto Accounts: Report
                                                  • Unchained: Bitcoin Slips to $27.4K Amid Escalating Israel-Hamas War but Long-Range Impact Remains Uncertain
                                                  • Nic Carter Twitter thread: Can crypto-twitter OSINT outperform the WSJ’s chain analysis?
                                                  • Nic Carter Tweet: Liz Warren wyd?
                                                  • The Wall Street Journal: The Wall Street Journal and Liz Warren double down on the Hamas crypto canard
                                                  • Washington Post: U.S. to warn crypto firms against financing Hamas, terror groups
                                                  • CoinDesk: The Hamas Funding Story Is Why Crypto Is Sick of the Mainstream Media
                                                  • Layer Zero/Lido

                                                    • LayerZero’s wstETH bridge deployment draws Lido DAO ire
                                                    • LayerZero introduces omnichain token to move Lido's wstETH across Avalanche, BNB Chain and Scroll

                                                    • dYdX

                                                      • Examining dYdX’s Path to Profitable DeFi

                                                      Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                                      1 hr
                                                    • SBF Trial, Day 16: In Final Cross Examination, SBF Gets Caught Again by His Own Words

                                                      For a second, consecutive day, prosecutors pounded away at Sam Bankman-Fried’s credibility, asking the former FTX CEO to explain his obliviousness about how Alameda had spent $8 billion of FTX customer funds.


                                                      Prosecutors and the defense both rested their cases on Day 16 of the high-profile trial. Both sides will make their closing arguments on Wednesday and jurors could begin deliberating the following day. 


                                                      While Bankman-Fried claimed that he thought “it was permissible” for Alameda to use FTX customers’ fiat deposits, he also admitted that he didn’t tell his employees not to spend that money or create measures to segregate FTX customer funds from Alameda’s.


                                                      Prosecutor Danielle Sassoon also grilled him on why he didn’t look into who had spent the FTX customer money. “So it’s your testimony that while you were CEO of Alameda some unknown people spent $8 billion without your knowledge?” prosecutor Danielle Sassoon asked Bankman-Fried, who replied that he didn’t agree that was his testimony.


                                                      Bankman-Fried later said that he had asked former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison to explain the $8 billion in spending but did not fire anyone. Under subsequent defense questioning, Bankman-Fried said that he had wanted to look ahead.


                                                      Earlier in the day, Sassoon had honed in on Bankman-Fried’s allegedly close relationship with government officials in the Bahamas, and presented an email in which he said that the company had “segregated funds for all Bahamian customers on FTX and that it would be “more than happy to open up withdrawals for all Bahamian customers on FTX.” The communication came Nov. 9, 2022, a few days after FTX had halted customer withdrawals as awareness of its financial problems grew. 


                                                      Catch up on Unchained’s previous coverage: 
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF’s Family
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied’ While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable’
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF’s Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda’s Special Privileges
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison?
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life'
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness?
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 12: Former FTX General Counsel Speaks Out Against SBF
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 14: Sam Bankman-Fried Casts Blame on Others for Key Decisions at FTX
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 15: Prosecutors Hammer Bankman-Fried’s Contradictions With Reams of Evidence
                                                      • Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors?
                                                      • Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify
                                                      • Here’s How Sam Bankman-Fried’s High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out
                                                      • SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case
                                                      • The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect
                                                      • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                                        12 min
                                                      • SBF Trial, Day 15: Prosecutors Hammer Bankman-Fried’s Contradictions With Reams of Evidence

                                                        In a trial during which he has suffered many low points, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried may have reached a nadir on day 15 as prosecutor Danielle Sassoon used his own words to show stark contradictions from his earlier testimony and a seemingly callous disregard for customer assets.


                                                        The tenacious, methodical Sassoon punctuated her more than four hours of interrogation on Monday afternoon with devastating audio and visual evidence of Bankman-Fried, including memos to himself, internal FTX and Alameda documents, and testimony to Congress that countered statements he’d made under his defense team team’s kinder questioning. In one instance, Sassoon showed a Signal chat in which Bankman-Fried expressed his interest in purchasing MAPs token, a direct refutation of his testifying that he “was not involved at all in any way” in trading. 


                                                        In another instance, she illustrated Bankman-Fried’s alleged lack of regard for his Twitter followers, showing a screenshot of a Twitter DM with Kelsy Piper in which he admits to being insincere about his support for regulation that protects customers, telling Piper at one point, “just PR, fuck regulators.”


                                                        Bankman-Fried claimed not to remember a spreadsheet with seven, different balance sheets created by then Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison to make the company’s balance sheet look better than it was, a key piece of evidence that Ellison addressed in her testimony. Sassoon presented Google metadata showing Bankman-Fried had read the document. 


                                                        Dressed in a light gray suit with a purple tie, Bankman-Fried claimed repeatedly not to remember other events or his responses in conversations, and he answered other questions with curt yeses and nos, unlike the windy, often convoluted responses that he provided to his defense team earlier in the day and on Monday. And as Sassoon continued to catch him in contradictions, he seemed to grow irritable and occasionally rocked back and forth in his chair. 


                                                        Prosecutors will continue their cross-examination on Tuesday followed by redirect for one or two hours before the defense closes its case. The prosecution will then call two rebuttal witnesses.


                                                        Catch up on Unchained’s previous coverage: 
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF’s Family
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied’ While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable’
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF’s Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda’s Special Privileges
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison?
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life'
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness?
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 12: Former FTX General Counsel Speaks Out Against SBF
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 13: Before Judge, Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Gives Few Straight Answers
                                                        • SBF Trial, Day 14: Sam Bankman-Fried Casts Blame on Others for Key Decisions at FTX
                                                        • Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors?
                                                        • Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify
                                                        • Here’s How Sam Bankman-Fried’s High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out
                                                        • SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried’s Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case
                                                        • The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect
                                                        • Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

                                                          10 min

                                                        About Unchained

                                                        From the publisher's feed

                                                        Crypto assets and blockchain technology are about to transform every trust-based interaction of our lives, from financial services to identity to the Internet of Things. In this podcast, host Laura…