
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In United States v. Steen, the appellant was charged with introduction and distribution of marijuana. At trial, the government sought to admit text messages wherein the appellant sought to acquire marijuana for personal use. The text messages were created after the alleged offense but the government argued it was, under MRE 404(b), admissible to show the appellant had a plan to maintain a certain amount of marijuana and the fact that he wanted some demonstrated that he must have distributed his stock to the informant and needed to replenish. The case is interesting because it involves several rules of evidence, "opening the door" to excluded evidence, and the risk of broad assertions. At about 14:19, the episode changes gears slightly to discuss using text messages on cross-examination.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In United States v. Steen, the appellant was charged with introduction and distribution of marijuana. At trial, the government sought to admit text messages wherein the appellant sought to acquire marijuana for personal use. The text messages were created after the alleged offense but the government argued it was, under MRE 404(b), admissible to show the appellant had a plan to maintain a certain amount of marijuana and the fact that he wanted some demonstrated that he must have distributed his stock to the informant and needed to replenish. The case is interesting because it involves several rules of evidence, "opening the door" to excluded evidence, and the risk of broad assertions. At about 14:19, the episode changes gears slightly to discuss using text messages on cross-examination.

90,932 Listeners

43,818 Listeners

228,694 Listeners

38,800 Listeners

26,224 Listeners

153,509 Listeners

1,066 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

15,863 Listeners

26,623 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

619 Listeners