In this Giving Tuesday special episode of Unpacking Injustice, MTIP Executive Director Amy Sings In The Timber and Legal Director Brady Minow Smith walk through the Montana Innocence Project’s newly released strategic plan.

Since 2008, MTIP has been dedicated to freeing the innocent and challenging injustice. In this episode, Amy and Brady break down how our mission is expanding to meet the needs we see every day in Montana’s legal system — from strengthening legal casework to improving reentry support and advancing second-chance reforms.

Together, they discuss each of our four strategic priorities:

1. Narrative Change

How shifting public understanding, elevating lived experiences, and sharing accurate data can change the conversation about justice in Montana.

2. Legal Work

How MTIP will continue our commitment to innocence work while expanding our legal efforts to address other forms of injustice and bring about second chances for more people.

3. Support for Reentry

Why reentry support is essential, what Montanans face as they come home from prison, and how MTIP will stand alongside clients as they rebuild their lives.

4. Advocacy

How community-powered policy work and statewide collaboration can build a more fair, accountable, and transparent justice system.

Whether you’ve followed MTIP for years or are joining us for the first time, this episode offers clear insight into where we’re headed and why this moment matters.

Support Our Work

If you believe in the work ahead, consider making a Giving Tuesday gift to help bring this strategic plan to life.

https://mtinnocenceproject.org/donate

Read the Strategic Plan Summary

https://mtinnocenceproject.org/mtip-2026-2029-strategic-plan/

What does justice look like when we execute someone, knowing the system is fallible?

In this episode, Montana Innocence Project Executive Director Amy Sings In The Timber and Legal Director Brady Minow Smith discuss the death penalty — its moral, legal, and human implications through the lens of innocence and manifest injustice work.

They explore how personal experience shapes perspective, why innocence cases reveal the irreversible dangers of capital punishment, and what redemption means in a justice system built on retribution.

The conversation also touches on the case of Robert Roberson, an Innocence Project client who, at the time of recording, was scheduled for execution in Texas based on discredited science. Amy and Brady unpack what happens when new evidence and evolving science are ignored and what that says about our justice system.

We are elated to share that since this recording, Robert has been granted a stay of execution, opening the door for a step toward justice.

Join us for a discussion marking World Day Against the Death Penalty. We encourage you to listen, reflect, and share this episode with someone who may be interested in learning more perspectives on this critical issue.

Recommended Resources:

Witness to Innocence

Conservatives Concerned

Death Penalty Action

Recommended Reads:

His Execution Is Days Away. A Detective Says He’s Innocent.

The Last Appeal Podcast by Lester Holt

Texas court blocks execution of death row inmate Robert Roberson

In recognition of the 12th Annual International Wrongful Conviction Day, the Montana Innocence Project was honored to be joined by author, lawyer, and exoneree Calvin Duncan. Alongside MTIP Executive Director Amy Sings In The Timber and Legal Director Brady Minow Smith, the panel explored the barriers that keep people behind bars, Calvin’s story and work since exoneration—including his current bid for the Clerk of Courts office—and broader manifest injustices affecting Montanans and communities nationwide beyond actual innocence cases.

This conversation is both educational and inspiring, highlighting actionable steps we can take to advance fairness and reform in our legal system.

In this episode of Unpacking Injustice, we sit down with Ali Lacayo, Social Services Advocate at the Montana Innocence Project. Ali shares their journey from incarceration to advocacy, reflecting on how cultural identity, resilience, and community values guide their work.

The conversation explores the intersections of racial justice and criminal legal reform, the impact of lived experience on advocacy, and MTIP’s future initiatives, such as parole planning and Inside Out Organizing, which empower incarcerated individuals to lead change. Ali underscores the importance of cultural identity in building stronger movements, the need for community support, and why sustainable funding is essential to advancing justice.

We dive into Ali’s personal story, highlighting how they embody the caring, loving, and colorful spirit of their culture. This Hispanic Heritage Month, we celebrate Ali’s work and the vibrant values that continue to shape their advocacy and community leadership.

In this episode of Unpacking Injustice, Montana Innocence Project client Katie Garding shares her experience on a three-day women’s backpacking retreat at Doris Lake near Whitefish, Montana. While this was her first backpacking adventure, her lifelong love of nature made the journey all the more meaningful. Katie describes the trip as freeing—an opportunity to be fully present in nature without the weight of her ongoing wrongful conviction. We discuss the details of her retreat, the emotions that surfaced upon her return home, and the grounding lessons that nature offers in presence and resilience.

Our mission is to free the innocent and unjustly incarcerated, and advocate for systems of Justice that are accurate, accountable, and fair for all. One of the main ways we achieve this is through providing free legal representation. On this episode, we are joined by MTIP Legal Director Brady Minow Smith who details the types of cases MTIP takes on and how to initiate the application process.

In Part 2 of this series, we continue our conversation with Katherine Judson, the Executive Director of the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences. In this episode we will explore how similar symptoms to SBS/AHT can sometimes be overlooked or dismissed, further leading to misdiagnosis and how forensic and medical experts' biases or assumptions influence the outcomes of these cases. We'll also discuss the emotional toll SBS/AHT cases have on clients and their attorneys, the importance of collaborative efforts between medical and legal communities, and the need for ongoing research and updated scientific standards to prevent parents and caretakers from being wrongfully convicted based on this diagnosis.

In today’s episode you will hear from Katherine Judson, the Executive Director of the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences.

Katherine previously served as the SBS/AHT Litigation Coordinator for the Wisconsin Innocence Project, where she coordinated strategic litigation efforts in science-dependent cases, trained lawyers, consulted on medically complex cases, taught law students, and engaged in direct representation of clients wrongfully convicted of child abuse and homicide. Earlier in her career, she served as the Innocence Network Shaken Baby Syndrome Litigation Fellow and as a trial attorney with the New Mexico Public Defender Department, where she represented clients facing felony charges, including capital crimes, and specialized in cases involving complicated forensic evidence. Her background in science–prior to law school–includes a bachelor’s degree in Zoology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and work as a research assistant in a pathology laboratory at the University. She has spoken before the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, the Innocence Network, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and other law schools and professional organizations on topics related to forensic science.

In this conversation, Katherine will share her insights into the history of the highly controversial Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma diagnosis and will highlight the ongoing debates and key misconceptions that have persisted in both the medical community and the courtroom in these types of cases.

In Part 2 of this series, we continue our conversation with MTIP Board Member and criminal defense attorney Paul Leisher to delve deeper into the details of Aaron Oliphant’s case, examining how his ineffective assistance of counsel and the absence of medical expert testimony impacted the outcome of his trial. Additionally, we will explore the key challenges attorneys encounter when defending clients wrongfully accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome, and discuss potential reforms to be made within the medical and legal systems to help prevent future wrongful convictions in SBS cases.

MTIP Board Member and criminal defense attorney Paul Leisher sat down with MTIP Communications Associate Ashley Miller to explain the highly controversial diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome, the role it played in MTIP client Aaron Oliphant’s case, and its implications for wrongful conviction.