
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Send us a text
The wheels of justice grind slowly—and sometimes erratically—as Sean "Diddy" Combs faces a pivotal court date that could determine whether he receives an acquittal, a new trial, or is simply told to "kick rocks in flip flops with no socks." Today's hearing centers on post-trial motions where Diddy's legal team challenges the application of the Mann Act, arguing that historical definitions of "prostitution" don't apply to his case and that his activities amounted to nothing more than making adult content videos.
But the bombshell news stealing headlines comes from Deontay Nash, Diddy's former stylist who testified during the criminal trial. Nash has now filed a shocking 47-page lawsuit alleging sexual battery, human trafficking, and false imprisonment during his decade-long employment. Among the disturbing allegations: Nash claims Diddy sexually assaulted him multiple times, violently strangled him after learning Nash and Cassie had dinner without permission, and even broke into Nash's home with his security team.
What's profoundly troubling—and speaks to the heart of why the prosecution may have failed to secure convictions on more serious charges—is that Nash testified at trial without ever mentioning his own alleged sexual assault. This glaring omission highlights fundamental flaws in how the case was presented. While prosecutors wasted time on "Victim Number Three" who never appeared, they apparently neglected to present the full scope of abuse allegations from witnesses who did testify. By focusing primarily on relationships with women characterized as "girlfriends," they inadvertently reinforced the defense's narrative rather than demonstrating a broader pattern of exploitation spanning multiple types of relationships.
As we watch this case unfold, one thing becomes crystal clear: when prosecutors fail to present evidence that resonates with jurors' common-sense understanding, even the most serious allegations can disappear into a maze of legal technicalities. The question remains—will justice finally be served, or will power and privilege once again tip the scales?
Support the show
Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe
for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!
www.andidontlikeit.com
FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!
FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!
5
105105 ratings
Send us a text
The wheels of justice grind slowly—and sometimes erratically—as Sean "Diddy" Combs faces a pivotal court date that could determine whether he receives an acquittal, a new trial, or is simply told to "kick rocks in flip flops with no socks." Today's hearing centers on post-trial motions where Diddy's legal team challenges the application of the Mann Act, arguing that historical definitions of "prostitution" don't apply to his case and that his activities amounted to nothing more than making adult content videos.
But the bombshell news stealing headlines comes from Deontay Nash, Diddy's former stylist who testified during the criminal trial. Nash has now filed a shocking 47-page lawsuit alleging sexual battery, human trafficking, and false imprisonment during his decade-long employment. Among the disturbing allegations: Nash claims Diddy sexually assaulted him multiple times, violently strangled him after learning Nash and Cassie had dinner without permission, and even broke into Nash's home with his security team.
What's profoundly troubling—and speaks to the heart of why the prosecution may have failed to secure convictions on more serious charges—is that Nash testified at trial without ever mentioning his own alleged sexual assault. This glaring omission highlights fundamental flaws in how the case was presented. While prosecutors wasted time on "Victim Number Three" who never appeared, they apparently neglected to present the full scope of abuse allegations from witnesses who did testify. By focusing primarily on relationships with women characterized as "girlfriends," they inadvertently reinforced the defense's narrative rather than demonstrating a broader pattern of exploitation spanning multiple types of relationships.
As we watch this case unfold, one thing becomes crystal clear: when prosecutors fail to present evidence that resonates with jurors' common-sense understanding, even the most serious allegations can disappear into a maze of legal technicalities. The question remains—will justice finally be served, or will power and privilege once again tip the scales?
Support the show
Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe
for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!
www.andidontlikeit.com
FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!
FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!
8,634 Listeners
10,151 Listeners
8,432 Listeners
66 Listeners
10,793 Listeners
8,270 Listeners
18,197 Listeners
9,880 Listeners
481 Listeners
2,153 Listeners
5,884 Listeners
35 Listeners
541 Listeners
696 Listeners
9,524 Listeners