
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


I’m off extractive, algorithm-driven social media since nine years. Therefore, I’m not accustomed to being attacked verbally, because I’m not participating in this kind of “sport” anymore. Still, there’s times when frustrated people make comments on my YouTube videos. Of course, a large majority of those people are on my Polish channel, since Polish people are very frustrated and at the same time they are also very poor communicators - so these two characteristics together make for very bad commenter experience.
But I digress.
How to have a good, respectful conversation online?
If you would like to improve the quality of your discussions online, first of all, don’t start the comment by saying that:
* the video author is wrong, or that
* you don’t agree.
It’s because the people who make those videos have put a lot of time and effort in producing those videos and they really don’t care whether you agree or not. But they are open to have a conversation. If you start by stating that you don’t agree, you close the possibility for the conversation, because you already came to the conclusion that you don’t agree. It’s over.
If you want to discuss a part of the video, start by:
* stating your point of view (for example, if the video author says “I think donuts are a great cure for depression”, you can start by saying “I was depressed 3 years ago and tried donuts. It didn’t work for me.”
* saying what you would like to discuss and then tell it - and if possible, use your personal experience (the “I tried the donuts” in the bullet above - and add what worked for you), because if it’s something you feel or that (worse) you read online on someone else’s website and adopted as your point of view, it will not enrich the conversation.
Like in real life
Be respectful. Act as you would be acting in real life. I know it’s hard, since the anonymity that the internet gives you is so tempting. If someone asks you a question, don’t ignore the question - answer the question. If someone asks you the question three times, don’t ignore him, because in real life you would not ignore someone asking you three times the same question, wouldn’t you?
Ask questions
If you really want to know someone else’s point of view, to benefit from the takeaways that offers someone else’s experience - just ask questions. That’s it. You don’t have to judge the person that recorded the video or wrote the blogpost. You don’t have to say that you’re better than them. It’s irrelevant. If you start like that, no one will actually want to discuss anything with you, neither the author nor other commenters, because you will appear as a deficient person as far as your self worth is concerned.
Whereas, if you ask an intelligent question, it will be and reaching for everybody and a lot of people will engage with you.
Personal experience matters
If you have some kind of a personal experience with the people who recorded the video or posted the blogpost, don’t think that this personal experience will not have any incidence on how the discussion will go, because it will have consequences. So, let’s imagine that you met the person that posted the video several times in real life and each time:
* you were an a*****e,
* you were not supportive,
* you were passively aggressive,
* you were manipulative,
don’t expect to be treated very well online. You will be treated as if the discussion online was a consequence of what happened in real life. That’s how people work.
Give negative feedback in private
If you want to make a negative comment and you really want to help the people who worked hard to post a video, publish a blogpost or publish a book - contact them directly.
Write a direct email with the negative comment or with your salty suggestion. There’s a million ways you can contact directly a person today on the internet - there’s email, you can find people’s phone numbers online, there’s direct messages. A lot of creators publish their email addresses - use them. A personal message is far better than criticising someone in public because that way you show that you actually want to help, that you actually want to discuss something.
In the corporate world, there’s a rule that very few managers know, but it’s a very good rule. This rule says:
Give positive feedback in public, but give negative feedback in the privacy of your office.
It’s because people in general will be inclined to remember the negative feedback and to remember the social cues around this negative feedback. If you give negative feedback in public, you will actually perform straightforward aggression on the person to whom you give this negative feedback. You will just show everybody else that you have a deficiency in your self worth, that you lack confidence and that you need to cope with this deficiency by giving negative feedback in public and humiliating the person in question. If you do that, you will not have friends and you will certainly not advance your career.
It’s exactly the same online. If you want to help the creator - write a personal email, call the creator. If instead you choose to make a public comment about it, you will rather show that you wanted to help yourself by judging someone in public.
Freedom
I can already hear some of you screaming about freedom of speech.
You don’t have to show people in public that you don’t agree with them. It’s not a sign of freedom. It’s a sign of your deficiency. You have the freedom because you can write a negative comment in public. Nobody took away this possibility from you. But the fact that you can does not mean you should.
Positivity
If you want to be helpful and have good discussions, please try to remember those rules. It doesn’t mean that you always have to be positive about everything. But remember that being a creator is hard, so if you can, and especially if you know the people that create content online and if you want to show support, say nice things in public about what they create. They will be grateful and they will for sure be thankful that you did. If you have improvement ideas - say them in private.
Now enter the mind-blowing part: you can do both at the same time! You can like and comment positively a video that your friend recorded and simultaneously write a personal email saying that he should improve his storytelling skills. Isn’t it amazing? And don’t forget to tell him also how he can do it (that’s the hard part)!
My garden
I sometimes react in a rough and rude way if someone makes a negative comment in public about something I created, because I understand the mechanism I described above and I want to keep people from doing that. It’s on purpose and it’s exactly how I want to react.
It’s not by error.
I don’t want to have a negativity feast in the comment section on my YouTube channel. I have seven years of YouTube experience on my Polish channel, where commenters ranged from passively aggressive to full-fledged actively aggressive. There were people who wrote to me in the comments that they will find me and kill me. I thought that I had to endure that because it’s how the world online is. That it’s a price I have to pay for having my YouTube channel.
Today, I don’t think like that anymore. The fact that I tolerated aggressive people on my Polish YouTube channel brought nothing positive to my life nor to the life of other people watching my content. Today I know it.
I don’t have to pay a price for having a YouTube channel and I certainly don’t think that I should endure this kind of comments. Today, I think of my comment section as of my garden. I am deciding what I want to keep in my garden.
If I don’t want to have bad plants in my garden, I can take them out of the ground.
I’m off extractive, algorithm-driven social media since nine years. Therefore, I’m not accustomed to being attacked verbally, because I’m not participating in this kind of “sport” anymore. Still, there’s times when frustrated people make comments on my YouTube videos. Of course, a large majority of those people are on my Polish channel, since Polish people are very frustrated and at the same time they are also very poor communicators — so these two characteristics together make for very bad commenter experience.
But I digress.
How to have a good, respectful conversation online?
If you would like to improve the quality of your discussions online, first of all, don’t start the comment by saying that:
* the video author is wrong, or that
* you don’t agree.
It’s because the people who make those videos have put a lot of time and effort in producing those videos and they really don’t care whether you agree or not. But they are open to have a conversation. If you start by stating that you don’t agree, you close the possibility for the conversation, because you already came to the conclusion that you don’t agree. It’s over.
If you want to discuss a part of the video, start by:
* stating your point of view (for example, if the video author says “I think donuts are a great cure for depression”, you can start by saying “I was depressed 3 years ago and tried donuts. It didn’t work for me.”
* saying what you would like to discuss and then tell it — and if possible, use your personal experience (the “I tried the donuts” in the bullet above — and add what worked for you), because if it’s something you feel or that (worse) you read online on someone else’s website and adopted as your point of view, it will not enrich the conversation.
Like in real life
Be respectful. Act as you would be acting in real life. I know it’s hard, since the anonymity that the internet gives you is so tempting. If someone asks you a question, don’t ignore the question — answer the question. If someone asks you the question three times, don’t ignore him, because in real life you would not ignore someone asking you three times the same question, wouldn’t you?
Ask questions
If you really want to know someone else’s point of view, to benefit from the takeaways that offers someone else’s experience — just ask questions. That’s it. You don’t have to judge the person that recorded the video or wrote the blogpost. You don’t have to say that you’re better than them. It’s irrelevant. If you start like that, no one will actually want to discuss anything with you, neither the author nor other commenters, because you will appear as a deficient person as far as your self worth is concerned.
Whereas, if you ask an intelligent question, it will be and reaching for everybody and a lot of people will engage with you.
Personal experience matters
If you have some kind of a personal experience with the people who recorded the video or posted the blogpost, don’t think that this personal experience will not have any incidence on how the discussion will go, because it will have consequences. So, let’s imagine that you met the person that posted the video several times in real life and each time:
* you were an a*****e,
* you were not supportive,
* you were passively aggressive,
* you were manipulative,
don’t expect to be treated very well online. You will be treated as if the discussion online was a consequence of what happened in real life. That’s how people work.
Give negative feedback in private
If you want to make a negative comment and you really want to help the people who worked hard to post a video, publish a blogpost or publish a book — contact them directly.
Write a direct email with the negative comment or with your salty suggestion. There’s a million ways you can contact directly a person today on the internet — there’s email, you can find people’s phone numbers online, there’s direct messages. A lot of creators publish their email addresses — use them. A personal message is far better than criticising someone in public because that way you show that you actually want to help, that you actually want to discuss something.
In the corporate world, there’s a rule that very few managers know, but it’s a very good rule. This rule says:
Give positive feedback in public, but give negative feedback in the privacy of your office.
It’s because people in general will be inclined to remember the negative feedback and to remember the social cues around this negative feedback. If you give negative feedback in public, you will actually perform straightforward aggression on the person to whom you give this negative feedback. You will just show everybody else that you have a deficiency in your self worth, that you lack confidence and that you need to cope with this deficiency by giving negative feedback in public and humiliating the person in question. If you do that, you will not have friends and you will certainly not advance your career.
It’s exactly the same online. If you want to help the creator — write a personal email, call the creator. If instead you choose to make a public comment about it, you will rather show that you wanted to help yourself by judging someone in public.
Freedom
I can already hear some of you screaming about freedom of speech.
You don’t have to show people in public that you don’t agree with them. It’s not a sign of freedom. It’s a sign of your deficiency. You have the freedom because you can write a negative comment in public. Nobody took away this possibility from you. But the fact that you can does not mean you should.
Positivity
If you want to be helpful and have good discussions, please try to remember those rules. It doesn’t mean that you always have to be positive about everything. But remember that being a creator is hard, so if you can, and especially if you know the people that create content online and if you want to show support, say nice things in public about what they create. They will be grateful and they will for sure be thankful that you did. If you have improvement ideas — say them in private.
Now enter the mind-blowing part: you can do both at the same time! You can like and comment positively a video that your friend recorded and simultaneously write a personal email saying that he should improve his storytelling skills. Isn’t it amazing? And don’t forget to tell him also how he can do it (that’s the hard part)!
My garden
I sometimes react in a rough and rude way if someone makes a negative comment in public about something I created, because I understand the mechanism I described above and I want to keep people from doing that. It’s on purpose and it’s exactly how I want to react.
It’s not by error.
I don’t want to have a negativity feast in the comment section on my YouTube channel. I have seven years of YouTube experience on my Polish channel, where commenters ranged from passively aggressive to full-fledged actively aggressive. There were people who wrote to me in the comments that they will find me and kill me. I thought that I had to endure that because it’s how the world online is. That it’s a price I have to pay for having my YouTube channel.
Today, I don’t think like that anymore. The fact that I tolerated aggressive people on my Polish YouTube channel brought nothing positive to my life nor to the life of other people watching my content. Today I know it.
I don’t have to pay a price for having a YouTube channel and I certainly don’t think that I should endure this kind of comments. Today, I think of my comment section as of my garden. I am deciding what I want to keep in my garden.
If I don’t want to have bad plants in my garden, I can take them out of the ground.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In a world dominated by digital devices and instant communication, it's easy to overlook the simplicity and power of traditional methods. I discovered something profound yet straightforward: the transformative effect of taking notes with pen and paper. This revelation may seem trivial in the age of laptops and smartphones, but its implications are far-reaching, affecting not just how we remember things but also how we engage with the world around us.
The Memory Boost
The first and most striking benefit of this practice is its impact on memory. Studies show, and my experience confirms, that writing notes by hand significantly enhances recall. When you scribble down points during a meeting or a lecture, your brain engages in a deeper form of processing, embedding the information more firmly in your memory. This method isn't just about recording information; it's about embedding it in your neural pathways.
Moreover, this tactile process of writing aids in structuring information more coherently. By physically forming words and sentences, you're also constructing a mental framework, helping to spot connections and patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. It's a cognitive exercise that sharpens your ability to synthesize and understand complex information.
Enhancing Decision-Making
Another aspect where pen and paper triumph is in the realm of decision-making. The act of writing fosters clearer thinking and faster decision-making. When you jot down notes, you're not just passively receiving information; you're actively engaging with it, evaluating it, and making judgments. This active engagement is crucial in developing a keen sense of discernment, vital for effective decision-making.
This method also cultivates creativity. The freedom of a blank page invites exploration of ideas in a way that typing on a keyboard can't match. The physical act of writing stimulates the brain differently, opening up new avenues for creative thought.
Social Dynamics and Respect
Beyond cognitive benefits, there's a significant social aspect to consider. In meetings, using pen and paper instead of a laptop or smartphone sends a strong message of engagement and respect. It shows you're fully present and interested in the conversation. This nonverbal communication is powerful in establishing rapport and trust.
In contrast, hiding behind a laptop can create a barrier. It can give the impression of disinterest or distraction, even if that's not the case. The pen and paper approach, on the other hand, is universally perceived as attentive and respectful.
Integrating with Technology
Despite its benefits, pen and paper might seem outdated in our digital world. But the truth is, they can coexist beautifully with technology. With the advent of OCR (Optical Character Recognition) technology, handwritten notes can easily be digitized and stored in platforms like Evernote or Google Drive. This integration provides the best of both worlds: the cognitive and social advantages of handwriting and the convenience and accessibility of digital storage.
This blend of old and new methods exemplifies how we can leverage technology to enhance, not replace, more traditional practices. It's about finding the right balance and recognizing the unique strengths of each approach.
A Personal Experiment
I decided to put this theory to the test in my own life. I started taking handwritten notes in all my meetings, and the results were astounding. Not only did my recall improve, but I also noticed a significant difference in how my colleagues responded to me. There was a palpable shift in the dynamics of the meetings. I was more engaged, and so were they.
The experience was so transformative that I've made it a permanent practice. It's not just about the notes themselves; it's about the process and the mindset that comes with it.
The Call to Action
So, I challenge you to try this simple yet powerful change. Next time you're in a meeting, resist the urge to open your laptop. Take out a notebook and a pen, and start writing. Observe the difference not just in what you remember, but in how you engage with the people around you.
Remember, it's not about rejecting technology; it's about using it wisely. It's about understanding the unique benefits that different methods bring to the table and using them to enhance your cognitive abilities and social interactions.
It's far too easy to forget the beauty of simplicity.
The Awakening
Over four years ago, we made a decision that seemed small but has changed our lives dramatically: we sold our smartphones. It was a leap into the unknown, an act of defiance against the norms of our hyper-connected world. The immediate impact? An overwhelming sense of relief.
Today, most of the time we're bombarded with the successes and lifestyles of others. It's a never-ending stream of comparison, leaving us feeling inadequate and restless. We, too, were caught in this vicious cycle, constantly comparing our lives, our achievements, our everyday moments with those of strangers on the internet.
The transformation was immediate and profound. Without the constant temptation to peek into others' lives, we found a silence that was both intimidating and liberating. No more endless scrolling, no more subconsciously measuring our lives against the curated highlights of others. It was just us, in our own world, with our own thoughts and dreams.
The Transformation
This shift led to an unexpected revelation: the less we compared ourselves to others, the more confident and sure of ourselves we became. It's like shedding a heavy coat we never realised was weighing us down. The freedom to be, to exist without the pressure of external validation, was exhilarating.
Imagine waking up each day without the urge to check your phone. Instead, you greet the morning with a clear mind, ready to embrace the day on your own terms. This was our new reality. We began to notice the small joys around us, the things we had taken for granted in our digital haze.
Our relationships deepened. Conversations became more meaningful, eye contact more frequent. We were present, truly present, in each moment. And in this presence, we discovered a wellspring of inner peace and self-assurance that had been buried under layers of digital noise.
The Creative Surge
But here's the most fascinating part: our creativity skyrocketed. When you're not bogged down by the endless cycle of comparison, your mind is free to wander, to explore, to create without fear or hesitation. Our vlogging frequency increased, not because we felt we had to keep up, but because we wanted to. The joy of creation returned to us, unmarred by the shadow of comparison.
We started to see the world with fresh eyes, appreciating the beauty in the mundane. Our ideas flowed more freely, and our work felt more authentic. It was as if a dam had been broken, releasing a flood of creative energy that had been stifled by our previous digital habits.
This creative surge wasn't just about producing more; it was about producing better. Our work had a new depth, a new resonance that came from a place of true inspiration rather than obligation. We were creating not to impress, but to express.
Rediscovering Joy
Rediscovering joy in the simple things became our new norm. We found ourselves more connected to nature, more attuned to the rhythms of life that we had overlooked in our screen-filled existence.
We began to savor our experiences more deeply. A walk in the park, a conversation with a friend, a quiet moment of reflection—all these became richer, more fulfilling. The absence of a smartphone made room for a more profound presence in our lives.
Our journey wasn't just about ditching a device; it was about reclaiming our time, our focus, and our sense of self. It was about breaking free from the chains of comparison and finding contentment in who we are and what we have.
The Power of Presence
The power of presence cannot be overstated. Being fully present is a radical act. It's a statement that says, "I am here, now, and that's enough." This presence has brought us a sense of peace and purpose that we never knew we were missing.
We learned to listen more deeply, to ourselves and to others. Without the distraction of a smartphone, we became more attuned to the subtleties of conversation, the nuances of emotion. Our interactions became richer, more meaningful.
This newfound presence also allowed us to connect more deeply with ourselves. We had time to reflect, to dream, to plan without the constant interruption of notifications. This inner dialogue became a source of strength and clarity.
Our journey continues...
Despite the convenience and allure of digital tools, there's a growing movement towards embracing the simplicity and effectiveness of paper planning. I still use a paper notebook and don't plan to stop.
Rediscovering Paper
For years, we’ve been told that digital is the way to go. Apps like Notion, Obsidian, and various project management tools promise to streamline our lives. But after decades of experimentation, many of us are realizing that nothing beats the simplicity of paper. Paper is always ready, universally accessible, and devoid of distractions.
When we write on paper, we take the first step towards making our thoughts tangible. This act of writing helps us feel more committed to our plans. Unlike digital tools, paper doesn’t tempt us with endless customization or the allure of procrastination. It’s just us, our thoughts, and the pen.
The Advantages of Paper
One of the biggest advantages of paper is its readiness. There’s no need to wait for an app to load or worry about battery life. A paper notebook is always there, ready to capture our thoughts and plans. This immediacy can be a game-changer for productivity.
Another key benefit is the lack of distractions. Digital devices are designed to grab our attention with notifications, blinking lights, and endless apps. In contrast, a paper notebook is a blank canvas, free from any interruptions. This allows us to focus deeply and think more clearly.
The Tactile Experience
Writing on paper also provides a tactile experience that digital devices can’t replicate. The feel of a good quality pen on high-quality paper can be incredibly satisfying. This physical interaction helps us connect more deeply with our thoughts and ideas.
I certainly love writing with my Kaweco brass pen in my Midori A6 notebook. This combo works very well together.
Moreover, the act of writing by hand engages different parts of our brain compared to typing. This can lead to better retention and understanding of the information we’re working with. It’s a small but significant advantage that can make a big difference in our productivity.
Reflecting and Structuring
Paper is also excellent for reflection and structuring our thoughts. When we write things down, we create a physical record that we can revisit and review. Very easily review, should I add - you don’t have to find the option to visualize completed tasks or otherwise find your past notes, you just flip pages. This makes it easier to see the big picture and track our progress over time.
Unlike digital tools, which can be overwhelming with their endless features and options, paper is simple and straightforward. This simplicity forces us to be more deliberate and thoughtful about what we write. It encourages clarity and focus, which are essential for effective planning.
The Role of Quality
The quality of the paper and pen we use can also influence our productivity. Investing in high-quality materials can make the act of writing more enjoyable and satisfying. It can also encourage us to be more careful and intentional with our notes.
Mistakes on paper are more permanent than in digital tools, where we can easily delete or edit. This permanence encourages us to think more carefully before writing and to take our plans more seriously. It’s a subtle but powerful way to enhance our focus and commitment.
Balancing Digital and Paper
Of course, digital tools still have their place. They are excellent for storing and organizing large amounts of information, setting reminders, and managing repetitive tasks. But for daily planning and deep thinking, paper can be far more effective.
By combining the strengths of both digital and paper tools, we can create a balanced and efficient system. Use digital calendars for scheduling and reminders, but rely on paper for daily planning and note-taking. This hybrid approach allows us to leverage the best of both worlds.
Embracing Simplicity
In a world that’s intentionally complex, there’s something incredibly refreshing about the simplicity of paper. It strips away the noise and distractions, allowing us to focus on what truly matters. It’s a return to basics that can have a profound impact on our productivity and well-being.
We don’t need the latest app or gadget to be productive. Sometimes, all we need is a notebook and a pen.
Taking Action
So, let’s take action. Let’s experiment with paper planning and see how it impacts our productivity. Start small with a simple notebook and pen. Write down your daily tasks, thoughts, and plans. Notice how it feels and how it affects your focus and clarity.
As you integrate paper planning into your daily routine, you may find that it offers a level of simplicity and effectiveness that digital tools can’t match. It’s a small change that can lead to significant improvements in your overall well-being.
Moving Forward
In a world that’s constantly pushing us towards digital solutions, paper planning offers a refreshing alternative. It’s a reminder that sometimes, the simplest tools can be the most effective.
We discuss the tension between pursuing ambitious career goals and designing a fulfilling life. It's about reconciling the drive for success with the desire for a quality life that resonates with our personal values.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Human interaction with AI did not start with ChatGPT. It started years earlier, on social media: all the timelines (or newsfeeds) on social media nowadays are curated using complex AI algorithms.
https://youtu.be/o5TRwFJzxkA
Today, we know it: social media - an intricate experiment, a playground for AI to manipulate our choices, stir emotions, and shape our perceptions - is not beneficial for humanity. End of story.
It's unsettling to realize that this experiment's results have manifested as:
- polarized societies,
- the erosion of democracy, and
- vulnerable teenage minds.
The power and danger of AI lie not just in the technology itself, but in how it's wielded.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In our digitally driven world, we’ve encountered a new frontier that has the potential to revolutionize our communication. This is the advent of AI in email clients, specifically the GPT 3.5 integrated in Spark. It’s like having a personal assistant that helps us craft emails that are not only grammatically correct but also appropriate in tone. But as we embrace this convenience, we find ourselves at a crossroads, wrestling with questions about the trade-off between convenience and authenticity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ2q4OcU8FM
As non-native English speakers, we appreciate the struggle of ensuring our emails are grammatically correct and convey our intended message accurately. And while we acknowledge the allure of AI-assisted communication, we can't ignore the concerns it raises. Are we losing our personal touch in our communication? Are we sacrificing authenticity for the sake of convenience?
The questions are not without merit. We've all seen the discrepancies between online personas and real-life individuals. It's like those LinkedIn profiles with photos that are a decade old. When we finally meet these individuals in person, the difference can be jarring. This discrepancy can undermine trust, which is crucial in any professional relationship.
However, it's important to note that using AI doesn't necessarily equate to deception. It's about using available tools to communicate effectively. It's not about pretending to be someone else, but about ensuring our message is conveyed as accurately and professionally as possible.
But wouldn't it be great if the AI could mimic our specific writing style? Imagine an AI that has analyzed our past emails and can replicate our unique tone and style. That would be a game-changer. Until then, we must tread carefully and ensure we're not compromising our authenticity for the sake of convenience.
We also discussed the potential of AI in automating our publishing process. We believe that AI can be a valuable tool if used correctly. It's not about replacing our voice or ideas, but about enhancing our productivity and efficiency.
In conclusion, the integration of AI in email communication is an exciting development that offers numerous benefits. However, it also raises important questions about authenticity and personal branding. As we continue to explore this new frontier, we invite you to join us in this fascinating journey. Tune in to our YouTube video for a more in-depth discussion on this topic.
1. How can you maintain your personal touch in AI-assisted communication?
2. Are you willing to sacrifice a bit of your authenticity for the sake of convenience?
3. How can you ensure that your AI-assisted communication is accurate and professional without being deceptive?
4. How can you incorporate your unique writing style into your AI-assisted emails?
5. How can AI be used effectively in your publishing process?
6. How can you ensure that AI doesn't replace your voice or ideas in your communication?
7. How can you strike a balance between efficiency and authenticity in your digital communication?
8. How can you avoid creating a false image of yourself through AI-assisted communication?
9. What steps can you take to ensure that your use of AI in communication doesn't undermine trust in your professional relationships?
10. How can you use AI to enhance your productivity without losing your personal touch?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Are you wondering when the best time is to give your child a smartphone? You're not alone. Many parents struggle with this decision, and today, we want to discuss an organization called "Wait Until 8th" - https://www.waituntil8th.org/ that has a powerful suggestion for parents: wait until your child is at least 14 years old before giving them a smartphone.
Watch on Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0v80P8mb1s
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
From the publisher's feed

53 Listeners

10,184 Listeners

0 Listeners