
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


“Hey! You were meant to give me 10 days before terminating the contract!”
Two property owners entered into a contract with a builder to construct two duplex buildings. The builder moved slower than the owners hoped.
They ended up terminating the contract because the builder didn’t complete the work, rectify defects, or get a construction certificate in time.
Nor did the builder obtain a construction certificate at all: [13] The builder appealed, saying the contract required the owners to give 10 days’ notice before terminating, and they failed to do that. The builder went down on appeal.
The Court found that there was a requirement to give 10 days’ notice before termination but – crucially – that only applied if the default was capable of remedy within that period: [31]
The Court went on to find that even if termination was not valid, the owners should get a damages payment because of the builder’s failure to get a CC before construction or at all.
The entitlement to damages was not dependent on the termination being improper: [5]
By James d'Apice5
22 ratings
“Hey! You were meant to give me 10 days before terminating the contract!”
Two property owners entered into a contract with a builder to construct two duplex buildings. The builder moved slower than the owners hoped.
They ended up terminating the contract because the builder didn’t complete the work, rectify defects, or get a construction certificate in time.
Nor did the builder obtain a construction certificate at all: [13] The builder appealed, saying the contract required the owners to give 10 days’ notice before terminating, and they failed to do that. The builder went down on appeal.
The Court found that there was a requirement to give 10 days’ notice before termination but – crucially – that only applied if the default was capable of remedy within that period: [31]
The Court went on to find that even if termination was not valid, the owners should get a damages payment because of the builder’s failure to get a CC before construction or at all.
The entitlement to damages was not dependent on the termination being improper: [5]

1,065 Listeners

23 Listeners

797 Listeners

773 Listeners

25 Listeners

89 Listeners

18 Listeners

1 Listeners

314 Listeners

649 Listeners

227 Listeners

169 Listeners

8 Listeners

14 Listeners

18 Listeners