
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
“Hey! You were meant to give me 10 days before terminating the contract!”
Two property owners entered into a contract with a builder to construct two duplex buildings. The builder moved slower than the owners hoped.
They ended up terminating the contract because the builder didn’t complete the work, rectify defects, or get a construction certificate in time.
Nor did the builder obtain a construction certificate at all: [13] The builder appealed, saying the contract required the owners to give 10 days’ notice before terminating, and they failed to do that. The builder went down on appeal.
The Court found that there was a requirement to give 10 days’ notice before termination but – crucially – that only applied if the default was capable of remedy within that period: [31]
The Court went on to find that even if termination was not valid, the owners should get a damages payment because of the builder’s failure to get a CC before construction or at all.
The entitlement to damages was not dependent on the termination being improper: [5]
5
22 ratings
“Hey! You were meant to give me 10 days before terminating the contract!”
Two property owners entered into a contract with a builder to construct two duplex buildings. The builder moved slower than the owners hoped.
They ended up terminating the contract because the builder didn’t complete the work, rectify defects, or get a construction certificate in time.
Nor did the builder obtain a construction certificate at all: [13] The builder appealed, saying the contract required the owners to give 10 days’ notice before terminating, and they failed to do that. The builder went down on appeal.
The Court found that there was a requirement to give 10 days’ notice before termination but – crucially – that only applied if the default was capable of remedy within that period: [31]
The Court went on to find that even if termination was not valid, the owners should get a damages payment because of the builder’s failure to get a CC before construction or at all.
The entitlement to damages was not dependent on the termination being improper: [5]
68 Listeners
756 Listeners
23 Listeners
862 Listeners
69 Listeners
18 Listeners
51 Listeners
32 Listeners
313 Listeners
143 Listeners
243 Listeners
51 Listeners
40 Listeners
18 Listeners
19 Listeners