Claims that Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was a "witch hunt" reveal more about the people making the claim than the actual proceedings themselves. Framing her prosecution as political theater or scapegoating for Epstein’s death ignores the mountains of evidence presented by survivors, investigators, and even Maxwell’s own associates. She wasn’t dragged into court on vague allegations or hearsay—she was tried based on detailed, corroborated accounts of her role in recruiting, grooming, and enabling the abuse of underage girls over many years. Calling that a “witch hunt” is a rhetorical shield—an attempt to reframe a hard-earned moment of accountability as hysteria, all while ignoring the systemic failures and powerful networks that allowed Epstein’s operation to flourish unchecked.

This revisionist push to rebrand Maxwell as some kind of martyr isn’t just offensive—it’s dangerous. It discredits survivors, undermines public trust in criminal accountability, and fuels the exact kind of misinformation campaign that let Epstein operate in plain sight for decades. The “witch hunt” narrative serves a particular crowd: those desperate to deflect scrutiny from the institutions, financiers, and power brokers who were too close for comfort. If anything, Maxwell’s trial barely scratched the surface. To call it overreach is not just dishonest—it’s a calculated distraction from the justice that remains unserved.

To contact me:

[email protected]


source:


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10467497/Prince-Andrews-ex-Lady-Victoria-Hervey-44-says-Ghislaine-Maxwells-trial-witch-hunt.html