The Epstein Chronicles

In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

1027.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.

The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Larry Visoski was far more than Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime pilot. For nearly three decades, he occupied a critical logistical position inside Epstein’s world, flying him between New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands and other destinations while gaining firsthand familiarity with Epstein’s properties, travel patterns, employees and associates. Visoski’s importance was underscored by his testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, where he described Maxwell as essentially Epstein’s number two and helped prosecutors explain the internal structure of Epstein’s operation. His connection to Epstein also extended beyond the cockpit, including reported property and financial ties involving roughly 40 acres connected to Zorro Ranch. None of that, by itself, proved that Visoski knowingly participated in Epstein’s crimes, but his extraordinary longevity, access and proximity made him one of the most potentially valuable witnesses for reconstructing how Epstein’s operation actually functioned.

The larger unanswered question was why the government never provided a comprehensive public accounting of what Visoski knew and whether investigators seriously explored the possibility that his knowledge went beyond innocent employment. Epstein’s criminal enterprise depended heavily on private aviation to connect his secluded properties, transport employees and guests, and maintain the mobility that allowed him to operate across multiple jurisdictions. A chief pilot serving him for decades would have been positioned to observe recurring passengers, unusual travel patterns, scheduling practices and the employees responsible for coordinating Epstein’s movements, even if he never directly witnessed sexual abuse. Prosecutors would have needed evidence of criminal intent to charge Visoski, and proximity alone was never enough, but that did not lessen the need for exhaustive scrutiny. His role ultimately highlighted one of the enduring failures of the Epstein investigation: the public learned an enormous amount about the machinery surrounding Epstein, yet still received remarkably few answers about what his longest-serving insiders knew, what they told investigators and why so little accountability extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell.


to contact me:


[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Day four of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, held July 9, centered on some of the prosecution’s most consequential evidence yet, including a recorded interview with Robinson’s former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. In the interview, Twiggs described Robinson’s behavior after Charlie Kirk was killed and authenticated text exchanges in which Robinson allegedly admitted responsibility for the shooting, discussed the rifle and expressed concern that investigators would find his DNA on it. Twiggs also said Robinson later confirmed the confession in person and expressed regret about what he had done. Prosecutors additionally introduced Robinson’s handwritten note to Twiggs, which allegedly said that he had an opportunity to “take out Charlie Kirk” and took it, although Judge Tony Graf quickly ordered the image removed after it was inadvertently displayed publicly. Twiggs also identified Robinson in surveillance images with varying degrees of certainty, telling investigators that some of the later photographs definitely appeared to show him.


The state also spent a significant portion of the day strengthening the forensic connection between Robinson and the physical evidence. Investigators testified that Robinson’s DNA was found on numerous portions of the rifle recovered near Utah Valley University, including the stock, grips, trigger area, bolt and barrel, as well as on ammunition associated with the weapon. An ATF analysis also linked a rotary engraving tool recovered from Robinson’s residence to markings found on cartridge cases, supporting the prosecution’s allegation that ammunition had been engraved before the shooting. At the same time, the forensic evidence was not absolute across the board: investigators could not conclusively determine that the bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Kirk’s autopsy had been fired from the recovered rifle. By the end of the fourth day, however, prosecutors had combined Robinson’s alleged admissions, Twiggs’ account, the handwritten note, surveillance evidence and extensive DNA testimony into their clearest presentation yet of why they believe Robinson was the shooter.







to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Deadline reported that the mystery surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs’ recent head injury at FCI Fort Dix deepened after the Federal Bureau of Prisons flatly denied reports that he was injured during a fight with convicted Jamaican drug trafficker Christopher “Dudus” Coke. Combs was taken by ambulance from the New Jersey federal prison early Saturday, October 10, for treatment of a head injury that was described as non-life-threatening, and he returned to the facility later that day. Multiple reports had claimed Combs was hurt in an altercation with Coke, but the Bureau of Prisons said that account was false and “did not happen.” Combs’ family has also denied there was a fight, while other reporting suggested he may have struck his head on a bunk bed. Federal prison officials have not publicly explained what actually caused the injury, leaving the circumstances unresolved.

The incident added another controversy to Combs’ incarceration at Fort Dix, where he is serving a 50-month federal sentence after being convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution while being acquitted of the more serious racketeering and sex-trafficking charges. His time at the facility has already generated scrutiny over alleged contraband, special meals, massages, cellphone access and other claimed privileges, and he has spent time in a special housing unit following disciplinary issues. His projected release date has also been pushed to March 2, 2028. The central development in Deadline’s latest report, however, is that the most sensational explanation for Combs’ hospitalization—a prison fight with Coke—is now being explicitly rejected by federal authorities, while officials still have not provided an alternative explanation for how Combs suffered the head injury that required outside medical treatment.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:

Diddy's Prison Head Injury Mystery: Feds Deny Fight With Drug Lord Was Cause

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. The lawsuit seeks access to unredacted federal investigative files that New Mexico says are necessary to identify victims, witnesses and possible co-conspirators tied to Epstein’s activities in the state. Torrez argues that DOJ’s refusal to turn over the material violates the Administrative Procedure Act and interferes with New Mexico’s sovereign authority to investigate crimes committed within its borders. The state has said the federal files contain substantial information about Zorro Ranch and that publicly released Epstein records already include thousands of references to New Mexico and the property.

The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued the U.S. Department of Justice on August 5, 2026, accusing the federal government of obstructing the state’s renewed criminal investigation into alleged abuse, trafficking and other crimes connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. The lawsuit seeks access to unredacted federal investigative files that New Mexico says are necessary to identify victims, witnesses and possible co-conspirators tied to Epstein’s activities in the state. Torrez argues that DOJ’s refusal to turn over the material violates the Administrative Procedure Act and interferes with New Mexico’s sovereign authority to investigate crimes committed within its borders. The state has said the federal files contain substantial information about Zorro Ranch and that publicly released Epstein records already include thousands of references to New Mexico and the property.

The lawsuit also rests on New Mexico’s claim that federal prosecutors effectively told state investigators to stand down in 2019 while the Southern District of New York pursued its own Epstein investigation, with an understanding that relevant information would later be shared. According to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, that information was never provided, and the state says repeated requests in 2026 produced little of investigative value, including a 31-page production made up largely of already-public or heavily redacted material. New Mexico is asking a federal court to declare DOJ’s refusal unlawful and order the department to provide access to the unredacted records, arguing that the continued withholding has directly hampered an active criminal investigation into what happened at Zorro Ranch and who, beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, may have been involved.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.dcd.295266.1.0.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The piece argues that Ghislaine Maxwell’s U.S. citizenship could potentially be challenged because of answers she gave on her naturalization application before becoming a citizen in 2002. According to the story, Maxwell answered “no” when asked whether she had ever committed an offense for which she had not been arrested and whether she had been involved in procuring prostitution or related conduct. The article contends those answers were contradicted by evidence introduced at Maxwell’s 2021 federal trial, where prosecutors established that her involvement in recruiting and grooming underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein stretched back into the 1990s, years before she filed for naturalization. On that basis, the story argues that the government could potentially pursue denaturalization by claiming Maxwell obtained citizenship through material misrepresentations.

The story places that possibility against the broader controversy surrounding Maxwell’s current circumstances, including her transfer to the minimum-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, her attempts to obtain clemency, and allegations that she has received unusually favorable treatment while incarcerated. It argues that denaturalization could ultimately expose Maxwell to removal from the United States after she serves her sentence, most plausibly to the United Kingdom, although such an action would require the Justice Department to actually initiate proceedings and prove the necessary elements in court. The piece is considerably more confident about the strength of a potential denaturalization case than the public record itself establishes, but its central point is that Maxwell’s pre-citizenship conduct and the answers on her N-400 application could provide the government with another legal avenue against her separate from her criminal conviction.


to contact me:


[email protected]



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell Lied on Her Citizenship Form—And It Could Strip Her U.S. Status – La Voce di New York



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Newly released High Court documents showed that Thames Valley Police feared Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could obstruct searches of his properties by arguing that officers needed permission from King Charles because the residences or property belonged to the Crown. Police searched Royal Lodge in Windsor and Andrew’s home on the Sandringham Estate in February while investigating allegations that he improperly shared sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein during his time as the UK’s special representative for trade and investment. Investigators specifically sought paperwork, diaries, business records and other documents connected to Andrew’s official work, telling the judge who issued the warrants that advance notice or attempts to obtain royal permission could jeopardize the investigation or lead to the loss of evidence. The filings said police regarded Andrew as a suspect in several serious offences, including allegations that he forwarded official reports concerning overseas trade missions to Epstein within minutes of receiving them.

The searches have since become the subject of a significant legal fight because Thames Valley Police conceded that the warrants used to raid Andrew’s properties were unlawful. Andrew, who was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation, denied wrongdoing and challenged both the searches and the police justification for conducting them without first seeking his cooperation. His lawyers argued that officers never contacted Andrew or his legal team to ask for voluntary access and disputed suggestions that he could not be trusted to cooperate. Police, meanwhile, have asked the court for permission to retain evidence seized during the unlawful searches, a request Andrew is opposing. That question is expected to be decided at a private hearing in 2027, leaving both the fate of the seized material and the broader criminal investigation unresolved.



to contact me:


[email protected]



source:

Police feared Andrew would block searches by demanding King’s permission | The Independent


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Robert Garcia, with Republican Rep. Thomas Massie also backing the measure, introduced the Epstein Wall Street Records Act, legislation aimed at forcing federal regulators to examine the financial institutions and executives that maintained ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The bill would require agencies including the Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Epstein-connected firms and individuals for possible violations of banking, securities and illicit-finance laws. Regulators would also be required to publicly disclose records relating to Epstein and his associates, refer potential criminal violations to the Justice Department, and could impose fines or even bar executives found responsible from working in the U.S. financial industry.

The legislation arrived alongside renewed scrutiny of former Barclays CEO Jes Staley and the bank's handling of his relationship with Epstein. Warren accused Barclays of “dodging responsibility” after the bank responded to congressional questions by arguing that Staley had concealed the true nature of his relationship with Epstein and that significant information only emerged after his 2021 resignation. Staley had previously worked at JPMorgan, where he developed a close relationship with Epstein, and was ultimately banned from the British financial sector after regulators determined that he had misrepresented that relationship. Warren argued that the Barclays episode demonstrated why voluntary corporate accountability was insufficient and why regulators should be compelled to investigate the broader financial network surrounding Epstein and the executives who helped keep him connected to the banking system.



to contact me:


[email protected]




source:

US lawmakers unveil bill to hold Wall Street’s ‘Epstein-connected’ bosses to account | Banking | The Guardian



Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.