Why does God seem to place a high priority on physical elements of worship in the old testament but not in the new testament? God's opinion on places of worship and sacrifices look inconsistent to many.

How can we believe the bible is a divine book when it seems to deny culturally acceptable practices like interracial marriages? Why does it also turn around and speak highly of people who appear to be violating those prohibitions?

The bible seems to present different intentions for the longevity of God's covenant with Israel, was it supposed to end, or was it supposed to last forever?

Because of our recent history in America, this topic is a hot button issue, and it is one which many critics seize on to discredit the bible. Not only does the bible seem to violate our civilized sensibilities, but statements from different authors don't seem to agree.

Criticism of the bible often focuses on whether or not the bible condoned behavior that doesn't represent moral principles.

Even technical information should match if we are going to say that the bible narrative was communicated by God. A divine source should know data accurately.

The origin of instrumentation is credited to different people. Its usage in worship also seems to be viewed differently by different biblical authors. are these discrepancies reconcilable?

In the final episode of this topic, we focus on instances of alleged contradiction in the later part of the old covenant

Why does God seem to endorse practices which we accept as immoral? If God contradicts Himself can the bible be trusted?

We open a section looking at seemingly contradictory statements concerning foundational moral concepts. We include a very uncomfortable topic.