
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this week’s edition of IPWatchdog Unleashed, my conversation is with Clint Mehall, a partner with Davidson Kappel, LLC, and John Rogitz, who is managing attorney for Rogitz & Associates. Both are prominent voices in the patent world, and they also serve on our ad hoc IPWatchdog Advisory Committee.
The purpose of our conversation was to explore the patent eligibility landscape, and particularly the August 4 memo on patent eligibility from Deputy Commissioner of Patents Charles Kim, which was sent to Technology Centers 2100, 2600 and 3600.
The memo was labeled as a reminder on the proper evaluation of subject matter eligibility of claims under 35 U.S.C. 101. And it was also specifically stated that the “memorandum is not intended to announce any new USPTO practice or procedure and is meant to be consistent with existing USPTO guidance.” Notwithstanding, there does seem to be important new emphasis on the patent eligibility inquiry, and particularly on when rejections are appropriate.
Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.
You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.
By Gene Quinn5
55 ratings
Send us a text
In this week’s edition of IPWatchdog Unleashed, my conversation is with Clint Mehall, a partner with Davidson Kappel, LLC, and John Rogitz, who is managing attorney for Rogitz & Associates. Both are prominent voices in the patent world, and they also serve on our ad hoc IPWatchdog Advisory Committee.
The purpose of our conversation was to explore the patent eligibility landscape, and particularly the August 4 memo on patent eligibility from Deputy Commissioner of Patents Charles Kim, which was sent to Technology Centers 2100, 2600 and 3600.
The memo was labeled as a reminder on the proper evaluation of subject matter eligibility of claims under 35 U.S.C. 101. And it was also specifically stated that the “memorandum is not intended to announce any new USPTO practice or procedure and is meant to be consistent with existing USPTO guidance.” Notwithstanding, there does seem to be important new emphasis on the patent eligibility inquiry, and particularly on when rejections are appropriate.
Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.
You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

38,466 Listeners

38,768 Listeners

14,264 Listeners

375 Listeners

26,387 Listeners

24 Listeners

56,388 Listeners

6,551 Listeners

9,519 Listeners

6,057 Listeners

3,867 Listeners

6,389 Listeners

58,271 Listeners

9 Listeners

16,722 Listeners