In our latest edition of IPWatchdog Unleashed, host Gene Quinn welcomes back Patrick Kilbride, known to many throughout the industry for serving as the Senior Executive Vice President at the United States Chamber of Commerce's Global Innovation Policy Center for 15 years. Drawing from his extensive experience across corporate, university, and industry association sectors, Kilbride discusses the critical components required for a thriving innovation ecosystem and discusses the intricate balance needed between production capabilities and policy frameworks.

About a year ago Kilbride, a veteran in the trade and intellectual property policy communities, founded Kilbride Public Affairs, where he provides public policy advise, advocacy and education, with a focus on helping clients within the innovation ecosystem as they work to navigate the economics of innovation and intellectual property.

Kilbride recounted his transformative journey from skepticism about intellectual property—often regarded as a hindrance in trade agreements during his time as a U.S. Trade Representative during the George W. Bush administration—to becoming a staunch advocate for IP.  He argues for a system where novel work is protected by law, honoring the American founders' vision that property rights should be tied to labor.

Kilbride’s vision is clear: fostering an environment where innovation thrives and where the United States can lead to the leveraging intangible assets, including those assets that general accounting principles refuse to recognize. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

Join us this week on IPWatchdog Unleashed as we welcome Ted Wood, a retired military officer, electrical engineer, business leader, and a patent attorney. In this episode, Ted shares his unique journey from his unexpected career in the military to becoming an accomplished patent attorney. Host Gene Quinn discusses Ted’s fascinating work in satellite communications, electronic warfare, and AI technologies, which ultimately lead him into the law and to become a patent practitioner. Ted also discusses the evolving role of AI in the patent industry, the challenges of adapting to new tools, and the importance of perseverance and hard work. The conversation is filled with insightful anecdotes and valuable life lessons for anyone interested in patent law, engineering, and the transformative power of AI. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed Gene interviews András Jókúti, Director of the Patent Technology Law Division at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Gene and András discuss WIPO's three-year strategy on Standard Essential Patents (SEPs), why WIPO will be placing so much focus on SEPs over the next few years, the importance for WIPO to approach the task in a way that maintains neutrality, how WIPO plans to drive the conversation, bringing together implementers and innovators and those who are both implementers and innovators, fostering collaboration and cooperation, and also some of the substantively thorny issues presented by determining what is (and what is not) fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND). Gene and András also discuss the upcoming WIPO Global SEP Symposium. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed my conversation is with Kevin McNish, who is a registered patent attorney who represents clients in inter partes reviews (IPR), post-grant reviews (PGR), ex parte reexaminations, and other proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

I invited McNish to join us for a conversation about PTAB practice and how it has evolved over the last several months, and to specifically discuss one of the more intriguing criteria being used by the USPTO to discretionarily deny institution of IPR challenges—the settled expectations of the patent owner. This factor takes into account the length of time a patent has been in force and not challenged. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we have a conversation about one of the hottest topics not just in the intellectual property world, but one of the topics that everyone both inside and outside of government is discussing. The cost of prescription pharmaceuticals is higher in the United States than anywhere else in the world, and many in the United States—including President Trump—are fed up with this imbalance. 

So, we will set the record straight and explain what is really causing Americans to pay high drug prices. To accomplish this my conversation is with Corey Salsberg, who is Vice President and Global Head of IP Affairs for Novartis, which is one of the leading and most innovative biopharmaceutical companies in the world. We discuss the issues that matter for the pharmaceutical industry, including what and who is really responsible for higher drug prices in America. We discuss President Trump’s attempts to force most favored nation (MFN) pricing that would demand the U.S. pay no more than what other countries pay for drugs. And we also take a moment to discuss the recent tragic deaths of Malcolm Jamal Warner, Ozzy Osbourne, and Hulk Hogan, and the future of artificial intelligence (AI).

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we explore the age-old question about whether it is best to keep an innovation as a trade secret or whether it makes sense to seek patent protection. And while this question is not one that is new, it is a question that has been getting more attention in recent years. And what I mean by that is this—it is hard not to notice that U.S. patents have been under siege for some time now. This has driven innovators into trade secret protection and away from patent protection in at least some technology fields. So, it is against this backdrop of increasing interest in trade secrets instead of patents that we had a conversation about how to determine whether to keep an innovation as a trade secret or to plow forward to seek patent protection.

Joining moderator Gene Quinn for this conversation are Carlo Cotrone, who is the former Chief IP Officer for Techtronic Industries who also spent time in the oil and gas industry as lead IP counsel for Baker Hughes. Today, Carlo is the founder and principal consultant for Quartal IP. Also joining the conversation is a former law school mate of mine, Arash Behravesh, who is Enterprise Counsel for the Chemistry & Supplies Division at Agilent Technologies, and Bryan Walker, who is Senior IP Counsel at 3M, where he has responsibility for developing and managing international patent portfolios, trade secrets, generative AI and more.

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed my conversation is with my friend Wen Xie. Many of you probably already know Wen. If you've been to IPWatchdog events, you've undoubtedly met her already, and you've heard her speak on our stage and in our webinars about various topics related to patent practice and procedure. 

Wen has more than a decade of experience as a U.S. patent attorney, and her specialty is with software and artificial intelligence (AI). She recently founded Lex Lumen Intellectual Property law firm, where she engages in representation with a client-centered focus that fuses digital modernity with a traditional patent practice. 

We begin our conversation by giving Wen an open mic opportunity to share her thoughts on the state of the industry, with me specifically asking:  What was on your mind as you drove to the studio today?

“You just asked me just now before we started filming, should we be afraid of AI,” Wen begins. “And my answer is there's no point in being afraid because it's coming… AI is coming in every profession, every technology."

After discussing Issac Asimov's three rules for robots, our conversation takes a turn toward innovation and patents. Can AI contribute originality at this point in its development that would be properly considered conception within the legal definition of inventing. We also discuss the importance of prompting, and how it can and should be used to streamline patent practice and drafting. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we dive into patent eligibility waters, with a discussion on how patent attorneys and litigators alike can cope with Alice. Our conversation will triangulate the issue from the political perspective, from the perspective of a patent litigator who represents patent owners in federal court, and from the perspective of a patent attorney who represents clients as they attempt to obtain software patents.

Joining us this week is the Honorable Andrei Iancu, former Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. And as many of you no doubt know, Andrei was responsible for the 2019 Patent Eligibility Guidance from the USPTO, which has made it easier to obtain software patents from the Office, but which the Federal Circuit continues to ignore in favor of their own disjointed, unpredictable, non-repeatable test.  From the patent litigator perspective we have Vince Rubino, who is a partner with Fabricant in the firm’s NY City office, and from the patent prosecution perspective we have John Rogitz, who is Managing Attorney at Rogitz & Associates. 

I started our conversation giving an open mic opportunity for Andrei, Vince and John to jumpstart our conversation by giving me their big picture thoughts on 101. Andrei, who was unfortunately suffering from a bit of laryngitis, leads off.  

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

To successfully monetize a patent portfolio, it is necessary to identify the value within the portfolio and to put in the work to prove to third parties and potential partners that that value exists. But even then, even when all the hard work has been done, after quality assets have been obtained, after evidence of use has been gathered and negotiations have begun, there are no guarantees.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we enter the world of patent monetization, with a conversation about patent licensing and dealmaking—and of course the enforcement landscape. We also discuss the impact the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the United States Patent and Trademark Office continues to have over the industry, and particularly the influence the PTAB exerts over patent monetization and dealmaking. 

Joining me this week are Russell Binns, the CEO at Allied Security Trust, Bill Geary, the Chief Strategy Officer at IDEAHUB, and Jonathan Rogers, who is Chief Operating Officer for cybersecurity leader Centripetal. 

As you hear the conversation unfold we discuss that deals are still getting done and although the value of the deals currently being consummated has not increased in 2025 compared with the last several years, the number of deals being done has dramatically increased, which could very well be the first sign of a bounce in the patent marketplace on the horizon. 

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we enter the patent litigation world for a conversation about gaming the system. For too long popular sentiment has been that patent owners are bad actors simply because they are patent owners. 

Obviously, just being a patent owner does not make one a bad actor, and neither does enforcing a patent against an alleged infringer. But this patent troll narrative has been quite successful and has turned everyone who owns and enforces patents into an evil archvillain. 

Meanwhile, alleged infringers love to portray themselves as victims of unscrupulous patent trolls. So ineffectual is patent protection in the United States that the largest implementers who take products and services to market do not license patents, they simply engage in efficient infringement. 

To break through the generalities and get to the heart of the matter we hosted a discussion on June 3 between Katie O’Sullivan, who is Senior Corporate Counsel for U.S. Litigation at Renesas Electronics, Ben Herbert, who is a partner and co-lead of the Intellectual Property Practice at Miller Barondess, and Ben Weed, who is General Counsel for Ridge, the wallet company that sells primarily on Amazon and through other online platforms. 

We begin our conversation with my asking each for their initial, big picture, preliminary views on gaming patent litigation.

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.