
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of The Bari Chronicles, Damo and Tash unpack a confronting and deeply unsettling healthcare experience that many people living in larger bodies know all too well.
What should have been a simple GP appointment to update a referral for revision surgery became a stark example of how personal bias can override evidence-based care. Tash shares what it was like to sit in front of a medical professional who openly opposed bariatric surgery, dismissed lived experience, and relied on opinion rather than data — and how different that interaction could have been if she were less informed, less confident, or earlier in her journey.
This conversation is not about attacking individual doctors or discrediting medicine. It is about what happens when personal belief collides with patient-centred care, and the emotional toll that takes on people who cannot “unring the bell” of past treatment decisions.
Together, Damo and Tash discuss:
Medical bias and moral judgement in healthcare settings
The difference between opinion and evidence-based practice
Why advocacy matters, especially when power dynamics are at play
Red flags to watch for when building a healthcare team
What respectful, collaborative care actually looks like
Content note: This episode discusses negative healthcare experiences and may be challenging for some listeners. You are welcome to listen at your own pace.
If you have ever left an appointment feeling dismissed, judged, or unheard, this episode will resonate. You are not alone — and your care deserves to be grounded in evidence, respect, and humanity.
By Damien Verner & Tash JarrettIn this episode of The Bari Chronicles, Damo and Tash unpack a confronting and deeply unsettling healthcare experience that many people living in larger bodies know all too well.
What should have been a simple GP appointment to update a referral for revision surgery became a stark example of how personal bias can override evidence-based care. Tash shares what it was like to sit in front of a medical professional who openly opposed bariatric surgery, dismissed lived experience, and relied on opinion rather than data — and how different that interaction could have been if she were less informed, less confident, or earlier in her journey.
This conversation is not about attacking individual doctors or discrediting medicine. It is about what happens when personal belief collides with patient-centred care, and the emotional toll that takes on people who cannot “unring the bell” of past treatment decisions.
Together, Damo and Tash discuss:
Medical bias and moral judgement in healthcare settings
The difference between opinion and evidence-based practice
Why advocacy matters, especially when power dynamics are at play
Red flags to watch for when building a healthcare team
What respectful, collaborative care actually looks like
Content note: This episode discusses negative healthcare experiences and may be challenging for some listeners. You are welcome to listen at your own pace.
If you have ever left an appointment feeling dismissed, judged, or unheard, this episode will resonate. You are not alone — and your care deserves to be grounded in evidence, respect, and humanity.

55 Listeners

360 Listeners