There’s something profoundly backward about how we measure trust in early relationships.We say we want to “see what someone’s really like.” But instead of getting to know them, some people roll out an obstacle course of subtle stressors—emotional shit tests, if you will. Tiny control probes. Fake “boundaries” that are actually performance screens. We’re not talking about real trauma, or authentic needs. We’re talking about low-key emotional warfare to test whether someone will fail.And a hell of a lot of people do.But here’s the thing: what if the test itself is the failure?THE UNSPOKEN CONTRACT OF DATINGLet’s be real. Not everyone is out there for a soulmate. Some are out for chemistry. Some are out for a hookup. Others, just some company. And in between all that is what I call the “unspoken contract.”We all know the deal: we’re going to meet up, check for vibe, maybe mess around if it clicks. That’s the lab. But what we’re not doing is signing on to a syllabus of tests to prove we’re good enough to be loved, touched, respected, or seen.So when someone starts testing from jump—“I just got a tattoo so I can’t hook up yet,” or “let’s see if he gets mad when I say no”—they’re not screening for safety. They’re setting up a power imbalance. That’s not dating. That’s science fiction sociology and it doesn’t lead anywhere stable.WHERE IT COMES FROM: CONTROL, NOT CONNECTIONAccording to a 2007 study by Simpson, Tran, and Collins, people with anxious or avoidant attachment styles are more likely to use emotion-driven defenses in relationships. These include withdrawing, baiting, or “testing” their partners instead of directly expressing need. The result? Emotional confusion and reduced bonding capacity.So yeah—these kinds of dynamics don’t just happen. They’re often coping mechanisms from past relationships or childhood trauma. Another study by Shaffer, Yates, and Egeland (2009) showed that emotional maltreatment in early life directly correlates to emotional manipulation and boundary-testing in teen and adult relationships.So if someone is testing you early on, it’s not just about you. It’s about what they’re still fighting with, in their own head.SHIT TESTING ISN’T SEXY, IT’S A TRAPHere’s the red pill they won’t tell you:Shit tests don’t predict long-term success. They kill it.According to Robins et al. (2000), early-stage emotional conflict—even subtle—leads to trust erosion and lower relationship satisfaction over time. And in dyadic studies—where both people in a couple are studied—mismatched communication and emotional games directly lead to a decline in romantic quality (Peterson et al., 2018).So if you start a relationship in “lab rat” mode—testing, reacting, analyzing instead of feeling—you’re already off the rails.MAMA’S SHADOW AND THE MYTH OF THE FEMALE LITMUS TESTThis isn’t about being anti-woman. This isn’t manosphere ragebait.It’s about recognizing power dynamics that nobody wants to name, especially if they come from places that were once supposed to nurture you.You ever feel humiliated by your mother growing up? That early relational trauma doesn’t just go away. It becomes the blueprint. And some women—without knowing it—mirror that humiliation pattern into their love lives.Should they be allowed to test and be trusted not to go frying it?Because if you keep throwing the chicken in the fire to “see if it survives,” all you’ll end up with is overcooked, dry-ass nothingness.FULL CIRCLE CHECK-IN: WHO WAS THIS REALLY FOR?Let’s stretch further out. Ever wonder if some of this “empowerment” culture was actually designed for the women being sold it?Look back. Many movements had real goals: liberty, dignity, protection. But the way they got framed, sold, and weaponized—wasn’t always for women. It was for agendas. Media. Profit. Even control.Sometimes people were made into soldiers for a war that was never in their home. Now that doesn’t mean liberation was wrong. But it does mean we need to walk full circle and look around.Because some people started handing out tests they were never meant to grade. They just thought that’s what freedom looked like.FINAL NOTE: THIS AIN’T WAR, IT’S AWARENESSNo, this isn’t some red-pill “us vs. them.” It’s not about gender war. It’s about truth war.Because emotional testing is happening in both directions—men too. But what matters is what those tests are built on. Are you checking for safety, honesty, shared reality? Or are you manufacturing pressure and calling it “screening”?Stop setting people up to fail and calling it strength.Start setting people up to connect—and let the chemistry write its own lab report.SOURCES & CREDITS* Simpson, J.A., Tran, S.S., & Collins, W.A. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships. PDF* Robins, R.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship. PDF* Peterson, C.M., Peugh, J., & Loucks, L. (2018). Emotional maltreatment and young adult relationship satisfaction. DOI* Fosco, G.M., Caruthers, A.S., & Dishion, T.J. (2012). A six-year predictive test of adolescent family relationship quality. PDF* Shaffer, A., Yates, T.M., & Egeland, B.R. (2009). Emotional maltreatment and early adolescent competence. PDF* Donnellan, M.B., & Larsen-Rife, D. (2005). Personality and competence in early adult relationships. PDF* Briggs-Gowan, M.J., & Carter, A.S. (2008). Social-emotional screening and elementary school outcomes. PDF* Dunn, J. (2003). Emotional development in early childhood. Google Books
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit whisperingpiratepodcast.substack.com/subscribe