
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court has considered five different cases dealing with Section 922(g)(3) and its prohibition on "unlawful" drug users possessing firearms, but so far has only granted cert to U.S. v. Hemani. Cam and Armed American Radio's Mark Walters break down why the DOJ wanted Hemani to be the case that determines the future of the statute.
By Townhall Media4.8
421421 ratings
The Supreme Court has considered five different cases dealing with Section 922(g)(3) and its prohibition on "unlawful" drug users possessing firearms, but so far has only granted cert to U.S. v. Hemani. Cam and Armed American Radio's Mark Walters break down why the DOJ wanted Hemani to be the case that determines the future of the statute.

23,461 Listeners

62,865 Listeners

1,633 Listeners

886 Listeners

875 Listeners
783 Listeners

460 Listeners

4,856 Listeners

1,523 Listeners

762 Listeners

1,188 Listeners

611 Listeners

90 Listeners

360 Listeners

908 Listeners