
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court has considered five different cases dealing with Section 922(g)(3) and its prohibition on "unlawful" drug users possessing firearms, but so far has only granted cert to U.S. v. Hemani. Cam and Armed American Radio's Mark Walters break down why the DOJ wanted Hemani to be the case that determines the future of the statute.
By Townhall Media4.8
427427 ratings
The Supreme Court has considered five different cases dealing with Section 922(g)(3) and its prohibition on "unlawful" drug users possessing firearms, but so far has only granted cert to U.S. v. Hemani. Cam and Armed American Radio's Mark Walters break down why the DOJ wanted Hemani to be the case that determines the future of the statute.

26,439 Listeners

64,909 Listeners

1,642 Listeners

798 Listeners

783 Listeners

12,919 Listeners

1,405 Listeners

1,543 Listeners

2,623 Listeners

5,585 Listeners

43,971 Listeners

312 Listeners

89 Listeners

383 Listeners

1,102 Listeners