
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The SEC's scheduling debate will renew when the conference's spring meetings begin later this month.
It's that age-old question of whether to stick with eight conference games or bump up to nine.
On today's episode, hosts Blake Toppmeyer and John Adams debate the merit of adding a ninth conference game versus sticking with the status quo. Retaining the eight-game format would sacrifice the annual nature of some secondary rivalries, like Auburn-Georgia and Alabama-Tennessee.
Is that worth it? Well, that depends.
Toppmeyer and Adams are intrigued by the idea of an SEC-Big Ten football challenge -- so intrigued, that they like the concept of an interconference clash better than a ninth SEC game.
If the SEC wants to prove its supremacy, what better way than to put it on the line throughout 16 non-conference games against the Big Ten?
4.3
2626 ratings
The SEC's scheduling debate will renew when the conference's spring meetings begin later this month.
It's that age-old question of whether to stick with eight conference games or bump up to nine.
On today's episode, hosts Blake Toppmeyer and John Adams debate the merit of adding a ninth conference game versus sticking with the status quo. Retaining the eight-game format would sacrifice the annual nature of some secondary rivalries, like Auburn-Georgia and Alabama-Tennessee.
Is that worth it? Well, that depends.
Toppmeyer and Adams are intrigued by the idea of an SEC-Big Ten football challenge -- so intrigued, that they like the concept of an interconference clash better than a ninth SEC game.
If the SEC wants to prove its supremacy, what better way than to put it on the line throughout 16 non-conference games against the Big Ten?
306 Listeners
1,300 Listeners
459 Listeners
1,098 Listeners
1,168 Listeners
3,972 Listeners
70 Listeners
1,794 Listeners
202 Listeners
791 Listeners
220 Listeners
148 Listeners
3,447 Listeners
79 Listeners
368 Listeners