
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court heard two partisan gerrymandering cases—one from North Carolina and another from Maryland—this week: Lamone v. Benisek and Rucho v. Common Cause. Examining those cases and how the Court might rule, host Jeffrey Rosen sits down with Nick Stephanopoulos, one of the attorneys in the North Carolina case and a law professor at the University of Chicago, and Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation. These scholars debate whether or not the Supreme Court should be involved in examining partisan gerrymandering claims, and discuss what the Constitution says about gerrymandering.
For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts.
Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].
By National Constitution Center4.6
10811,081 ratings
The Supreme Court heard two partisan gerrymandering cases—one from North Carolina and another from Maryland—this week: Lamone v. Benisek and Rucho v. Common Cause. Examining those cases and how the Court might rule, host Jeffrey Rosen sits down with Nick Stephanopoulos, one of the attorneys in the North Carolina case and a law professor at the University of Chicago, and Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation. These scholars debate whether or not the Supreme Court should be involved in examining partisan gerrymandering claims, and discuss what the Constitution says about gerrymandering.
For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts.
Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].

8,465 Listeners

4,038 Listeners

3,541 Listeners

2,026 Listeners

146 Listeners

6,294 Listeners

2,559 Listeners

2,374 Listeners

32,328 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

5,866 Listeners

3,948 Listeners

15,950 Listeners

749 Listeners

640 Listeners