
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court heard two partisan gerrymandering cases—one from North Carolina and another from Maryland—this week: Lamone v. Benisek and Rucho v. Common Cause. Examining those cases and how the Court might rule, host Jeffrey Rosen sits down with Nick Stephanopoulos, one of the attorneys in the North Carolina case and a law professor at the University of Chicago, and Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation. These scholars debate whether or not the Supreme Court should be involved in examining partisan gerrymandering claims, and discuss what the Constitution says about gerrymandering.
For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts.
Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].
By National Constitution Center4.6
10811,081 ratings
The Supreme Court heard two partisan gerrymandering cases—one from North Carolina and another from Maryland—this week: Lamone v. Benisek and Rucho v. Common Cause. Examining those cases and how the Court might rule, host Jeffrey Rosen sits down with Nick Stephanopoulos, one of the attorneys in the North Carolina case and a law professor at the University of Chicago, and Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation. These scholars debate whether or not the Supreme Court should be involved in examining partisan gerrymandering claims, and discuss what the Constitution says about gerrymandering.
For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts.
Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].

8,474 Listeners

4,113 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

146 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

2,550 Listeners

2,380 Listeners

32,354 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

746 Listeners

632 Listeners