
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 14, 2026.
Petitioner: Cedric Galette.
Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In August 2018, Cedric Galette was a passenger in a vehicle stopped on Market Street in Philadelphia when it was struck by a vehicle operated by the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit). Galette suffered physical injuries as a result of the collision and brought a negligence lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court against both the vehicle’s driver, Julie McCrey, and NJ Transit. NJ Transit responded by asserting that it was an arm of the State of New Jersey, and therefore immune from private suit in Pennsylvania under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
The trial court denied NJ Transit’s motion to dismiss, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed, holding that NJ Transit is not an arm of New Jersey. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed, holding that NJ Transit qualifies as an arm of the state and is therefore immune under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
Question
Is the New Jersey Transit Corporation an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes?
By scotusstats.com4.9
3737 ratings
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 14, 2026.
Petitioner: Cedric Galette.
Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In August 2018, Cedric Galette was a passenger in a vehicle stopped on Market Street in Philadelphia when it was struck by a vehicle operated by the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit). Galette suffered physical injuries as a result of the collision and brought a negligence lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court against both the vehicle’s driver, Julie McCrey, and NJ Transit. NJ Transit responded by asserting that it was an arm of the State of New Jersey, and therefore immune from private suit in Pennsylvania under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
The trial court denied NJ Transit’s motion to dismiss, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed, holding that NJ Transit is not an arm of New Jersey. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed, holding that NJ Transit qualifies as an arm of the state and is therefore immune under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
Question
Is the New Jersey Transit Corporation an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes?

3,550 Listeners

382 Listeners

676 Listeners

1,112 Listeners

2,020 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

32,378 Listeners

7,264 Listeners

5,836 Listeners

3,943 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

399 Listeners

744 Listeners

501 Listeners

459 Listeners