
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 14, 2026.
Petitioner: Cedric Galette.
Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In August 2018, Cedric Galette was a passenger in a vehicle stopped on Market Street in Philadelphia when it was struck by a vehicle operated by the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit). Galette suffered physical injuries as a result of the collision and brought a negligence lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court against both the vehicle’s driver, Julie McCrey, and NJ Transit. NJ Transit responded by asserting that it was an arm of the State of New Jersey, and therefore immune from private suit in Pennsylvania under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
The trial court denied NJ Transit’s motion to dismiss, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed, holding that NJ Transit is not an arm of New Jersey. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed, holding that NJ Transit qualifies as an arm of the state and is therefore immune under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
Question
Is the New Jersey Transit Corporation an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes?
By scotusstats.com4.9
3737 ratings
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 14, 2026.
Petitioner: Cedric Galette.
Respondent: New Jersey Transit Corporation.
Advocates:
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
In August 2018, Cedric Galette was a passenger in a vehicle stopped on Market Street in Philadelphia when it was struck by a vehicle operated by the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit). Galette suffered physical injuries as a result of the collision and brought a negligence lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court against both the vehicle’s driver, Julie McCrey, and NJ Transit. NJ Transit responded by asserting that it was an arm of the State of New Jersey, and therefore immune from private suit in Pennsylvania under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
The trial court denied NJ Transit’s motion to dismiss, and the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed, holding that NJ Transit is not an arm of New Jersey. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed, holding that NJ Transit qualifies as an arm of the state and is therefore immune under the doctrine of interstate sovereign immunity.
Question
Is the New Jersey Transit Corporation an arm of the State of New Jersey for interstate sovereign immunity purposes?

3,550 Listeners

383 Listeners

670 Listeners

1,115 Listeners

2,037 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

32,388 Listeners

7,254 Listeners

5,865 Listeners

3,955 Listeners

3,365 Listeners

397 Listeners

745 Listeners

500 Listeners

459 Listeners