Supreme Court Oral Arguments

[24-1260] Watson v. Republican National Committee


Listen Later

Watson v. Republican National Committee

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Mar 23, 2026.

Petitioner: Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State.
Respondent: Republican National Committee, et al.

Advocates:

  • Scott G. Stewart (for the Petitioner)
  • Paul D. Clement (for the Respondents)
  • D. John Sauer (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
  • Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

    Federal statutes designate the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the uniform day for electing members of Congress and appointing presidential electors. While Mississippi requires voters to cast absentee ballots by this federal deadline, the state legislature amended its election code in 2020 to permit the counting of mail-in ballots received up to five business days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked by that Tuesday. This “postmark rule” allows validly cast votes delayed by mail service to be included in the final tally, a practice currently utilized by approximately thirty states.

    In 2024, the Republican National Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, the Libertarian Party of Mississippi, and individual voters filed suit against Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson and county election officials. The plaintiffs argued that the federal statutes establishing a singular “election” day preempt Mississippi’s five-day receipt window, contending that an election is not legally concluded until officials actually receive the ballots. They sought to invalidate the state statute and enjoin officials from counting any absentee ballots received after federal Election Day.

    The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the state officials, ruling that the state law did not conflict with federal statutes. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed, holding that federal law preempts the Mississippi statute because ballots must be both cast and received by Election Day.

    Question

    Do the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day?

    ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Supreme Court Oral ArgumentsBy scotusstats.com

    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9
    • 4.9

    4.9

    37 ratings


    More shows like Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    View all
    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

    Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

    3,530 Listeners

    Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

    Bloomberg Law

    379 Listeners

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    663 Listeners

    We the People by National Constitution Center

    We the People

    1,110 Listeners

    Conversations with Bill Kristol by Bill Kristol

    Conversations with Bill Kristol

    2,031 Listeners

    The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

    The Lawfare Podcast

    6,304 Listeners

    Stay Tuned with Preet by Preet Bharara

    Stay Tuned with Preet

    32,354 Listeners

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

    Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

    7,244 Listeners

    Strict Scrutiny by Strict Scrutiny

    Strict Scrutiny

    5,832 Listeners

    Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

    Advisory Opinions

    3,946 Listeners

    The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

    The Dispatch Podcast

    3,357 Listeners

    Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

    Amarica's Constitution

    399 Listeners

    Divided Argument by Will Baude & Dan Epps

    Divided Argument

    746 Listeners

    Shield of the Republic by The Bulwark

    Shield of the Republic

    500 Listeners

    Central Air by Josh Barro, Megan McArdle & Ben Dreyfuss

    Central Air

    457 Listeners