
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.
By Paul Engel: Author, speaker and podcaster4
4343 ratings
There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.

23,061 Listeners

26,043 Listeners

11,935 Listeners

153,248 Listeners

63,872 Listeners

41,384 Listeners

10,121 Listeners

2,559 Listeners

2,177 Listeners

65,493 Listeners

43,834 Listeners

39,483 Listeners

6,272 Listeners

670 Listeners

16,332 Listeners