
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.
By Paul Engel: Author, speaker and podcaster4
4343 ratings
There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.

23,247 Listeners

26,371 Listeners

12,064 Listeners

154,084 Listeners

62,746 Listeners

41,148 Listeners

10,093 Listeners

2,552 Listeners

2,250 Listeners

66,662 Listeners

44,008 Listeners

40,486 Listeners

6,272 Listeners

691 Listeners

17,001 Listeners