
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.
By Paul Engel: Author, speaker and podcaster4
4343 ratings
There will always be tension between our desire for privacy and safety. We're all for privacy, until we find that an invasion of said privacy could have stopped some terrible event. But are we willing to trade our privacy for safety? "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." --Benjamin Franklin In the case of SCHOLL and BEDNARZ v. Illinois State Police the privacy question revolves around automatic license place readers (ALPRs) and what makes a search reasonable.

23,356 Listeners

26,464 Listeners

12,091 Listeners

153,989 Listeners

64,567 Listeners

41,393 Listeners

10,200 Listeners

2,550 Listeners

2,275 Listeners

65,964 Listeners

43,953 Listeners

40,434 Listeners

6,298 Listeners

696 Listeners

16,982 Listeners