By Thomas Harrington at Brownstone dot org.

[The following is an excerpt from Thomas Harrington's book, The Treason of the Experts: Covid and the Credentialed Class.]

When most people hear the terms "shock and awe" and "full spectrum dominance" they probably think - if they think about them at all - of the early moments of the premeditated US destruction of Iraq and the ever-smug grin of Donald Rumsfeld.

It was Rumsfeld, you will recall, who supposedly spent the first months of his mandate as Secretary of Defense totally rethinking the mechanics of the US way of making war.

At the center of the new defense doctrine were the two approaches mentioned above.

The first refers to the practice of hitting the enemy so hard, so quickly, and from so many angles that he will immediately recognize the futility of mounting a defense and rapidly give up the struggle.

The second tactic, which is subsumed by the first, refers, among other things, to the practice of inundating the informational environments of the enemy, the domestic US audience, and potential US allies with pro-American narratives that leave absolutely no space or time for formulating skeptical questions or coherent discourses of dissent.

In short, the overarching goal of Rumsfeld's new defense doctrine was - to use a term near and dear to the hearts of James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen who earned millions from the US Defense department after September 11 for designing the torture programs used at Guantanamo Bay and other US black sites around the world - to induce "learned helplessness" in as many segments of the world population as was technically possible.

For many, I think, the idea that governments might have the capacity and the desire to assault their own populations with well-organized and persistent campaigns of information warfare seems rather far-fetched. And for others, I suspect, speaking of the widespread infliction of "trauma" in this context might evoke comparisons to some of the worst forms of whiny and exaggerated campus wokery.

But after all we have seen over the last several decades of world history, is the idea that governments might often be strategically motivated, serial abusers of their own populations really so hard to acknowledge?

We know, as I have previously mentioned, that when the US-backed Italian government was faced with the growing possibility of having to share power with that country's Communist Party in the 1970s and 1980s, elements of the government or close to it greenlighted a number of false flag attacks on the Italian police and the general population, the most notable of these being the Peteano bombing of 1972 and the Bologna train station massacre of 1980.

The aim of the bombings, as was subsequently explained by one of the government-protected authors of the attacks, Vicenzo Vinciguerra, was to generate a social panic that would drive those disaffected with the country's social and economic reality back into the arms of the increasingly discredited, but US-approved Christian-Democrat party.

It was his witness of these events as an anti-establishment activist that impelled the philosopher Giorgio Agamben to write his influential studies on the architectures of social control used by contemporary Western governments, studies that suggest among many other things, that generating "states of exception" wherein the normal deliberative processes of the society are suspended or gravely curtailed, has become standard operating procedure in many Western "democracies."

I think few would now dispute that, whatever the origins of the attacks of September 11, the widespread sense of trauma generated within the US population by the repetitive broadcasting of that day's horrific images greatly facilitated the government's drive to radically redefine longstanding notions of civil liberty and achieved citizen buy-in for its multiple wars of aggression in the Middle East.

All of which bring us to Covid.

Can anyone who has read Laura Doddsworth's e...