
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this Monday in two cases that challenge the consideration of race in undergraduate admissions. The Court’s decisions in these cases will undoubtedly shape the future of American higher education for millions of students.
In previous challenges to affirmative action, the Court has continued to uphold the principles of affirmative action and the notion that diversity in higher education serves a compelling governmental interest. But the plaintiffs in both cases currently before the Court, a conservative activist group called Students for Fair Admissions, argue that affirmative action itself is discriminatory.
Dr. Melissa Murray, Frederick I. and Grace Stokes Professor of Law at NYU, joins us to unpack these arguments and consider their ramifications.
4.3
712712 ratings
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this Monday in two cases that challenge the consideration of race in undergraduate admissions. The Court’s decisions in these cases will undoubtedly shape the future of American higher education for millions of students.
In previous challenges to affirmative action, the Court has continued to uphold the principles of affirmative action and the notion that diversity in higher education serves a compelling governmental interest. But the plaintiffs in both cases currently before the Court, a conservative activist group called Students for Fair Admissions, argue that affirmative action itself is discriminatory.
Dr. Melissa Murray, Frederick I. and Grace Stokes Professor of Law at NYU, joins us to unpack these arguments and consider their ramifications.
6,173 Listeners
462 Listeners
9,157 Listeners
665 Listeners
3,762 Listeners
913 Listeners
38,523 Listeners
43,821 Listeners
319 Listeners
90,860 Listeners
37,883 Listeners
27,080 Listeners
916 Listeners
11,504 Listeners
32,075 Listeners
929 Listeners
8,245 Listeners
43,353 Listeners
6,681 Listeners
11,912 Listeners
4,627 Listeners
320 Listeners
1,881 Listeners
16,093 Listeners
1,512 Listeners