All about contested spaces: physical statehood and online safety.

Naomi Smith, Alex Andreou and Kenny Campbell discuss the impending recognition of Palestine by Britain (and France). Why now?

And as the Online Safety Act begins to impact our internet use, we ask whether it fixes anything or just creates a whole new range of problems.

Plus regular features 'Wokey Dokey' and 'Grin And Share It'.

***SPONSOR US AT ⁠⁠⁠⁠KO-FI.COM/QUIETRIOTPOD⁠⁠⁠⁠***

“Netanyahu has behaved in a way that demonstrates exactly the characteristics of a politician who is running out of time. There is only so long he can avoid an election. As the pressure builds towards it, maybe what we are seeing is part of an emboldened international community speaking directly to the Israeli people.”

“A two-state solution depends on there being power brokers on both sides who can sit down and talk meaningfully to move things forward. That's not Hamas and, increasingly clearly, that’s not Netanyahu either. Whatever solutions eventually come to pass, key to them is gonna be getting those problematic parties out of the picture.” 

“Trump is transactional and being transactional, he doesn't really understand ideological constraints. Having offered transactions that he thinks Netanyahu and Putin would take, he just cannot fathom why they didn't. So he's beginning to see them as people he can't do business with. A bad position to be in with Trump.”

“As the law comes into effect, there is no public register of approved age verification providers, no duty on those providers to meet any specific privacy or security standards, above data protection alone, and no requirement for platforms to choose trusted or certified providers.”

“The Online Safety Act is like saying: We love the sea. The sea is a fabulous place. We spent many happy years playing in the sea. But the sea is now full of sewage and horrible things. And we're going to solve that problem by making it harder to get into the sea. It doesn't actually deal with any of the causes at all.”

“I keep coming up against this conundrum, this circle that cannot be squared: the same anonymity that makes the internet exceptionally useful to some, is also what makes it a risk to others… For it to become a space within which the law applies, it cannot be anonymous. Otherwise we accept it is incapable of being regulated and belongs, in part, to bad actors.”

“What happens if you shut down direct access to a thing for the group of people who are most likely to use it? Especially young people. They will go round the side.”

***SPONSOR US AT ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠KO-FI.COM/QUIETRIOTPOD⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠***

CALLS TO ACTION:

Complain to Sky News about disproportionate Reform UK coverage.

Find out more about the UNICEF Gaza appeal for children in crisis.

Sign the Open Rights Group letter to gov't about online safety.

GRIN AND SHARE IT:

Watch the report about the discovery of the Denver Parkingsaurus.

Buy something from ⁠⁠⁠our bookshop here⁠⁠⁠.

Email us at ⁠⁠⁠⁠[email protected]⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Or visit our website ⁠⁠⁠⁠www.quietriotpod.com⁠⁠⁠⁠.

With Naomi Smith, Alex Andreou and Kenny Campbell – in cahoots with Sandstone Global.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices