Andrew Rappaport hosts a compelling discussion with Ryan Denton on the often contentious topic of spiritual gifts, diving into the nuances of continuationism and cessationism. They kick things off by exploring the extremes within these doctrines, particularly focusing on Ryan's concerns regarding the cessationist side, which he believes may sometimes be too rigid. As they navigate through definitions and historical perspectives, they emphasize the importance of balancing scriptural interpretation with a recognition of God's ongoing work in the world. The conversation highlights the value of nuanced understanding, encouraging listeners to engage thoughtfully with both traditional and contemporary views of spiritual gifts. Ultimately, this episode serves as an invitation for open dialogue among believers, stressing the significance of discernment in addressing the complexities of faith and practice.

Takeaways:

• The hosts dive deep into the topic of spiritual gifts, discussing continuationism and cessationism, and their nuances, highlighting how these interpretations affect modern Christian practices.
• Ryan Denton, a Presbyterian minister, shares his perspective on cessationism, arguing that while certain gifts ceased, God can still work through extraordinary means today, albeit in a non-normative manner.
• Andrew Rappaport emphasizes the importance of biblical accuracy in doctrinal discussions, reminding listeners that miracles may occur but should not be confused with the gifts that were present in the apostolic age.
• The conversation reveals a mutual respect between the hosts despite their differing views, showcasing how open dialogue can lead to a deeper understanding of complex theological issues.
• The hosts stress the significance of discernment in evaluating claims of spiritual experiences, cautioning against attributing personal feelings or experiences as direct communications from God.
• Listeners are encouraged to engage with the hosts on future platforms for more discussions, emphasizing the value of respectful debate in theological circles.

Mentioned in this episode:

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar

Andrew Rapoport welcomes listeners to a thought-provoking discussion on the intricacies of Islam and the Christian faith, featuring guest James Rayment, the director of the Al-Maidah Initiative. The main takeaway centers around the necessity of understanding Islam beyond surface-level perceptions, emphasizing the importance of engaging with Muslims in meaningful ways. Rayment reflects on his journey from a simplistic view of Islam shaped by media and political events to a nuanced understanding cultivated through personal interactions and academic exploration. He encourages Christians to step out of their comfort zones and initiate conversations with their Muslim neighbors, highlighting the vital role of hospitality and curiosity in bridging cultural divides. The episode serves as both an invitation and a challenge for listeners to actively learn about and engage with those of different faiths, fostering genuine relationships that could lead to transformative discussions about belief and identity.

Andrew Rapoport welcomes his guest, James Remnant, the director of the Al-Maidah Initiative, a ministry dedicated to equipping Christians to understand Islam and engage with Muslim communities. Their conversation dives deep into James's personal journey with Islam, starting from his early experiences post-9/11, which sparked his interest in understanding the religion beyond the media narratives. The discussion highlights the importance of learning directly from Islamic sources, such as the Quran and Hadith, rather than relying solely on Christian interpretations. James recounts a pivotal moment when he began engaging with Muslims in America, emphasizing the significance of personal relationships and genuine curiosity in impactful conversations. He shares how he transitioned from a superficial understanding to meaningful interactions, fostering friendships that have since blossomed into ministry opportunities. Andrew and James further explore the theological differences between Islam and Christianity, particularly in relation to the concepts of sin, salvation, and the nature of God. They explore the historical context of these beliefs and how they influence interactions today, encouraging listeners to approach Muslims with love and understanding, rather than fear or prejudice. The episode wraps up by encouraging Christians to build bridges with their Muslim neighbors, highlighting the natural curiosity that can lead to profound conversations about faith and truth.

Takeaways:

• Andrew Rapoport discusses the importance of understanding Islam to engage meaningfully with Muslim communities.
• James Rayment shares his journey into studying Islam and how it shifted his perspective on interfaith dialogue.
• The podcast emphasizes the importance of Christians approaching evangelism with curiosity and genuine interest in Muslim beliefs.
• The value of hospitality is highlighted as a bridge for building relationships with Muslim neighbors.
• Listeners are encouraged to consider cultural events as great opportunities to meet and engage with Muslims in their local communities.
• Training and resources are available to help churches equip their members to understand and interact with Islam.

Mentioned in this episode:

What Do They Believe

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar

Pastor Phil joins Andrew Rapoport on the Rap Report to dive deep into the pressing issues facing the church today, particularly the encroaching influence of wokeness and the social justice movement. The conversation kicks off with a look back at how the church has historically handled attacks on its foundations, with Phil drawing parallels between past and current challenges. They explore the concept of “hijacking virtue,” where seemingly noble causes are manipulated for ulterior motives, alluding to movements like Black Lives Matter and the growing complexity of racial reconciliation efforts. Throughout the episode, they emphasize the need for discernment in identifying idols in our lives and churches that could lead believers astray, ultimately pointing to the importance of a solid biblical worldview. As they wrap up, listeners are encouraged to look critically at their own communities and the teachings they encounter, ensuring they remain anchored in the truth of Scripture amidst a rapidly changing cultural landscape.

The episode culminates in a call to action for listeners to become more discerning about the influences shaping their faith and the church community. Andrew and Phil encourage a proactive approach to understanding the root causes of cultural movements and their potential impact on the church. They articulate a vision of the church as a beacon of hope and truth in a world increasingly hostile to its teachings. By grounding themselves in scripture and fostering a community that prioritizes spiritual growth over societal trends, believers can effectively counter the narratives that seek to undermine their faith. The conversation concludes with practical advice for identifying potential pitfalls within church teachings and a reminder of the importance of community and dialogue in navigating these complex issues. Phil's book serves as a resource for those looking to deepen their understanding of these themes, providing a framework for recognizing and combating modern idolatry in all its forms.

Takeaways:

• Andrew and Pastor Phil discuss the modern challenges facing the church, emphasizing the need for biblical interpretation amidst societal pressures.
• The podcast highlights the importance of recognizing and resisting the hijacking of virtue by secular movements, particularly in the context of social justice.
• Pastor Phil shares insights from his book, 'Idols on the Hills', addressing how ancient idolatry manifests in contemporary issues like materialism and cultural ideology.
• Listeners are encouraged to critically evaluate their churches for signs of compromise with modern ideologies, particularly regarding race and morality in light of scripture.
• The discussion touches on the role of pastors in navigating modern complexities while remaining grounded in the truth of the gospel, avoiding guilt manipulation.
• Both speakers stress the necessity of maintaining a clear Christian worldview to combat the influences of wokeness and to support biblical teachings effectively.

Links referenced in this episode:

• strivingforeternity.org
• amazon.com
• philbrainard.com
• squirrellyjoescoffee.com
• mypillow.com

Mentioned in this episode:

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar

What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

The Rap Report dives deep into the essential topic of biblical inerrancy, kicking off with a serious question that hangs in the air: Are there errors in the Bible? Andrew Rapoport, the host, introduces his friend Keith Foskey, known for his humorous takes on various denominations, but today, he brings a weighty discussion on textual criticism. Kieth explores how to trust the Bible as the authentic word of God, touching on the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, a pivotal document from the '70s that sought to clarify what inerrancy truly means. This episode is a rich blend of scholarly insight and accessible discussion, making complex theological concepts relatable and engaging for listeners while also maintaining a light-hearted vibe amidst serious discourse. As he unravels the layers of biblical authority and textual transmission, they invite the audience to consider the reliability of Scripture in a world marked by skepticism and varied interpretations.

Takeaways:

• The podcast discusses the importance of biblical inerrancy and how it underpins Christian faith, emphasizing that if the Bible contains errors, it poses a significant problem for believers.
• Andrew Rapoport introduces Keith Foskey, noting his expertise in textual criticism, which is essential for understanding how we can trust the integrity of biblical texts over time.
• The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, developed in the 70s, serves as a foundational document affirming the Bible's authority and trustworthiness amidst modern skepticism.
• Listeners are encouraged to explore the various translations of the Bible and the complexities surrounding textual variations to gain a deeper understanding of scriptural reliability.
• The podcast highlights the remarkable preservation of biblical texts, with a wealth of manuscripts that allow scholars to reconstruct what the originals likely stated despite minor variants.
• Rapoport argues that understanding the Bible's authority is key for Christians today, especially in light of contemporary challenges to its truth claims and interpretations.

Mentioned in this episode:

Book a SfE speaker today

We have several speakers that can cover many different topics. Contact us today: [email protected]

What Do They Believe

What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

The conversation dives into a particularly intriguing phenomenon: why do professing atheists spend so much time discussing a God they claim does not exist? Andrew Rappaport and Adam Parker mull over this paradox, poking at the inconsistency of devoting energy to a belief system they reject. The episode reveals that many of these atheists engage more in critiquing Christianity than in articulating their own beliefs about atheism, raising questions about their underlying motivations. Throughout the banter, they explore the idea that this focus on God may stem from a deeper struggle with their own past beliefs and a common desire to challenge the convictions that once shaped their lives. Ultimately, the discussion leads to reflections on sincerity in dialogue, the nature of belief, and the powerful impact of genuine interactions in the realm of faith and skepticism.

A fascinating conversation unfolds as Andrew Rapoport and Adam Parker tackle an intriguing paradox: why do professing atheists spend so much time discussing a deity they claim does not exist? Andrew, a seasoned apologist, leads this engaging discussion with his characteristic wit and insight. The duo explores the phenomenon of atheists focusing their rhetoric predominantly on Christianity rather than on their own beliefs or alternatives. Throughout their dialogue, they dissect the motivations and implications of such behavior, suggesting that it may stem from a deeper psychological need to confront or refute the very idea of God. They delve into various anecdotal evidence, considering personal experiences with atheists who often seem more invested in attacking Christianity than promoting any coherent atheistic ideology. This conversation not only highlights the peculiarities of atheistic discourse but also challenges listeners to reflect on their own beliefs and the underlying assumptions that guide their worldviews. The episode presents a thought-provoking exploration of belief, disbelief, and the social dynamics at play in contemporary discussions surrounding faith.

Takeaways:

• The podcast dives into the curious phenomenon of why atheists frequently engage in discussions about God, despite claiming disbelief in Him.
• Andrew and Adam explore the paradox of atheists focusing their arguments against Christianity, while largely avoiding discussions on atheism itself.
• Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the sincerity behind their interactions with atheists, as genuine relationships can open avenues for sharing the gospel effectively.
• The conversation underscores the importance of maintaining a respectful demeanor when engaging with atheists, highlighting that character often speaks louder than words.
• A significant theme of the podcast is the idea that many atheists may actually harbor a belief in God deep down, which influences their vocal opposition to Christianity.
• Andrew shares personal anecdotes illustrating how consistent kindness and sincerity can transform adversarial relationships into respectful dialogues, even with staunch critics.

Mentioned in this episode:

Book a SfE speaker today

We have several speakers that can cover many different topics. Contact us today: [email protected]

The discussion centers around the concept of false converts, a critical issue in evangelism that hampers genuine outreach efforts. Andrew Rapoport and his friend Randy dive deep into the characteristics of false converts, highlighting how these individuals often believe they are saved while lacking true understanding or commitment to the gospel. They explore the complexities of church dynamics, where many attendees may outwardly appear to embrace faith yet remain spiritually blind to their own need for salvation. The conversation also touches on the implications of self-righteousness and the dangers posed by a superficial faith that fails to recognize the gravity of sin and the necessity of repentance. Listeners are encouraged to reflect on their own faith and discern whether their beliefs align with a true understanding of Christ's sacrifice and the transformative power of genuine conversion. Throughout the episode, the hosts maintain a light-hearted yet profound tone, making it both engaging and thought-provoking.

In this eye-opening episode, Andrew Rapoport and Randy Atkins tackle the perplexing issue of false converts within the Christian faith. Their relaxed, colloquial banter does not diminish the gravity of the topic, as they delve into the intricacies of what it means to truly follow Christ versus merely adopting a title. Rapoport brings his expertise as the executive director of Striving for Eternity into the conversation, outlining the historical and theological implications of false conversions that have plagued the church throughout the ages. They discuss how cultural trends and modern evangelism tactics have often led to shallow commitments to faith, where individuals mistakenly believe they are secure in their salvation based on emotional experiences rather than a deep, scripted understanding of the gospel.

The duo emphasizes the necessity of self-examination, encouraging listeners to reflect on their own spiritual journeys. They utilize biblical texts to illustrate the dangers of being a false convert, noting how the New Testament is rife with warnings about self-deception and the importance of genuine repentance. Rapoport's anecdotes about evangelism experiences serve as cautionary tales, highlighting the need for churches to foster environments where authentic faith can flourish rather than simply counting numbers. Through their lively dialogue, listeners are encouraged to not only scrutinize their own beliefs but also engage in conversations about faith with others, challenging the status quo of mere nominalism in the church.

The episode is both informative and entertaining, merging deep theological insights with a warm, approachable style. Rapoport and Atkins remind their audience that understanding the gospel is a lifelong journey, one that requires diligence, humility, and a sincere heart. As they wrap up, they leave listeners with a powerful exhortation to seek after true conversion, making it clear that a relationship with Christ is not about ticking boxes, but about a transformative experience that changes lives.

Takeaways:

• The podcast episode dives deep into the topic of false converts, emphasizing the struggles evangelists face when engaging with individuals who mistakenly believe they are saved.
• Andrew Rapaport reflects on the historical context of false converts, discussing how the visible church has often been filled with those who do not truly believe.
• Listeners learn to differentiate between true salvation and mere profession of faith, highlighting the importance of self-examination in the Christian walk.
• The speakers stress the significance of understanding the gospel correctly, warning that many who claim to be Christians may not grasp the true implications of their faith.
• Through personal anecdotes, Rapaport illustrates the dangers of relying on superficial markers of faith, such as decision cards or emotional experiences, rather than genuine repentance.
• The episode concludes with a call to prioritize biblical sufficiency in understanding salvation, urging listeners to seek a genuine relationship with Christ rather than mere religious observance.

Mentioned in this episode:

What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

What Do They Believe

Today’s chat dives deep into the intricate dance of defining primary and secondary issues of faith, a topic more important than finding the right taco truck in a city full of them. Andrew Rapaport, the host, brings his A-game as he engages in a spirited discussion, shedding light on the critical distinctions between what believers should stand firm on versus what might be better left to the side. The duo tackles the common pitfall of majoring in minors while encouraging listeners to focus on the essentials that truly matter in their faith journey. They explore the nuances of how different interpretations can lead to spirited debates without losing sight of unity in Christ. As they navigate the complex web of doctrines, they serve a hearty reminder that understanding and grace should be at the forefront of our discussions, especially in an age where social media can turn a simple disagreement into a full-blown theological throwdown.

Takeaways:

• In the podcast, they dive deep into the distinctions between primary, secondary, and tertiary theological issues, emphasizing how misplacing these can lead to unnecessary conflicts within the Christian community.
• Andrew Rapaport shares his journey from a Jewish upbringing to becoming a pastor, illustrating how one's background can shape their theological perspectives and interactions with faith.
• The hosts discuss the importance of grace and understanding in theological debates, suggesting that Christians should strive for civility and openness when encountering differing views on faith.
• A lively discussion unfolds around the implications of charismatic gifts and their cessation, highlighting how these beliefs can significantly affect one's understanding of Scripture and church practices.
• The episode addresses the need for believers to differentiate between essential doctrines that are explicitly taught in Scripture and those that are more nuanced, which can lead to meaningful and respectful dialogue.
• Listeners are encouraged to reflect on their theological presuppositions and be open to re-evaluating their beliefs in light of Scripture, fostering a more inclusive and understanding church environment.

Mentioned in this episode:

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar

Book a SfE speaker today

We have several speakers that can cover many different topics. Contact us today: [email protected]

In this episode, Andrew Rapoport dives deep into the murky waters of pastoral ethics in the age of social media, particularly in relation to the recent controversy surrounding Josh Buice. Listeners are in for a treat as Andrew shares personal experiences and insights many may not have heard before, shedding light on the often-hidden struggles of navigating public ministry amidst scandal. With a focus on biblical interpretation and application, he explores the ethical responsibilities of pastors and how social media can complicate the Christian witness. Their conversation touches on the emotional turmoil that arises when trusted leaders falter, emphasizing the importance of prayer and humility over judgment. Ultimately, Andrew calls for a collective reevaluation of how Christians interact with one another online, urging the community to prioritize reconciliation and understanding over division and criticism.

In a heartfelt dialogue, Andrew Rapoport and Greg Moore delve into the ethical dilemmas surrounding pastors and their use of social media, particularly in light of the recent scandal involving Josh Buice. The conversation unfolds with Andrew sharing his personal journey, filled with struggles against slander and misrepresentation from anonymous sources, showcasing the often unseen battles that accompany ministry. As they unpack the implications of public scrutiny, Andrew emphasizes the importance of accountability and humility, advocating for a culture where Christians uplift one another rather than succumb to the allure of gossip and judgment. His insights challenge listeners to reflect on their own attitudes toward fallen leaders, prompting a broader discourse on the need for grace and understanding within the church community. Through their banter, both speakers maintain a light-hearted tone. Yet, the gravity of their discussion is palpable, making it a poignant exploration of faith, forgiveness, and the ethics of digital communication.

Takeaways:

• In this podcast episode, Andrew Rappaport discusses the ethical responsibilities of pastors and Christians on social media, emphasizing the need for integrity and accountability in their online interactions.
• The conversation highlights how personal experiences, like Andrew's own struggles with slander, shape one's approach to handling public controversies within the church community.
• Listeners are encouraged to pray for those who have stumbled in their faith, such as Josh Buice, instead of rushing to judgment or criticism. This will foster a spirit of reconciliation among believers.
• Andrew shares that the importance of discernment in ministry is distinguishing between right and wrong and between right and almost right, urging caution in public discourse.
• The episode reminds us that social media platforms can amplify pride and tribalism among Christians, urging individuals to reflect on their intentions before posting.
• Ultimately, the dialogue aims to encourage a culture of prayer and support within the Christian community rather than one of condemnation and division, especially during times of crisis.

Links referenced in this episode:

• strivingforeeternity.org
• www.reformed.money
• dmwpodcast.com

Companies mentioned in this episode:

• Striving for Eternity
• Dead Man Walking Podcast
• Dominion Wealth Strategists
• G3
• Josh Bice
• Steve Lawson
• Virgil Walker
• Tom Buck
• Scott Annual
• Wretched Radio
• Justin Peters
• Joel Webbing
• Adoniram Judson

Mentioned in this episode:

Book a SfE speaker today

We have several speakers that can cover many different topics. Contact us today: [email protected]

What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

What Do They Believe

The podcast delves into the complex discussion of whether the Roman Catholic Church can be classified as a cult, with Andrew Rappaport taking a firm stance on the matter. They assert that the Catholic Church's doctrines, particularly regarding justification and the authority of Scripture, present significant challenges to the fundamental teachings of Christianity, especially the idea of salvation by grace alone through faith alone. The conversation is lively and punctuated with witty banter as the speakers dissect various theological positions, historical contexts, and the implications of Church doctrines on personal faith. They explore contentious scriptural interpretations and engage in a spirited debate about the nature of good works within the framework of salvation. Throughout, there is a sense of camaraderie and a shared commitment to understanding the complexities of faith in a way that challenges listeners to think critically about their beliefs and the institutions they adhere to.

Takeaways:

• The discussion emphasized the distinction between faith and works, particularly in the context of Catholicism, where faith is often seen as insufficient without accompanying actions.
• Key points were raised regarding the significant variation in the interpretation of scripture between Catholic and Protestant beliefs, particularly in terms of authority and justification.
• The speakers analyzed the historical context of the Catholic Church's teachings and how they have evolved, impacting the perceptions of salvation and grace among its followers.
• A significant debate emerged regarding the role of works in salvation, highlighting the differences in understanding between Catholics and various Protestant denominations, particularly in relation to the concepts of grace and justification.
• The importance of clarity in language and definitions when discussing theological concepts was emphasized, highlighting the potential for misunderstandings that can arise between differing Christian traditions.
• The conversation highlighted the importance of ongoing dialogue and examination of beliefs, as both sides presented their arguments on the nature of salvation and the church's role in interpreting scripture.

Links referenced in this episode:

• apologeticslive.com
• strivingforeternity.org
• 5solas.net
• 5solas.net/evangelism
• 5solas.net/catholicism

Companies mentioned in this episode:

• Striving for Eternity Ministries
• Apologetics Live
• Living Waters
• MyPillow
• Squirrelly Joe's Coffee
• Matter of Theology
• Open Air Theology

Mentioned in this episode:

What Do They Believe

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar

Social justice is the hot topic that gets tossed around like a beach ball at a summer picnic, but is it really the fresh concept many claim it to be? This dives into this debate, unraveling how the roots of social justice can be traced way back to Paul's day, showing that the struggle against such ideologies is not a new battle but an age-old one. As they unpack Colossians 2:8, the discussion shifts towards the dangers lurking within the church, warning against the alluring traps of philosophy and empty deception that can ensnare believers. Andrew does not hesitate to point fingers at how contemporary movements, likened to Gnosticism, subtly infiltrate churches, twisting the narrative to fit a human-centric worldview that leaves the truth behind. With clever quips and sharp insights, they emphasize that the real antidote to this captivating error lies not in engaging with these philosophies, but in grounding oneself in the unshakeable truth of Christ.

Takeaways:

• In discussing social justice, Andrew emphasizes that its roots can be traced back to historical contexts, revealing a long-standing debate that resonates today.
• Andrew humorously notes that while the sermon may seem light on notes, the depth of the conversation around social justice is anything but superficial.
• The podcast highlights a warning against the allure of false philosophies that can ensnare believers, urging a steadfast adherence to biblical truths instead.
• A critical point raised is that social justice, while often framed positively, might lead people astray from the core tenets of faith, posing a danger to spiritual integrity.
• Andrew provocatively questions whether contemporary discussions around social justice are truly new or merely a reiteration of age-old challenges faced by the church historically.
• Through witty banter, Andrew illustrates how modern philosophical debates echo ancient ones, particularly the Gnostic belief in superior knowledge, which can still mislead believers today.

Mentioned in this episode:

Bible Interpretation made Easy seminar