
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.

5,212 Listeners

2,712 Listeners

1,516 Listeners

161 Listeners

1,012 Listeners

3,130 Listeners

2,854 Listeners

5,369 Listeners

5,329 Listeners

1,532 Listeners

2,466 Listeners

948 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,096 Listeners