
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.
 By Ken Ham and Mark Looy
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
370370 ratings
For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.

8,613 Listeners

3,932 Listeners

1,707 Listeners

2,183 Listeners

1,511 Listeners

1,944 Listeners

3,074 Listeners

3,137 Listeners

2,875 Listeners

21,014 Listeners

5,372 Listeners

1,497 Listeners

1,574 Listeners

2,884 Listeners

12,913 Listeners