
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
For atheists to argue against the Bible, they have to start with the Bible.
Here’s what I mean. In the evolutionary worldview, everything is the result of random, chance processes and everything is material. So where do the immaterial laws of nature come from? How can a naturalistic process produce something immaterial?
And what about logic? For an atheist to argue against the Bible, he needs to use logic. But why should immaterial laws of logic exist in a naturalistic, material world?
The laws of nature and laws of logic only make sense if there’s a logical, orderly Creator who made both the material and the immaterial.

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners