What’s the first thing that comes to your mind when you think about comfort foods? It may surprise you to learn that the phrase comfort food hasn’t always been associated with foods that have a nostalgic implication attached to them. Today we share how the phrase has changed its meaning over the years, discuss comfort food from a psychological perspective, and share some listeners' thoughts on what it takes to be classified as a comfort food.
Introduced in the 1960s, the term comfort food was associated with consumer psychology and notably held a negative connotation. It wasn't until the 1980s that people started turning the dialogue around and associating it with nostalgic foods.
In her book, Comforting Food Judith Olney described comfort foods as evocative and nostalgic, rich, golden, and juicy.
Although comfort food has become a culinary genre unto itself, the way we view and describe comfort foods, individually can be quite different. Some people associate comfort foods as creamy, rich, or naughty foods. In contrast, others define it by the sensation a particular food induces. Often, we associate comfort foods with our memories of happier times. A particular food may evoke a specific memory and become a touchstone loved one or those we’ver lost.
Whether you define comfort food by its structure, the sensation that it evokes, or the memories that it stirs, there is a universality to it. As Judith Olney points out, comfort food has no social pretense. It’s simple and oftentimes what we would consider old fashioned. And true to its moniker, it brings relief to whatever seems to be ailing us.
Connect with us at AsWeEat.com, on Instagram @asweeat or join our new As We Eat community on Facebook.
Do you have a great idea 💡 for a show topic, a recipe 🥘 that you want to share, or just say “hi”👋🏻? Send us an email at [email protected]
Review As We Eat on Podchaser or Apple Podcast. We would like to know what you think.
Mentioned in the Podcast
Comforting Foods, Judith Olney
Gastronomica
New York Times Article