Parsing Immigration Policy

Asylum Reform: Withdraw from the UN Treaty, or Not?


Listen Later

This week’s Parsing Immigration Policy podcast features a panel discussion from the third annual conference of the International Network for Immigration Research (INIR), convened recently in Washington. Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies, and Yonatan Jakubowicz, Director of the Israeli Immigration Policy Center, offer contrasting perspectives on how to fix the asylum system – the main vehicle for illegal immigration to the developed world – as established in the 1951 Refugee Convention (often called the Geneva Convention) and the 1967 Protocol.

Krikorian argues that meaningful asylum reform requires that the United States to withdraw from the UN refugee treaty, restoring national control over immigration decisions. “The Refugee Convention is an asymmetrical agreement that binds democratic countries but does not affect the behavior of non-democratic countries,” he notes.

Jakubowicz agrees that the asylum system is not working, but he maintains that reform is possible without abandoning the Geneva framework. He points out that the Convention itself leaves wide discretion to states on who qualifies as “lawfully present,” meaning that nations can strengthen enforcement and restrict abuse within the treaty’s existing terms. The key, he argues, is to return to the drafters’ original intent and the plain text – not the expansive interpretations that have emerged over time.

Both speakers agree that sending illegal-alien asylum-seekers to third countries represents the future of asylum. Unlike the “Remain in Mexico” approach, where illegal border-crossers are still permitted to apply for asylum in the target country, but must do so from outside, what Krikorian calls “Remain in Mongolia” would bar illegal aliens altogether from applying for asylum in the U.S. (or Europe, Israel, etc.), and would send them to a safe country that has an agreement with the U.S. to apply there. Once it becomes clear that simply uttering the word “asylum” is no longer the key to entry or work authorization, far fewer people will attempt to exploit the system.

Videos of the full conference will be posted in the near future.

Host

Mark Krikorian is the Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies.

Guest

Yonatan Jakubowicz Director of the Israeli Immigration Policy Center.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Parsing Immigration PolicyBy Center for Immigration Studies

  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2

4.2

53 ratings


More shows like Parsing Immigration Policy

View all
The NPR Politics Podcast by NPR

The NPR Politics Podcast

25,871 Listeners

Federalist Radio Hour by Radio America

Federalist Radio Hour

3,313 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,119 Listeners

3 Martini Lunch by Current events, satire, humor news by Radio America

3 Martini Lunch

1,524 Listeners

The Ricochet Podcast by Ricochet

The Ricochet Podcast

1,396 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,868 Listeners

The Playbook Podcast by POLITICO

The Playbook Podcast

696 Listeners

National Review's Radio Free California Podcast by National Review

National Review's Radio Free California Podcast

699 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

842 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,830 Listeners

The Daily Signal by The Daily Signal

The Daily Signal

1,391 Listeners

Throughline by NPR

Throughline

16,240 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,884 Listeners

RealClearPolitics Podcast by RealClearPolitics, Carl Cannon, Tom Bevan

RealClearPolitics Podcast

367 Listeners

The Focus Group Podcast by The Bulwark

The Focus Group Podcast

2,555 Listeners