Parsing Immigration Policy

Asylum Reform: Withdraw from the UN Treaty, or Not?


Listen Later

This week’s Parsing Immigration Policy podcast features a panel discussion from the third annual conference of the International Network for Immigration Research (INIR), convened recently in Washington. Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies, and Yonatan Jakubowicz, Director of the Israeli Immigration Policy Center, offer contrasting perspectives on how to fix the asylum system – the main vehicle for illegal immigration to the developed world – as established in the 1951 Refugee Convention (often called the Geneva Convention) and the 1967 Protocol.

Krikorian argues that meaningful asylum reform requires that the United States to withdraw from the UN refugee treaty, restoring national control over immigration decisions. “The Refugee Convention is an asymmetrical agreement that binds democratic countries but does not affect the behavior of non-democratic countries,” he notes.

Jakubowicz agrees that the asylum system is not working, but he maintains that reform is possible without abandoning the Geneva framework. He points out that the Convention itself leaves wide discretion to states on who qualifies as “lawfully present,” meaning that nations can strengthen enforcement and restrict abuse within the treaty’s existing terms. The key, he argues, is to return to the drafters’ original intent and the plain text – not the expansive interpretations that have emerged over time.

Both speakers agree that sending illegal-alien asylum-seekers to third countries represents the future of asylum. Unlike the “Remain in Mexico” approach, where illegal border-crossers are still permitted to apply for asylum in the target country, but must do so from outside, what Krikorian calls “Remain in Mongolia” would bar illegal aliens altogether from applying for asylum in the U.S. (or Europe, Israel, etc.), and would send them to a safe country that has an agreement with the U.S. to apply there. Once it becomes clear that simply uttering the word “asylum” is no longer the key to entry or work authorization, far fewer people will attempt to exploit the system.

Videos of the full conference will be posted in the near future.

Host

Mark Krikorian is the Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies.

Guest

Yonatan Jakubowicz Director of the Israeli Immigration Policy Center.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Parsing Immigration PolicyBy Center for Immigration Studies

  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2
  • 4.2

4.2

53 ratings


More shows like Parsing Immigration Policy

View all
Federalist Radio Hour by Radio America

Federalist Radio Hour

3,319 Listeners

Hillsdale Dialogues by Hillsdale College

Hillsdale Dialogues

2,128 Listeners

The Glenn Show by Glenn Loury

The Glenn Show

2,279 Listeners

3 Martini Lunch – Political Humor & Commentary by Jim Geraghty & Greg Corombos – Political Humor Commentary

3 Martini Lunch – Political Humor & Commentary

1,536 Listeners

The Libertarian by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

The Libertarian

984 Listeners

The Ricochet Podcast by Ricochet

The Ricochet Podcast

1,399 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,906 Listeners

3 Whisky Happy Hour by Ricochet

3 Whisky Happy Hour

498 Listeners

National Review's Radio Free California Podcast by National Review

National Review's Radio Free California Podcast

697 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

846 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,838 Listeners

The American Mind Podcast by The Claremont Institute

The American Mind Podcast

1,224 Listeners

New Discourses by New Discourses

New Discourses

2,381 Listeners

The Auron MacIntyre Show by Blaze Podcast Network

The Auron MacIntyre Show

508 Listeners

Next Up with Mark Halperin by MK Media

Next Up with Mark Halperin

1,396 Listeners