
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I explore whether Georges Bataille can be read as a radical theologian precisely because he refuses to save God.
Drawing from Allan Stoekl’s essay “Bataille, Teilhard de Chardin, and the Death of God,” I contrast Teilhard’s vision of convergence and Omega with Bataille’s insistence that completion ends in rupture — that absolute knowledge collapses into nonknowledge.
Although I no longer identify as a Christian, I remain drawn to radical theology. Here, I wrestle with a tension I feel even within progressive theology: after rejecting a literal deity, do we still preserve a highest ground — a metaphysical guarantor — under another name?
Bataille’s atheism forces me to ask whether a truly radical theology must relinquish even that.
Not comfort.
But courage.
By Quique Autrey5
1515 ratings
In this episode, I explore whether Georges Bataille can be read as a radical theologian precisely because he refuses to save God.
Drawing from Allan Stoekl’s essay “Bataille, Teilhard de Chardin, and the Death of God,” I contrast Teilhard’s vision of convergence and Omega with Bataille’s insistence that completion ends in rupture — that absolute knowledge collapses into nonknowledge.
Although I no longer identify as a Christian, I remain drawn to radical theology. Here, I wrestle with a tension I feel even within progressive theology: after rejecting a literal deity, do we still preserve a highest ground — a metaphysical guarantor — under another name?
Bataille’s atheism forces me to ask whether a truly radical theology must relinquish even that.
Not comfort.
But courage.

91,072 Listeners

15,272 Listeners

2,110 Listeners

1,461 Listeners

136 Listeners

315 Listeners

511 Listeners

585 Listeners

597 Listeners

353 Listeners

3,607 Listeners

58 Listeners

205 Listeners

289 Listeners

234 Listeners