
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I explore whether Georges Bataille can be read as a radical theologian precisely because he refuses to save God.
Drawing from Allan Stoekl’s essay “Bataille, Teilhard de Chardin, and the Death of God,” I contrast Teilhard’s vision of convergence and Omega with Bataille’s insistence that completion ends in rupture — that absolute knowledge collapses into nonknowledge.
Although I no longer identify as a Christian, I remain drawn to radical theology. Here, I wrestle with a tension I feel even within progressive theology: after rejecting a literal deity, do we still preserve a highest ground — a metaphysical guarantor — under another name?
Bataille’s atheism forces me to ask whether a truly radical theology must relinquish even that.
Not comfort.
But courage.
By Quique Autrey5
1515 ratings
In this episode, I explore whether Georges Bataille can be read as a radical theologian precisely because he refuses to save God.
Drawing from Allan Stoekl’s essay “Bataille, Teilhard de Chardin, and the Death of God,” I contrast Teilhard’s vision of convergence and Omega with Bataille’s insistence that completion ends in rupture — that absolute knowledge collapses into nonknowledge.
Although I no longer identify as a Christian, I remain drawn to radical theology. Here, I wrestle with a tension I feel even within progressive theology: after rejecting a literal deity, do we still preserve a highest ground — a metaphysical guarantor — under another name?
Bataille’s atheism forces me to ask whether a truly radical theology must relinquish even that.
Not comfort.
But courage.

91,328 Listeners

15,238 Listeners

2,119 Listeners

1,460 Listeners

130 Listeners

316 Listeners

511 Listeners

582 Listeners

599 Listeners

356 Listeners

3,621 Listeners

58 Listeners

205 Listeners

289 Listeners

233 Listeners