
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
It's undeniable that the Bible explicitly teaches that a husband is the "head" of his wife. While church history has pretty much always believed this means the husband is the primary leader in the marriage and household, there has been serious pushback against this view from egalitarian scholars in more recent years.
Time Stamps!!
0:00 - Intro
1. 10:33 - Part 1: Medical Claims That "Head" Means "Source"
2. 31:47 - Part 2: Bible Context Claims That "Head" Doesn't Imply "Authority"
3. 54:20 - Part 3: Church History Argument
4. 1:01:10 - Part 4: The Battle of Lexicons; does kephale mean authority?
5. 1:33:33 - Conclusions
Their basic contention is that "head" doesn't mean what you probably think it means when you read it in Scripture as the description of the relationship between husbands and wives. They tend to offer 4 main arguments to support their case:
1) In the Greek speaking world of New Testament times, general medical opinion was that the heart or liver controlled the body while the head was merely the "source" of nutrition. The egalitarians say that we need to factor in this popular medical understanding of "head" or we will mistakenly think the husband is the leader of his wife.
2) Egalitarian scholars say that when you look carefully at Paul's use of the metaphor "head" and the specific context of the passages when it is used, you come to see that Paul is NOT meaning to imply anything about authority, but is speaking of nourishment or source. For instance, they will say that man is the source of woman in the sense that Eve was formed from Adam. Adam was her source.
3) Surprisingly, some Egalitarians will actually share a quote from Chrysostom to show that one of the church fathers understood perfectly well that this term "head" didn't mean to imply authority. Catherine Kroeger, founder of CBE promotes this view, and many echo her.
4) Finally, we get to the biggest one. They will claim that the Greek word translated "head" really means "source" and not "authority." I've found that egalitarians will repeatedly make very similar claims that ancient lexicons do not support the meaning of "authority" and that one very respected lexicon in particular (the LSJ) defends their case.
I'm going to analyze each of these claims to see what the Bible really says about husbands being the head of their wives. This is super important, because it doesn't just impact who is in church leadership, it impacts every single marriage in the body of Christ! I can't overstate the practical impact of getting this topic wrong, so I have spent a ton of time gathering and, more importantly, researching to properly vet and test egalitarian claims about male headship. I'll give you the spoiler here in the description. On every single point they are very wrong, and even putting out blatant misinformation. I'll provide both analysis and evidence to support all this in today's video.
After years of being a bit confused about the topic of women in ministry, I set out to spend months researching the topic in great detail to produce this exhaustive teaching series on the topic. This is just part 8.
CLICK HERE for the playlist of ALL the videos in this series (more will be added as I make them).
To get ALL the references, you’ll need to grab my notes (for free) HERE, but here are some quick links relevant to today’s study:
CLICK HERE for the video on Christophanies (appearances of Jesus) in the Old Testament.
CLICK HERE for the FULL series on How to Find Jesus in the Old Testament.
CLICK HERE for Natasha Crain's content that helps parents to disciple their kids.
CLICK HERE for Foundation Worldview which has actual video lessons to help teach your kids a Christian worldview.
CLICK HERE for BibleThinker shirts, mugs, and other stuff. The goal isn't to make money on these, they are just for you, for fun, since we set the profit margin as low as they'll allow us to go.
0:00 - Intro
This is the secret location where I store my searchable database of hundreds of videos.
You can also find me on podcast, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and the dreadful TikTok. Just search my name.
There are several links to additional stuff you might be interested in:
1) An article on "raqia" or the Hebrew word we often see translated as "firmament." The big debate on this word is whether it implies the sky has a hard, solid dome or if it's just talking about an expansive space. I didn't cover it in today's video because it isn't about the shape of the earth. But, people are interested, so CLICK HERE for an article that Cultish put together on the topic.
2) Cultish is a very interesting show which covers lots of fringe topics and a variety of groups from Charles Manson's group, to Masons, to the JW's strange Bible translation, to the "cult of right wing politics." CLICK HERE to visit their YouTube channel.
And CLICK HERE for their website.
You can also find them on whatever podcast app you use.
Allow me to react to some of the kinds of comments I expect to get on this video, since they also came in on the Cultish version of this interview which released earlier, and to make a few requests for those inclined to consider them.
1) "Mike is biased and untrustworthy, disingenuous, and generally bad."
My response: That's a lot of bad stuff about me, but you haven't touched my reasoning or handled the Bible in context in order to demonstrate your position. Please comment below with Bible verses that, when examined in full context, promote your view. And please don't just post a verse, post your interpretation of it, as well, so that we can all understand and learn.
2) "No flat earth proponents use those verses. Mike isn't dealing with the real Bible verses we use."
My response: That's definitely not true. I got these verses from flat earthers, I didn't make them up. However, it's true that many of those who say the Bible supports a flat earth never really get around to offering specific verses that you can examine. They tend to just reference the Bible more vaguely or lean on what someone else says about the Ancient Near East. If you reject these as flat earth Bible verses, then you actually agree with me that those who use them (and plenty do) are misinterpreting the Bible for their purposes. However, if you have OTHER verses that support a flat earth, then please comment below with Bible verses that, when examined in full context, promote your view. And please don't just post a verse, post your interpretation of it, as well, so that we can all understand and learn.
3) "You should have a flat earth proponent on to talk about this stuff for themselves."
My response: No thanks. I don't need to have every single person on my channel who I disagree with. Imagine the apostle Paul inviting Judaizers on tour with him or cowriting Galatians with someone who disagrees with him for, you know, objectivity. That's silly. I can handle views without turning my entire ministry into a debate and interview platform. I read plenty of flat earth literature and looked at plenty of videos from proponents in order to make sure I got Bible verses that were really being used to support that side. This complaint is merely a way of ignoring what I've said and saying I should have done something totally different. I'm not your puppet, and this response ignores careful Bible study instead of considering it. I've got books by Rob Skiba and Dean Odle, and have had a private and long conversation with Dean Odle just to better understand his views.
4) "Mike sees poetry but forgets that even poetry must have some connection to the thing it is describing."
My response: I don't forget that. Let's take the "bars and doors" on the coastline poetry for example. I take it that there are "bars and doors" in the sense that there are limits, but not that there are literal bars and literal doors or anything physical that corresponds to them. It's the effect they have which is the physical correspondence of the poetic symbol, not the presence of something physical that very much acts like a bar or door. Flat earth proponents will likely take the exact same interpretation as me at that point. But when we read, in the exact same passage, that the earth has foundations, they have a very literal view of it in all aspects. I know you hear me saying that a lot of FE verses are poetry, but this isn't a compromise on my part. It's just the case that FE proponents offer up a bunch of Bible verses for their views, and they happen to continually pick poetic ones. The flaw is in the FE verse choices, not those who recognize poetry.
Sweeping dismissals will not be sufficient in the same way that verses with interpretations supported by the greater context of those verses will be. That's my challenge to you. Give a BIBLE study that supports your view. I don't think it can be done.
My website: https://BibleThinker.org
I know it can feel oppressive to constantly hear that we have such a high calling to self-sacrifice and self-examination. But it's only oppressive to our flesh. And if you don't kill that sinful selfishness, it will kill everything else.
My website: https://BibleThinker.org
You know, there's one benefit of sharing bank accounts that I never mentioned in this video. It's the reality that you can't hide things as easily when you both can see what the money is being spent on. This inability to hide expenses is a good thing since grievous sins are often nurtured in the dark.
Thank you to Lisa Laizure, of “Women’s Bible Study” for organizing and hosting this event. Her ministry website is HERE.
My website https://BibleThinker.org
HERE is the video on the senior pastor who said God is pro-choice.
HERE is the link to an article on how "Progressive Christians" are more political.
This is the book by Craig Blomberg on the reliability of the Gospels. He has a section on the census and Quirinius in it.
Here's me on Instagram.
This is the secret location where I store my searchable database of hundreds of videos.
Reading the Bible in context is all it takes to solve most of these bad teaching issues. This is Senior Pastor Mike Thomas, from Radiant Church in Seattle, Washington. Original video can be found HERE.
Thank you to Woke Preacher Clips for making these sorts of clips available for needful discussion.
Here's me on Twitter.
My website, with hundreds of hours of free content helping you learn to think biblically about everything: https://BibleThinker.org
There's a popular, fairly progressive Christian meme that has made the rounds online. It pretends to refute a "colonizer Jesus" and to support a "historical Jesus." But it turns out to just be another piece of poorly thought out propaganda. Proving once again that lots of people care very little about understanding Jesus and care very much about claiming that Jesus is supportive of their agenda.
You all said that I should walk through this popular progressive meme and unpack it. We aren't going to shoot for talking points or picking sides here, unless the "side" is Jesus' side. This will be a thoughtful analysis of each point in this popular meme.
JWs die every year because of what they are taught about blood transfusions. Here's what they teach, why it's wrong, and how the Governing Board has abused JWs on this topic: CLICK HERE
CLICK HERE for the good and bad stuff the Bible says about alcohol.
CLICK HERE for my video on dealing with depression.
CLICK HERE for my playlist of teachings going verse-by-verse through the book of Romans.
CLICK HERE for the teaching in the Gospel of Mark where I explain why not all mental issues are demonic.
Here's me on Instagram.
Me on TikTok.
BibleThinker.org
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

1,257 Listeners

1,946 Listeners

306 Listeners

206 Listeners

21,174 Listeners

5,422 Listeners

5,368 Listeners

3,604 Listeners

577 Listeners

1,609 Listeners

1,306 Listeners

1,105 Listeners

1,360 Listeners

281 Listeners

382 Listeners