With oral arguments over and the term on the home stretch, the Court is issuing opinions at high speed. But before they issued this week's opinions, the Justices threw a curve-ball at court watchers by taking Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, a major abortion case that could see the court overturn or rein in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Your hosts discuss that case and the four opinions handed down this week. Among them, two major criminal procedure cases, one civil procedure case, and a stinging rebuke to the IRS for engaging in administrative shenanigans. Zack interviews Judge Randolph of the D.C. Circuit who shares a wealth of fascinating stories about his career and his many friends from the Circuit who went on to SCOTUS. Lastly, GianCarlo grills Zack with trivia about judicial attire.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It's full steam ahead as the Court finishes up its second-to-last week of oral arguments for the term. Among the six cases argued this week, were two blockbuster First Amendment cases, one that may decide the meaning of "freedom of association," and another that may decide whether schools can punish students for speech made outside of school. Your hosts discuss those arguments and more. GianCarlo explains the one opinion of the week, which is all about the meaning of the word "a," and explains how it's round two in the ongoing debate between Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh about the right way to do textualism. GianCarlo also interviews veteran advocate and Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr. Last up, Zack tries to stump GianCarlo with more strategic retirement trivia.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It was a very busy week at the Court with six oral arguments, three opinions, and a couple of noteworthy orders. GianCarlo discusses the Court's order striking down a California COVID-19 restriction that discriminated against religious practice and a patent case with facts fit for an episode of Suits. Zack, meanwhile, discusses a case raising that all-important issue of whether and how the lawyers will get paid. Together your hosts explain this week's opinions, which involve life without parole for juvenile murderers, Social Security administrative law judges, and the scope of the Federal Trade Commission's enforcement powers. Zack interviews Judge Robert Luck of the Eleventh Circuit, and GianCarlo grills Zack with trivia about strategically timed SCOTUS retirements.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week the Court issued a high-profile and very technical opinion in the copyright dispute between Google and Oracle. Your hosts break down the complicated issues in that case and cover other interesting orders from this week including an opinion by Justice Thomas about free speech and Big Tech that sparked a national conversation. Later on, Amy Swearer joins us again! This time, however, she's in the hot seat as a guest and subject-matter expert to discuss the Supreme Court and the Second Amendment. Lastly, Zack quizzes GianCarlo with some trivia about the Justices' pre-SCOTUS jobs.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

It was a busy week for the court with a number of high-profile orders, three oral arguments, and three unanimous opinions. In orders this week, the Justices announced that they will take up an abortion case but only to resolve a procedural issue, and they also delivered a very predictable rebuke to the Sixth Circuit in a habeas case. Zack and GianCarlo discuss oral arguments with a special focus on the antitrust case that will decide whether the NCAA’s student-athlete compensation rules are lawful. The hosts also discuss the three opinions issued, which involve spam text messages, media conglomerates, and a water-rights fight between Florida and Georgia. GianCarlo interviews Judge Ada E. Brown of the Northern District of Texas and quizzes Zack with trivia about the Justices' extracurricular activities.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week the Court takes us back to our first year of law school with cases destined for the casebooks. Oral arguments this week involved a takings case that touches on first-year property and the "bundle of rights," a Fourth Amendment case involving the community caretaking exception to the warrant requirement, and a unique case about tribal police. We also got two blockbuster opinions this week involving personal jurisdiction and the definition of a "seizure" for the Fourth Amendment. Your hosts unpack all of that, and more. GianCarlo also interviews John Wood, a veteran litigator, Justice Thomas clerk, and current Chief Legal Officer of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Last up, Zack grills GianCarlo with Fourth Amendment trivia. If he does well, all credit goes to Judge Pamela Harris who taught him criminal procedure.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, news that all of the Justices have received COVID-19 vaccines sparked a debate among advocates and law professors about remote vs in-person arguments. Zack fairly discusses both sides, while GianCarlo stakes out an aggressive position early on. GianCarlo also unpacks the one opinion this week, which answers the question: If the government violates your civil rights and you only ask for nominal damages, can you sue? The hosts jointly interview their new colleague, Sarah Parshall Perry, about the ripple effects of the Bostock decision. Lastly, the hosts play trivia and the theme is "Where in the world is Justice Carmen Sandiego?"

You can read two of Sarah's recent pieces on the topics of our interview here and here.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Court is back from its working recess and so are Zack and GianCarlo. Zack kicks off the show discussing the Court's denial of two 2020 election lawsuits out of Pennsylvania. GianCarlo and Zack then discuss the three oral arguments of the week, and GianCarlo unpacks this week's one opinion, which involves the Federal Tort Claims Act's judgment bar. GianCarlo then interviews Ninth Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay. Last up, Zack proves he's got a mind for comedy as GianCarlo quizzes him about the funniest fun-facts about SCOTUS.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

For the first time in years, the Supreme Court issued surprise opinions during its February working recess. It issued an opinion in the Nazi art case and another in a case about railroads and retirement plans. Zack and GianCarlo discuss those as well as the newest case on the court's docket, which will decide whether a corporation can use the federal government's eminent domain power against a state government. Your hosts are joined this week by Judge Brantley Starr who discusses his journey to the bench and the influence his famous uncle had on his decision to become a lawyer. Lastly, Zack lobs some snowy-weather themed trivia at GianCarlo.

Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected].

Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!

Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.