L. M. v. Middleborough, Petitioner v. United States, et al. | Decision Date: 5/27/25 | Case No. 24-410Link to Docket: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-410.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Here</a>.Question Presented: Whether school officials may presume substantial disruption or a violation of the rights of others from a student’s silent, passive, and untargeted ideological speech simply because that speech relates to matters of personal identity, even when the speech responds to the school’s opposing views, actions, or policies.Result: Denial of certiorari.Voting Breakdown: 7-2. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the denial of certiorari.Link to Decision: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-410_o75p.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Here</a>.

L. M. v. Middleborough, Petitioner v. United States, et al. | Decision Date: 5/27/25 | Case No. 24-410 Link to Docket: Here. Question Presented: Whether school officials may presume substantial disruption or a violation of the rights of others from a student’s silent, passive, and untargeted ideological speech simply because that speech relates to matters of personal identity, even when the speech responds to the school’s opposing views, actions, or policies. Result: Denial of certiorari. Voting Breakdown: 7-2. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the denial of certiorari. Link to Decision: Here.

L. M. v. Middleborough, Petitioner v. United States, et al. | Decision Date: 5/27/25 | Case No. 24-410Link to Docket: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-410.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a>.Question Presented: Whether school officials may presume substantial disruption or a violation of the rights of others from a student’s silent, passive, and untargeted ideological speech simply because that speech relates to matters of personal identity, even when the speech responds to the school’s opposing views, actions, or policies.Result: Denial of certiorari.Voting Breakdown: 7-2. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the denial of certiorari.Link to Decision: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-410_o75p.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Here</a>.

Cert Denial: Where Do Student Speech Rights End? The ‘Two Genders’ T-Shirt Controversy

The High Court Report makes Supreme Court decisions accessible to everyone.
We deliver comprehensive SCOTUS coverage without the legal jargon or partisan spin—just clear analysis that explains how these cases affect your life, business, and community.

What you get: Case previews and breakdowns, raw oral argument audio, curated key exchanges, detailed opinion analysis, and expert commentary from a practicing attorney who's spent 12 years in courtrooms arguing the same types of cases the Supreme Court hears.

Why it works: Whether you need a focused 10-minute update or a deep constitutional dive, episodes are designed for busy professionals, engaged citizens, and anyone who wants to understand how the Court shapes America.

When we publish: 3-5 episodes weekly during the Court's October-June term, with summer coverage of emergency orders and retrospective analysis.

Growing archive: Oral arguments back to 2020 and expanding, so you can hear how landmark cases unfolded and track the Court's evolution.
Your direct line to understanding the Supreme Court—accessible, thorough, and grounded in real legal expertise.**

Business

Education

Government

The High Court Report makes Supreme Court decisions accessible to everyone. We deliver comprehensive SCOTUS coverage without the legal jargon or partisan spin—just clear analysis that explains how these cases affect your life, business, and community. What you get: Case previews and breakdowns, raw oral argument audio, curated key exchanges, detailed opinion analysis, and expert commentary from a practicing attorney who's spent 12 years in courtrooms arguing the same types of cases the Supreme Court hears. Why it works: Whether you need a focused 10-minute update or a deep constitutional dive, episodes are designed for busy professionals, engaged citizens, and anyone who wants to understand how the Court shapes America. When we publish: 3-5 episodes weekly during the Court's October-June term, with summer coverage of emergency orders and retrospective analysis. Growing archive: Oral arguments back to 2020 and expanding, so you can hear how landmark cases unfolded and track the Court's evolution. Your direct line to understanding the Supreme Court—accessible, thorough, and grounded in real legal expertise.**

Share Cert Denial: Where Do Student Speech Rights End? The ‘Two Genders’ T-Shirt Controversy

Sign up to save your podcasts

Cert Denial: Where Do Student Speech Rights End? The ‘Two Genders’ T-Shirt Controversy

Cert Denial: Where Do Student Speech Rights End? The ‘Two Genders’ T-Shirt Controversy

More shows like The High Court Report

The NPR Politics Podcast

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Bloomberg Law

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

We the People

The Fifth Column

The Lawfare Podcast

The Daily

Stay Tuned with Preet

Today, Explained

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

Strict Scrutiny

Advisory Opinions

The Ezra Klein Show

Divided Argument