​On April 1, 2024, the first day of Chad Daybell's jury selection commenced in Boise, Idaho, with the goal of seating 18 jurors—12 primary and 6 alternates—for a trial projected to last 8 to 10 weeks. The day began with 16 potential jurors undergoing group questioning (voir dire) led by Judge Steven Boyce, focusing on their familiarity with the case, potential biases, and any hardships that might prevent them from serving. Several jurors were excused due to pre-existing opinions about Daybell's guilt, scheduling conflicts, or personal reservations about the death penalty, which is a possible sentence in this case. By the end of the day, 16 jurors had advanced to the next phase of selection.

Throughout the proceedings, both the prosecution, represented by Lindsey Blake and Rob Wood, and the defense, led by John Prior, meticulously questioned jurors on their ability to remain impartial, especially given the extensive media coverage of the case. Discussions also addressed jurors' views on the death penalty, as it remains a sentencing option. The court emphasized the importance of selecting jurors who could set aside preconceived notions and base their verdict solely on evidence presented during the trial. Jury selection is expected to continue over the next two weeks to ensure a fair and unbiased panel is chosen.


On April 2, 2024, the second day of Chad Daybell's jury selection in Boise, Idaho, proceedings continued with individual questioning of potential jurors to assess their suitability for the trial. The day began with 16 prospective jurors, and through a series of interviews, several were excused due to pre-existing opinions about the case, personal hardships, or strong views on the death penalty, which remains a potential sentence. Judge Steven Boyce and attorneys focused on ensuring that selected jurors could remain impartial despite extensive media coverage and the trial's anticipated 8 to 10-week duration.

Throughout the day, both the prosecution and defense meticulously questioned jurors about their knowledge of the case, media exposure, and personal beliefs regarding capital punishment. By the day's end, the jury pool had expanded, moving closer to the required 50 potential jurors before peremptory challenges could commence. Judge Boyce emphasized the importance of selecting jurors who could set aside preconceived notions and base their judgments solely on the evidence presented during the trial.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.